- Access by Xinjiang University
Experimental Persistence Probability for Fluctuating Steps
Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 136102 – Published 6 September, 2002
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.136102
Abstract
The persistence behavior for fluctuating steps on the Si(111)--Al surface was determined by analyzing time-dependent STM images for temperatures between 770 and 970 K. Using the standard persistence definition, the measured persistence probability displays power-law decay with an exponent of . This is consistent with the value of predicted for attachment-detachment limited step kinetics. If the persistence analysis is carried out in terms of return to a fixed-reference position, the measured probability decays exponentially. Numerical studies of the Langevin equation used to model step motion corroborate the experimental observations.
Article Text
References (23)
- Z. Toroczkai and E. D. Williams, Phys. Today 52, 24(1999).
- S. N. Majumdar, C. Sire, A. J. Bray, and S. J. Cornell, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2867 (1996).
- B. Derrida, V. Hakim, and V. Pasqiuer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 751 (1995).
- S. Redner, A Guide to First-Passage Processes (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2001).
- J. Krug, H. Kallabis, S. N. Majumdar, S. J. Cornell, A. J. Bray, and C. Sire, Phys. Rev. E 56, 2702 (1997).
- M. Giesen, Prog. Surf. Sci. 68, 1 (2001), and references therein.
- K. Morgenstern et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5739 (2001); M. J. Rost et al., 86, 5983 (2001); M. Giesen et al., Surf. Sci. 412/413, 645 (1998); C. Steimer et al., Phys. Rev. B 64, 085416 (2001).
- H. C. Jeong and E. D. Williams, Surf. Sci. Rep. 34, 171 (1999), and references therein.
- S. Kodambaka et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 146101 (2002); K. Thurmer et al., 83, 5531 (1999); , Surf. Sci. 452, 273 (2000); K. Yagi et al., Surf. Sci. Rep. 43, 45 (2001); M. Kammler et al., Phys. Rev. B 65, 075312 (2002); J. B. Hannon et al., Nature (London) 405, 552 (2000); A. Saul et al., Phys. Rev. B 65, 075409 (2002).
- H. Hibino et al., Phys. Rev. B 63, 245402 (2001); K. Morgenstern et al., 63, 045412 (2001); C. R. Stoldt et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 2950 (1998); K. Thurmer et al., 87, 186102 (2001); M. J. Rost et al., 84, 1966 (2000); J. B. Hannon et al., 79, 4226 (1997; A. Ichimiya et al., 84, 3662 (2000); W. W. Pai et al., 86, 3088 (2001); A. M. Cadilhe et al., Phys. Rev. B 61, 4910 (2000); M. Giesen and H. Ibach, Surf. Sci. 431, 109 (1999); A. Ichimiya et al., 493, 555 (2001).
- W. Y. Tam, R. Zeitak, K. Y. Szeto, and J. Stavans, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1588 (1997).
- B. Yurke, A. N. Pargellis, S. N. Majumdar, and C. Sire, Phys. Rev. E 56, R40 (1997).
- M. Marcos-Martin, D. Beysens, J. P. Bouchad, C. Godreche, and I. Yekutieli, Physica (Amsterdam) 214A, 396 (1995).
- G. P. Wong, R. W. Mair, and R. L. Walsworth, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4156 (2001).
- J. J. Lander and J. Morrison, Surf. Sci. 2, 553 (1964).
- R. J. Hamers, Phys. Rev. B 40, 1657 (1989).
- I. Lyubinetsky, D. B. Dougherty, H. L. Richards, T. L. Einstein, and E. D. Williams, Surf. Sci. 492, L671 (2001).
- I. Lyubinetsky, D. B. Dougherty, T. L. Einstein, and E. D. Williams, Phys. Rev. B 66, 085327 (2002).
- I Dornic and C. Godreche, J. Phys. A 31, 5413 (1998).
- D. B. Dougherty, I. Lyubinetsky, and E. D. Williams (to be published).
- S. Cueille and C. Sire, Eur. Phys. J. B 7, 111 (1999).
- S. N. Majumdar and A. J. Bray, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3700 (2001).
- Z. Toroczkai, T. J. Newman, and S. Das Sarma, Phys. Rev. E 60, R1115 (1999).