Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Effects of Reduced Dimensionality on Spin Dynamics in the Layered Perovskite La1.4Sr1.6Mn2O7

R. H. Heffner1, D. E. MacLaughlin2, G. J. Nieuwenhuys3, T. Kimura4, G. M. Luke5, Y. Tokura4,6, and Y. J. Uemura5

  • 1Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545
  • 2Department of Physics, University of California, Riverside, California 92521
  • 3Kamerlingh Onnes Laboratory, Leiden University, P.O. Box 9506, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands
  • 4Joint Research Center for Atomic Technology (JRCAT), Tsukuba 305, Japan
  • 5Department of Physics, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027
  • 6Department of Applied Physics, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113, Japan

Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1706 – Published 24 August, 1998

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.1706

Abstract

We report zero-field muon spin rotation data in single crystals of La1.4Sr1.6Mn2O7 for T=5325K. The spin-lattice relaxation rate is spatially inhomogeneous below the 3D magnetic transition temperature TC and anisotropic above TC. We find evidence against 2D spin ordering or in-plane correlations above TC. Additionally, the very slow spin fluctuations found below TC in cubic (3D) perovskites like (La,Ca)MnO3 or (La,Sr)MnO3, and attributed to relatively small magnetoelastic polarons, are absent in La1.4Sr1.6Mn2O7. This suggests that the polaron size in the layered material is significantly larger than in the 3D perovskites.

References (23)

  1. G. H. Jonker and J. H. van Santen, Physics 16, 337 (1950); E. O. Wollan and W. C. Koehler, Phys. Rev. 100, 548 (1955); J. Volger, Physica (Utrecht) 20, 49 (1954).
  2. R. M. Kusters et al., Physica (Amsterdam) 155B, 362 (1989); R. von Helmholtz et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 2331 (1993).
  3. A. Urushibara et al., Phys. Rev. B 51, 14 103 (1995); P. Schiffer et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3336 (1995).
  4. N. Furukawa, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 64, 3164 (1995); A. J. Millis et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 5144 (1995); H. Röder et al., 76, 1356 (1996).
  5. M. F. Hundley et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 67, 860 (1995); M. Jaime et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 951 (1997).
  6. S. Billinge et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 715 (1996); J. M. De Teresa et al., Nature (London) 386, 256 (1997).
  7. C. H. Booth et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 853 (1998).
  8. R. H. Heffner et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1869 (1996); , Physica (Amsterdam) 230–232B, 759 (1997).
  9. J. W. Lynn et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 4046 (1996); L. Vasiliu-Doloc et al., J. Appl. Phys. 81, 5491 (1997).
  10. T. Kimura et al., Science 274, 1698 (1996).
  11. T. Kimura et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 3720 (1997).
  12. D. Argyriou et al., J. Appl. Phys. 83, 6374 (1998).
  13. T. Moriya, Prog. Theor. Phys. 28, 371 (1962).
  14. E. Holzschuh et al., Hyperfine Interact. 8, 615 (1981); C. Boekema et al., Phys. Rev. B 33, 210 (1986); N. Nishida et al., Hyperfine Interact. 63, 183 (1990); M. Weber et al., 63, 207 (1990); W. K. Dawson et al., 63, 219 (1990).
  15. S. N. Ruddlesden and P. Popper, Acta Crystallogr. 11, 54 (1958).
  16. B. Hitti et al., Hyperfine Interact. 63, 287 (1990).
  17. A. Yaouanc, P. Dalmas de Réotier, and E. Frey, Phys. Rev. B 47, 796 (1993).
  18. A. Yaouanc and P. Dalmas de Réotier, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 3, 6195 (1991).
  19. R. H. Heffner, M. F. Hundley, and C. W. Booth, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 494, 275 (1998).
  20. T. Ishikawa et al., Phys. Rev. B 57, R8079 (1998).
  21. D. Louca, G. Kwei, and J. F. Mitchell (to be published).
  22. D. Louca et al., Phys. Rev. B 56, R8475 (1997).
  23. H. Röder, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 43, 471 (1998).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation