- Access by Xinjiang University
Quasiparticle Interference Effects in a Ballistic Superconductor-Semiconductor-Superconductor Josephson Junction
Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1686 – Published 24 August, 1998
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.1686
Abstract
We have studied transport properties in a superconductor-semiconductor-superconductor junction formed by two superconducting Nb electrodes and a two-dimensional electron gas in an InAs/AlSb heterostructure in the ballistic regime on the basis of measurements. We observe sharp spikes in the differential resistance at temperatures below 2.5 K which can be explained by quasiparticle interference effects, which are related to Andreev bound states.
References (27)
- B. D. Josephson, Phys. Lett. 1, 261 (1962).
- W. L. McMillan, Phys. Rev. 167, 331 (1968).
- A. W. Kleinsasser, T. N. Jackson, G. D. Pettit, H. Schmid, J. M. Woodall, and D. P. Kern, IEEE Trans. Magn. 23, 703 (1987).
- A. F. Andreev, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 46, 1823 (1964); Sov. Phys. JETP 19, 1228 (1964).
- A. F. Morpurgo, S. Holl, B. J. van Wees, T. M. Klapwijk, and G. Borghs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2636 (1997).
- I. O. Kulik, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 57, 1745 (1969); Sov. Phys. JETP 30, 944 (1970).
- M. Octavio, M. Tinkham, G. E. Blonder, and T. M. Klapwijk, Phys. Rev. B 27, 6739 (1983).
- R. Kümmel, U. Schüssler, U. Gunsenheimer, and H. Plehn, Physica (Amsterdam) 185C–189C, 221 (1991).
- U. Schüssler and R. Kümmel, Phys. Rev. B 47, 2754 (1993).
- Some authors have measured similar spikes in the curves of a few samples [[11,12]], partially called the “fingerprint” of the junction [[13]], which might have the same origin as our observations, but there has never been a systematic study, and it was unclear if these structures resulted from imperfect sample preparation.
- S. G. Lachenmann, I. Friedrich, A. Förster, D. Uhlisch, and A. A. Golubov, Phys. Rev. B 56, 14 108 (1997).
- J. R. Gao, J. P. Heida, B. J. van Wees, T. M. Klapwijk, G. Borghs, and C. T. Foxon, Surf. Sci. 305, 470 (1994).
- C. Nguyen, J. Werking, H. Kroemer, and E. L. Hu, Appl. Phys. Lett. 57, 87 (1990).
- C. Nguyen, H. Kroemer, and E. L. Hu, Appl. Phys. Lett. 65, 103 (1994).
- M. Kuhlmann, U. Zimmermann, D. Dikin, S. Abens, K. Keck, and V. M. Dmitriev, Z. Phys. B 96, 13 (1994).
- A. Chrestin, T. Matsuyama, and U. Merkt, Phys. Rev. B 55, 8457 (1997).
- A. F. Morpurgo, B. J. van Wees, T. M. Klapwijk, and G. Borghs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 4010 (1997).
- C. J. Lambert, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 5, 707 (1993).
- P. F. Bagwell, R. Riedel, and L. Chang, Physica (Amsterdam) 203B, 475 (1994).
- S. Chaudhuri and P. F. Bagwell, Phys. Rev. B 51, 16 936 (1995).
- In other terms, the spikes in the differential resistance can be understood as an effect of parametric interaction of an overdamped Josephson junction with a high- resonator. In this case, the resonator losses can be partially compensated and the curve exhibits similar peculiarities [[22]].
- K. K. Likharev, Dynamics of Josephson Junctions and Circuits (Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, New York, 1986).
- Similar spikes in the curves and their spectral shift with temperature have also been observed in a superconductor-insulator-normal-conductor-insulator-superconductor sandwich structure made of very recently [H. Schulze et al. (to be published)], which shows the general validity of the discussed effect.
- A. F. Morpurgo and F. Beltram, Phys. Rev. B 50, 1325 (1994).
- Two different points along the width with different phases can be connected by a “standing wave” if the phase condition is met. The phase difference along the width is changed by the magnetic field, so that the resonance condition is changed.
- J. Nitta, T. Akazaki, and H. Takayanagi, Phys. Rev. B 49, 3659 (1994).
- U. Gunsenheimer, U. Schüssler, and R. Kümmel, Phys. Rev. B 49, 6111 (1994).