Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Coexistence of Buckled and Flat Monolayers

M. M. Lipp1, K. Y. C. Lee1, D. Y. Takamoto1, J. A. Zasadzinski1,*, and A. J. Waring2

  • 1Department of Chemical Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106
  • 2MLK/Drew University Medical Center and Perinatal Labs, Harbor-UCLA, California 90059

  • *To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email address: gorilla@engineering.ucsb.edu

Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1650 – Published 24 August, 1998

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.1650

Abstract

The minimum surface tension and respreadability of a surfactant monolayer is limited by a two to three dimensional instability called collapse. Liquid-condensed or solid phase monolayers collapse via fracture followed by loss of material. Liquid-expanded phase monolayers collapse by solubilization into the subphase. Monolayers that retain a continuous liquid-expanded phase network surrounding islands of liquid-condensed or solid phase collapse at low surface tensions via a localized, large amplitude buckling. The buckled regions coexist with the flat monolayer, remain attached to the interface, and reversibly reincorporate into the monolayer upon expansion.

References (24)

  1. H. M. McConnell, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 42, 171 (1991).
  2. C. M. Knobler and R. C. Desai, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 43, 207 (1992).
  3. H. Ries and H. Swift, Langmuir 3, 853 (1987).
  4. S. Siegel et al., J. Phys. Chem. 96, 8157 (1992).
  5. M. M. Lipp et al., Science 273, 1196 (1996).
  6. P. Tchoreloff et al., Chem. Phys. Lipids 59, 151 (1991).
  7. K. Birdi and D. Vu, Langmuir 10, 623 (1994).
  8. M. M. Lipp., Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Santa Barbara, 1997.
  9. R. H. Notter et al., J. Lipid Res. 21, 10 (1980).
  10. H. Liu et al., Colloid Interface Sci. 167, 378 (1994).
  11. J. A. Clements, Physiologist 5, 11 (1962).
  12. B. A. Holm et al., Pediatr. Res. 39, 805 (1996).
  13. D. L. Shapiro and R. H. Notter, Surfactant Replacement Therapy (Liss, New York, 1989).
  14. Two larger lung surfactant-specific proteins, SP-A and SP-D, are also present in lung surfactant but do not contribute as directly to surface activity as the amphipilic surfactant proteins SP-B and SP-C.
  15. M. M. Lipp et al., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 68, 2574 (1997).
  16. K. Y. C. Lee et al., Langmuir 14, 2567 (1998).
  17. L. Bordieu et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 1502 (1994).
  18. A. Saint-Jalmes et al., Europhys. Lett. 28, 565 (1994).
  19. J.-G. Hu and R. Granek, J. Phys. II (France) 6, 999 (1996).
  20. S. T. Milner et al., Europhys. Lett. 9, 495 (1989).
  21. E. Guitter et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2949 (1988).
  22. E. Guitter et al., J. Phys. (Paris) 50, 1787 (1989).
  23. Retention of the fluid phase at high surface pressure was also seen in DPPC/POPG monolayers with surfactant protein SP-C; see A. von Nahmen et al., Biophys. J. 72, 463 (1997).
  24. Y. Tanaka et al., J. Lipid Res. 27, 475 (1986).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation