Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Frequency Analysis of 3D Electronic 1/r Dynamics: Tuning between Order and Chaos

Jan von Milczewski1, David Farrelly2, and T. Uzer1

  • 1School of Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0430
  • 2Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Utah State University, Logan, Utah 84322-0300

Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1436 – Published 24 February, 1997

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.1436

Abstract

Frequency analysis is used to chart the global phase space structure for the most general case of an electron bound by Coulombic and harmonic potentials and perturbed by tilted electric and magnetic fields. Distinct order-chaos transitions are found together with an example of a wave function scarred by a 3D “exotic” periodic orbit, thereby providing compelling evidence for the power of frequency analysis in studying multidimensional chaos.

References (25)

  1. R. C. Ashoori, Nature (London) 379, 413 (1996).
  2. T. F. Gallagher, Rydberg Atoms (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,1994).
  3. Physics of Low-Dimensional Semiconductor Structures, P. Butcher, N. H. March, and M. P. Tosi (Plenum, New York,1993).
  4. M. Gutzwiller, Chaos in Classical and Quantum Mechanics (Springer-Verlag, New York,1990).
  5. D. L. Shepelyansky and A. D. Stone, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 2098 (1995).
  6. A. J. Lichtenberg and M. A. Lieberman, Regular and Chaotic Dynamics (Springer-Verlag, New York,1992).
  7. J. Laskar, Physica (Amsterdam) 67D, 257 (1993).
  8. H. S. Dumas and J. Laskar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2975 (1993).
  9. E. J. Heller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 1515 (1984).
  10. L. Marmet, H. Held, G. Raithel, J. A. Yeazell, and H. Walther, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 3779 (1994).
  11. T. Pang and S. G. Louie, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 1635 (1990).
  12. D. C. Reynolds and T. C. Collins, Excitons: Their Properties and Uses (Academic Press, London,1981).
  13. T. M. Fromhold, P. B. Wilkinson, F. W. Sheard, L. Eaves, J. Miao, and G. Edwards, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1142 (1995).
  14. P. B. Wilkinson, T. M. Fromhold, L. Eaves, F. W. Sheard, N. Miura, and T. Takamatsu, Nature (London) 380, 608 (1996).
  15. G. Muller, G. S. Boebinger, H. Mathur, L. N. Pfeiffer, and K. W. West, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 2875 (1995).
  16. B. R. Johnson, J. O. Hirschfelder, and K.-H. Yang, Rev. Mod. Phys. 55, 122 (1983).
  17. Suitable measures of the electric and magnetic field strengths in the absence of a dot confining potential and taking ε=1 are E0=eZ/a02 and B0=c/ea02 where a0=2/μZe2 where μ is the reduced mass. It is convenient to work with the dimensionless quantities F=E/E0 and γ=B/B0. In a quantum dot effective atomic units are used [[1]].
  18. M. M. Dignam and J. E. Sipe, Phys. Rev. B 45, 6819 (1992).
  19. R. L. Greene and K. K. Bajaj, Phys. Rev. B 31, 913 (1985).
  20. D. Farrelly, Phys. Lett. A 191, 265 (1994).
  21. J. Laskar and P. Robutel, Nature (London) 361, 608 (1993).
  22. J. von Milczewski, G. H. F. Diercksen, and T. Uzer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 2890 (1996).
  23. D. Farrelly, T. Uzer, P. E. Raines, J. P. Skelton, and J. A. Milligan, Phys. Rev. A 45, 4738 (1992).
  24. J. von Milczewski, G. H. F. Diercksen, and T. Uzer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 2428 (1994).
  25. A. Deprit, Celest. Mech. 1, 12 (1969).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation