Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Effective charges and the surface stability of O on Cu(001)

E. A. Colbourn

J. E. Inglesfield

  • ICI Wilton Materials Research Centre, P.O. Box 90, Wilton, Middlesbrough TS6 8JE, England

  • Institute for Theoretical Physics, Catholic University of Nijmegen, Toernooiveld, NL-6525ED Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 2006 – Published 15 April, 1991

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.2006

Abstract

The effective charge on a surface atom gives both the force on the atom in terms of an external, unscreened field, and the change in the surface dipole contribution to the work function when the atom is displaced. It is shown that this can give rise to a surface instability if the effective charge is big enough. In the case of O adsorbed on Cu(001) in the fourfold hollow site, calculations give an effective charge of -0.9‖e‖, which means that the ‘‘ideal’’ c(2×2) structure at 0.5-monolayer coverage is unstable. This provides an explanation for the reconstruction to the (√2 ×2 √2 )R45° phase which is observed.

References (22)

  1. R. Mayer, C. S. Zhang and K. G. Lynn, Phys. Rev. B 33, 8899 (1986).
  2. M. Wuttig, R. Franchy and H. Ibach, Surf. Sci. 213, 103 (1989).
  3. H. C. Zeng, R. A. McFarlane, and K. A. R. Mitchell, Surf. Sci. 208, L7 (1989).
  4. M. C. Asensio, M. J. Ashwin, A. L. D. Kilcoyne, D. P. Woodruff, A. W. Robinson, T. Lindner, J. S. Somers, D. E. Ricken and A. M. Bradshaw, Surf. Sci. 236, 1 (1990).
  5. A. Atrei, U. Bardi, G. Rovida and E. Zanazzi, Vacuum 41, 333 (1990).
  6. U. Döbler, K. Baberschke, J. Stöhr and D. A. Outka, Phys. Rev. B 31, 2532 (1985).
  7. D. D. Vvedensky, J. B. Pendry, U. Döbler and K. Baberschke, Phys. Rev. B 35, 7756 (1987).
  8. A. Scheidt, H. Richter and U. Gerhardt, Surf. Sci. 205, 38 (1988).
  9. K. W. Jacobsen and J. K. Nørskov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 1788 (1990).
  10. D. L. Mills, Prog. Surf. Sci. 8, 143 (1977).
  11. D. R. Hamann and P. J. Feibelman, Phys. Rev. B 37, 3847 (1988).
  12. S. L. Cunningham and A. A. Maradudin, Phys. Rev. B 7, 3870 (1973).
  13. S. E. Trullinger and S. L. Cunningham, Phys. Rev. Lett. 30, 913 (1973).
  14. S. E. Trullinger and S. L. Cunningham, Phys. Rev. B 8, 2622 (1973).
  15. P. V. Madhavan and M. D. Newton, J. Chem. Phys. 86, 4030 (1987).
  16. J. E. Inglesfield and G. A. Benesh, Phys. Rev. B 37, 6682 (1988).
  17. J. E. Inglesfield, J. Phys. C 14, 3795 (1981).
  18. Physics Vade Mecum (AIP, New York, 1981).
  19. P. S. Bagus and F. Illas, Phys. Rev. B 42, 10 852 (1990).
  20. P. W. Anderson and E. I. Blount, Phys. Rev. Lett. 14, 217 (1965).
  21. P. Hofmann, R. Unwin, W. Wyrobisch and A. M. Brad\%shaw, Surf. Sci. 72, 635 (1978).
  22. R. W. Godby, G. A. Benesh, R. Haydock and V. Heine, Phys. Rev. B 32, 655 (1985).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation