- Access by Xinjiang University
Implications of a Possible Octet
Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 141 – Published 27 July, 1964
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.141
References (18)
- M. Taher-Zadeh et al., Phys. Rev. Letters 11, 470 (1963)
- L. W. Alvarez et al., Phys. Rev. Letters 10, 184 (1963) P. L. Bastien and J. P. Berge, 10, 188 (1963)
- S. L. Glashow and A. H. Rosenfeld, Phys. Rev. Letters 10, 192 (1963) A. W. Martin, to be published
- J. J. Sakurai [Phys. Letters 10, 132 (1964)]
- [L. David Roper, Phys. Rev. Letters 12, 340 (1964) Auvil and Lovelace, to be published]
- Sakurai ([4])
- A. W. Martin and K. C. Wali, Nuovo Cimento 31, 1324 (1964)
- [2] Glashow and Rosenfeld, [3]
- A. W. Martin and K. C. Wali, Phys. Rev. 130, 2455 (1963)
- Eq. (6) of [7]
- J. Schwinger, Phys. Rev. Letters 12, 237 (1964)
- R. E. Cutkosky, Phys. Rev. Letters 12, 530 (1964)
- S. L. Glashow and D. J. Kleitman, to be published
- J. J. de Swart, Rev. Mod. Phys. 35, 916 (1963)
- [16] I. S. Gerstein and K. T. Mahanthappa [Phys. Rev. Letters 12, 570 (1964)]
- E. Johnson and R. Sawyer, Phys. Letters 9, 212 (1964)
- [16] several authors ([12,13])
Omitted endnote