Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Squeezed States of Light for Future Gravitational Wave Detectors at a Wavelength of 1550 nm

Fabian Meylahn*, Benno Willke, and Henning Vahlbruch

  • Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics (Albert Einstein Institute), D-30167 Hannover, Germany and Leibniz Universität Hannover, D-30167 Hannover, Germany

  • *fabian.meylahn@aei.mpg.de

Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 121103 – Published 16 September, 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.121103

Abstract

The generation of strongly squeezed vacuum states of light is a key technology for future ground-based gravitational wave detectors (GWDs) to reach sensitivities beyond their quantum noise limit. For some proposed observatory designs, an operating laser wavelength of 1550 nm or around 2μm is required to enable the use of cryogenically cooled silicon test masses for thermal noise reduction. Here, we present for the first time the direct measurement of up to 11.5 dB squeezing at 1550 nm over the complete detection bandwidth of future ground-based GWDs ranging from 10 kHz down to below 1 Hz. Furthermore, we directly observe a quantum shot-noise reduction of up to (13.5±0.1)dB at megahertz frequencies. This allows us to derive a precise constraint on the absolute quantum efficiency of the photodiode used for balanced homodyne detection. These results hold important insight regarding the quantum noise reduction efficiency in future GWDs, as well as for quantum information and cryptography, where low decoherence of nonclassical states of light is also of high relevance.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (37)

  1. B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration), Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016).
  2. B. P. Abbott et al. (KAGRA, LIGO Scientific, and Virgo Collaborations), Prospects for observing and localizing gravitational-wave transients with Advanced LIGO, Advanced Virgo and KAGRA, Living Rev. Relativity 23, 3 (2020).
  3. R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, and KAGRA Collaboration), GWTC-3: Compact binary coalescences observed by LIGO and Virgo during the second part of the third observing run, arXiv:2111.03606.
  4. J. Aasi et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration), Advanced LIGO, Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 074001 (2015).
  5. A. Buikema et al., Sensitivity and performance of the Advanced LIGO detectors in the third observing run, Phys. Rev. D 102, 062003 (2020).
  6. F. Acernese et al. (Virgo Collaboration), Advanced Virgo: A second-generation interferometric gravitational wave detector, Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 024001 (2015).
  7. K. L. Dooley et al., GEO 600 and the GEO-HF upgrade program: Successes and challenges, Classical Quantum Gravity 33, 075009 (2016).
  8. F. Acernese et al. (Virgo Collaboration), Increasing the Astrophysical Reach of the Advanced Virgo Detector via the Application of Squeezed Vacuum States of Light, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 231108 (2019).
  9. M. Tse et al., Quantum-Enhanced Advanced LIGO Detectors in the Era of Gravitational-Wave Astronomy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 231107 (2019).
  10. J. Lough, E. Schreiber, F. Bergamin, H. Grote, M. Mehmet, H. Vahlbruch, C. Affeldt, M. Brinkmann, A. Bisht, V. Kringel, H. Lück, N. Mukund, S. Nadji, B. Sorazu, K. Strain, M. Weinert, and K. Danzmann, First Demonstration of 6 dB Quantum Noise Reduction in a Kilometer Scale Gravitational Wave Observatory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 041102 (2021).
  11. H. J. Kimble, Y. Levin, A. B. Matsko, K. S. Thorne, and S. P. Vyatchanin, Conversion of conventional gravitational-wave interferometers into quantum nondemolition interferometers by modifying their input and/or output optics, Phys. Rev. D 65, 022002 (2001).
  12. Y. Zhao et al., Frequency-Dependent Squeezed Vacuum Source for Broadband Quantum Noise Reduction in Advanced Gravitational-Wave Detectors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 171101 (2020).
  13. L. McCuller, C. Whittle, D. Ganapathy, K. Komori, M. Tse, A. Fernandez-Galiana, L. Barsotti, P. Fritschel, M. MacInnis, F. Matichard, K. Mason, N. Mavalvala, R. Mittleman, H. Yu, M. E. Zucker, and M. Evans, Frequency-Dependent Squeezing for Advanced LIGO, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 171102 (2020).
  14. J. Abadie et al. (The LIGO Scientific Collaboration), A gravitational wave observatory operating beyond the quantum shot-noise limit, Nat. Phys. 7, 962 (2011).
  15. M. Mehmet and H. Vahlbruch, The squeezed light source for the Advanced Virgo detector in the observation run O3, Galaxies 8, 79 (2020).
  16. H. Vahlbruch, M. Mehmet, K. Danzmann, and R. Schnabel, Detection of 15 dB Squeezed States of Light and their Application for the Absolute Calibration of Photoelectric Quantum Efficiency, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 110801 (2016).
  17. M. Mehmet and H. Vahlbruch, High-efficiency squeezed light generation for gravitational wave detectors, Classical Quantum Gravity 36, 015014 (2018).
  18. S. S. Y. Chua, M. S. Stefszky, C. M. Mow-Lowry, B. C. Buchler, S. Dwyer, D. A. Shaddock, P. K. Lam, and D. E. McClelland, Backscatter tolerant squeezed light source for advanced gravitational-wave detectors, Opt. Lett. 36, 4680 (2011).
  19. A. R. Wade, G. L. Mansell, S. S. Y. Chua, R. L. Ward, B. J. J. Slagmolen, D. A. Shaddock, and D. E. McClelland, A squeezed light source operated under high vacuum, Sci. Rep. 5, 18052 (2015).
  20. M. S. Stefszky, C. M. Mow-Lowry, S. S. Y. Chua, D. A. Shaddock, B. C. Buchler, H. Vahlbruch, A. Khalaidovski, R. Schnabel, P. K. Lam, and D. E. McClelland, Balanced homodyne detection of optical quantum states at audio-band frequencies and below, Classical Quantum Gravity 29, 145015 (2012).
  21. ET Steering Committee, Einstein gravitational wave Telescope, Technical Report No. ET-0007B-20, 2020, https://apps.et-gw.eu/tds/ql/?c=15418.
  22. D. Reitze et al., Cosmic explorer: The U.S. contribution to gravitational-wave astronomy beyond LIGO, Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 51, 035 (2019), https://baas.aas.org/pub/2020n7i035.
  23. M. Evans et al., A horizon study for cosmic explorer: Science, observatories, and community, arXiv:2109.09882.
  24. A. Schönbeck, F. Thies, and R. Schnabel, 13 dB squeezed vacuum states at 1550 nm from 12 mW external pump power at 775 nm, Opt. Lett. 43, 110 (2018).
  25. C. Darsow-Fromm, J. Gurs, R. Schnabel, and S. Steinlechner, Squeezed light at 2128 nm for future gravitational-wave observatories, Opt. Lett. 46, 5850 (2021).
  26. M. Mehmet, S. Ast, T. Eberle, S. Steinlechner, H. Vahlbruch, and R. Schnabel, Squeezed light at 1550 nm with a quantum noise reduction of 12.3 dB, Opt. Express 19, 25763 (2011).
  27. G. L. Mansell, T. G. McRae, P. A. Altin, M. J. Yap, R. L. Ward, B. J. J. Slagmolen, D. A. Shaddock, and D. E. McClelland, Observation of Squeezed Light in the 2μm Region, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 203603 (2018).
  28. A. Schönbeck, Compact squeezed-light source at 1550 nm, Ph.D. thesis, Universität Hamburg, 2018.
  29. M. J. Yap, D. W. Gould, T. G. McRae, P. A. Altin, N. Kijbunchoo, G. L. Mansell, R. L. Ward, D. A. Shaddock, B. J. J. Slagmolen, and D. E. McClelland, Squeezed vacuum phase control at 2μm, Opt. Lett. 44, 5386 (2019).
  30. F. Meylahn, N. Knust, and B. Willke, Stabilized laser system at 1550 nm wavelength for future gravitational-wave detectors, Phys. Rev. D 105, 122004 (2022).
  31. R. Drever, J. L. Hall, F. Kowalski, J. Hough, G. Ford, A. Munley, and H. Ward, Laser phase and frequency stabilization using an optical resonator, Appl. Phys. B 31, 97 (1983).
  32. N. Uehara, E. K. Gustafson, M. M. Fejer, and R. L. Byer, Modeling of efficient mode-matching and thermal-lensing effect on a laser-beam coupling into a mode-cleaner cavity, in Modeling and Simulation of Higher-Power Laser Systems IV edited by U. O. Farrukh and S. Basu (SPIE-International Society for Optical Engineering, Bellingham, WA, 1997), Vol. 2989, pp. 57–68, 10.1117/12.273681.
  33. Laser Components GmbH, https://www.lasercomponents.com/de-en/product/high-quantum-efficiency-photodiodes/, accessed on 31 May 2022.
  34. E. Schreiber, Gravitational-wave detection beyond the quantum shot-noise limit, Ph.D. thesis, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Universität Hannover, 2018.
  35. H. Vahlbruch, S. Chelkowski, B. Hage, A. Franzen, K. Danzmann, and R. Schnabel, Coherent Control of Vacuum Squeezing in the Gravitational-Wave Detection Band, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 011101 (2006).
  36. T. Atkutsu et al. (KAGRA Collaboration), Overview of KAGRA: Detector design and construction history, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2021, 05A101 (2021).
  37. B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration), Exploring the sensitivity of next generation gravitational wave detectors, Classical Quantum Gravity 34, 044001 (2017).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation