- Featured in Physics
- Editors' Suggestion
- Access by Xinjiang University
Study of and Observation of a Charged Charmoniumlike State at Belle
Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 252002 – Published 17 June, 2013Erratum Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 019901 (2013)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.252002
Abstract
The cross section for between 3.8 and 5.5 GeV is measured with a data sample collected by the Belle detector at or near the () resonances. The state is observed, and its resonance parameters are determined. In addition, an excess of production around 4 GeV is observed. This feature can be described by a Breit-Wigner parametrization with properties that are consistent with the state that was previously reported by Belle. In a study of decays, a structure is observed in the mass spectrum with significance, with mass and width , where the errors are statistical and systematic, respectively. This structure can be interpreted as a new charged charmoniumlike state.
Corrections
19 June, 2013
Erratum
Publisher’s Note: Study of and Observation of a Charged Charmoniumlike State at Belle [Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 252002 (2013)]
Viewpoint
New Particle Hints at Four-Quark Matter
Two experiments have detected the signature of a new particle, which may combine quarks in a way not seen before.
See more in Physics
See Also
Observation of a Charged Charmoniumlike Structure in at
Article Text
References (23)
- B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 142001 (2005).
- Q. He et al. (CLEO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 74, 091104(R) (2006).
- K. Abe et al. (Belle Collaboration), arXiv:hep-ex/0612006.
- S. K. Choi et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 142001 (2008).
- R. Mizuk et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 78, 072004 (2008).
- A. Bondar et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 122001 (2012).
- T. E. Coan et al. (CLEO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 162003 (2006).
- C. Z. Yuan et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 182004 (2007).
- J. P. Lees et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 86, 051102(R) (2012).
- S. Kurokawa and E. Kikutani, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 499, 1 (2003), and other papers included in this volume; T. Abe et al., Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2013, 03A001 (2013) and following articles up to 03A011.
- A. Abashian et al. (Belle Collaboration), Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 479, 117 (2002); also see detector section in J. Brodzicka et al., Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2012, 04D001 (2012).
- G. Rodrigo, H. Czyż, J. H. Kühn, and M. Szopa, Eur. Phys. J. C 24, 71 (2002).
- K. Hanagaki, H. Kakuno, H. Ikeda, T. Iijima, and T. Tsukamoto, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 485, 490 (2002); A. Abashian et al., 491, 69 (2002).
In the Letter, is used instead of the invariant mass of the four final state particles to improve the mass resolution. Here is the nominal mass of the .
- K. Zhu, C. Z. Yuan, and R. G. Ping, Phys. Rev. D 78, 036004 (2008).
- J. Beringer et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 86, 010001 (2012).
The cross sections are measured to be and at , , and at , for the and modes, respectively. Our measurements agree with the predictions of at 10.87 GeV, and at 10.02 GeV [18] within errors.
- E. A. Kuraev and V. S. Fadin, Yad. Fiz. 41, 733 (1985) [Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 41, 466 (1985)].
Considering the correlation between and , we get and for and , respectively, for solution I; and and for and , respectively, for solution II, where the first and second errors are statistical and systematic, respectively.
A smaller systematic error is obtained because we no longer use a BW with a phase-space-dependent total width to parametrize .
The fraction of events is obtained from a one-dimensional fit to the distribution without including possible interference with other amplitudes. For a more precise determination of this fraction, a full partial wave analysis with more statistics would be required.
We perform a partial wave analysis with , , nonresonant wave, and amplitudes, and find that the -wave contributions dominate. The MC distributions with fit parameters are shown in Fig. 3 with open histograms.
- M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), preceding Letter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 252001 (2013).