Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Consistency of the Adiabatic Theorem

M. H. S. Amin

  • D-Wave Systems Inc., 100-4401 Still Creek Drive, Burnaby, British Columbia, V5C 6G9, Canada

Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 220401 – Published 3 June, 2009Erratum Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 039902 (2015)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.220401

Abstract

The adiabatic theorem provides the basis for the adiabatic model of quantum computation. Recently the conditions required for the adiabatic theorem to hold have become a subject of some controversy. Here we show that the reported violations of the adiabatic theorem all arise from resonant transitions between energy levels. In the absence of fast driven oscillations the traditional adiabatic theorem holds. Implications for adiabatic quantum computation are discussed.

Erratum

Article Text

References (26)

  1. P. Ehrenfest, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 356, 327 (1916).
  2. M. Born and V. Fock, Z. Phys. 51, 165 (1928).
  3. T. Kato, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 5, 435 (1950).
  4. E. Farhi, J. Goldstone, S. Gutmann, J. Lapan, A. Lundgren, and D. Preda, Science 292, 472 (2001).
  5. D. Aharonov, W. van Dam, J. Kempe, Z. Landau, S. Lloyd, and O. Regev, SIAM J. Comput. 37, 166 (2007).
  6. K.-P. Marzlin and B. C. Sanders, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 160408 (2004).
  7. D. M. Tong, K. Singh, L. C. Kwek, and C. H. Oh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 110407 (2005).
  8. J. Du, L. Hu, Y. Wang, J. Wu, M. Zhao, and D. Suter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 060403 (2008).
  9. S. Duki, H. Mathur, and O. Narayan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 128901 (2006).
  10. J. Ma, Y. Zhang, E. Wang, and B. Wu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 128902 (2006).
  11. K.-P. Marzlin and B. C. Sanders, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 128903 (2006).
  12. Z. Wu and H. Yang, Phys. Rev. A 72, 012114 (2005).
  13. R. MacKenzie, E. Marcotte, and H. Paquette, Phys. Rev. A 73, 042104 (2006).
  14. J.-L. Chen, M.-S. Zhao, J.-D. Wu, and Y. D. Zhang, arXiv:quant-ph/07060299.
  15. J.-D. Wu, M.-S. Zhao, J.-L. Chen, and Y.-D. Zhang, arXiv:0706.0264.
  16. D. M. Tong, K. Singh, L. C. Kwek, and C. H. Oh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 150402 (2007).
  17. S. Jansen, M.-B. Ruskai, and R. Seiler, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 48, 102111 (2007).
  18. D. A. Lidar, A. T. Rezakhani, and A. Hamma, arXiv:0808.2697.
  19. Z. Wei and M. Ying, Phys. Rev. A 76, 024304 (2007).
  20. M. S. Sarandy and D. A. Lidar, Phys. Rev. A 71, 012331 (2005); Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 250503 (2005); M. J. O’Hara and D. P. O’Leary, Phys. Rev. A 77, 042319 (2008).
  21. L. I. Schiff, Quantum Mechanics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1968), 3rd ed.
  22. The approximation becomes self-consistent by making sure that the error εn is small at the end.

  23. J. Roland and N. J. Cerf, Phys. Rev. A 65, 042308 (2002).
  24. M. H. S. Amin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 130503 (2008).
  25. S. P. Jordan (private communication).
  26. M. H. S. Amin, P. J. Love, and C. J. S. Truncik, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 060503 (2008); M. H. S. Amin, D. V. Averin, and J. A. Nesteroff, Phys. Rev. A 79, 022107 (2009); M. H. S. Amin, C. J. S. Truncik, and D. V. Averin, arXiv:0803.1196.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation