Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Techniques for improved statistical convergence in quantification of eddy diffusivity moments

Dana L. O.-L. Lavacot1,*, Jessie Liu1,*, Brandon E. Morgan2, and Ali Mani1

  • *These authors contributed equally to this work.

Phys. Rev. Fluids 10, 114904 – Published 17 November, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/yrnt-y4mp

Abstract

While recent approaches, such as the macroscopic forcing method (MFM) or Green's function-based approaches, can be used to compute Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes closure operators using forced direct numerical simulations, MFM can also be used to directly compute moments of the effective nonlocal and anisotropic eddy diffusivities. The low-order spatial and temporal moments contain limited information about the eddy diffusivity but are often sufficient for quantification and modeling of nonlocal and anisotropic effects. However, when using MFM to compute eddy diffusivity moments, the statistical convergence can be slow for higher-order moments. In this work, we demonstrate that using the same direct numerical simulation (DNS) for all forced MFM simulations improves statistical convergence of the eddy diffusivity moments. We present its implementation in conjunction with a decomposition method that handles the MFM forcing semianalytically and allows for consistent boundary condition treatment, which we develop for both scalar and momentum transport. We demonstrate that for a two-dimensional Rayleigh-Taylor instability case study, using the same DNS for all forced MFM simulations results in convergence with O(100) simulations rather than O(1000) simulations. We then demonstrate the impacts of improved convergence on the quantification of the eddy diffusivity.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (25)

  1. J. V. Boussinesq, Essai sur la théorie des eaux courantes, in Mémoires présentés par divers savants a l'Academie des Sciences de l'Institute National de France (Impr. Nationale, 1877), Vol. XXIII.
  2. S. Corrsin, Limitations of gradient transport models in random walks and in turbulence, Adv. Geophys. 18, 25 (1975).
  3. N. Romanof, Application of the orthonormal expansion of random functions to turbulent diffusion, in Proceedings of the 7th Conference on Probability Theory (VSP, Brasov, Romania, 1985), p. 493.
  4. R. H. Kraichnan, Eddy viscosity and diffusivity: Exact formulas and approximations, Complex Syst. 1, 805 (1987).
  5. F. Hamba, Nonlocal expression for scalar flux in turbulent shear flow, Phys. Fluids 16, 1493 (2004).
  6. A. Mani and D. Park, Macroscopic forcing method: A tool for turbulence modeling and analysis of closures, Phys. Rev. Fluids 6, 054607 (2021).
  7. F. Hamba, Nonlocal analysis of the Reynolds stress in turbulent shear flow, Phys. Fluids 17, 115102 (2005).
  8. J. Liu, H. H. Williams, and A. Mani, Systematic approach for modeling a nonlocal eddy diffusivity, Phys. Rev. Fluids 8, 124501 (2023).
  9. D. L. O.-L. Lavacot, J. Liu, H. Williams, B. E. Morgan, and A. Mani, Nonlocality of mean scalar transport in two-dimensional Rayleigh-Taylor instability using the macroscopic forcing method, J. Fluid Mech. 985, A47 (2024).
  10. N. G. van Kampen, A power series expansion of the master equation, Can. J. Phys. 39, 551 (1961).
  11. D. Park and A. Mani, Direct calculation of the eddy viscosity operator in turbulent channel flow at Reτ=180, J. Fluid Mech. 998, A33 (2024).
  12. S. H. Bryngelson, F. Schäfer, J. Liu, and A. Mani, Fast macroscopic forcing method, J. Comput. Phys. 499, 112721 (2024).
  13. J. Liu, F. Schäfer, S. H. Bryngelson, T. A. Zaki, and A. Mani, Adjoint-based computation of nonlocal eddy viscosity in turbulent channel flow, Phys. Rev. Fluids 9, 094606 (2024).
  14. A. Nadim, M. Pagitsas, and H. Brenner, Higher-order moments in macrotransport processes, J. Chem. Phys. 85, 5238 (1986).
  15. D. Park, J. Liu, and A. Mani, Non-Boussinesq effects of eddy viscosity in a separated turbulent boundary layer, in 34th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics (Office of Naval Research, Washington, DC, 2022).
  16. B. E. Morgan, B. J. Olson, W. J. Black, and J. A. McFarland, Large-eddy simulation and Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes modeling of a reacting Rayleigh–Taylor mixing layer in a spherical geometry, Phys. Rev. E 98, 033111 (2018).
  17. W. H. Cabot and A. W. Cook, Reynolds number effects on Rayleigh-Taylor instability with possible implications for type Ia supernovae, Nat. Phys. 2, 562 (2006).
  18. B. Morgan, B. Olson, J. White, and J. McFarland, Self-similarity of a Rayleigh-Taylor mixing layer at low Atwood number with a multimode initial perturbation, J. Turbul. 18, 973 (2017).
  19. D. L. Youngs, Numerical simulation of mixing by Rayleigh-Taylor and Richtmyer-Meshkov instabilities, Laser Part. Beams 12, 725 (1994).
  20. B. Morgan and J. Greenough, Large-eddy and unsteady RANS simulations of a shock-accelerated heavy gas cylinder, Shock Waves 26, 355 (2016).
  21. J. D. Bender, O. Schilling, K. S. Raman, R. A. Managan, B. J. Olson, S. R. Copeland, C. L. Ellison, D. J. Erskine, C. M. Huntington, B. E. Morgan et al., Simulation and flow physics of a shocked and reshocked high-energy-density mixing layer, J. Fluid Mech. 915, A84 (2021).
  22. R. W. Sharp, Jr. and R. Barton, HEMP advection model, Technical report, California University, Livermore (USA), Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, 1981.
  23. P. E. Dimotakis, The mixing transition in turbulent flows, J. Fluid Mech. 409, 69 (2000).
  24. B. E. Morgan and W. J. Black, Parametric investigation of the transition to turbulence in Rayleigh-Taylor mixing, Physica D 402, 132223 (2020).
  25. R. F. Pawula, Approximation of the linear Boltzmann equation by the Fokker-Planck equation, Phys. Rev. 162, 186 (1967).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation