Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Latent-space variational data assimilation in two-dimensional turbulence

Andrew Cleary*

Qi Wang

Tamer A. Zaki†

  • *Contact author: acleary7@jhu.edu
  • †Contact author: t.zaki@jhu.edu

Phys. Rev. Fluids 11, 104903 – Published 14 October, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/slk7-7l5v

Abstract

Starting from limited measurements of a turbulent flow, data assimilation (DA) attempts to estimate all the spatiotemporal scales of motion. Success is dependent on whether the system is observable from the measurements, or how much of the initial turbulent field is encoded in the available measurements. Adjoint-variational DA minimizes the discrepancy between the true and estimated measurements by optimizing the initial velocity or vorticity field (the “state space”). Here, we propose to instead optimize in a lower-dimensional latent space which is learned by implicit rank-minimizing autoencoders. Assimilating in latent space, rather than state space, redefines the observability of the measurements and identifies the physically meaningful perturbation directions which matter most for accurate prediction of the flow evolution. When observing coarse-grained measurements of two-dimensional Kolmogorov flow at moderate Reynolds numbers, the proposed latent-space DA approach estimates the full turbulent state with a relative error improvement of 2 orders of magnitude over the standard state-space DA approach. The small scales of the estimated turbulent field are predicted more faithfully with latent-space DA, greatly reducing erroneous small-scale velocities typically introduced by state-space DA. Furthermore, latent-space DA is demonstrated to be robust to noisy measurements over the range of Reynolds numbers considered. These findings demonstrate that the observability of the system from available data can be greatly improved when turbulent measurements are assimilated in the right space, or coordinates.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (30)

  1. T. A. Zaki, Turbulence from an observer perspective, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 57, 311 (2025).
  2. K. Taira, S. L. Brunton, S. T. Dawson, C. W. Rowley, T. Colonius, B. J. McKeon, O. T. Schmidt, S. Gordeyev, V. Theofilis, and L. S. Ukeiley, Modal analysis of fluid flows: An overview, AIAA J. 55, 4013 (2017).
  3. S. L. Brunton, B. R. Noack, and P. Koumoutsakos, Machine learning for fluid mechanics, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 52, 477 (2020).
  4. K. Fukami and K. Taira, Grasping extreme aerodynamics on a low-dimensional manifold, Nat. Commun. 14, 6480 (2023).
  5. K. Zeng, C. E. P. De Jesús, A. J. Fox, and M. D. Graham, Autoencoders for discovering manifold dimension and coordinates in data from complex dynamical systems, Mach. Learn.: Sci. Technol. 5, 025053 (2024).
  6. A. Cleary and J. Page, Characterizing the Reynolds number dependence of the chaotic attractor in two-dimensional turbulence with dimension-minimizing autoencoders, Phys. Rev. E 112, 055105 (2025).
  7. K. Fukami, K. Fukagata, and K. Taira, Super-resolution reconstruction of turbulent flows with machine learning, J. Fluid Mech. 870, 106 (2019).
  8. J. P. Williams, O. Zahn, and J. N. Kutz, Sensing with shallow recurrent decoder networks, Proc. Royal Soc. A Mathe. Phys. Eng. Sci. 480, 20240054 (2024).
  9. Y. Du, M. Wang, and T. A. Zaki, State estimation in minimal turbulent channel flow: A comparative study of 4DVar and PINN, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 99, 109073 (2023).
  10. J. Page, Super-resolution of turbulence with dynamics in the loss, J. Fluid Mech. 1002, R3 (2025).
  11. M. Weyrauch, M. Linkmann, and J. Page, State estimation in homogeneous isotropic turbulence using super-resolution with a 4DVar training algorithm, J. Fluid Mech. 1032, A43 (2026).
  12. E. Özalp, A. Nóvoa, and L. Magri, Real-time forecasting of chaotic dynamics from sparse data and autoencoders, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 450, 118600 (2026).
  13. P. Clark Di Leoni, L. Lu, C. Meneveau, G. E. Karniadakis, and T. A. Zaki, Neural operator prediction of linear instability waves in high-speed boundary layers, J. Comput. Phys. 474, 111793 (2023).
  14. G. J. Chandler and R. R. Kerswell, Invariant recurrent solutions embedded in a turbulent two-dimensional Kolmogorov flow, J. Fluid Mech. 722, 554 (2013).
  15. A. Cleary and J. Page, Dynamical relevance of periodic orbits under increasing Reynolds number and connections to inviscid dynamics, J. Fluid Mech. 1020, A52 (2025).
  16. D. Kochkov, J. A. Smith, A. Alieva, Q. Wang, M. P. Brenner, and S. Hoyer, Machine learning–accelerated computational fluid dynamics, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2101784118 (2021).
  17. G. Dresdner, D. Kochkov, P. Norgaard, L. Zepeda-Núñez, J. A. Smith, M. P. Brenner, and S. Hoyer, Learning to correct spectral methods for simulating turbulent flows, arXiv:2207.00556.
  18. M. Wang, Q. Wang, and T. A. Zaki, Discrete adjoint of fractional-step incompressible Navier-Stokes solver in curvilinear coordinates and application to data assimilation, J. Comput. Phys. 396, 427 (2019).
  19. X. Fan, X. Liu, M. Wang, and J.-X. Wang, Diff-FlowFSI A GPU-optimized differentiable CFD platform for high-fidelity turbulence and FSI simulations, Comp. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 448, 118455 (2026).
  20. D. P. Kingma and J. Ba, Adam: A method for stochastic optimization, arXiv:1412.6980.
  21. L. Jing, J. Zbontar, and Y. LeCun, Implicit rank-minimizing autoencoder, in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, edited by H. Larochelle, M. Ranzato, R. Hadsell, M. Balcan, and H. Lin (Curran Associates, Inc., 2020), Vol. 33, pp. 14736–14746.
  22. G. Benettin, L. Galgani, and J.-M. Strelcyn, Kolmogorov entropy and numerical experiments, Phys. Rev. A 14, 2338 (1976).
  23. T. A. Zaki and M. Wang, From limited observations to the state of turbulence: Fundamental difficulties of flow reconstruction, Phys. Rev. Fluids 6, 100501 (2021).
  24. M. Wang and T. A. Zaki, State estimation in turbulent channel flow from limited observations, J. Fluid Mech. 917, A9 (2021).
  25. Q. Wang, M. Wang, and T. A. Zaki, What is observable from wall data in turbulent channel flow? J. Fluid Mech. 941, A48 (2022).
  26. C. W. Rowley, Model reduction for fluids, using balanced proper orthogonal decomposition, Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos 15, 997 (2005).
  27. G. Huang, Z. Liu, L. Van Der Maaten, and K. Q. Weinberger, Densely connected convolutional networks, 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, 2017), pp. 2261–2269.
  28. D. Hendrycks and K. Gimpel, Gaussian error linear units (GELUS), arXiv:1606.08415.
  29. S. Ioffe and C. Szegedy, Batch normalization: Accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift, in Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning, edited by F. Bach and D. Blei, Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, Vol. 37 (PMLR, Lille, France, 2015), pp. 448–456.
  30. I. Loshchilov and F. Hutter, Decoupled weight decay regularization, in International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR, 2019).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation