Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Nonlinear and added mass effects on the settling of particles with large to moderate density ratio in turbulence

A. Dejoan

R. Monchaux

Phys. Rev. Fluids 11, 104603 – Published 9 October, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/nnhm-tcjv

Abstract

While extended research has been conducted on solid particles settling in turbulence, most of them have focused on very dense particles like solid ones in air turbulence or on almost neutrally buoyant ones. The intermediate case of particles whose density is representative of solid particles falling in water turbulence has been scarcely explored in the academic literature. In the present work, we aim to bridge this gap. To this end, we perform Eulerian-Lagrangian point-particle numerical simulations to examine the settling of small particles in homogeneous turbulence with two values of particle-to-fluid density ratio, Γ=4 and 14. The analysis of the results provides a comparison with the much more investigated case of very heavy particles with Γ=1000 to compare and contrast the settling mechanisms between the moderate and large density ratios. The simulations are performed in one-way and two-way coupling for dilute particle-laden conditions and two turbulence Reynolds numbers, Reλ=40 and 115. In two-way coupling, both particle self-disturbance and force-spreading operator related issues are handled by determining an effective particle diameter. The main results show that the settling increase is significantly smaller for moderate than large values of Γ and that the commonly reported centrifuge effect for high density ratios is not observed for the much smaller ones considered here. Under two-way coupling, it is found that for the moderate density ratios, the particle settling velocity is not mainly governed by the sampled fluid velocity as a consequence of a significant added mass contribution that tends to balance the dragged fluid motion. When particle inertia is large, the settling velocity is, on average, and as commonly reported in the literature, mainly modified by the mean fluid velocity sampled by the particles; however, a histogram-based data analysis reveals that the correlation between settling and sampled fluid velocities holds true for only a relatively small subset of individual particles. Furthermore, high particle inertia induces a severe local unbalance between gravitational and drag forces. This unbalance creates a nonhomogeneous distribution of particle acceleration, an effect shown to be further amplified by drag nonlinearity. While this latter finding has been addressed for very high particle-to-fluid density ratio, it is also expected to occur for moderate density ratios provided that particle inertia is high enough. The two considered values of the turbulence Reynolds number do not have a significant effect on the analyzed particle and flow quantities. Finally, as far as the existing literature allows for comparison, the experimental data used for comparisons of the settling velocity, fluid, and particle velocity, and acceleration statistics are in fair agreement with the simulations.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (71)

  1. L. P. Wang, The gravitational settling of aerosol particles in homogeneous turbulence and random flow fields, J. Fluid Mech. 174, 441 (1987).
  2. L. P. Wang and M. R. Maxey, Settling velocity and concentration distribution of heavy particles in homogeneous isotropic turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 256, 27 (1993).
  3. P. Nielsen, Turbulence effects on the settling of suspended particle, SEPM J. Sedim. Res. 63, 835 (1993).
  4. J. Tom and A. D. Bragg, Multiscale preferential sweeping of particle settling in turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 871, 244 (2019).
  5. A. J. Petersen, L. Baker, and F. Coletti, Experimental study of inertial partciles clustering and settling in homogeneous turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 864, 925 (2019).
  6. J. Li, A. Abraham, M. Guala, and J. Hong, Evidence of preferential sweeping during snow settling in atmospheric turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 928, A8 (2021).
  7. D. De Souza, T. Zürner, and R. Monchaux, Simple distinction of similar looking inertial particles and fluid tracers on camera images, Exp. Fluids 62, 114 (2021).
  8. L. Brandt and F. Coletti, Particle-laden turbulence: Progress and perspectives, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 54, 159 (2022).
  9. B. Laplace, Experimental study of inertial partcile settling in turbulence, Ph.D. thesis, Université de Lyon, 2022.
  10. R. Mei, Effect of turbulence on the particle settling velocity on the nonlinear drag range, Int. J. Multiphase Flow 20, 273 (1994).
  11. G. H. Good, P. J. Ireland, G. P. Bewley, E. Bodenschatz, L. R. Collins, and Z. Warhaft, Settling regimes of inertial particles in isotropic turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 759, R3 (2014).
  12. J. E. Stout, S. P. Arya, and E. L. Genikhovich, Effect of nonlinear drag on the motion and settling velocity of heavy particles, J. Atmos. Sci. 52, 3836 (1995).
  13. A. Aliseda, A. Cartellier, F. Hainaux, and J. C. Lashera, Effect of preferential concentration on the settling velocity of heavy particles in homogeneous isotropic turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 468, 77 (2002).
  14. L. Baker, A. Frankel, A. Mani, and F. Coletti, Coherent clusters of inertial particles in homogeneous turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 833, 364 (2017).
  15. A. Dejoan and R. Monchaux, Preferential concentration and settling of heavy particles in homogeneous turbulence, Phys. Fluids 25, 013301 (2013).
  16. S. L. Rani, R. Dhariwal, and D. Koch, Clustering of rapidly settling, low-inertia particle pairs in isotropic turbulence. Part 2. Comparison of theory and DNS, J. Fluid Mech. 871, 477 (2019).
  17. M. Momenifar and A. D. Bragg, Local analysis of the clustering, velocities, and accelerations of particles settling in turbulence, Phys. Rev. Fluids 5, 034306 (2020).
  18. J. C. H. Fung, Effect of nonlinear drag on the settling velocity of particles in homogeneous isotropic turbulence, J. Geophys. Res. 103, 27905 (1998).
  19. T. S. Yang and S. S. Shy, The settling velocity of heavy particles in an aqueous near-isotropic turbulence, Phys. Fluids 15, 868 (2003).
  20. K. Kawanisi and R. Shiozaki, Turbulent effect on the settling velocity of suspended sediment, J. Hydraul. Eng. 134, 261 (2008).
  21. Q. Zhou and N.-S. Cheng, Experiment of single particle settling in turbulence generated by oscillating grid, Chem. Eng. J. 149, 289 (2009).
  22. Y. Akutina, T. Revil-Baudard, J. Chauchat, and O. Eiff, Experimental evidence of settling retardation in a turbulence column, Phys. Rev. Fluids 5, 014303 (2020).
  23. S. Baek, Y. S. Park, and I. Seo, Settling velocity of weakly inertial particles in vertical flow, Eur. J. Mech. B Fluids 109, 92 (2025).
  24. A. Chouippe and M. Uhlmann, Forcing homogeneous turbulence in direct numerical simulation of particulate flow with interface resolution and gravity, Phys. Fluids 27, 123301 (2015).
  25. W. Fornari, F. Picano, G. Sardina, and L. Brandt, Reduced particle settling speed in turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 808, 153 (2016).
  26. C. Peng, K. Karzhaubayev, L.-P. Wang, S. Chen, and N. Zhongguo, Settling of finite-size particles in homogeneous isotropic turbulence: The influence of particle inertia and unified predictive model, J. Fluid Mech. 1016, A63 (2025).
  27. M. A. T. van Hinsberg, H. J. H. Clerex, and F. Toschi, Enhanced settling of nonheavy inertial particles in homogeneous isotropic turbulence: The role of the pressure gradient and the Basset history force, Phys. Rev. E 95, 023106 (2017).
  28. P. F. Tooby, G. L. Wick, and J. D. Isaacs, The motion of a small sphere in a rotating velocity field: A possible mechanism for suspending particles in turbulence, J. Geophys. Res. 82, 2096 (1977).
  29. C. Reartes and P. D. Mininni, Settling and clustering of particles of moderate mass density in turbulence, Phys. Rev. Fluids 6, 114304 (2021).
  30. T. Bosse, L. Kleiser, and E. Meiburg, Small particles in homogeneous turbulence: Settling velocity enhancement by two-way coupling, Phys. Fluids 18, 027102 (2006).
  31. R. Monchaux and A. Dejoan, Settling velocity and preferential concentration of heavy particles under two-way coupling effects in homogeneous turbulence, Phys. Rev. Fluids 2, 104302 (2017).
  32. R. Hassaini, A. J. Petersen, and F. Coletti, Effect of two-way coupling on clustering and settling of heavy particles in homogeneous turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 976, A12 (2023).
  33. S. Sumbekova, Clustering of inertial sub-Kolomogorov particles: Structure of clusters and their dynamics, Ph.D. thesis, Université Grenoble-Alpes, 2016.
  34. C. Li, K. Lim, T. Berk, A. Abraham, M. Heisel, M. Guala, F. Coletti, and J. Hong, Settling and clustering of snow particles in atmospheric turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 912, A49 (2021).
  35. B. Rosa, S. Kopeć, A. Ababaei, and J. Pozorski, Collision statistics and settling velocity of inertial particles in homogeneous turbulence from high-resolution DNS under two-way momentum coupling, Int. J. Multiphase Flow 148, 103906 (2022).
  36. P. J. Ireland, A. D. Bragg, and L. R. Collins, The effect of Reynolds number on inertial particle dynamics in isotropic turbulence. Part 2. Simulations with gravitational effects, J. Fluid Mech. 796, 659 (2016).
  37. D. O. Mora, M. Obligado, A. Aliseda, and A. Cartellier, Effect of Reλ and Rouse numbers on the settling of inertial droplets in homogeneous isotropic turbulence, Phys. Rev. Fluids 6, 044305 (2021).
  38. T. S. Yang and S. S. Shy, Two-way interaction between solid particles and homogeneous air turbulence: Particle settling rate and turbulence modification measurements, J. Fluid Mech. 526, 171 (2005).
  39. A. Ferran, N. Machicoane, A. Aliseda, and M. Obligado, An experimental study on the settling velocity of inertial particles in different homogeneous isotropic turbulent flows, J. Fluid Mech. 970, A23 (2023).
  40. C. Y. Yang and U. Lei, The role of the turbulent scales in the settling velocity of heavy particles in homogeneous isotropic turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 371, 179 (1998).
  41. B. Rosa, H. Parishani, O. Ayala, and L. P. Wang, Settling velocity of small inertial particles in homogeneous isotropic turbulence from high-resolution DNS, Int. J. Multiphase Flow 83, 217 (2016).
  42. R. Gatignol, The Faxén formulae for a rigid particle in an unsteady non-uniform Stokes flow, J. Méc. Théor. Appl. 2, 143 (1983).
  43. M. R. Maxey and J. J. Riley, Equation of motion for a small rigid sphere in a nonuniform flow, Phys. Fluids 26, 883 (1983).
  44. M. R. Maxey, Simulation methods for particulate flows and concentrated suspensions, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 49, 171 (2017).
  45. M. R. Maxey and B. K. Patel, Localized force representations for particles sedimenting in Stokes flow, Int. J. Multiphase Flow 27, 1603 (2001).
  46. R. S. Rogallo, Numerical experiments in homogeneous turbulence, NASA Technical Memorandum No. 81315 (1981).
  47. J. Jímenez and A. Wray, On the characteristics of vortex filaments in isotropic turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 373, 255 (1998).
  48. S. Elghobashi and G. C. Truesdell, On the two-way interaction between homogeneous turbulence and dispersed solid particles. I: Turbulence modification, Phys. Fluids 5, 1790 (1993).
  49. M. Boivin, O. Simonin, and K. D. Squires, Direct numerical simulation of turbulence modulation by particles in isotropic turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 375, 235 (1998).
  50. A. Ferrante and S. Elghobashi, On the physical mechanisms of two-way coupling in particle-laden isotropic turbulence, Phys. Fluids 15, 315 (2003).
  51. J. Tom, M. Carbone, and D. Bragg, How does two-way coupling modify particle settling and the role of multiscale preferential sweeping? J. Fluid Mech. 947, A7 (2022).
  52. P. Gualtieri, F. Pican, G. Sardina, and C. M. Casciola, Exact regularized point particle method for multiphase flows in the two-way coupling regime, J. Fluid Mech. 773, 520 (2015).
  53. J. A. K. Horwitz and A. Mani, Accurate calculation of Stokes drag for point–particle tracking in two-way coupled flows, J. Comput. Phys. 318, 85 (2016).
  54. P. J. Ireland and O. Dejardin, Improving drag predictions in Euler-Lagrangian simulations with two-way coupling, J. Comput. Phys. 338, 405 (2017).
  55. J. A. K. Horwitz and A. Mani, Correction scheme for point-particle models applied to a nonlinear drag law in simulations of particle-fluid interaction, Int. J. Multiphase Flow 101, 74 (2018).
  56. M. Mehrabadi, J. A. K. Horwitz, and A. Mani, A direct comparison of particle-resolved and point-particle methods in decaying turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 850, 336 (2018).
  57. J. F. Poustis, J. M. Senoner, D. Zuzio, and P. Villedieu, Regularization of the Lagrangian point force approximation for deterministic discrete particle simulations, Int. J. Multiphase Flow 117, 138 (2019).
  58. S. Balachandar, K. Liu, and M. Lakhote, Self-induced velocity correction for improved drag estimation in Euler-Lagrange poin-particle simulations, J. Comput. Phys. 376, 160 (2019).
  59. B. L. Sawford, P. Yeung, M. S. Borgas, P. Vedula, A. La Porta, A. M. Crawford, and E. Bodenschatz, Conditional and unconditional acceleration statistics in turbulence, Phys. Fluids 15, 3478 (2003).
  60. R. Garg, C. Narayanan, D. Lakehal, and S. Subramaniam, Accurate numerical estimation of interphasemomentum transfer in Lagrangian-Eulerian simulations of dispersed two-phase flows, Int. J. Multiphase Flow 33, 1337 (2007).
  61. F. Balboa Usabiaga, R. Delgado-Buscalioni, B. E. Griffith, and A. Donev, Inertial coupling method for particles in an incompressible fluctuating fluid, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 269, 139 (2014).
  62. R. Monchaux, M. Bourgoin, and A. Cartellier, Analyzing preferential concentration and clustering of inertial particles in turbulence, Int. J. Multiphase Flow 40, 1 (2012).
  63. R. Monchaux, M. Bourgoin, and A. Cartellier, Preferential concentration of heavy particles: A Voronoi analysis, Phys. Fluids 22, 103304 (2010).
  64. J.-S. Ferenc and Z. Néda, On the size distribution of Poisson Voronoi cells, Phys. A 385, 518 (2007).
  65. M. Romain, Measuring concentration with Voronoï diagrams: Study of possible biases, New J. Phys. 14, 095013 (2012).
  66. J. Bec, L. Biferale, M. Cencini, A. S. Lanotte, and F. Toschi, Effects of vortex filaments on the velocity of tracers and heavy particles in turbulence, Phys. Fluids 18, 081702 (2006).
  67. J. K. Eaton and J. R. Fessler, Preferential concentration of particles by turbulence, Int. J. Multiphase Flow 20, 169 (1994).
  68. P. D. Huck, C. Bateson, R. Volk, A. Cartellier, M. Bourgoin, and A. Aliseda, The role of collective effects on settling velocity enhancement for inertial particles in turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 846, 1059 (2018).
  69. T. Berk and F. Coletti, Dynamics of small heavy particles in homogeneous turbulence: A Lagrangian experimental study, J. Fluid Mech. 917, A47 (2021).
  70. M. R. Wells and D. E. Stock, The effects of crossing trajectories on the dispersion of articles in a turbulent flow, J. Fluid Mech. 136, 31 (1983).
  71. T. Zürner, C. Toupoint, D. De Souza, D. Mezouane, and R. Monchaux, Settling of localized particle plumes in a quiescent water tank, Phys. Rev. Fluids 8, 024301 (2023).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation