Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Polydisperse collision kernels in droplet-laden turbulence with implications for rain formation

Lukas A. Codispoti*, Daniel W. Meyer, and Patrick Jenny

  • *Contact author: lukasco@ethz.ch

Phys. Rev. Fluids 11, 064601 – Published 1 June, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/kxxm-ghty

Abstract

The collision kernel of droplets in warm clouds is a crucially important quantity for the parametrization of precipitation in weather and climate models. Nevertheless, its accurate representation remains a challenge, specifically in the bottleneck range 15µm<r<40µm, within which turbulence is believed to substantially contribute to droplet growth. In this work, we address this problem by performing direct numerical simulations of polydisperse inertial particles suspended in three-dimensional turbulence at Reynolds number up to Reλ=418. Collision statistics are compiled for droplet pairs across the Stokes number range St[0.02,2], yielding comprehensive bidisperse maps of collision kernels, radial relative velocities, and radial distribution functions at contact. Our analysis reveals that polydispersity enhances collisions between light droplets through differential sampling, but attenuates collisions at larger Stokes numbers by rapidly reducing the spatial overlap of droplet clusters. By benchmarking existing models, we show that dominant bidisperse errors arise from overpredicted cross-species clustering. In light of these results, we propose an adapted model for the bidisperse radial distribution function, as well as a novel parametrization for the associated collision kernel, applicable to the smallest droplets in the bottleneck range with small settling velocities. Finally, we study the broadening of the droplet size distribution due to collision-coalescence and demonstrate that droplet growth is markedly accelerated in parcels of large local dissipation rate, supporting the hypothesis that turbulent intermittency may help overcome the bottleneck barrier.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (44)

  1. E. Bodenschatz, S. P. Malinowski, R. A. Shaw, and F. Stratmann, Can we understand clouds without turbulence? Science 327, 970 (2010).
  2. W. W. Grabowski and L.-P. Wang, Growth of cloud droplets in a turbulent environment, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 45, 293 (2013).
  3. M. R. Maxey, The gravitational settling of aerosol particles in homogeneous turbulence and random flow fields, J. Fluid Mech. 174, 441 (1987).
  4. K. D. Squires and J. K. Eaton, Preferential concentration of particles by turbulence, Phys. Fluids 3, 1169 (1991).
  5. M. Cencini, J. Bec, L. Biferale, G. Boffetta, A. Celani, A. S. Lanotte, S. Musacchio, and F. Toschi, Dynamics and statistics of heavy particles in turbulent flows, J. Turbul. 7, N36 (2006).
  6. B. Ray and L. R. Collins, Preferential concentration and relative velocity statistics of inertial particles in Navier-Stokes turbulence with and without filtering, J. Fluid Mech. 680, 488 (2011).
  7. M. James and S. S. Ray, Enhanced droplet collision rates and impact velocities in turbulent flows: The effect of poly-dispersity and transient phases, Sci. Rep. 7, 12231 (2017).
  8. V. Nair, B. Devenish, and M. van Reeuwijk, Effect of gravity on particle clustering and collisions in decaying turbulence, Flow, Turbul. Combust. 110, 889 (2023).
  9. Y. Zhou, A. S. Wexler, and L.-P. Wang, Modelling turbulent collision of bidisperse inertial particles, J. Fluid Mech. 433, 77 (2001).
  10. G. Falkovich, A. Fouxon, and M. G. Stepanov, Acceleration of rain initiation by cloud turbulence, Nature (London) 419, 151 (2002).
  11. M. Wilkinson and B. Mehlig, Caustics in turbulent aerosols, Europhysics Letters (EPL) 71, 186 (2005).
  12. J. Meibohm, L. Sundberg, B. Mehlig, and K. Gustavsson, Caustic formation in a non-Gaussian model for turbulent aerosols, Phys. Rev. Fluids 9, 024302 (2024).
  13. L. A. Codispoti, D. W. Meyer, and P. Jenny, Dissecting inertial clustering and sling dynamics in high-Reynolds number particle-laden turbulence, Phys. Fluids 37, 015161 (2025).
  14. G. P. Bewley, E.-W. Saw, and E. Bodenschatz, Observation of the sling effect, New J. Phys. 15, 083051 (2013).
  15. P. Deepu, S. Ravichandran, and R. Govindarajan, Caustics-induced coalescence of small droplets near a vortex, Phys. Rev. Fluids 2, 024305 (2017).
  16. I. Fouxon, S. Lee, and C. Lee, Intermittency and collisions of fast sedimenting droplets in turbulence, Phys. Rev. Fluids 7, 124303 (2022).
  17. S. Ravichandran and R. Govindarajan, Waltz of tiny droplets and the flow they live in, Phys. Rev. Fluids 7, 110512 (2022).
  18. H. Siebert, R. A. Shaw, J. Ditas, T. Schmeissner, S. P. Malinowski, E. Bodenschatz, and H. Xu, High-resolution measurement of cloud microphysics and turbulence at a mountaintop station, Atmos. Meas. Tech. 8, 3219 (2015).
  19. B. Thiede, M. L. Larsen, F. Nordsiek, O. Schlenczek, E. Bodenschatz, and G. Bagheri, Highly localised droplet clustering in shallow cumulus clouds, arXiv:2502.19272.
  20. N. Allwayin, M. L. Larsen, S. Glienke, and R. A. Shaw, Locally narrow droplet size distributions are ubiquitous in stratocumulus clouds, Science 384, 528 (2024).
  21. A. B. Kostinski and R. A. Shaw, Fluctuations and luck in droplet growth by coalescence, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 86, 235 (2005).
  22. R. Onishi and J. C. Vassilicos, Collision statistics of inertial particles in two-dimensional homogeneous isotropic turbulence with an inverse cascade, J. Fluid Mech. 745, 279 (2014).
  23. R. Onishi, K. Matsuda, and K. Takahashi, Lagrangian tracking simulation of droplet growth in turbulence–turbulence enhancement of autoconversion rate, J. Atmos. Sci. 72, 2591 (2015).
  24. R. Onishi and A. Seifert, Reynolds-number dependence of turbulence enhancement on collision growth, Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16, 12441 (2016).
  25. P. J. Ireland, A. D. Bragg, and L. R. Collins, The effect of Reynolds number on inertial particle dynamics in isotropic turbulence. Part 1. Simulations without gravitational effects, J. Fluid Mech. 796, 617 (2016).
  26. S. Sundaram and L. R. Collins, Collision statistics in an isotropic particle-laden turbulent suspension. Part 1. Direct numerical simulations, J. Fluid Mech. 335, 75 (1997).
  27. L.-P. Wang, A. S. Wexler, and Y. Zhou, Statistical mechanical descriptions of turbulent coagulation, Phys. Fluids 10, 2647 (1998).
  28. K. Gustavsson and B. Mehlig, Statistical models for spatial patterns of heavy particles in turbulence, Adv. Phys. 65, 1 (2016).
  29. F. Hoffmann, Y. Noh, and S. Raasch, The route to raindrop formation in a shallow cumulus cloud simulated by a Lagrangian cloud model, J. Atmos. Sci. 74, 2125 (2017).
  30. K. K. Chandrakar, H. Morrison, W. W. Grabowski, and R. P. Lawson, Are turbulence effects on droplet collision–coalescence a key to understanding observed rain formation in clouds? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2319664121 (2024).
  31. O. Ayala, B. Rosa, and L.-P. Wang, Effects of turbulence on the geometric collision rate of sedimenting droplets. Part 2. Theory and parameterization, New J. Phys. 10, 075016 (2008).
  32. L.-P. Wang, A. S. Wexler, and Y. Zhou, Statistical mechanical description and modelling of turbulent collision of inertial particles, J. Fluid Mech. 415, 117 (2000).
  33. Y. Li, E. Perlman, M. Wan, Y. Yang, C. Meneveau, R. Burns, S. Chen, A. Szalay, and G. Eyink, A public turbulence database cluster and applications to study Lagrangian evolution of velocity increments in turbulence, J. Turbul. 9, N31 (2008).
  34. P. Jenny, M. Torrilhon, and S. Heinz, A solution algorithm for the fluid dynamic equations based on a stochastic model for molecular motion, J. Comput. Phys. 229, 1077 (2010).
  35. Message Passing Interface Forum, MPI: A message-passing interface standard version 4.0 (2021), https://www.mpi-forum.org/docs/mpi-4.0/mpi40-report.pdf.
  36. M. Voßkuhle, A. Pumir, E. Lévêque, and M. Wilkinson, Prevalence of the sling effect for enhancing collision rates in turbulent suspensions, J. Fluid Mech. 749, 841 (2014).
  37. M. Wilkinson, B. Mehlig, and V. Bezuglyy, Caustic activation of rain showers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 048501 (2006).
  38. L. Pan and P. Padoan, Relative velocity of inertial particles in turbulent flows, J. Fluid Mech. 661, 73 (2010).
  39. J. Abrahamson, Collision rates of small particles in a vigorously turbulent fluid, Chem. Eng. Sci. 30, 1371 (1975).
  40. Y. Zhou, A. S. Wexler, and L.-P. Wang, On the collision rate of small particles in isotropic turbulence. II. Finite inertia case, Phys. Fluids 10, 1206 (1998).
  41. P. A. Vaillancourt and M. K. Yau, Review of particle-turbulence interactions and consequences for cloud physics, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 81, 285 (2000).
  42. P. J. Ireland, A. D. Bragg, and L. R. Collins, The effect of Reynolds number on inertial particle dynamics in isotropic turbulence. Part 2. Simulations with gravitational effects, J. Fluid Mech. 796, 659 (2016).
  43. J. Bec, S. S. Ray, E. W. Saw, and H. Homann, Abrupt growth of large aggregates by correlated coalescences in turbulent flow, Phys. Rev. E 93, 031102(R) (2016).
  44. F. E. Kruis and K. A. Kusters, The collision rate of particles in turbulent flow, Chem. Eng. Commun. 158, 201 (1997).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation