Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Drag regimes of acoustic liners in a turbulent channel flow without acoustic excitation

Paul Kraemer*, Olivier Léon, Fabien Méry, and Estelle Piot

  • *Contact author: paul.kraemer@onera.fr

Phys. Rev. Fluids 11, 074608 – Published 29 July, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/kgyh-7dq5

Abstract

In this study, we investigate the drag regimes of acoustic liners in the absence of external acoustic excitation. Friction coefficients Cf are estimated in a turbulent channel flow over a wide range of Reynolds numbers using mean pressure-drop measurements. Two main drag regimes are identified: a viscous regime and a transitional regime in which pressure drag becomes significant. Within the transitional regime, two distinct behaviors are observed. The first exhibits low to moderate Cf increments relative to the smooth-wall reference, consistent with d-type roughness trends. The second exhibits large drag increases associated with the onset of aeroacoustic resonance at the liner resonance frequency, which significantly distorts the mean velocity profiles. Despite the one-decade range of Reynolds numbers investigated, no fully rough regime is reached, questioning current approaches to modeling acoustic liner drag. Finally, liner hierarchy in terms of Cf within the transitional regime correlates satisfactorily with a geometric dimensionless parameter λf, analogous to the frontal solidity used in roughness studies, offering insight into the role of orifice geometry in liner drag.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (46)

  1. B. M. Howerton and M. G. Jones, Acoustic liner drag: A parametric study of conventional configurations, in 21st AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (AIAA, Reston, VA, 2015), AIAA Paper 2015-2230.
  2. B. Howerton and M. Jones, A conventional liner acoustic/drag interaction benchmark database, in 23rd AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, 2017 (AIAA, Reston, VA, 2017), AIAA Paper 2017-4190.
  3. M. Zheng, C. Chen, and X. Li, Experimental investigation of factors influencing acoustic liner drag using direct measurement, Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 130, 107903 (2022).
  4. H. Shahzad, S. Hickel, and D. Modesti, Turbulence and added drag over acoustic liners, J. Fluid Mech. 965, A10 (2023).
  5. J. Jiménez, Turbulent flows over rough walls, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 36, 173 (2004).
  6. D. Chung, N. Hutchins, M. P. Schultz, and K. A. Flack, Predicting the drag of rough surfaces, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 53, 439 (2021).
  7. B. M. Howerton, Acoustic liner drag: Measurement uncertainty reduction and application to novel perforate geometries, in 30th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (AIAA, Reston, VA, 2024), AIAA Paper 2024-3247.
  8. M. Zheng, C. Chen, and X. Li, Aerodynamic drag reduction of acoustic liners without compromising sound absorption performance, AIAA J. 64, 3775 (2026).
  9. Q. Zhang and D. Bodony, Numerical investigation of a honeycomb liner grazed by laminar and turbulent boundary layers, J. Fluid Mech. 792, 936 (2016).
  10. O. Léon, F. Méry, E. Piot, and C. Conte, Near-wall aerodynamic response of an acoustic liner to harmonic excitation with grazing flow, Exp. Fluids 60, 144 (2019).
  11. S. B. Pope, Turbulent Flows (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000).
  12. A. Güttler, High accuracy determination of skin friction differences in an air channel flow based on pressure drop measurements, Ph.D. thesis, Karlsruher Institut für Technologie, 2017.
  13. R. B. Dean, Reynolds number dependence of skin friction and other bulk flow variables in two-dimensional rectangular duct flow, J. Fluids Eng. 100, 215 (1978).
  14. M. P. Schultz and K. A. Flack, Reynolds-number scaling of turbulent channel flow, Phys. Fluids 25, 025104 (2013).
  15. I. Marusic, B. J. McKeon, P. A. Monkewitz, H. M. Nagib, A. J. Smits, and K. R. Sreenivasan, Wall-bounded turbulent flows at high Reynolds numbers: Recent advances and key issues, Phys. Fluids 22, 065103 (2010).
  16. F. Durst, M. Fischer, J. Jovanovic´, and H. Kikura, Methods to set up and investigate low Reynolds number, fully developed turbulent plane channel flows, J. Fluids Eng. 120, 496 (1998).
  17. E.-S. Zanoun, F. Durst, and H. Nagib, Evaluating the law of the wall in two-dimensional fully developed turbulent channel flows, Phys. Fluids 15, 3079 (2003).
  18. J. P. Monty, Developments in smooth wall turbulent duct flows, Ph.D. thesis, University of Melbourne, Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, 2005.
  19. D. Marx, Developed spatial turbulent channel flow simulation for acoustic wave propagation, Computers & Fluids 245, 105586 (2022).
  20. E.-S. Zanoun, H. Nagib, and F. Durst, Refined cf relation for turbulent channels and consequences for high-Re experiments, Fluid Dyn. Res. 41, 021405 (2009).
  21. J. Nikuradse, Laws of flow in rough pipes, Technical Memorandum 1292 (National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Washington, DC, 1950).
  22. C. F. Colebrook, C. M. White, and G. I. Taylor, Experiments with fluid friction in roughened pipes, Proc. R. Soc. A 161, 367 (1937).
  23. T. Ishii, K. Nagai, H. Oinuma, and S. Enomoto, Experimental study of acoustic liner panels shared in IFAR program, in 25th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (AIAA, Reston, VA, 2019), AIAA Paper 2019-2602.
  24. Y. Murata, T. Ishii, S. Enomoto, H. Oinuma, K. Nagai, J. Oki, and H. Daiguji, Acoustic liners combined with fine perforated film, AIAA J. 62, 2200 (2024).
  25. J. Gustavsson, Y. Zhang, L. N. Cattafesta, and J. R. Kreitzman, Acoustic liner drag measurements, in 25th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (AIAA, Reston, VA, 2019), AIAA Paper 2019-2683.
  26. C. Jasinski and T. Corke, Mechanism for increased viscous drag over porous sheet acoustic liners, AIAA J. 58, 3393 (2020).
  27. S. Wilkinson, Influence of wall permeability on turbulent boundary-layer properties, in 21st Aerospace Sciences Meeting (AIAA, Reston, VA, 1983), AIAA Paper 1983-294.
  28. B. J. McKeon and A. J. Smits, Static pressure correction in high Reynolds number fully developed turbulent pipe flow, Meas. Sci. Technol. 13, 1608 (2002).
  29. F. A. Macmillan, Experiments on Pitot-Tubes in Shear Flow (Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London, 1957).
  30. S. C. C. Bailey, M. Hultmark, J. P. Monty, P. H. Alfredsson, M. S. Chong, R. D. Duncan, J. H. M. Fransson, N. Hutchins, I. Marusic, B. J. McKeon, et al., Obtaining accurate mean velocity measurements in high Reynolds number turbulent boundary layers using Pitot tubes, J. Fluid Mech. 715, 642 (2013).
  31. H. M. Nagib and K. A. Chauhan, Variations of von Kármán coefficient in canonical flows, Phys. Fluids 20, 101518 (2008).
  32. K. A. Flack and M. P. Schultz, Roughness effects on wall-bounded turbulent flowsa), Phys. Fluids 26, 101305 (2014).
  33. A. E. Perry, W. H. Schofield, and P. N. Joubert, Rough wall turbulent boundary layers, J. Fluid Mech. 37, 383 (1969).
  34. H. H. Ambrose, Discussion of ‘A New Concept of Flow in Rough Conduits’, Proc. Ameri. Soc. Civil Engineers 80, 491, (1954).
  35. V. L. Streeter, W. Rand, and H. H. Ambrose, Discussion of “Streeter on rough conduits”, Trans. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 120, 399 (1955).
  36. R. Sebastian, D. Marx, and V. Fortuné, Numerical simulation of a turbulent channel flow with an acoustic liner, J. Sound Vib. 456, 306 (2019).
  37. D. Marx, R. Sebastian, and V. Fortuné, Simulation of instability and sound production in a turbulent channel flow with an acoustic liner, J. Sound Vib. 573, 118223 (2024).
  38. D. Marx, Y. Aurégan, H. Bailliet, and J.-C. Valière, PIV and LDV evidence of hydrodynamic instability over a liner in a duct with flow, J. Sound Vib. 329, 3798 (2010).
  39. R. Kirby and A. Cummings, The impedance of perforated plates subjected to grazing gas flow and backed by porous media, J. Sound Vib. 217, 619 (1998).
  40. M. Bruneau, Fundamentals of Acoustics (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, 2013).
  41. H. Schlichting, Experimental investigation of the problem of surface roughness, Technical Memorandum No. 823 (National Advisory Commitee for Aeronautics, Washington, DC, 1937).
  42. M. MacDonald, L. Chan, D. Chung, N. Hutchins, and A. Ooi, Turbulent flow over transitionally rough surfaces with varying roughness densities, J. Fluid Mech. 804, 130 (2016).
  43. X. I. A. Yang and C. Meneveau, Large eddy simulations and parameterisation of roughness element orientation and flow direction effects in rough wall boundary layers, J. Turbul. 17, 1072 (2016).
  44. C. Meneveau, N. Hutchins, and D. Chung, The wind-shade roughness model for turbulent wall-bounded flows, J. Fluid Mech. 1001, A3 (2024).
  45. A. Favre, Équations des gaz turbulents compressibles. II. Méthode des vitesses moyennes; méthode des vitesses moyennes pondérées par la masse volumique, J. de Méc. 4, 391 (1965).
  46. T. B. Gatski and J.-P. Bonnet, Compressibility, Turbulence and High Speed Flow (Elsevier, Oxford, 2013).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation