- Access by Xinjiang University
Data-driven augmentation of a turbulence model in three dimensional separated flows
Phys. Rev. Fluids 11, 074607 – Published 29 July, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/gqry-jcsy
Abstract
Classic turbulence models often struggle to accurately predict complex flows. Although data-driven techniques have addressed these shortcomings, most existing research has concentrated on two-dimensional (2D) cases. In this study, we bridge this gap by enhancing a data-driven turbulence model, the shear stress transport-conditioned (SST-CND) model, which was originally trained on 2D separated flows, in three-dimensional (3D) scenarios. An additional correction term is introduced to account for 3D effects. The distribution of this term is determined through a 3D field inversion process using high-fidelity data obtained from the flow around a cube. An algebraic expression for is then derived through symbolic regression and formulated to degrade to zero in 2D cases. The performance of the resulting SST-CND3D model is evaluated across a range of flows. In 2D flows, the SST-CND3D model performs identically to its 2D-trained predecessor. However, the model exhibits superior performance in 3D flows, such as the flow around the complex JAXA standard model high-lift configuration. These findings indicate that a sequential approach, constructing a 3D correction term that vanishes in 2D on top of a 2D-trained model, constitutes a promising method for developing data-driven turbulence models that perform accurately in 3D while preserving their effectiveness in 2D.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (48)
- C. L. Rumsey, Exploring a method for improving turbulent separated-flow predictions with k-omega models, NASA/TM-2009-215952 (NASA, 2009).
- F. Aqilah, M. Islam, J. Fürst, and F. Juretić, CFD analysis around Ahmed body using a laminar kinetic energy based transition and turbulence model, in Proceedings of the Topical Problems of Fluid Mechanics, edited by D. Šimurda and T. Bodnár (IMCE, Prague, 2019), pp. 1–6.
- H. Li, Y. Zhang, and H. Chen, Aerodynamic prediction of iced airfoils based on modified three-equation turbulence model, AIAA J. 58, 3863 (2020).
- S. Zhang, H. Li, Y. Zhang, and H. Chen, Aerodynamic prediction of high-lift configuration using turbulence model, AIAA J. 60, 2916 (2022).
- S. Zhang, H. Li, and Y. Zhang, Aerodynamic prediction of the high-lift common research model with modified turbulence model, AIAA J. 62, 2723 (2024).
- K. Duraisamy, P. R. Spalart, and C. L. Rumsey, Status, emerging ideas and future directions of turbulence modeling research in aeronautics, NASA/TM-2017-219682 (NASA, 2017).
- K. Duraisamy, G. Iaccarino, and H. Xiao, Turbulence modeling in the age of data, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 51, 357 (2019).
- J. Ling, A. Kurzawski, and J. Templeton, Reynolds averaged turbulence modelling using deep neural networks with embedded invariance, J. Fluid Mech. 807, 155 (2016).
- Y. Yin, P. Yang, Y. Zhang, H. Chen, and S. Fu, Feature selection and processing of turbulence modeling based on an artificial neural network, Phys. Fluids 32, 105117 (2020).
- H. Tang, Y. Wang, T. Wang, and L. Tian, Discovering explicit Reynolds-averaged turbulence closures for turbulent separated flows through deep learning-based symbolic regression with non-linear corrections, Phys. Fluids 35, 025118 (2023).
- Y. Zhao, H. D. Akolekar, J. Weatheritt, V. Michelassi, and R. D. Sandberg, RANS turbulence model development using CFD-driven machine learning, J. Comput. Phys. 411, 109413 (2020).
- M. J. Rincón, M. Reclari, X. I. A. Yang, and M. Abkar, A generalisable data-augmented turbulence model with progressive and interpretable corrections for incompressible wall-bounded flows, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 116, 109970 (2025).
- A. P. Singh, S. Medida, and K. Duraisamy, Machine-learning-augmented predictive modeling of turbulent separated flows over airfoils, AIAA J. 55, 2215 (2017).
- J. R. Holland, J. D. Baeder, and K. Duraisamy, Field inversion and machine learning with embedded neural networks: Physics-consistent neural network training, AIAA 2019-3200, AIAA Aviation 2019 Forum (AIAA, Dallas, Texas, 2019).
- V. Srivastava and K. Duraisamy, Towards a generalizable data-driven approach to predict separation-induced transition, in 12th International Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena (TSFP12) (TSFP, Osaka, Japan, 2022).
- C. Wu and Y. Zhang, Enhancing the shear-stress-transport turbulence model with symbolic regression: A generalizable and interpretable data-driven approach, Phys. Rev. Fluids 8, 084604 (2023).
- S. Zhang, C. Wu, and Y. Zhang, Three-dimensional high-lift configuration simulation using data-driven turbulence model, Phys. Fluids 37, 075139 (2025).
- C. Wu, S. Zhang, and Y. Zhang, Development of a generalizable data-driven turbulence model: Conditioned field inversion and symbolic regression, AIAA J. 63, 687 (2025).
- J. Ho and A. West, Field inversion and machine learning for turbulence modelling applied to three-dimensional separated flows, AIAA 2021-2903, AIAA Aviation 2021 Forum (AIAA, 2021).
- C. Yan, Y. Zhang, and H. Chen, Data augmented turbulence modeling for three-dimensional separation flows, Phys. Fluids 34, 075101 (2022).
- J. Bell, J. Heineck, G. Zilliac, R. Mehta, and K. Long, Surface and flow field measurements on the FAITH hill model, AIAA 2012-0704, in 50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition (AIAA, 2012).
- X. Sun, Y. Liu, W. Zhang, Y. Wang, J. Zou, Z. Han, and Y. Su, Development and deployment of data-driven turbulence model for three-dimensional complex configurations, Mach. Learn.: Sci. Technol. 5, 035085 (2024).
- J. Steiner, R. Dwight, and A. Viré, Data-driven turbulence modeling for wind turbine wakes under neutral conditions, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1618, 062051 (2020).
- A. Avdis, S. Lardeau, and M. Leschziner, Large eddy simulation of separated flow over a two-dimensional hump with and without control by means of a synthetic slot-jet, Flow Turbul. Combust. 83, 343 (2009).
- Y. Bentaleb, S. Lardeau, and M. A. Leschziner, Large-eddy simulation of turbulent boundary layer separation from a rounded step, J. Turbul. 13, N4 (2012).
- F. R. Menter, Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications, AIAA J. 32, 1598 (1994).
- P. E. Gill, W. Murray, and M. A. Saunders, : An SQP algorithm for large-scale constrained optimization, SIAM Rev. 47, 99 (2005).
- A. Jameson and S. Kim, Reduction of the adjoint gradient formula for aerodynamic shape optimization problems, AIAA J. 41, 2114 (2003).
- A. C. Duffy, An introduction to gradient computation by the discrete adjoint method, Technical Report (2009), https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/An-Introduction-to-Gradient-Computation-by-the-Duffy/5278ad3d426c123e2f1642f47fb73d0cd64317ed.
- P. He, C. A. Mader, J. R. R. A. Martins, and K. J. Maki, An aerodynamic design optimization framework using a discrete adjoint approach with OpenFOAM, Comput. Fluids 168, 285 (2018).
- P. He, C. A. Mader, J. R. R. A. Martins, and K. J. Maki, : An open-source adjoint framework for multidisciplinary design optimization with OpenFOAM, AIAA J. 58, 1304 (2020).
- M. Sagebaum, T. Albring, and N. R. Gauger, High-performance derivative computations using , ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 45, 1 (2019).
- S. B. Pope, A more general effective-viscosity hypothesis, J. Fluid Mech. 72, 331 (1975).
- D. C. Wilcox, Formulation of the -ω turbulence model revisited, AIAA J. 46, 2823 (2008).
- M. Cranmer, Interpretable machine learning for science with PySR and SymbolicRegression.jl, arXiv:2305.01582.
- R. Martinuzzi and C. Tropea, The flow around surface-mounted, prismatic obstacles placed in a fully developed channel flow (data bank contribution), J. Fluids Eng. 115, 85 (1993).
- G. Iaccarino, A. Ooi, P. A. Durbin, and M. Behnia, Reynolds averaged simulation of unsteady separated flow, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 24, 147 (2003).
- B. L. da Silva, D. Sumner, and D. J. Bergstrom, On the flow dynamics around a surface-mounted cube and boundary layer effects, J. Fluid Mech. 991, A17 (2024).
- H. Jasak, OpenFOAM: Open source CFD in research and industry, Int. J. Nav. Archit. Ocean Eng. 1, 89 (2009).
- C. L. Rumsey, CFL3D Version 6 home page NASA (1980), https://nasa.github.io/CFL3D/.
- B. G. Arlinger and T. Larsson, NLR 7301 two element airfoil at high lift, Notes Numer. Fluid Mech. 58, 375 (1997).
- K. Wieghardt and W. Tillmann, On the turbulent friction layer for rising pressure, Report No. NACA-TM-1314 (1951).
- OpenCFD Ltd., Turbulent flat plate (2018), https://www.openfoam.com/documentation/guides/latest/doc/verification-validation-turbulent-flat-plate-zpg.html.
- R. L. Simpson and C. H. Long, Study of vortical separation from an axisymmetric hill, in Second Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena (Begell House Inc., Danbury, 2001), pp. 65–70.
- M. Garcia-Villalba, N. Li, W. Rodi, and M. A. Leschziner, Large-eddy simulation of separated flow over a three-dimensional axisymmetric hill, J. Fluid Mech. 627, 55 (2009).
- G. Byun and R. L. Simpson, Structure of three-dimensional separated flow on an axisymmetric bump, AIAA J. 44, 999 (2006).
- N. M. Husen, S. Woodiga, T. Liu, and J. Sullivan, Global luminescent oil-film skin-friction meter generalized to three-dimensional geometry and applied to FAITH hill, in 52nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting (AIAA, 2014).
- C. L. Rumsey, J. P. Slotnick, and A. J. Sclafani, Overview and summary of the third AIAA high lift prediction workshop, AIAA Aerosp. Sci. Meet. 56, 621 (2018).