- Access by Xinjiang University
Free-stream conicity effects on hypersonic laminar flow over a slender sharp cone
Phys. Rev. Fluids 11, 103401 – Published 5 October, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/bh3c-r25b
Abstract
The influence of free-stream conicity on flow over a slender sharp cone was investigated. A unified parameter , relating to the degree of freestream conicity, is defined; both theoretical analysis and numerical simulation were conducted for a range of flow conditions. Results show that conicity can strongly alter surface pressure, boundary-layer thickness, edge density, and wall heat flux compared to parallel flow, while the shock shape is less sensitive. Inviscid analysis reveals that the conicity response is governed by the hypersonic similarity parameter and streamwise coordinate ; normalized distributions for identical collapse into the same curve, indicating that conicity acts primarily as a streamwise scaling. At high Mach numbers, strong viscous interaction modifies the effective body shape and degrades the accuracy of analytical predictions, disrupting the scaling collapse. Thermochemical nonequilibrium has a minor effect on conicity corrections, although species distributions do not follow the scaling because they are controlled by finite-rate chemistry. Empirical transition assessment shows that conicity can delay or even suppress transition by increasing the transition Reynolds number and reducing the local edge Reynolds number. Since large conicity significantly affects the flow over slender cones, it is essential to first quantify the conicity level in experiments. If the conicity is non-negligible, its effects must be accounted for; when strong viscous interaction invalidates analytical scaling, CFD corrections should be introduced. The conicity metric is not restricted to conical nozzles and can be extended to other divergent free streams using the Mach number gradient.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (57)
- H. Hornung, Effect of conical free stream on shock stand-off distance, AIAA J. 57, 4115 (2019).
- P. M. Finch, J. J. Girard, T. Schwartz, C. L. Strand, R. K. Hanson, W. M. Yu, J. M. Austin, and H. G. Hornung, Measurements of T5 shock tunnel freestream temperature, velocity, and composition, AIAA J. 61, 1555 (2023).
- S. Gu, C.-Y. Wen, J. Hao, W. Wang, and Q. Wang, The influence of hypersonic free-stream conicity on the flow over a sphere, J. Fluid Mech. 989, A10 (2024).
- D. E. Gildfind, P. A. Jacobs, R. J. Gollan, P. Toniato, T. J. McIntyre, A. Andrianatos, C. M. James, and R. G. Morgan, Flow characterization and modeling of the X2 and X3 expansion tubes, in VKI Lecture Series STO-EN-AVT-325 on Flow Characterization and Modeling of Hypersonic Wind Tunnels (NATO Science and Technology Organization (STO), Neuilly-sur-Seine, 2018).
- E. N. Hoffman, E. J. LaLonde, A. Andrade, I. Chen, H. A. Bilbo, and C. S. Combs, Flow characterization of the UTSA hypersonic Ludwieg tube, Aerospace 10, 463 (2023).
- H. Ashkenas and F. S. Sherman, Structure and utilization of supersonic free jets in low density wind tunnels, Technical Report No. NASA-CR-60423, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), Washington, DC (1965).
- J. D. Whitfield and G. D. Norfleet, Source Flow Effects in Conical Hypervelocity Nozzles (Arnold Engineering Development Center, Air Force Systems Command, USA, 1962).
- S. Gu, H. Olivier, C.-Y. Wen, J. Hao, and Q. Wang, Characterization of reflected shock tunnel air conditions using a simple method, Phys. Fluids 34, 056103 (2022).
- A. Kharitonov, V. Zvegintsev, N. Adamov, L. Vasenev, A. Kuraeva, D. Nalivajchenko, A. Novikov, S. Shpak, and V. Chirkashenko, Calibration trials of working capabilities of the new hypersonic wind tunnel AT-303 at ITAM, in Proceedings of the 1st European Conference for Aerospace Sciences (EUCASS), Moscow (Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 2005).
- C. G. Miller, Expansion tunnel performance with and without an electromagneticallyopened tertiary diaphragm, AIAA J. 15, 1045 (1977).
- G. P. Menees, Experimental study of wall boundary layer growth in the 10 deg half angle conical nozzle of a reflected shock tunnel, Technical Report No. NASA-TM-X-2647, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), Washington, DC, USA (1972).
- U. Koch, A. Gülhan, and B. Esser, Two dimensional spatially resolved two photon oxygen atom laser induced fluorescence measurements in the flow field of the arc heated facility L3K, in Proceedings of the Fifth European Symposium on Aerothermodynamics for Space Vehicles (ESA SP-563), 8–11 November 2004, Cologne, Germany, edited by D. Danesy (ESA Publications Division, Noordwijk, 2005), Vol. 563, p. 493.
- H. Tanno and K. Itoh, Flow characterization and current technical research issues of the HIEST hypersonic facility, Technical Report No. Number: STO-EN-AVT-325, NATO Science and Technology Organization (STO), Neuilly-sur-Seine, France (2018).
- J. G. Hall and A. L. Russo, Recent studies of nonequilibrium flows at the Cornell Aeronautical Laboratory, in Agard Colloq. on Recent Advan. in Aerothermochem., NASA-CR-74170 (National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), Washington, DC, 1966).
- L. Lees and T. Kubota, Inviscid hypersonic flow over blunt-nosed slender bodies, J. Aeronaut. Sci. 24, 195 (1957).
- M. Inouye, Numerical solutions for blunt axisymmetric bodies in a supersonic spherical source flow, Technical Report No. NASA-TN-D-3383, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), Washington, DC, USA (1966).
- E. Shapiro, Similarity properties with the flow of supersonic uniform and nonuniform flows of gas around a sphere, Fluid Dyn. 10, 69 (1975).
- S. B. Savage, Effects of a source-type hypersonic free stream on the flow field about an axisymmetric cone, Aeronaut. Q. 17, 161 (1966).
- A. R. George, Nonuniform hypersonic flow past a wedge, Phys. Fluids 9, 453 (1966).
- M. Yasuhara and S. Watanabe, Inviscid hypersonic source flow, over slender power-law bodies, Aeronaut. Q. 26, 165 (1975).
- H. Hornung, N. Gibbons, R. Gollan, and P. Jacobs, Effect of conical free stream on shock detachment and heat flux in hypersonic blunt-body flows, in International Symposium on Shock Waves (Springer, Berlin, 2023), pp. 365–374.
- L. M. Mack, Boundary-layer linear stability theory, in Special Course on Stability and Transition of Laminar Flow, AGARD-R-709 (Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development (AGARD), Neuilly-sur-Seine, France, 1984).
- H. B. Johnson, T. G. Seipp, and G. V. Candler, Numerical study of hypersonic reacting boundary layer transition on cones, Phys. Fluids 10, 2676 (1998).
- M. Gorgui, The hypersonic source flow past wedges and cones, Aeronaut. Q. 22, 327 (1971).
- M. Yasuhara and T. Nakajirna, Parallel-source correspondence in the hypersonic slender-body theory, AIAA J. 15, 1667 (1977).
- M. Yasuhara, Y. Nakamura, K. Tsuboi, and K. Kuwabara, Theory and shock tunnel experiments on flow past hypersonic vehicles, Memoirs of the Faculty of Engineering, Nagoya University 42, 290 (1991).
- M. Lebedev and Y. N. Sadkov, Calculation of radial supersonic gas flow past sharp-nosed cones, Comput. Math. Model. 7, 148 (1996).
- J. Lukasiewicz, R. Jackson, and J. D. Whitfield, Status of development of hotshot tunnels at the AEDC, in AGARDograph (Elsevier, 1964), Vol. 68, pp. 323–356.
- C. H. Lewis, Pressure Distribution and Shock Shape Over Blunted Slender Cones at Mach Numbers from 16 to 19 (Arnold Engineering Development Center, Air Force Systems Command, USA, 1961).
- J. D. Cole, Newtonian flow theory for slender bodies, J. Aeronaut. Sci. 24, 448 (1957).
- H. K. Cheng, Hypersonic flow with combined leading-edge bluntness and boundary-layer displacement effect, Technical Report No. AF-1285-A-4, Cornell Aeronautical Laboratory, Buffalo, New York (1960).
- H. K. Cheng, J. G. Hall, T. Golian, and A. Hertzberg, Boundary-layer displacement and leading-edge bluntness effects in high-temperature hypersonic flow, J. Aerosp. Sci. 28, 353 (1961).
- M. D. Van Dyke, A study of hypersonic small-disturbance theory, Technical Report No. NACA-TR-1194, National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA), Washington, DC, USA (1954).
- J. G. Hall, Effects of Ambient Nonuniformities in Flow Over Hypersonic Test Bodies, Technical Report No.128, Cornell Aeronautical Laboratory, Buffalo, New York (1963).
- J. D. Anderson, Hypersonic and High Temperature Gas Dynamics (Aiaa, Reston, Virginia, 1989).
- R. J. Gollan and P. A. Jacobs, About the formulation, verification and validation of the hypersonic flow solver Eilmer, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 73, 19 (2013).
- N. N. Gibbons, K. A. Damm, P. A. Jacobs, and R. J. Gollan, Eilmer: An open-source multi-physics hypersonic flow solver, Comput. Phys. Commun. 282, 108551 (2023).
- N. Deepak, S. Gai, and A. Neely, High-enthalpy flow over a rearward-facing step–A computational study, J. Fluid Mech. 695, 405 (2012).
- H. Hornung, R. Gollan, and P. Jacobs, Unsteadiness boundaries in supersonic flow over double cones, J. Fluid Mech. 916, A5 (2021).
- J. R. Edwards, A low-diffusion flux-splitting scheme for Navier-Stokes calculations, Comput. Fluids 26, 635 (1997).
- C. Park, Review of chemical-kinetic problems of future NASA missions. I-Earth entries, J. Thermophys. Heat Transfer 7, 385 (1993).
- M. Saiprakash, C. S. Kumar, G. K. Sunil, S. Rampratap, V. Shanmugam, and G. Balu, Heat transfer rate and surface pressure measurements in short duration hypersonic flow, Aeronaut. J. 123, 1857 (2019).
- B. R. Hollis, M. Barnhardt, M. G. MacLean, A. T. Dufrene, and T. P. Wadhams, Turbulent aeroheating measurements on a 7-deg half-angle sphere-cone in a high-enthalpy expansion tunnel, in 2018 AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA), Reston, Virginia, 2018), p. 0377.
- S. L. Kieweg, J. Ray, V. G. Weirs, B. Carnes, D. Dinzl, B. Freno, M. Howard, E. Phipps, W. Rider, and T. Smith, Validation assessment of hypersonic double-cone flow simulations using uncertainty quantification, sensitivity analysis, and validation metrics, in AIAA SciTech 2019 Forum (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA), Reston, Virginia, 2019), p. 2278.
- J. Sivasubramanian and H. F. Fasel, Direct numerical simulation of transition in a sharp cone boundary layer at Mach 6: Fundamental breakdown, J. Fluid Mech. 768, 175 (2015).
- A. C. Laible, Numerical investigation of boundary-layer transition for cones at Mach 3.5 and 6.0, Ph.D. thesis, University of Arizona, 2011.
- M. Rhode and R. DeLoach, Hypersonic wind tunnel calibration using the modern design of experiments, in 41st AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA), Reston, Virginia, 2005), p. 4274.
- K. G. Bowcutt, J. D. Anderson, and D. Capriotti, Numerical optimization of conical flow waveriders including detailed viscous effects, Aerodynamics of Hypersonic Lifting Vehicles, Technical Report No. AGARD-CP-428, Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development (AGARD), Neuilly-sur-Seine (1987).
- K. G. Bowcutt, J. D. Anderson, and D. Capriotti, Viscous optimized hypersonic waveriders, in 25th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting (1987), p. 272.
- J. Shen, Z. Shao, F. Ji, X. Chen, H. Lu, and H. Ma, High enthalpy non-equilibrium expansion effects in turbulent flow of the conical nozzle, Aerospace 10, 455 (2023).
- K. Hannemann, J. Martinez Schramm, A. Wagner, S. Karl, and V. Hannemann, A closely coupled experimental and numerical approach for hypersonic and high enthalpy flow investigations utilising the HEG shock tunnel and the DLR TAU code-part 2, NATO Research and Technology Organisation, Techinical Report No. RTO-EN-AVT-186, NATO Research and Technology Organisation (RTO), Neuilly-sur-Seine (2010).
- C. Selcan, Advancement of the high-enthalpy free-piston reflected shock tunnel HELM for in situ determination of aerothermal stagnation conditions, Ph.D. thesis, University of the Bundeswehr Munich, 2022.
- W. Zhao, Z. Jiang, T. Saito, J. Lin, H. Yu, and K. Takayama, Performance of a detonation driven shock tunnel, Shock Waves 14, 53 (2005).
- F. F. Schrijer and W. J. Bannink, Description and flow assessment of the Delft hypersonic Ludwieg tube, J. Spacecr. Rockets 47, 125 (2010).
- K. P. Lynch, T. Grasser, R. Spillers, C. Downing, K. Daniel, E. Jans, S. Kearney, B. Morreale, R. Wagnild, and J. Wagner, Design and characterization of the Sandia free-piston reflected shock tunnel, Shock Waves 33, 299 (2023).
- E. Marineau and H. Hornung, Heat flux calibration of T5 hypervelocity shock tunnel conical nozzle in air, in 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA), Reston, Virginia, 2009), p. 1158.
- A. Gülhan, B. Esser, U. Koch, M. Fischer, E. Magens, and V. Hannemann, Characterization of high-enthalpy-flow environment for ablation material tests using advanced diagnostics, AIAA J. 56, 1072 (2018).