Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Flows over backward-facing steps with different spanwise widths

Ke Zheng*, Heri Setiawan, Jimmy Philip, Junghoon Lee, and Jason P. Monty§

  • *Contact author: kzheng1@student.unimelb.edu.au
  • Present address: Ocean Engineering Program, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Bandung, Jawa Barat 40132, Indonesia.
  • Present address: Platforms Division, Defence Science and Technology Group, Victoria 3207, Australia.
  • §Contact author: montyjp@unimelb.edu.au

Phys. Rev. Fluids 9, 124601 – Published 4 December, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.9.124601

Abstract

The separated and reattached flow over backward-facing steps with different spanwise widths is experimentally investigated in a wind tunnel. The height and streamwise length of steps are fixed at 19 mm and 3.95 m, respectively. Five different spanwise aspect ratios (AR), defined as the ratio of step width to height, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 16, are tested. The Reynolds number based on the step height and free-stream velocity is 11 300, and a well-developed turbulent boundary layer is present before the flow encounters the step. Planar particle image velocimetry is employed to measure the velocity field along the centerline over and behind the steps. Results show that the three-dimensional effect becomes more significant as AR increases up to 4 and persists when AR=8, likely attributed to the corner vortices formed alongside the step, as well as rolled up the sidewall shear layer. Surface oil-film flow visualization shows that the effect of side edges on the central flow remains significant until AR reaches 16. For AR=16, the step flow is nominally two dimensional and exhibits similar characteristics as a typical two-dimensional backward-facing step flow. The mean reattachment length increases with AR and then tends to approach an asymptotic level, while a much larger AR may be required for the saturation in the span of the reattachment zone. For AR=4 and 8, a distinct flow structure is observed, characterized by jettisoned flow away from the floor after reattachment, and the distributions of Reynolds stresses are therefore not confined within a narrow region below the step height. The highest Reynolds stresses are observed when AR=4 while the largest-scale turbulence appears when AR=2. Furthermore, as AR increases, the evolution of vortical structures becomes more complex and the spreading of the shear layer slows down.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (47)

  1. L. Chen, K. Asai, T. Nonomura, G. Xi, and T. Liu, A review of backward-facing step (BFS) flow mechanisms, heat transfer and control, Therm. Sci. Eng. Prog. 6, 194 (2018).
  2. F. W. Roos and J. T. Kegelman, Control of coherent structures in reattaching laminar and turbulent shear layers, AIAA J. 24, 1956 (1986).
  3. J. Kim, S. J. Kline, and J. P. Johnston, Investigation of a reattaching turbulent shear layer: Flow over a backward-facing step, ASME J. Fluids Eng. 102, 302 (1980).
  4. J. Kostas, J. Soria, and M. Chong, Particle image velocimetry measurements of a backward-facing step flow, Exp. Fluids 33, 838 (2002).
  5. F.-F. Wang, S.-Q. Wu, and B. Huang, Flow structure and unsteady fluctuation with separation over a two-dimensional backward-facing step, J. Hydrodyn. 31, 1204 (2019).
  6. L. M. Hudy, A. Naguib, and W. M. Humphreys, Stochastic estimation of a separated-flow field using wall-pressure-array measurements, Phys. Fluids 19, 024103 (2007).
  7. J. Rajasekaran, On the flow characteristics behind a backward-facing step and the design of a new axisymmetric model for their study, Master's thesis, University of Toronto, 2011.
  8. K. A. M. Moinuddin, P. N. Joubert, and M. S. Chong, Experimental investigation of turbulence-driven secondary motion over a streamwise external corner, J. Fluid Mech. 511, 1 (2004).
  9. D. E. Abbott and S. J. Kline, Experimental investigation of subsonic turbulent flow over single and double backward-facing steps, ASME J. Basic Eng. 84, 317 (1962).
  10. P. Bradshaw and F. Y. F. Wong, The reattachment and relaxation of a turbulent shear layer, J. Fluid Mech. 52, 113 (1972).
  11. F. Durst and C. Tropea, Flows over two-dimensional backward-facing steps, in Proceedings of Structure of Complex Turbulent Shear Flow IUTAM Symposium, edited by R. Dumas and L. Fulachier (Springer-Verlag, Marseille, France, 1982), pp. 41–52.
  12. P. M. Nadge and R. N. Govardhan, High Reynolds number flow over a backward-facing step: Structure of the mean separation bubble, Exp. Fluids 55, 1657 (2014).
  13. F.-F. Wang, A. Gao, S.-Q. Wu, S.-L. Zhu, J.-Y. Dai, and Q. Liao, Experimental investigation of coherent vortex structures in a backward-facing step flow, Water 11, 2629 (2019).
  14. H. Le, P. Moin, and J. Kim, Direct numerical simulation of turbulent flow over a backward-facing step, J. Fluid Mech. 330, 349 (1997).
  15. M. Barri, G. K. E. Khoury, H. I. Andersson, and B. Pettersen, DNS of backward-facing step flow with fully turbulent inflow, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 64, 777 (2010).
  16. J. L. Aider, A. Danet, and M. Lesieur, Large-eddy simulation applied to study the influence of upstream conditions on the time-dependant and averaged characteristics of a backward-facing step flow, J. Turbul. 8, N51 (2007).
  17. R. Hu, L. Wang, and S. Fu, Investigation of the coherent structures in flow behind a backward-facing step, Intl J. Numer. Methods Heat Fluid Flow 26, 1050 (2016).
  18. J. K. Eaton and J. P. Johnston, A review of research on subsonic turbulent flow reattachment, AIAA J. 19, 1093 (1981).
  19. R. Y. Hu, L. Wang, and S. Fu, Review of backward-facing step flow and separation reduction (in Chinese), Sci. Sin.-Phys. Mech. Astron. 45, 124704 (2015).
  20. F. Scarano and M. L. Reithmuller, Iterative multigrid approach in PIV image processing with discrete window offset, Exp. Fluids 26, 513 (1999).
  21. P. Spazzini, G. Iuso, M. Onorato, N. Zurlo, and G. M. D. Cicca, Unsteady behavior of back-facing step flow, Exp. Fluids 30, 551 (2001).
  22. S. D. Hall, M. Behnia, C. A. J. Fletcher, and G. L. Morrison, Investigation of the secondary corner vortex in a benchmark turbulent backward-facing step using cross-correlation particle imaging velocimetry, Exp. Fluids 35, 139 (2003).
  23. C. Shih and C. M. Ho, Three-dimensional recirculation flow in a backward facing step, ASME J. Fluids Mech. 116, 228 (1994).
  24. T. R. Troutt, B. Scheelke, and T. R. Norman, Organized structures in a reattaching separated flow field, J. Fluid Mech. 143, 413 (1984).
  25. G. L. Brown and A. Roshko, On density effects and large structure in turbulent mixing layers, J. Fluid Mech. 64, 775 (1974).
  26. C. D. Winant and F. K. Browand, Vortex pairing: The mechanism of turbulent mixing-layer growth at moderate Reynolds number, J. Fluid Mech. 63, 237 (1974).
  27. Y. Z. Liu, W. Kang, and H. J. Sung, Assessment of the organization of a turbulent separated and reattaching flow by measuring wall pressure fluctuations, Exp. Fluids 38, 485 (2005).
  28. D. M. Driver, H. L. Seegmiller, and J. G. Marvin, Time-dependent behavior of a reattaching shear layer, AIAA J. 25, 914 (1987).
  29. R. L. Simpson, Review—a review of some phenomena in turbulent flow separation, ASME J. Fluids Eng. 103, 520 (1981).
  30. B. F. Armaly, F. Durst, J. C. F. Pereira, and B. Schönung, Experimental and theoretical investigation of backward-facing step flow, J. Fluid Mech. 127, 473 (1983).
  31. E. W. Adams and J. P. Johnston, Effects of the separating shear layer on the reattachment flow structure part 2: Reattachment length and wall shear stress, Exp. Fluids 6, 493 (1988).
  32. V. de Brederode and P. Bradshaw, Three-dimensional flow in nominally two-dimensional separation bubbles. I. Flow behind a rearward-facing step, Technical Report No. 72-19 (Imperial College of Science and Technology, 1972).
  33. K. Chauhan, J. Philip, C. M. de Silva, N. Hutchins, and I. Marusic, The turbulent/non-turbulent interface and entrainment in a boundary layer, J. Fluid Mech. 742, 119 (2014).
  34. Kevin, J. Monty, and N. Hutchins, Turbulent structures in a statistically three-dimensional boundary layer, J. Fluid Mech. 859, 543 (2019).
  35. R. J. Adrian and J. Westerweel, Particle Image Velocimetry (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2011).
  36. F. K. Lu, Surface oil flow visualization, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 182, 51 (2010).
  37. C. E. Tinney and L. S. Ukeiley, A study of a 3-D double backward-facing step, Exp. Fluids 47, 427 (2009).
  38. R. Martinuzzi and C. Tropea, The flow around surface-mounted, prismatic obstacles placed in a fully developed channel flow (data bank contribution), ASME J. Fluids Eng. 115, 85 (1993).
  39. X. Fang and M. F. Tachie, Flows over surface-mounted bluff bodies with different spanwise widths submerged in a deep turbulent boundary layer, J. Fluid Mech. 877, 717 (2019).
  40. K. C. Kim, H. S. Ji, and S. H. Seong, Flow structure around a 3-D rectangular prism in a turbulent boundary layer, J. Wind. Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 91, 653 (2003).
  41. G. Eitel-Amor, R. Örlü, and P. Schlatter, Simulation and validation of a spatially evolving turbulent boundary layer up to Reθ=8300, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 47, 57 (2014).
  42. J. H. Lee, Kevin, J. P. Monty, and N. Hutchins, Validating under-resolved turbulence intensities for PIV experiments in canonical wall-bounded turbulence, Exp. Fluids 57, 129 (2016).
  43. N. Kasagi and A. Matsunaga, Three-dimensional particle-tracking velocimetry measurement of turbulence statistics and energy budget in a backward-facing step flow, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 16, 477 (1995).
  44. S. Chun, Y. Z. Liu, and H. J. Sung, Wall pressure fluctuations of a turbulent separated and reattaching flow affected by an unsteady wake, Exp. Fluids 37, 531 (2004).
  45. H. Xu and A. Pollard, Large eddy simulation of turbulent flow in a square annular duct, Phys. Fluid 13, 3321 (2001).
  46. P. Mendis, T. Ngo, N. Haritos, A. Hira, B. Samali, and J. Cheung, Wind loading on tall buildings, Elec. J. Struct. Eng. 7, 41 (2007).
  47. M. J. Emes, M. Arjomandi, F. Ghanadi, and R. M. Kelso, Effect of turbulence characteristics in the atmospheric surface layer on the peak wind loads on heliostats in stow position, Solar Energy 157, 284 (2017).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation