Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Influence of freestream turbulence and porosity on porous disk-generated wakes

M. Bourhis* and O. R. H. Buxton

  • *Contact author: m.bourhis@imperial.ac.uk

Phys. Rev. Fluids 9, 124501 – Published 9 December, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.9.124501

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the effect of freestream turbulence (FST) on wakes produced by disks with different porosity. The wakes are exposed to various freestream turbulence “flavors,” where turbulence intensity and integral length scale are independently varied. The turbulent wakes are interrogated through hot-wire anemometry from 3 to 15 diameters downstream of the disks. It is found that disks with low porosity behave similarly to a solid body, in terms of both entrainment behavior and scaling laws for the centerline mean velocity evolution. Far from the disks, the presence of FST reduces both the wake growth rate and entrainment rate, with a clear effect of both turbulence intensity and integral length scale. As porosity increases, these “solid body” FST effects gradually diminish and are reversed above a critical porosity. The entrainment behavior in disk-generated wakes is significantly influenced by the presence of large-scale coherent structures, which act as a shield between the wake and the surrounding flow, thus impeding mixing in the near wake. We found that higher porosity, turbulence intensity, or integral length scale weakens the energy content of these structures, thereby limiting their influence on wake development to a shorter distance downstream of the disk. This, in turn, potentially reduces the influence of large-scale engulfment on the overall entrainment mechanism to a shorter distance downstream of the disks as well. For low-porosity disks, freestream turbulence intensity initially promotes near-wake growth through the suppression of large-scale structures; however, farther downstream, the wakes grow faster when the background is nonturbulent.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (88)

  1. L. J. Vermeer, J. N. Sørensen, and A. Crespo, Wind turbine wake aerodynamics, Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 39, 467 (2003).
  2. R. J. Barthelmie, S. T. Frandsen, M. N. Nielsen, S. C. Pryor, P. E. Rethore, and H. E. Jørgensen, Modelling and measurements of power losses and turbulence intensity in wind turbine wakes at Middelgrunden offshore wind farm, Wind Energy 10, 517 (2007).
  3. R. J. Barthelmie and L. E. Jensen, Evaluation of wind farm efficiency and wind turbine wakes at the Nysted offshore wind farm, Wind Energy 13, 573 (2010).
  4. K. S. Hansen, R. J. Barthelmie, L. E. Jensen, and A. Sommer, The impact of turbulence intensity and atmospheric stability on power deficits due to wind turbine wakes at Horns Rev wind farm, Wind Energy 15, 183 (2012).
  5. F. Porté-Agel, Y.-T. Wu, and C.-H. Chen, A numerical study of the effects of wind direction on turbine wakes and power losses in a large wind farm, Energies 6, 5297 (2013).
  6. K. Thomsen and P. Sørensen, Fatigue loads for wind turbines operating in wakes, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 80, 121 (1999).
  7. S. Frandsen, Turbulence and turbulence-generated structural loading in wind turbine clusters, Ph.D. thesis, Forskningscenter Risoe. Risoe-R, Denmark (2007).
  8. J. D. Sørensen, S. Frandsen, and N. J. Tarp-Johansen, Effective turbulence models and fatigue reliability in wind farms, Probab. Eng. Mech. 23, 531 (2008).
  9. T. N. Santelo, C. M. R. de Oliveira, C. D. Maciel, and J. R. B. de A. Monteiro, Wind turbine failures review and trends, J. Control Autom. Electr. Syst. 33, 505 (2022).
  10. N. H. C. Hwang and L. V. Baldwin, Decay of turbulence in axisymmetric wakes, J. Eng. 88, 261 (1966).
  11. H. Tennekes and J. L. Lumley, A First Course in Turbulence (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1972).
  12. B. Cantwell and D. Coles, An experimental study of entrainment and transport in the turbulent near wake of a circular cylinder, J. Fluid Mech. 136, 321 (1983).
  13. W. K. George, The self-preservation of turbulent flows and its relation to initial conditions and coherent structures, Adv. Turbul. 3973 (1989).
  14. C. B. da Silva, J. C. Hunt, I. Eames, and J. Westerweel, Interfacial layers between regions of different turbulence intensity, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 46, 567 (2014).
  15. P. Bearman and T. Morel, Effect of free stream turbulence on the flow around bluff bodies, Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 20, 97 (1983).
  16. K. S. Kankanwadi and O. R. H. Buxton, Turbulent entrainment into a cylinder wake from a turbulent background, J. Fluid Mech. 905, A35 (2020).
  17. K. S. Kankanwadi and O. R. H. Buxton, Influence of freestream turbulence on the near-field growth of a turbulent cylinder wake: Turbulent entrainment and wake meandering, Phys. Rev. Fluids 8, 034603 (2023).
  18. V. Okulov, I. Naumov, R. Mikkelsen, I. Kabardin, and J. Sørensen, A regular Strouhal number for large-scale instability in the far wake of a rotor, J. Fluid Mech. 747, 369 (2014).
  19. D. Medici and P. H. Alfredsson, Measurements on a wind turbine wake: 3D effects and bluff body vortex shedding, Wind Energy 9, 219 (2006).
  20. L. P. Chamorro, C. Hill, S. Morton, C. Ellis, R. E. A. Arndt, and F. Sotiropoulos, On the interaction between a turbulent open channel flow and an axial-flow turbine, J. Fluid Mech. 716, 658 (2013).
  21. N. Biswas and O. R. Buxton, Effect of tip speed ratio on coherent dynamics in the near wake of a model wind turbine, J. Fluid Mech. 979, A34 (2024).
  22. I. Neunaber, M. Hölling, and M. Obligado, Leading effect for wind turbine wake models, Renewable Energy 223, 119935 (2024).
  23. Y.-T. Wu and F. Porté-Agel, Atmospheric turbulence effects on wind-turbine wakes: An LES study, Energies 5, 5340 (2012).
  24. S. Gambuzza and B. Ganapathisubramani, The influence of freestream turbulence on the development of a wind turbine wake, J. Fluid Mech. 963, (2022).
  25. J. Sørensen, General Momentum Theory for Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines, Research Topics in Wind Energy, Vol. 4 (Springer International Publishing, Berlin, 2015).
  26. T. Blackmore, W. M. Batten, G. U. Muller, and A. S. Bahaj, Influence of turbulence on the drag of solid discs and turbine simulators in a water current, Exp. Fluids 55, 1637 (2014).
  27. D. Jin, Z. Wu, and H. Choi, A predictive model of the drag coefficient of a circular cylinder, Phys. Fluids 33, 111702 (2021).
  28. E. H. Camp and R. B. Cal, Mean kinetic energy transport and event classification in a model wind turbine array versus an array of porous disks: Energy budget and octant analysis, Phys. Rev. Fluids 1, 044404 (2016).
  29. E. H. Camp and R. B. Cal, Low-dimensional representations and anisotropy of model rotor versus porous disk wind turbine arrays, Phys. Rev. Fluids 4, 024610 (2019).
  30. K. Charmanski, V. Turner, John, and M. Wosnik, Physical model study of the wind turbine array boundary layer, in American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection, Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting (ASME Digital Collection, Chicago, Illinois, USA, 2014), Vol. 1D, p. V01DT39A010.
  31. J. Bossuyt, M. F. Howland, C. Meneveau, and J. Meyers, Wind tunnel study of the power output spectrum in a micro wind farm, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 753, 072002 (2016).
  32. J. Bossuyt, M. F. Howland, C. Meneveau, and J. Meyers, Measurement of unsteady loading and power output variability in a micro wind farm model in a wind tunnel, Exp. Fluids 58, 1 (2017).
  33. P. M. Sforza, P. Sheerin, and M. Smorto, Three-dimensional wakes of simulated wind turbines, AIAA J. 19, 1101 (1981).
  34. S. Cannon, F. Champagne, and A. Glezer, Observations of large-scale structures in wakes behind axisymmetric bodies, Exp. Fluids 14, 447 (1993).
  35. S. Aubrun, S. Loyer, P. E. Hancock, and P. Hayden, Wind turbine wake properties: Comparison between a non-rotating simplified wind turbine model and a rotating model, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 120, 1 (2013).
  36. L. E. Lignarolo, D. Ragni, C. J. Ferreira, and G. J. V. Bussel, Kinetic energy entrainment in wind turbine and actuator disc wakes: An experimental analysis, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 524, 012163 (2014).
  37. L. E. Lignarolo, D. Ragni, C. J. Ferreira, and G. J. V. Bussel, Experimental comparison of a wind-turbine and of an actuator-disc near wake, J. Renewable Sustainable Energy 8, 023301 (2016).
  38. S. Aubrun, M. Bastankhah, R. Cal, B. Conan, R. Hearst, D. Hoek, M. Hölling, M. Huang, C. Hur, B. Karlsen, I. Neunaber, M. Obligado, J. Peinke, M. Percin, L. Saetran, P. Schito, B. Schliffke, D. Sims-Williams, O. Uzol, M. Vinnes, and A. Zasso, Round-robin tests of porous disc models, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1256, 012004 (2019).
  39. M. K. Vinnes, S. Gambuzza, B. Ganapathisubramani, and R. J. Hearst, The far wake of porous disks and a model wind turbine: Similarities and differences assessed by hot-wire anemometry, J. Renewable Sustainable Energy 14, 023304 (2022).
  40. M. K. Vinnes, I. Neunaber, H. M. H. Lykke, and R. J. Hearst, Characterizing porous disk wakes in different turbulent inflow conditions with higher-order statistics, Exp. Fluids 64, 25 (2023).
  41. S. de J. Helvig, M. K. Vinnes, A. Segalini, N. A. Worth, and R. J. Hearst, A comparison of lab-scale free rotating wind turbines and actuator disks, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 209, 104485 (2021).
  42. I. Neunaber, M. Hölling, J. Whale, and J. Peinke, Comparison of the turbulence in the wakes of an actuator disc and a model wind turbine by higher order statistics: A wind tunnel study, Renewable Energy 179, 1650 (2021).
  43. B. Öztürk, A. Hassanein, M. T. Akpolat, A. Abdulrahim, M. Perçin, and O. Uzol, On the wake characteristics of a model wind turbine and a porous disc: Effects of freestream turbulence intensity, Renewable Energy 212, 238 (2023).
  44. J. W. Kurelek, A. Piqué, and M. Hultmark, Performance of the porous disk wind turbine model at a high Reynolds number: Solidity distribution and length scales effects, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 237, 105377 (2023).
  45. F. Carbajo Fuertes, C. D. Markfort, and F. Porté-Agel, Wind turbine wake characterization with nacelle-mounted wind lidars for analytical wake model validation, Remote Sensing 10, 668 (2018).
  46. R. Stevens, L. Martínez Tossas, and C. Meneveau, Comparison of wind farm large eddy simulations using actuator disk and actuator line models with wind tunnel experiments, Renewable Energy 116, 470 (2017).
  47. E. F. Noriega and N. Mazellier, Scaling analysis of the swirling wake of a porous disc: Application to wind turbines, arXiv:2406.08667 [physics.flu-dyn].
  48. M. Bastankhah and F. Porté-Agel, A new analytical model for wind-turbine wakes, Renewable Energy 70, 116 (2014).
  49. A. Niayifar and F. Porté-Agel, Analytical modeling of wind farms: A new approach for power prediction, Energies 9, 741 (2016).
  50. B. Öztürk, A. Hassanein, M. T. Akpolat, A. Abdulrahim, M. Perçin, and O. Uzol, Effects of freestream turbulence on the wake growth rate of a model wind turbine and a porous disc, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 2265, 022042 (2022).
  51. I. P. Castro, Wake characteristics of two-dimensional perforated plates normal to an air-stream, J. Fluid Mech. 46, 599 (1971).
  52. S. C. Cannon, Large-scale structures and the spatial evolution of wakes behind axisymmetric bluff bodies, Ph.D. thesis, University of Arizona (1991).
  53. H. Xiao, L. Duan, R. Sui, and T. Rösgen, Experimental investigations of turbulent wake behind porous disks, in Proceedings of the 1st Marine Energy Technology Symposium, METS2013: April 10–11, 2013, Washington, D.C. (Marine Energy Technology Symposium, 2013).
  54. M. Hultmark and A. J. Smits, Temperature corrections for constant temperature and constant current hot-wire anemometers, Meas. Sci. Technol. 21, 105404 (2010).
  55. W. Kannuluik and E. Carman, The temperature dependence of the thermal conductivity of air, Australian J. Chem. 4, 305 (1951).
  56. A. J. Smits and M. V. Zagarola, Applications of dense gases to model testing for aeronautical and hydrodynamic applications, Meas. Sci. Technol. 16, 1710 (2005).
  57. L. P. Chamorro, R. E. Arndt, and F. Sotiropoulos, Reynolds number dependence of turbulence statistics in the wake of wind turbines, Wind Energy 15, 733 (2012).
  58. IEC, IEC 61400–3, Wind energy generation systems-Part 3-1: Design requirements for fixed offshore wind turbines, Technical Report (International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva, 2019).
  59. T. Carmody, Establishment of the wake behind a disk, J. Basic Eng. 86, 869 (1964).
  60. E. H. Lingkan and O. R. Buxton, An assessment of the scalings for the streamwise evolution of turbulent quantities in wakes produced by porous objects, Renewable Energy 209, 1 (2023).
  61. F. W. Roos and W. W. Willmarth, Some experimental results on sphere and disk drag, AIAA J. 9, 285 (1971).
  62. E. Gaertner, J. Rinker, L. Sethuraman, F. Zahle, B. Anderson, G. Barter, N. Abbas, F. Meng, P. Bortolotti, W. Skrzypinski, G. Scott, R. Feil, H. Bredmose, K. Dykes, M. Shields, C. Allen, and A. Viselli, Definition of the IEA 15-Megawatt Offshore Reference Wind Turbine (National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2020).
  63. G. Dong, J. Qin, Z. Li, and X. Yang, Characteristics of wind turbine wakes for different blade designs, J. Fluid Mech. 965, A15 (2023).
  64. N. Jensen, A note on wind generator interaction, Risø-M No. 2411 (Risø National Laboratory, Roskilde, Denmark, 1983).
  65. T. Dasari, Y. Wu, Y. Liu, and J. Hong, Near-wake behaviour of a utility-scale wind turbine, J. Fluid Mech. 859, 204 (2019).
  66. F. Porté-Agel, M. Bastankhah, and S. Shamsoddin, Wind-turbine and wind-farm flows: A review, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 174, 1 (2019).
  67. T. Ishihara and G.-W. Qian, A new gaussian-based analytical wake model for wind turbines considering ambient turbulence intensities and thrust coefficient effects, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 177, 275 (2018).
  68. D. Mistry, J. Philip, J. R. Dawson, and I. Marusic, Entrainment at multi-scales across the turbulent/non-turbulent interface in an axisymmetric jet, J. Fluid Mech. 802, 690 (2016).
  69. O. R. H. Buxton, J. Chen, O. R. Buxton, and J. Chen, The relative efficiencies of the entrainment of mass, momentum and kinetic energy from a turbulent background, J. Fluid Mech. 977, R2 (2023).
  70. E. Rind and I. P. Castro, On the effects of free-stream turbulence on axisymmetric disc wakes, Exp. Fluids 53, 301 (2012).
  71. J. C. Vassilicos, Dissipation in turbulent flows, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 47, 95 (2015).
  72. V. P. Stein and H. J. Kaltenbach, Non-equilibrium scaling applied to the wake evolution of a model scale wind turbine, Energies 12, 2763 (2019).
  73. T. Göçmen, P. van der Laan, P.-E. Réthoré, A. P. Diaz, G. C. Larsen, and S. Ott, Wind turbine wake models developed at the technical University of Denmark: A review, Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 60, 752 (2016).
  74. D. Vahidi, F. Porté-Agel, D. Vahidi, and F. Porté-Agel, A physics-based model for wind turbine wake expansion in the atmospheric boundary layer, J. Fluid Mech. 943, A49 (2022).
  75. L. P. Chamorro and F. Porté-Agel, A wind-tunnel investigation of wind-turbine wakes: Boundary-layer turbulence effects, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 132, 129 (2009).
  76. A. Townsend, The Structure of Turbulent Shear Flow, Cambridge Monographs on Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, 1976).
  77. T. Dairay, M. Obligado, and J. C. Vassilicos, Non-equilibrium scaling laws in axisymmetric turbulent wakes, J. Fluid Mech. 781, 166 (2015).
  78. M. Obligado, T. Dairay, and J. C. Vassilicos, Nonequilibrium scalings of turbulent wakes, Phys. Rev. Fluids 1, 044409 (2016).
  79. I. Neunaber, M. Obligado, J. Peinke, and S. Aubrun, Application of the townsend-george wake theory to field measurements of wind turbine wakes, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1934, 012004 (2021).
  80. I. Neunaber, J. Peinke, and M. Obligado, Application of the Townsend–George theory for free shear flows to single and double wind turbine wakes—A wind tunnel study, Wind Energy Sci. 7, 201 (2022).
  81. I. Neunaber, M. Hölling, and M. Obligado, Wind tunnel study on the tip speed ratio's impact on a wind turbine wake development, Energies 15, 8607 (2022).
  82. J. Nedić, J. C. Vassilicos, and B. Ganapathisubramani, Axisymmetric turbulent wakes with new nonequilibrium similarity scalings, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 144503 (2013).
  83. C. Santoni, K. Carrasquillo, I. Arenas-Navarro, and S. Leonardi, Effect of tower and nacelle on the flow past a wind turbine, Wind Energy 20, 1927 (2017).
  84. F. Pierella and L. Sætran, Wind tunnel investigation on the effect of the turbine tower on wind turbines wake symmetry, Wind Energy 20, 1753 (2017).
  85. K. Chongsiripinyo, S. Sarkar, K. Chongsiripinyo, and S. Sarkar, Decay of turbulent wakes behind a disk in homogeneous and stratified fluids, J. Fluid Mech. 885, A31 (2020).
  86. K. Steiros, N. Bempedelis, and L. Ding, Recirculation regions in wakes with base bleed, Phys. Rev. Fluids 6, 034608 (2021).
  87. Y. Odemark and J. H. M. Fransson, The stability and development of tip and root vortices behind a model wind turbine, Exp. Fluids 54, 1591 (2013).
  88. K. Ben Miloud, M. Dghim, H. Fellouah, and M. Ferchichi, Free-stream turbulence interaction with a wing-tip vortex, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 206, 104211 (2020).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation