- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review Fluids

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Impact of ageostrophic dynamics on the predictability of Lagrangian trajectories in surface-ocean turbulence

Michael Maalouly1,*, Guillaume Lapeyre2, and Stefano Berti1

  • *Contact author: michael.maalouly@univ-lille.fr
PDF

Phys. Rev. Fluids 9, 104503 – Published 24 October, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.9.104503

Abstract

Turbulent flows at the surface of the ocean deviate from geostrophic equilibrium on scales smaller than about 10 km. These scales are associated with important vertical transport of active and passive tracers, and should play a prominent role in the heat transport at climate scales and for plankton dynamics. Measuring velocity fields on such small scales is notoriously difficult but new, high-resolution satellite altimetry is starting to reveal them. However, the satellite-derived velocities essentially represent the geostrophic flow component, and the impact of unresolved ageostrophic motions on particle dispersion needs to be understood to properly characterize transport properties. Here, we investigate ocean fine-scale turbulence using a model that represents some of the processes due to ageostrophic dynamics. We take a Lagrangian approach and focus on the predictability of the particle dynamics, comparing trajectories advected by either the full flow or by its geostrophic component only. Our results indicate that, over long times, relative dispersion is marginally affected after filtering out the ageostrophic component. Nevertheless, advection by the geostrophic-only flow leads to an overestimation of the typical pair-separation rate, and to a bias on trajectories (in terms of displacement from the actual ones), whose importance grows with the Rossby number. We further explore the intensity of the transient particle clustering induced by ageostrophic motions and find that it can be significant, even for small flow compressibility. Indeed, we show that clustering is here due to the interplay between compressibility and persistent flow structures that trap particles, enhancing their aggregation.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (58)

  1. G. K. Vallis, Atmospheric and Oceanic Fluid Dynamics (Cambridge University Press, New York, 2017).
  2. Z. Zhang, W. Wang, and B. Qiu, Oceanic mass transport by mesoscale eddies, Science 345, 322 (2014).
  3. P. Klein and G. Lapeyre, The oceanic vertical pump induced by mesoscale and submesoscale turbulence, Annu. Rev. Marine Sci. 1, 351 (2009).
  4. Z. Zhang, B. Qiu, P. Klein, and S. Travis, The influence of geostrophic strain on oceanic ageostrophic motion and surface chlorophyll, Nat. Commun. 10, 2838 (2019).
  5. J. C. McWilliams, Submesoscale currents in the ocean, Proc. R. Soc. A 472, 20160117 (2016).
  6. R. Morrow, L.-L. Fu, F. Ardhuin, M. Benkiran, B. Chapron, E. Cosme, F. d'Ovidio, J. T. Farrar, S. T. Gille, G. Lapeyre, P.-Y. Le Traon, A. Pascual, A. Ponte, B. Qiu, N. Rascle, C. Ubelmann, J. Wang, and E. D. Zaron, Global observations of fine-scale ocean surface topography with the surface water and ocean topography (SWOT) mission, Front. Mar. Sci. 6, 232 (2019).
  7. B. Barceló-Llull, A. Pascual, A. Sánchez-Román, E. Cutolo, F. d'Ovidio, G. Fifani, E. Ser-Giacomi, S. Ruiz, E. Mason, F. Cyr, A. Doglioli, B. Mourre, J. T. Allen, E. Alou-Font, B. Casas, L. Díaz-Barroso, F. Dumas, L. Gómez-Navarro, and C. Muñoz, Fine-scale ocean currents derived from in situ observations in anticipation of the upcoming SWOT altimetric mission, Front. Mar. Sci. 8, 679844 (2021).
  8. Z. Su, J. B. Wang, P. Klein, A. F. Thompson, and D. Menemenlis, Ocean submesoscales as a key component of the global heat budget, Nat. Commun. 9, 775 (2018).
  9. R. Lumpkin and S. Elipot, Surface drifter pair spreading in the North Atlantic, J. Geophys. Res. 115, C12017 (2010).
  10. S. Berti, F. Dos Santos, G. Lacorata, and A. Vulpiani, Lagrangian drifter dispersion in the Southwestern Atlantic Ocean, J. Phys. Oceanogr. 41, 1659 (2011).
  11. A. C. Poje, T. M. Özgökmen, B. L. Lipphardt, Jr., B. K. Haus, E. H. Ryan, A. C. Haza, G. A. Jacobs, A. J. H. M. Reniers, M. J. Olascoaga, G. Novelli, A. Griffa, F. J. Beron-Vera, S. S. Chen, E. Coelho, P. J. Hogan, A. D. Kirwan, Jr., H. S. Huntley, and A. J. Mariano, Submesoscale dispersion in the vicinity of the Deepwater Horizon Spill, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 12693 (2014).
  12. R. Corrado, G. Lacorata, L. Palatella, R. Santoleri, and E. Zambianchi, General characteristics of relative dispersion in the ocean, Sci. Rep. 7, 46291 (2017).
  13. E. A. D'Asaro, A. Y. Shcherbina, J. M. Klymak, J. Molemaker, G. Novelli, C. M. Guigand, A. C. Haza, B. K. Haus, E. H. Ryan, G. A. Jacobs, H. S. Huntley, N. J. M. Laxague, S. Chen, F. Judt, J. C. McWilliams, R. Barkan, A. D. Kirwan, Jr., A. C. Poje, and T. M. Özgökmen, Ocean convergence and the dispersion of flotsam, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115, 1162 (2018).
  14. C. Vic, S. Hascoët, J. Gula, T. Huck, and C. Maes, Oceanic mesoscale cyclones cluster surface Lagrangian material, Geophys. Res. Lett. 49, e2021GL097488 (2022).
  15. D. Balwada, J.-H. Xie, R. Marino, and F. Feraco, Direct observational evidence of an oceanic dual kinetic energy cascade and its seasonality, Sci. Adv. 8, eabq2566 (2022).
  16. L.-L. Fu, D. B. Chelton, P.-Y. Le Traon, and R. Morrow, Eddy dynamics from satellite altimetry, Oceanography 23, 14 (2010).
  17. R. Morrow, L.-L. Fu, M.-H. Rio, R. R. Ray, P. Prandi, P.-Y. Le Traon, and J. Benveniste, Ocean circulation from space, Surv. Geophys. 44, 1243 (2023).
  18. L.-L. Fu, T. Pavelsky, J.-F. Cretaux, R. Morrow, J. T. Farrar, P. Vaze, P. Sengenes, N. Vinogradova-Shiffer, A. Sylvestre-Baron, N. Picot, and G. Dibarboure, The Surface Water and Ocean Topography mission: A breakthrough in radar remote sensing of the ocean and land surface water, Geophys. Res. Lett. 51, e2023GL107652 (2024).
  19. C. B. Rocha, T. K. Chereskin, S. T. Gille, and D. Menemenlis, Mesoscale to submesoscale wavenumber spectra in Drake passage, J. Phys. Oceanogr. 46, 601 (2016).
  20. J. Wang, L. Fu, H. S. Torres, S. Chen, B. Qiu, and D. Menemenlis, On the spatial scales to be resolved by the Surface Water and Ocean Topography Ka-band radar interferometer, J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol. 36, 87 (2019).
  21. J. Callies, G. Flierl, R. Ferrari, and B. Fox-Kemper, The role of mixed-layer instabilities in submesoscale turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 788, 5 (2016).
  22. S. Berti and G. Lapeyre, Lagrangian pair dispersion in upper-ocean turbulence in the presence of mixed-layer instabilities, Phys. Fluids 33, 036603 (2021).
  23. G. Lapeyre and P. Klein, Dynamics of the upper oceanic layers in terms of surface quasigeostrophy theory, J. Phys. Oceanogr. 36, 165 (2006).
  24. I. M. Held, R. T. Pierrehumbert, S. T. Garner, and K. L. Swanson, Surface quasi-geostrophic dynamics, J. Fluid Mech. 282, 1 (1995).
  25. G. Lapeyre, Surface quasi-geostrophy, Fluids 2, 7 (2017).
  26. D. L. Rudnick, On the skewness of vorticity in the upper ocean, Geophys. Res. Lett. 28, 2045 (2001).
  27. G. Roullet and P. Klein, Cyclone-anticyclone asymmetry in geophysical turbulence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 218501 (2010).
  28. A. Y. Shcherbina, E. A. D'Asaro, C. M. Lee, J. M. Klymak, M. J. Molemaker, and J. C. McWilliams, Statistics of vertical vorticity, divergence, and strain in a developed submesoscale turbulence field, Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 4706 (2013).
  29. C. E. Buckingham, A. C. N. Garabato, A. F. Thompson, L. Brannigan, A. Lazar, D. P. Marshall, A. J. G. Nurser, G. Damerell, K. J. Heywood, and S. E. Belcher, Seasonality of submesoscale flows in the ocean surface boundary layer, Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 2118 (2016).
  30. G. A. Jacobs, H. S. Huntley, A. D. Kirwan, Jr., B. L. Lipphardt, Jr., T. Campbell, T. Smith, K. Edwards, and B. Bartels, Ocean processes underlying surface clustering, J. Geophys. Res. 121, 180 (2016).
  31. M. Berta, A. Griffa, A. C. Haza, J. Horstmann, H. S. Huntley, R. Ibrahim, B. Lund, T. M. Özgökmen, and A. C. Poje, Submesoscale kinematic properties in summer and winter surface flows in the Northern Gulf of Mexico, J. Geophys. Res. 125, e2020JC016085 (2020).
  32. F. Ragone and G. Badin, A study of surface semi-geostrophic turbulence: Freely decaying dynamics, J. Fluid Mech. 792, 740 (2016).
  33. G. J. Hakim, C. Snyder, and D. J. Muraki, A new surface model for cyclone–anticyclone asymmetry, J. Atmos. Sci. 59, 2405 (2002).
  34. M. Maalouly, G. Lapeyre, B. Cozian, G. Mompean, and S. Berti, Particle dispersion and clustering in surface ocean turbulence with ageostrophic dynamics, Phys. Fluids 35, 126601 (2023).
  35. A. Foussard, S. Berti, X. Perrot, and G. Lapeyre, Relative dispersion in generalized two-dimensional turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 821, 358 (2017).
  36. C. Perruche, P. Rivière, G. Lapeyre, X. Carton, and P. Pondaven, Effects of surface quasi-geostrophic turbulence on phytoplankton competition and coexistence, J. Mar. Res. 69, 105 (2011).
  37. J. B. Weiss, Point-vortex dynamics in three-dimensional ageostrophic balanced flows, J. Fluid Mech. 936, A19 (2022).
  38. X. Yu, A. L. Ponte, S. Elipot, D. Menemenlis, E. D. Zaron, and R. Abernathey, Surface kinetic energy distributions in the global oceans from a high-resolution numerical model and surface drifter observations, Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, 9757 (2019).
  39. H. Wang, N. Grisouard, H. Salehipour, A. Nuz, M. Poon, and A. L. Ponte, A deep learning approach to extract internal tides scattered by geostrophic turbulence, Geophys. Res. Lett. 49, e2022GL099400 (2022).
  40. B. K. Arbic, S. Elipot, J. M. Brasch, D. Menemenlis, A. L. Ponte, J. F. Shriver, X. Yu, E. D. Zaron, M. H. Alford, M. C. Buijsman, R. Abernathey, D. Garcia, L. Guan, P. E. Martin, and A. D. Nelson, Near-surface oceanic kinetic energy distributions from drifter observations and numerical models, J. Geophys. Res. 127, e2022JC018551 (2022).
  41. A. Celani, M. Cencini, A. Mazzino, and M. Vergassola, Active and passive fields face to face, New J. Phys. 6, 72 (2004).
  42. D. Balwada, Q. Xiao, S. Smith, R. Abernathey, and A. R. Gray, Vertical fluxes conditioned on vorticity and strain reveal submesoscale ventilation, J. Phys. Oceanogr. 51, 2883 (2021).
  43. M. Bourgoin, N. T. Ouellette, H. Xu, J. Berg, and E. Bodenschatz, The role of pair dispersion in turbulent flow, Science 311, 835 (2006).
  44. J. H. LaCasce, Statistics from Lagrangian observations, Prog. Oceanogr. 77, 1 (2008).
  45. M. Cencini and A. Vulpiani, Finite size Lyapunov exponent: Review on applications, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 46, 254019 (2013).
  46. V. Artale, G. Boffetta, A. Celani, M. Cencini, and A. Vulpiani, Dispersion of passive tracers in closed basins: Beyond the diffusion coefficient, Phys. Fluids A 9, 3162 (1997).
  47. G. Boffetta, A. Celani, G. Lacorata, and A. Vulpiani, The predictability problem in systems with an uncertainty in the evolution law, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 33, 1313 (2000).
  48. G. Lacorata, R. Corrado, F. Falcini, and R. Santoleri, FSLE analysis and validation of Lagrangian simulations based on satellite-derived globcurrent velocity data, Remote Sens. Environ. 221, 136 (2019).
  49. G. Lapeyre, Characterization of finite-time Lyapunov exponents and vectors in two-dimensional turbulence, Chaos 12, 688 (2002).
  50. M. Cencini, F. Cecconi, and A. Vulpiani, Chaos: From Simple Models to Complex Systems (World Scientific, Singapore, 2010).
  51. G. Benettin, L. Galgani, A. Giorgilli, and J.-M. Strelcyn, Lyapunov characteristic exponents for smooth dynamical systems and for Hamiltonian systems; a method for computing all of them. Part 1: Theory, Meccanica 15, 9 (1980).
  52. J. R. Cressman, J. Davoudi, W. I. Goldburg, and J. Schumacher, Eulerian and Lagrangian studies in surface flow turbulence, New J. Phys. 6, 53 (2004).
  53. G. Boffetta, J. Davoudi, B. B. Eckhardt, and J. Schumacher, Lagrangian tracers on a surface flow: The role of time correlations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 134501 (2004).
  54. A. Dhanagare, S. Musacchio, and D. Vincenzi, Weak-strong clustering transition in renewing compressible flows, J. Fluid Mech. 761, 431 (2014).
  55. A. Pumir, Structure of the velocity gradient tensor in turbulent shear flows, Phys. Rev. Fluids 2, 074602 (2017).
  56. P.-F. Yang, J. Fang, L. Fang, A. Pumir, and H. Xu, Low-order moments of the velocity gradient in homogeneous compressible turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 947, R1 (2022).
  57. A. Sinha, D. Balwada, N. Tarshish, and R. Abernathey, Modulation of lateral transport by submesoscale flows and inertia-gravity waves, J. Adv. Model Earth Syst. 11, 1039 (2019).
  58. R. S. Dù, K. S. Smith, and O. Bühler, Next-order balanced model captures submesoscale physics and statistics, arXiv:2408.03422.

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Fluids 9, 104503– Published 24 October, 2024
  • Received 6 June 2024
  • Accepted 17 September 2024
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation