Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Gravity current escape from a topographic depression

Edward W. G. Skevington1 and Andrew J. Hogg2,*

  • 1Energy and Environment Institute, University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, United Kingdom
  • 2School of Mathematics, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1UG, United Kingdom

  • *a.j.hogg@bristol.ac.uk

Phys. Rev. Fluids 9, 014802 – Published 9 January, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.9.014802

Abstract

An inertial gravity current released within a topographic depression may climb up the incline from a lower to an upper plateau if it is sufficiently energetic and then continue to flow unsteadily away from the step while simultaneously draining back into the depression. This density-driven motion is investigated theoretically using the shallow-water equations to simulate the flow up a smooth step from a lower to an upper horizontal plane and to compute the volume of fluid that escapes from the depression. It is shown that it is possible for all of the fluid to drain back down the step and that the volume of the escaped fluid diminishes with a power-law dependence on time. This phenomenon is explained by analyzing the unsteady flow of a gravity current along a semi-infinite horizontal plane along which the front advances but simultaneously fluid drains from the rear edge of the plane. The dynamics of this motion at early times is calculated both numerically and analytically. The latter exploits the hodograph transformation of the shallow water equation, a technique which allows rapid and precise evaluation of flow features such as reflections and the onset of bores. The flow at later times becomes self-similar, and the self-similarity is of the second kind. It features an anomalous exponent that provides the power-law dependence of the volume of fluid on time, and this exponent is a function of the imposed Froude number at the front of the current. In this way the diminishing volume of fluid that escapes from a topographic depression is explained quantitatively. Eventually the flow may transition to a regime in which drag becomes non-negligible; the model of simultaneous propagation and draining is extended to this regime to show that the escaped volume of fluid also decays temporally and ultimately vanishes.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (36)

  1. J. E. Simpson, Gravity Currents in the Environment and the Laboratory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1997), p. 244
  2. M. Ungarish, An Introduction to Gravity Currents and Intrusions (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2009), p. 489.
  3. P. G. Baines, Topographic Effects in Stratified Flows (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1995), p. 477.
  4. E.Gonzalez-Juez and E. Meiburg, Shallow-water analysis of gravity-current flows past isolated obstacles, J. Fluid Mech. 635, 415 (2009).
  5. T. Tokyay and G. Constantinescu, The effects of a submerged non-erodible triangular obstacle on bottom propagating gravity currents, Phy. Fluids 27, 056601 (2015).
  6. M. D. Falco, C. Adduce, and M. R. Maggi, Gravity current interacting with a bottom triangular obstacle and implications for entrainment, Adv. Water Resour. 154, 103967 (2021).
  7. M. Momen, Z. Zheng, E. Bou-Zeid, and H. A. Stone, Inertial gravity currents produced by fluid drainage from an edge, J. Fluid Mech. 827, 640 (2017).
  8. M. Ungarish, L. Zhu, and H. A. Stone, Inertial gravity current produced by the drainage of a cylindrical reservoir from an outer or inner edge, J. Fluid Mech. 874, 185 (2019).
  9. E. W. G. Skevington, A. J. Hogg, and M. Ungarish, Development of supercritical motion and internal jumps within lock-release radial currents and draining flows, Phys. Rev. Fluids 6, 063803 (2021).
  10. A. J. Hogg and E. W. G. Skevington, Dam-break reflection, Q. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 74, 441 (2021).
  11. E. W. G. Skevington and A. J. Hogg, The unsteady overtopping of barriers by gravity currents and dam-break flows, J. Fluid Mech. 960, A27 (2023).
  12. G. B. Whitham, Linear and Nonlinear Waves (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1974), p. 636.
  13. T. B. Benjamin, Gravity currents and related phenomena, J. Fluid Mech. 31, 209 (1968).
  14. M. Ungarish and A. J. Hogg, Models of internal jumps and the fronts of gravity currents: unifying two-layer theories and deriving new results, J. Fluid Mech. 846, 654 (2018).
  15. A. J. Hogg, Lock-release gravity currents and dam-break flows, J. Fluid Mech. 569, 61 (2006).
  16. E. W. G. Skevington and A. J. Hogg, Unsteady draining of reservoirs over weirs and through constrictions, J. Fluid Mech. 882, A9 (2020).
  17. G. I. Barenblatt, Scaling, Self-similarity and Intermediate Asymptotics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1996), p. 386.
  18. J. Gratton and F. Minotti, Self-similar viscous gravity currents: phase-plane formalism, J. Fluid Mech. 210, 155 (1990).
  19. J. A. Diez and R. Gratton, Self-similar solution of the second kind for a convergent viscous gravity current, Phys Fluids A 4, 1148 (1992).
  20. D. G. Aronson and J. Graveleau, A self-similar solution to the focusing problem for the porous medium equation, Eur. J. Appl. Math. 4, 65 (1993).
  21. A. C. Slim and H. E. Huppert, Self-similar solutions of the axisymmetric shallow-water equations governing converging inviscid gravity currents, J. Fluid Mech. 506, 331 (2004).
  22. C. G. Johnson and A. J. Hogg, Entraining gravity currents, J. Fluid Mech. 731, 477 (2013).
  23. A. J. Hogg and A. W. Woods, The transition from inertia to bottom-drag-dominated motion of turbulent gravity currents, J. Fluid Mech. 449, 201 (2001).
  24. S. E. King and A. W. Woods, Dipole solutions for viscous gravity currents: Theory and experiments, J. Fluid Mech. 483, 91 (2003).
  25. A. J. Hogg and D. Pritchard, The effects of drag on dam-break and other shallow inertial flows, J. Fluid Mech. 501, 179 (2004).
  26. J. Langham and A. J. Hogg, General linear stability properties of monoclinal shallow waves, Phys. Rev. Fluids 7, 053902 (2022).
  27. D. Serre, Systems of Conservation Laws 1: Hyperbolicity, Entropies, Shock Waves (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1999).
  28. H. E. Huppert and J. E. Simpson, The slumping of gravity currents, J. Fluid Mech. 99, 785 (1980).
  29. E. W. G. Skevington, A well balanced reconstruction with bounded velocities for the shallow water equations by convex combination, arXiv:2106.11273.
  30. A. Kurganov, S. Noelle, and G. Petrova, Semi-discrete central-upwind schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws and Hamilton-Jacobi equations, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 23, 707 (2001).
  31. E. W. G. Skevington, A well balanced reconstruction with bounded velocities and low-oscillation slow shocks for the shallow water equations, arXiv:2106.11256.
  32. D. P. Hoult, Oil spreading on the sea, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 4, 341 (1972).
  33. J. Gratton and C. Vigo, Self-similar gravity currents with variable inflow revisited: plane currents, J. Fluid Mech. 258, 77 (1994).
  34. H. E. Huppert, The propagation of two-dimensional and axisymmetric viscous gravity currents over a rigid horizontal surface, J. Fluid Mech. 121, 43 (1982).
  35. P. R. Garabedian, Partial Differential Equations (Chelsea, New York, 1986), p. 672.
  36. A. J. N. Goater and A. J. Hogg, Bounded dam-break flows with tailwaters, J. Fluid Mech. 686, 160 (2011).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation