Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Self-organization of autophoretic suspensions in confined shear flows

Prathmesh Vinze and Sebastien Michelin*

  • LadHyX, CNRS–Ecole Polytechnique, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, 91120 Palaiseau, France

  • *sebastien.michelin@polytechnique.edu

Phys. Rev. Fluids 9, 014202 – Published 22 January, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.9.014202

Abstract

Janus phoretic particles exploit chemical energy stored in their environment to produce mechanical work on the surrounding fluid and self-propel. These active particles modify and respond to their hydrodynamic and chemical environments, thus providing them with a sensibility to external flows and other particles. These chemical and hydrodynamic interparticle interactions are known to lead to nontrivial collective behavior within such biological or synthetic active suspensions (e.g., cluster formation of phoretic particles or bacterial swarming). Recent experiments and analysis have demonstrated that the response of active suspensions to shear flows is nontrivial and can, in fact, lead to significant reductions in viscosity due to the energy conversion at microscopic scales. In this work we numerically analyze using a continuum kinetic model the dynamics and response to shear of dilute and confined suspensions of chemotactic phoretic particles that reorient and drift toward the chemical solutes released by their neighbors. We show that a 1D transient steady distribution driven by the effect of confinement is a common feature for the confinement and shear rate intensities considered. This 1D state is stable for strong confinement and thus observed in the long-term dynamics in sufficiently narrow channels. For wider channels, the transient state becomes unstable to streamwise perturbations due to the chemotactic instability, leading to the formation of particle aggregates along the channel's walls. Their relative arrangements and dynamics are determined by the relative influence of shear intensity and chemotaxis and critically condition the suspension's dynamics and particle-induced flows. In a second step, the feedback effect on the flow and effective viscosity of the self-organized suspension is considered. We show that the induced flow and, consequently, its rheological behavior strongly depend on the self-organization regime, and therefore on the interplay of confinement, shear, and chemotaxis.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (99)

  1. M. C. Marchetti, J. F. Joanny, S. Ramaswamy, T. B. Liverpool, J. Prost, M. Rao, and R. A. Simha, Hydrodynamics of soft active matter, Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 1143 (2013).
  2. S. Ramaswamy, The mechanics and statistics of active matter, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 1, 323 (2010).
  3. R. W. Carlsen and M. Sitti, Bio-hybrid cell-based actuators for microsystems, Small 10, 3831 (2014).
  4. W. Gao and J. Wang, Synthetic micro/nanomotors in drug delivery, Nanoscale 6, 10486 (2014).
  5. B. J. Nelson, I. K. Kaliakatsos, and J. J. Abbott, Microrobots for minimally invasive medicine, Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 12, 55 (2010).
  6. N. H. Mendelson, A. Bourque, K. Wilkening, K. R. Anderson, and J. C. Watkins, Organized cell swimming motions in Bacillus subtilis colonies: Patterns of short-lived whirls and jets, J. Bacteriol. 181, 600 (1999).
  7. T. J. Pedley and J. O. Kessler, Bioconvection, Sci. Progress (1933–) 76, 105 (1992).
  8. F. Ginelli, F. Peruani, M.-H. Pillot, H. Chaté, G. Theraulaz, and R. Bon, Intermittent collective dynamics emerge from conflicting imperatives in sheep herds, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, 12729 (2015).
  9. B. L. Partridge, The structure and function of fish schools, Sci. Am. 246, 114 (1982).
  10. L. M. Aplin, D. R. Farine, R. P. Mann, and B. C. Sheldon, Individual-level personality influences social foraging and collective behaviour in wild birds, Proc. R. Soc. B 281, 20141016 (2014).
  11. R. Golestanian, T. B. Liverpool, and A. Ajdari, Designing phoretic micro-and nano-swimmers, New J. Phys. 9, 126 (2007).
  12. S. Michelin, Self-propulsion of chemically active droplets, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 55, 77 (2023).
  13. A. Bricard, J.-B. Caussin, N. Desreumaux, O. Dauchot, and D. Bartolo, Emergence of macroscopic directed motion in populations of motile colloids, Nature (London) 503, 95 (2013).
  14. E. M. Purcell, Life at low Reynolds number, Am. J. Phys. 45, 3 (1977).
  15. E. Lauga and T. R. Powers, The hydrodynamics of swimming microorganisms, Rep. Prog. Phys. 72, 096601 (2009).
  16. A. Babataheri, M. Roper, M. Fermigier, and O. Du Roure, Tethered fleximags as artificial cilia, J. Fluid Mech. 678, 5 (2011).
  17. R. Dreyfus, J. Baudry, M. L. Roper, M. Fermigier, H. A. Stone, and J. Bibette, Microscopic artificial swimmers, Nature (London) 437, 862 (2005).
  18. J. R. Howse, R. A. L. Jones, A. J. Ryan, T. Gough, R. Vafabakhsh, and R. Golestanian, Self-motile colloidal particles: From directed propulsion to random walk, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 048102 (2007).
  19. J. L. Moran and J. D. Posner, Phoretic self-propulsion, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 49, 511 (2017).
  20. J. L. Anderson, Colloid transport by interfacial forces, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 21, 61 (1989).
  21. A. Sokolov and I. S. Aranson, Reduction of viscosity in suspension of swimming bacteria, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 148101 (2009).
  22. C. Dombrowski, L. Cisneros, S. Chatkaew, R E. Goldstein, and J. O. Kessler, Self-concentration and large-scale coherence in bacterial dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 098103 (2004).
  23. J. Dunkel, S. Heidenreich, K. Drescher, H. H. Wensink, M. Bär, and R. E. Goldstein, Fluid dynamics of bacterial turbulence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 228102 (2013).
  24. R. Alert, J. Casademunt, and J.-F. Joanny, Active turbulence, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 13, 143 (2022).
  25. M. J. Kim and K. S. Breuer, Enhanced diffusion due to motile bacteria, Phys. Fluids 16, L78 (2004).
  26. K. C. Leptos, J. S. Guasto, J. P. Gollub, A. I. Pesci, and R. E. Goldstein, Dynamics of enhanced tracer diffusion in suspensions of swimming eukaryotic microorganisms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 198103 (2009).
  27. J. Adler, Chemotaxis in bacteria, Annu. Rev. Biochem. 44, 341 (1975).
  28. B. Petri and M. J. Sanz, Neutrophil chemotaxis, Cell Tissue Res. 371, 425 (2018).
  29. M. Eisenbach, Sperm chemotaxis, Rev. Reprod. 4, 56 (1999).
  30. V. Sourjik and N. S. Wingreen, Responding to chemical gradients: Bacterial chemotaxis, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 24, 262 (2012).
  31. E. Kanso and S. Michelin, Phoretic and hydrodynamic interactions of weakly confined autophoretic particles, J. Chem. Phys. 150, 044902 (2019).
  32. M Tătulea-Codrean and E. Lauga, Artificial chemotaxis of phoretic swimmers: Instantaneous and long-time behaviour, J. Fluid Mech. 856, 921 (2018).
  33. A. Sen, M. Ibele, Y. Hong, and D. Velegol, Chemo and phototactic nano/microbots, Faraday Discuss. 143, 15 (2009).
  34. H. C. Berg and D. A. Brown, Chemotaxis in Escherichia coli analysed by three-dimensional tracking, Nature (London) 239, 500 (1972).
  35. E. O. Budrene and H. C. Berg, Complex patterns formed by motile cells of Escherichia coli, Nature (London) 349, 630 (1991).
  36. E. Lushi, R. E. Goldstein, and M. J. Shelley, Nonlinear concentration patterns and bands in autochemotactic suspensions, Phys. Rev. E 98, 052411 (2018).
  37. S. Saha, R. Golestanian, and S. Ramaswamy, Clusters, asters, and collective oscillations in chemotactic colloids, Phys. Rev. E 89, 062316 (2014).
  38. D. Saintillan and M. J. Shelley, Instabilities, pattern formation, and mixing in active suspensions, Phys. Fluids 20, 123304 (2008).
  39. G. Subramanian and D. L. Koch, Critical bacterial concentration for the onset of collective swimming, J. Fluid Mech. 632, 359 (2009).
  40. E. W. Burkholder and J. F. Brady, Nonlinear microrheology of active Brownian suspensions, Soft Matter 16, 1034 (2020).
  41. H. M. López, J. Gachelin, C. Douarche, H. Auradou, and E. Clément, Turning bacteria suspensions into superfluids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 028301 (2015).
  42. S. Rafaï, L. Jibuti, and P. Peyla, Effective viscosity of microswimmer suspensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 098102 (2010).
  43. T. Traverso and S. Michelin, Collective dynamics and rheology of confined phoretic suspensions, J. Fluid Mech. 943, A21 (2022).
  44. S. E. Spagnolie and E. Lauga, Hydrodynamics of self-propulsion near a boundary: Predictions and accuracy of far-field approximations, J. Fluid Mech. 700, 105 (2012).
  45. M. Contino, E. Lushi, I. Tuval, V. Kantsler, and M. Polin, Microalgae scatter off solid surfaces by hydrodynamic and contact forces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 258102 (2015).
  46. E. Lushi, V. Kantsler, and R. E. Goldstein, Scattering of biflagellate microswimmers from surfaces, Phys. Rev. E 96, 023102 (2017).
  47. S. E. Spagnolie, G. R. Moreno-Flores, D. Bartolo, and E. Lauga, Geometric capture and escape of a microswimmer colliding with an obstacle, Soft Matter 11, 3396 (2015).
  48. A. Choudhary, K. V. S. Chaithanya, S. Michelin, and S. Pushpavanam, Self-propulsion in 2D confinement: Phoretic and hydrodynamic interactions, Eur. Phys. J. E 44, 97 (2021).
  49. Y. Ibrahim and T. B. Liverpool, How walls affect the dynamics of self-phoretic microswimmers, Eur. Phys. J.: Spec. Top. 225, 1843 (2016).
  50. L. Rothschild, Non-random distribution of bull spermatozoa in a drop of sperm suspension, Nature (London) 198, 1221 (1963).
  51. A. P. Berke, L. Turner, H. C. Berg, and E. Lauga, Hydrodynamic attraction of swimming microorganisms by surfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 038102 (2008).
  52. G. Li, J. Bensson, L. Nisimova, D. Munger, P. Mahautmr, J. X. Tang, M. R. Maxey, and Y. V. Brun, Accumulation of swimming bacteria near a solid surface, Phys. Rev. E 84, 041932 (2011).
  53. S. S. Suarez and A. A. Pacey, Sperm transport in the female reproductive tract, Human Reproduction Update 12, 23 (2006).
  54. A. Costanzo, R. Di Leonardo, G. Ruocco, and L. Angelani, Transport of self-propelling bacteria in micro-channel flow, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 24, 065101 (2012).
  55. B. Ezhilan and D. Saintillan, Transport of a dilute active suspension in pressure-driven channel flow, J. Fluid Mech. 777, 482 (2015).
  56. E. Lushi, H. Wioland, and R. E. Goldstein, Fluid flows created by swimming bacteria drive self-organization in confined suspensions, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 9733 (2014).
  57. H. Wioland, F. G. Woodhouse, J. Dunkel, J. O. Kessler, and R. E. Goldstein, Confinement stabilizes a bacterial suspension into a spiral vortex, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 268102 (2013).
  58. H. Wioland, E. Lushi, and R. E. Goldstein, Directed collective motion of bacteria under channel confinement, New J. Phys. 18, 075002 (2016).
  59. N. Figueroa-Morales, G. L. Mino, A. Rivera, R. Caballero, E. Clément, E. Altshuler, and A. Lindner, Living on the edge: Transfer and traffic of E. coli in a confined flow, Soft Matter 11, 6284 (2015).
  60. T. Kaya and H. Koser, Direct upstream motility in Escherichia coli, Biophys. J. 102, 1514 (2012).
  61. T. Omori and T. Ishikawa, Upward swimming of a sperm cell in shear flow, Phys. Rev. E 93, 032402 (2016).
  62. Q. Brosseau, F. B. Usabiaga, E. Lushi, Y. Wu, L. Ristroph, J. Zhang, M. Ward, and M. J. Shelley, Relating rheotaxis and hydrodynamic actuation using asymmetric gold-platinum phoretic rods, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 178004 (2019).
  63. W. E. Uspal, M. N. Popescu, S. Dietrich, and M. Tasinkevych, Rheotaxis of spherical active particles near a planar wall, Soft Matter 11, 6613 (2015).
  64. V. A. Martinez, E. Clément, J. Arlt, C. Douarche, A. Dawson, J. Schwarz-Linek, A. K. Creppy, V. Škultéty, A. N. Morozov, H. Auradou et al., A combined rheometry and imaging study of viscosity reduction in bacterial suspensions, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117, 2326 (2020).
  65. J. Gachelin, A. Rousselet, A. Lindner, and E. Clement, Collective motion in an active suspension of Escherichia coli bacteria, New J. Phys. 16, 025003 (2014).
  66. D. Saintillan, Extensional rheology of active suspensions, Phys. Rev. E 81, 056307 (2010).
  67. Y. Hatwalne, S. Ramaswamy, M. Rao, and R. A. Simha, Rheology of active-particle suspensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 118101 (2004).
  68. F. Rojas-Pérez, B. Delmotte, and S. Michelin, Hydrochemical interactions of phoretic particles: A regularized multipole framework, J. Fluid Mech. 919, A22 (2021).
  69. D. Saintillan and M. J. Shelley, Emergence of coherent structures and large-scale flows in motile suspensions, J. R. Soc. Interface 9, 571 (2012).
  70. D. Saintillan and M. J. Shelley, Theory of active suspensions, Complex Fluids in Biological Systems: Experiment, Theory, and Computation (Springer, New York, 2015), pp. 319–355.
  71. B. Liebchen, D. Marenduzzo, I. Pagonabarraga, and M. E. Cates, Clustering and pattern formation in chemorepulsive active colloids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 258301 (2015).
  72. T. Traverso and S. Michelin, Hydrochemical interactions in dilute phoretic suspensions: From individual particle properties to collective organization, Phys. Rev. Fluids 5, 104203 (2020).
  73. M. Theillard, R. Alonso-Matilla, and D. Saintillan, Geometric control of active collective motion, Soft Matter 13, 363 (2017).
  74. E. Lushi, R. E. Goldstein, and M. J. Shelley, Collective chemotactic dynamics in the presence of self-generated fluid flows, Phys. Rev. E 86, 040902(R) (2012).
  75. D. Saintillan and M. J. Shelley, Active suspensions and their nonlinear models, C. R. Phys. 14, 497 (2013).
  76. J. Gachelin, G. Miño, H. Berthet, A. Lindner, A. Rousselet, and É. Clément, Non-Newtonian viscosity of Escherichia coli suspensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 268103 (2013).
  77. L. Kleiser and U. Schumann, Treatment of incompressibility and boundary conditions in 3-d numerical spectral simulations of plane channel flows, in Proceedings of the Third GAMM-Conference on Numerical Methods in Fluid Mechanics, edited by E. H. Hirschel (Vieweg+Teubner Verlag, Wiesbaden, 1980), pp. 165–173.
  78. W. F. Paxton, K. C. Kistler, C. C. Olmeda, A. Sen, S. K. St. Angelo, Y. Cao, T. E. Mallouk, P. E. Lammert, and V. H. Crespi, Catalytic nanomotors: Autonomous movement of striped nanorods, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 13424 (2004).
  79. W. K. Subczynski and J. S. Hyde, Diffusion of oxygen in water and hydrocarbons using an electron spin resonance spin-label technique, Biophys. J. 45, 743 (1984).
  80. K. Valiev and E. N. Ivanov, Rotational Brownian motion, Sov. Phys. Usp. 16, 1 (1973).
  81. G. Ariel, A. Shklarsh, O. Kalisman, C. Ingham, and E. Ben-Jacob, From organized internal traffic to collective navigation of bacterial swarms, New J. Phys. 15, 125019 (2013).
  82. E. B. Jacob, I. Becker, Y. Shapira, and H. Levine, Bacterial linguistic communication and social intelligence, Trends Microbiol. 12, 366 (2004).
  83. P. M. Vinze, A. Choudhary, and S. Pushpavanam, Motion of an active particle in a linear concentration gradient, Phys. Fluids 33, 032011 (2021).
  84. G. Li and J. X. Tang, Accumulation of microswimmers near a surface mediated by collision and rotational Brownian motion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 078101 (2009).
  85. M. Theillard and D. Saintillan, Computational mean-field modeling of confined active fluids, J. Comput. Phys. 397, 108841 (2019).
  86. J. Buhl, D. J. T. Sumpter, I. D. Couzin, J. J. Hale, E. Despland, E. R. Miller, and S. J. Simpson, From disorder to order in marching locusts, Science 312, 1402 (2006).
  87. W. E. Arnoldi, The principle of minimized iterations in the solution of the matrix eigenvalue problem, Q. Appl. Math. 9, 17 (1951).
  88. Z. Liu, K. Zhang, and X. Cheng, Rheology of bacterial suspensions under confinement, Rheol. Acta 58, 439 (2019).
  89. M. Mussler, S. Rafaï, P. Peyla, and C. Wagner, Effective viscosity of non-gravitactic Chlamydomonas reinhardtii microswimmer suspensions, Europhys. Lett. 101, 54004 (2013).
  90. E. Guazzelli and J. F. Morris, A Physical Introduction to Suspension Dynamics, Cambridge Texts in Applied Mathematics Vol. 45 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011).
  91. D. G. Thomas, Transport characteristics of suspension: VIII. A note on the viscosity of Newtonian suspensions of uniform spherical particles, J. Colloid Sci. 20, 267 (1965).
  92. R. J. Henshaw, O. G. Martin, and J. S. Guasto, Dynamic mode structure of active turbulence, Phys. Rev. Fluids 8, 023101 (2023).
  93. M. Neef and K. Kruse, Generation of stationary and moving vortices in active polar fluids in the planar Taylor-Couette geometry, Phys. Rev. E 90, 052703 (2014).
  94. T. N. Shendruk, A. Doostmohammadi, K. Thijssen, and J. M. Yeomans, Dancing disclinations in confined active nematics, Soft Matter 13, 3853 (2017).
  95. A. Snezhko and I. S. Aranson, Magnetic manipulation of self-assembled colloidal asters, Nat. Mater. 10, 698 (2011).
  96. J. S. Park and D. Saintillan, Electric-field-induced ordering and pattern formation in colloidal suspensions, Phys. Rev. E 83, 041409 (2011).
  97. Y. Hong, N. M. K. Blackman, N. D. Kopp, A. Sen, and D. Velegol, Chemotaxis of nonbiological colloidal rods, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 178103 (2007).
  98. X. Garcia, S. Rafaï, and P. Peyla, Light control of the flow of phototactic microswimmer suspensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 138106 (2013).
  99. J. Palacci, S. Sacanna, A. P. Steinberg, D. J. Pine, and P. M. Chaikin, Living crystals of light-activated colloidal surfers, Science 339, 936 (2013).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation