- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review Fluids

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Characteristic rupture height of the mediating air film beneath an impacting drop on atomically smooth mica

Ramin Kaviani and John M. Kolinski*

  • EMSI Laboratory, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland

  • *john.kolinski@epfl.ch
PDF

Phys. Rev. Fluids 8, 103602 – Published 31 October, 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.8.103602

Abstract

Before a droplet can contact a surface during impact, it must first displace the air beneath it. Over a wide range of impact velocities, the droplet first squeezes the air into a thin film, enhancing its resistance to drainage; this slows the progress of the liquid toward the surface. Indeed, below a critical impact velocity, the air film remains intact, and the droplet rebounds off of the air film without making contact. For impact velocities exceeding this critical impact velocity, the droplet always makes contact. The initiation of contact formation requires a topological transition, whereby the initially connected gas domain is ruptured and a liquid capillary bridge forms, binding the droplet to the surface. Here we probe this transition in detail around the critical impact velocity using calibrated total internal reflection microscopy to monitor the air film thickness and profile at high speed during the impact process. Two air film rupture modalities are observed: nucleated contacts, which are isolated and do not correspond to the global minimum air film thickness, and spontaneous contacts, which occur always on a ring centered upon the impact axis where the air film reaches its global minimum. Our measurements show that for impact velocities exceeding the critical velocity for contact initiation, the air film ruptures at a nearly identical height hmin≈20 nm, for two fluids: silicone oil and a water-glycerol mixture. The height and time duration of the air film prior to contact are presented for over 180 droplet impact experiments. Impact events of water solution droplets show statistics for contact nucleation different from those for the silicone oil; this suggests that another mechanism may dominate contact nucleation during impact of the solution. Nevertheless, a critical impact velocity above which contact always occurs is identifiable for both liquids.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (47)

  1. C. Josserand and S. Thoroddsen, Drop impact on a solid surface, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 48, 365 (2016).
  2. S. Mandre, M. Mani, and M. P. Brenner, Precursors to splashing of liquid droplets on a solid surface, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 134502 (2009).
  3. J. M. Kolinski, S. M. Rubinstein, S. Mandre, M. P. Brenner, D. A. Weitz, and L. Mahadevan, Skating on a film of air: Drops impacting on a surface, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 074503 (2012).
  4. R. C. A. van der Veen, T. Tran, D. Lohse, and C. Sun, Direct measurements of air layer profiles under impacting droplets using high-speed color interferometry, Phys. Rev. E 85, 026315 (2012).
  5. W. Bouwhuis, R. C. A. van der Veen, T. Tran, D. L. Keij, K. G. Winkels, I. R. Peters, D. van der Meer, C. Sun, J. H. Snoeijer, and D. Lohse, Maximal air bubble entrainment at liquid-drop impact, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 264501 (2012).
  6. J. de Ruiter, J. M. Oh, D. van den Ende, and F. Mugele, Dynamics of collapse of air films in drop impact, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 074505 (2012).
  7. S. Mandre and M. P. Brenner, The mechanism of a splash on a dry solid surface, J. Fluid Mech. 690, 148 (2012).
  8. J. M. Kolinski, L. Mahadevan, and S. M. Rubinstein, Lift-off instability during the impact of a drop on a solid surface, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 134501 (2014).
  9. S. Mishra, S. M. Rubinstein, and C. H. Rycroft, Computing the viscous effect in early-time drop impact dynamics, J. Fluid Mech. 945, A13 (2022).
  10. J. M. Kolinski, L. Mahadevan, and S. Rubinstein, Drops can bounce from perfectly hydrophilic surfaces, Europhys. Lett. 108, 24001 (2014).
  11. J. de Ruiter, R. Lagraauw, D. van den Ende, and F. Mugele, Wettability-independent bouncing on flat surfaces mediated by thin air films, Nat. Phys. 11, 48 (2015).
  12. M. V. Chubynsky, K. I. Belousov, D. A. Lockerby, and J. E. Sprittles, Bouncing off the walls: The influence of gas-kinetic and van der Waals effects in drop impact, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 084501 (2020).
  13. S. T. Thoroddsen, K. Takehara, and T. G. Etoh, Bubble entrapment through topological change, Phys. Fluids 22, 051701 (2010).
  14. H. Y. Lo, Y. Liu, and L. Xu, Mechanism of contact between a droplet and an atomically smooth substrate, Phys. Rev. X 7, 021036 (2017).
  15. J. M. Kolinski, R. Kaviani, D. Hade, and S. M. Rubinstein, Surfing the capillary wave: Wetting dynamics beneath an impacting drop, Phys. Rev. Fluids 4, 123605 (2019).
  16. D. Roy, S. S. Rao, and S. Basu, Droplet impact on immiscible liquid pool: Multi-scale dynamics of entrapped air cushion at short timescales, Phys. Fluids 34, 052004 (2022).
  17. J. C. Burton and P. Taborek, Role of dimensionality and axisymmetry in fluid pinch-off and coalescence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 224502 (2007).
  18. W. Yuan, T. Wei, and M. Zhang, Dynamical vapour pocket of an impacting leidenfrost droplet: Evaporation and scaling relations, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 95, 108965 (2022).
  19. D. Panchanathan, P. Bourrianne, P. Nicollier, A. Chottratanapituk, K. K. Varanasi, and G. H. McKinley, Levitation of fizzy drops, Sci. Adv. 7, eabf0888 (2021).
  20. J. de Ruiter, D. van den Ende, and F. Mugele, Air cushioning in droplet impact. II. Experimental characterization of the air film evolution, Phys. Fluids 27, 012105 (2015).
  21. Y. Gao, S. Jung, and L. Pan, Interaction forces between water droplets and solid surfaces across air films, ACS Omega 4, 16674 (2019).
  22. F. B. Wyart and J. Daillant, Drying of solids wetted by thin liquid films, Can. J. Phys. 68, 1084 (1990).
  23. G. Reiter, A. Sharma, A. Casoli, M.-O. David, R. Khanna, and P. Auroy, Thin film instability induced by long-range forces, Langmuir 15, 2551 (1999).
  24. M. Pack, H. Hu, D. Kim, Z. Zheng, H. A. Stone, and Y. Sun, Failure mechanisms of air entrainment in drop impact on lubricated surfaces, Soft Matter 13, 2402 (2017).
  25. K. Langley, E. Q. Li, and S. T. Thoroddsen, Impact of ultra-viscous drops: Air-film gliding and extreme wetting, J. Fluid Mech. 813, 647 (2017).
  26. F. Gao, H. Yi, L. Qi, R. Qiao, and W. Deng, Weakly charged droplets fundamentally change impact dynamics on flat surfaces, Soft Matter 15, 5548 (2019).
  27. A. Latka, A. Strandburg-Peshkin, M. M. Driscoll, C. S. Stevens, and S. R. Nagel, Creation of prompt and thin-sheet splashing by varying surface roughness or increasing air pressure, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 054501 (2012).
  28. J. M. Kolinski, The role of air in droplet impact on a smooth, solid surface, Ph.D. thesis, Harvard University, 2015.
  29. S. J. Weinstein and K. J. Ruschak, Coating flows, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 36, 29 (2004).
  30. L. Xu, W. W. Zhang, and S. R. Nagel, Drop splashing on a dry smooth surface, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 184505 (2005).
  31. M. Shirota, M. A. J. van Limbeek, D. Lohse, and C. Sun, Measuring thin films using quantitative frustrated total internal reflection (FTIR), Eur. Phys. J. E 40, 54 (2017).
  32. M. M. Driscoll and S. R. Nagel, Ultrafast interference imaging of air in splashing dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 154502 (2011).
  33. M. Pack, P. Kaneelil, H. Kim, and Y. Sun, Contact line instability caused by air rim formation under nonsplashing droplets, Langmuir 34, 4962 (2018).
  34. P. Chantelot and D. Lohse, Drop impact on superheated surfaces: Short-time dynamics and transition to contact, J. Fluid Mech. 928, A36 (2021).
  35. R. Kaviani and J. M. Kolinski, High resolution interferometric imaging of liquid-solid interfaces with HOTNNET, Exp. Mech. 63, 309 (2023).
  36. L. Zhang, T. Soori, A. Rokoni, A. Kaminski, and Y. Sun, Thin film instability driven dimple mode of air film failure during drop impact on smooth surfaces, Phys. Rev. Fluids 6, 044002 (2021).
  37. J. O. Rädler and E. Sackmann, Imaging optical thicknesses and separation distances of phospholipid vesicles at solid surfaces, J. Phys. (France) II 3, 727 (1992).
  38. P.-G. Gennes, F. Brochard-Wyart, and D. Quéré, Capillarity and Wetting Phenomena: Drops, Bubbles, Pearls, Waves (Springer, New York, 2004).
  39. R. Behrends, K. Fuchs, U. Kaatze, Y. Hayashi, and Y. Feldman, Dielectric properties of glycerol/water mixtures at temperatures between 10 and 50∘C, J. Chem. Phys. 124, 144512 (2006).
  40. R. Granda, G. Li, V. Yurkiv, F. Mashayek, and A. L. Yarin, Dielectrophoretic stretching of drops of silicone oil: Experiments and multi-physical modeling, Phys. Fluids 34, 042108 (2022).
  41. H. K. Christenson and N. H. Thomson, The nature of the air-cleaved mica surface, Surf. Sci. Rep. 71, 367 (2016).
  42. S. M. Rubinstein, G. Cohen, and J. Fineberg, Detachment fronts and the onset of dynamic friction, Nature (London) 430, 1005 (2004).
  43. C. Gu and P. Yeh, Extended Jones matrix method II, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 10, 966 (1993).
  44. J. Schilling, K. Sengupta, S. Goennenwein, A. Bausch, and E. Sackmann, Absolute interfacial distance measurements by dual-wavelength reflection interference contrast microscopy, Phys. Rev. E 69, 021901 (2004).
  45. J. de Ruiter, F. Mugele, and D. van den Ende, Air cushioning in droplet impact. I. Dynamics of thin films studied by dual wavelength reflection interference microscopy, Phys. Fluids 27, 012104 (2015).
  46. J. Israelachvili, Intermolecular and Surface Forces, 3rd ed. (Academic Press, New York, 2011).
  47. To estimate the Reynolds number in the gas phase, we use the slow variation of the air film thickness during rebound, as plotted in Fig. 2. The inertial pressure of the droplet p=ρU2/2≈500 Pa confirms that the air compression is negligible for U≈1 m/s. The lateral velocity of the gas can be estimated by considering the changes in h and applying incompressibility locally. By inspection, h decreases by about 25 nm in 2 ms. Thus, a crude estimate of dh/dt is 12.5 µm/s; this change in height must be balanced by a flux of gas laterally along the air film. From incompressibility, ∇·u=0; thus, for an axisymmetric flow where uθ=0, 1r∂rur∂r+∂uz∂z=0. Here we assume that the radial direction is given by x and the direction normal to the surface by y and that there is no flow in the azimuthal direction by symmetry. A representative scale of x is 100 µm or more; a representative scale for y is 100 nm or less. Applying these scales, the lateral velocity of the gas is estimated as ux=dxdyuy=10−410−7ḣ=103×12.5µm/s=12.5mm/s. To complete the estimation of Re, we use the air film thickness 100 nm as the length scale, the air density of 1 kg/m3, and the air viscosity of approximately 2×10−5 Pas, resulting in Re≈6.25×10−5; thus, viscous stresses dominate in the air film. Estimating the Reynolds number in the liquid phase is more straightforward. The liquid droplet moves toward the surface at the same velocity as the air film in the vertical direction, estimated at 12.5 µm/s, over a similar lateral scale of 100 µm. The liquid's kinematic viscosity is 20 cSt or 2×10−5 m2/s, resulting in a similar Re≈6.25×10−5. Thus, viscous stresses dominate in both the liquid and the gas during the rebound process.

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Fluids 8, 103602– Published 31 October, 2023
  • Received 24 February 2023
  • Accepted 22 September 2023
Crossmark - Check for updates button

©2023 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation