Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Hydrodynamic slender-body theory for local rotation at zero Reynolds number

Benjamin J. Walker1,2,*, Kenta Ishimoto3,†, and Eamonn A. Gaffney4,‡

  • 1Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, United Kingdom
  • 2Department of Mathematics, University College London, London, WC1H 0AY, United Kingdom
  • 3Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences, Kyoto University, Kyoto, 606-8502, Japan
  • 4Wolfson Centre for Mathematical Biology, Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG, United Kingdom

  • *Corresponding author: bjw43@bath.ac.uk
  • ishimoto@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp
  • gaffney@maths.ox.ac.uk

Phys. Rev. Fluids 8, 034101 – Published 2 March, 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.8.034101

Abstract

Slender objects are commonplace in microscale flow problems, from soft deformable sensors to biological filaments such as flagella and cilia. While much research has focused on the local translational motion of these slender bodies, relatively little attention has been given to local rotation, even though it can be the dominant component of motion. In this study, we explore a classically motivated ansatz for the Stokes flow around a rotating slender body via superposed rotlet singularities, which leads us to pose an alternative ansatz that accounts for both translation and rotation. Through an asymptotic analysis that is supported by numerical examples, we determine the suitability of these flow ansatzes for capturing the fluid velocity at the surface of a slender body, assuming local axisymmetry of the object but allowing the cross-sectional radius to vary with arclength. In addition to formally justifying the presented slender-body ansatzes, this analysis reveals a markedly simple relation between the local angular velocity and the torque exerted on the body, which we term resistive torque theory. Though reminiscent of classical resistive force theories, this local relation is found to be algebraically accurate in the slender-body aspect ratio, even when translation is present, and is valid and required whenever local rotation contributes to the surface velocity at leading asymptotic order.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (46)

  1. G. J. Hancock, The self-propulsion of microscopic organisms through liquids, Proc. R. Soc. London A 217, 96 (1953).
  2. J. Gray and G. J. Hancock, The propulsion of sea-urchin spermatozoa, J. Exp. Biol. 32, 802 (1955).
  3. H. Brenner, Effect of finite boundaries on the Stokes resistance of an arbitrary particle, J. Fluid Mech. 12, 35 (1962).
  4. D. F. Katz, J. R. Blake, and S. L. Paveri-Fontana, On the movement of slender bodies near plane boundaries at low Reynolds number, J. Fluid Mech. 72, 529 (1975).
  5. T. Y. Wu and G. Yates, Finite-amplitude unsteady slender-body flow theory, 11th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Vol. 28 (London, UK, 1976).
  6. R. E. Johnson, Slender-body theory for Stokes flow and flagellar hydrodynamics, Ph.D. thesis, California Institute of Technology, 1977.
  7. R. E. Johnson, An improved slender-body theory for Stokes flow, J. Fluid Mech. 99, 411 (1980).
  8. J. B. Keller and S. I. Rubinow, Slender-body theory for slow viscous flow, J. Fluid Mech. 75, 705 (1976).
  9. J. J. L. Higdon, The hydrodynamics of flagellar propulsion: Helical waves, J. Fluid Mech. 94, 331 (1979).
  10. R. Cortez, The method of regularized Stokeslets, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 23, 1204 (2001).
  11. B. J. Walker, M. P. Curtis, K. Ishimoto, and E. A. Gaffney, A regularised slender-body theory of non-uniform filaments, J. Fluid Mech. 899, A3 (2020).
  12. E. A. Gillies, R. M. Cannon, R. B. Green, and A. A. Pacey, Hydrodynamic propulsion of human sperm, J. Fluid Mech. 625, 445 (2009).
  13. R. Cortez and M. Nicholas, Slender body theory for Stokes flows with regularized forces, Commun. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci. 7, 33 (2012).
  14. S. D. Olson, S. Lim, and R. Cortez, Modeling the dynamics of an elastic rod with intrinsic curvature and twist using a regularized Stokes formulation, J. Comput. Phys. 238, 169 (2013).
  15. L. Guglielmini, A. Kushwaha, E. S. G. Shaqfeh, and H. A. Stone, Buckling transitions of an elastic filament in a viscous stagnation point flow, Phys. Fluids 24, 123601 (2012).
  16. D. J. Smith, E. A. Gaffney, J. R. Blake, and J. C. Kirkman-Brown, Human sperm accumulation near surfaces: A simulation study, J. Fluid Mech. 621, 289 (2009).
  17. M. Roper, R. Dreyfus, J. Baudry, M. Fermigier, J. Bibette, and H. A. Stone, On the dynamics of magnetically driven elastic filaments, J. Fluid Mech. 554, 167 (2006).
  18. S. D. Olson and L. J. Fauci, Hydrodynamic interactions of sheets vs filaments: Synchronization, attraction, and alignment, Phys. Fluids 27, 121901 (2015).
  19. C. W. Wolgemuth, T. R. Powers, and R. E. Goldstein, Twirling and Whirling: Viscous Dynamics of Rotating Elastic Filaments, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1623 (2000).
  20. L. F. Liu and J. C. Wang, Supercoiling of the DNA template during transcription, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84, 7024 (1987).
  21. M. E. Holwill, H. J. Cohen, and P. Satir, A sliding microtubule model incorporating axonemal twist and compatible with three-dimensional ciliary bending, J. Exp. Biol. 78, 265 (1979).
  22. R. M. Macnab and M. K. Ornston, Normal-to-curly flagellar transitions and their role in bacterial tumbling. Stabilization of an alternative quaternary structure by mechanical force, J. Mol. Biol. 112, 1 (1977).
  23. B. J. Walker, K. Ishimoto, and E. A. Gaffney, Efficient simulation of filament elastohydrodynamics in three dimensions, Phys. Rev. Fluids 5, 123103 (2020).
  24. S. F. Schoeller, A. K. Townsend, T. A. Westwood, and E. E. Keaveny, Methods for suspensions of passive and active filaments, J. Comput. Phys. 424, 109846 (2020).
  25. O. Maxian and A. Donev, Slender body theories for rotating filaments, J. Fluid Mech. 952, A5 (2022).
  26. E. Moeendarbary, L. Valon, M. Fritzsche, A. R. Harris, D. A. Moulding, A. J. Thrasher, E. Stride, L. Mahadevan, and G. T. Charras, The cytoplasm of living cells behaves as a poroelastic material, Nat. Mater. 12, 253 (2013).
  27. L. Koens and E. Lauga, The boundary integral formulation of Stokes flows includes slender-body theory, J. Fluid Mech. 850, R1 (2018).
  28. A. Chwang and T. Y.-T. Wu, Hydromechanics of low-Reynolds-number flow. Part 1. Rotation of axisymmetric prolate bodies, J. Fluid Mech. 63, 607 (1974).
  29. H. Flores, E. Lobaton, S. Mendezdiez, S. Tlupova, and R. Cortez, A study of bacterial flagellar bundling, Bull. Math. Biol. 67, 137 (2005).
  30. E. Nazockdast, A. Rahimian, D. Zorin, and M. Shelley, A fast platform for simulating semi-flexible fiber suspensions applied to cell mechanics, J. Comput. Phys. 329, 173 (2017).
  31. K. Ishimoto and E. A. Gaffney, An elastohydrodynamical simulation study of filament and spermatozoan swimming driven by internal couples, IMA J. Appl. Math. 83, 655 (2018).
  32. J. Huang, L. Carichino, and S. D. Olson, Hydrodynamic interactions of actuated elastic filaments near a planar wall with applications to sperm motility, J. Coupled Syst. Multiscale Dyn. 6, 163 (2018).
  33. L. Carichino and S. D. Olson, Emergent three-dimensional sperm motility: Coupling calcium dynamics and preferred curvature in a Kirchhoff rod model, Math. Med. Biol. 36, 439 (2019).
  34. S. S. Antman, Nonlinear Problems of Elasticity, Applied Mathematical Sciences (Springer-Verlag, New York, 2005), Vol. 107.
  35. A. T. Chwang and T. Y.-T. Wu, Hydromechanics of low-Reynolds-number flow. Part 2. Singularity method for Stokes flows, J. Fluid Mech. 67, 787 (1975).
  36. S. Kim and S. J. Karrila, Microhydrodynamics, Butterworth-Heinemann Series in Chemical Engineering (Elsevier, Mineola, New York, 1991).
  37. That is, ss is both O(1) and not o(1).
  38. Our choice of ϕ=0 here is for notational convenience only, with the argument readily modified to consider general ϕ.
  39. D. G. Feingold and R. S. Varga, Block diagonally dominant matrices and generalizations of the Gerschgorin circle theorem, Pacific J. Math. 12, 1241 (1962).
  40. The restriction on η imposed by Walker [11] was later refined by Walker and Gaffney [46], who noted that η2 being Lipschitz continuous with an O(1) constant was sufficient.
  41. A. T. Chwang and W. Hwang, Rotation of a torus, Phys. Fluids 2, 1309 (1990).
  42. R. Thaokar, H. Schiessel, and I. Kulic, Hydrodynamics of a rotating torus, Eur. Phys. J. B 60, 325 (2007).
  43. https://gitlab.com/bjwalker/rotational-sbt.
  44. J. Lighthill, Flagellar hydrodynamics, SIAM Rev. 18, 161 (1976).
  45. L. Koens, Tubular-body theory for viscous flows, Phys. Rev. Fluids 7, 034101 (2022).
  46. B. Walker and E. Gaffney, Regularised non-uniform segments and efficient no-slip elastohydrodynamics, J. Fluid Mech. 915, A51 (2021).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation