Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Steady-state extensional rheology of a dilute suspension of spheres in a dilute polymer solution

Arjun Sharma

Donald L. Koch

  • Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA

  • Robert Frederick Smith School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA

Phys. Rev. Fluids 8, 033303 – Published 27 March, 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.8.033303

Abstract

We investigate the steady-state extensional rheology of a dilute suspension of spherical particles in a dilute polymer solution modeled by the FENE-P constitutive relation. The ensemble-averaged suspension stress uses a recent construct of Koch et al. [Phys. Rev. Fluids 1, 013301 (2016)], based on perturbation for small polymer concentration and the generalized reciprocal theorem, to determine the polymers' influence on the particle stresslet and the particles' influence on the polymer stress. The extensional viscosity is defined as half of the constant of proportionality between the deviatoric stress and the imposed rate of strain tensor in uniaxial extensional flow. For a particle-free polymeric fluid, the extensional viscosity (nondimensionalized by the solvent viscosity) is 1+μpoly, where μpoly is the polymer contribution to the extensional viscosity. When a small volume fraction, ϕ, of spheres is added to a polymeric fluid, we find that the stress is altered by the Einstein viscosity of 2.5ϕ and two additional stress contributions: the polymer influence on the stresslet and the particle-induced polymer stress (PIPS). At lower Deborah numbers (defined as the product of extension rate and polymer relaxation time), De0.5, the net interaction stress is positive, while it becomes negative at large De. Relative to undisturbed flow, the presence of spheres in uniaxial extensional flow creates regions of both larger and smaller local stretching. Below the coil-stretch transition, the polymers far from the particles are in a coiled state, while they are stretched more than their undisturbed state by large stretching regions around the particle. Due to their finite relaxation time, they also form a wake of stretched polymers downstream of the particle. This leads to a positive contribution to the suspension stress from both the stresslet (surface) and the PIPS (stretched wake). Beyond the coil-stretch transition, polymers far from the particle are highly stretched, but they collapse closer to the coiled state as they arrive at the low stretching regions near the particle surface. Therefore, a negative PIPS results from the regions of collapsed polymers. At sufficiently high Deborah numbers, De1.5, this region is very thin, and it becomes thinner and more intense upon further increasing De. For large maximum polymer extensibility, L, the particle-polymer contribution to the suspension rheology is independent of L below the coil-stretch transition, whereas it scales as L2 above the coil-stretch transition. When De0.6, the changes in extensional viscosity from the stresslet and the PIPS are ϕμpoly and approximately 1.85ϕμpoly, respectively. At large De, the polymer extensional viscosity, μpoly, is orders of magnitude larger than that of Newtonian solvent. Hence, adding particles reduces the extensional viscosity of the suspension as (2.50.85μpoly)ϕ<0.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (57)

  1. Z. Deng, S. Xu, and S. Li, Understanding a relaxation behavior in a nanoparticle suspension for drug delivery applications, Int. J. Pharmaceutics 351, 236 (2008).
  2. J. Breitenbach, Melt extrusion: From process to drug delivery technology, Eur. J. Pharmaceutics, Biopharmaceutics 54, 107 (2002).
  3. Z.-M. Huang, Y.-Z. Zhang, M. Kotaki, and S. Ramakrishna, A review on polymer nanofibers by electrospinning and their applications in nanocomposites, Compos. Sci. Technol. 63, 2223 (2003).
  4. T. Nakajima, K. Kajiwara, and J. E. McIntyre, Advanced Fiber Spinning Technology (Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, MA, 1994).
  5. A. C. Barbati, J. Desroches, A. Robisson, and G. H. McKinley, Complex fluids, and hydraulic fracturing, Annu. Rev. Chem. Biomol. Eng. 7, 415 (2016).
  6. R. H. Ewoldt and C. Saengow, Designing complex fluids, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 54, 413 (2022).
  7. E. S. G. Shaqfeh, On the rheology of particle suspensions in viscoelastic fluids, AIChE J. 65, e16575 (2019).
  8. R. B. Bird and A. J. Giacomin, Polymer fluid dynamics: Continuum and molecular approaches, Annu. Rev. Chem. Biomol. Eng. 7, 479 (2016).
  9. P. G. De Gennes, Coil-stretch transition of dilute flexible polymers under ultrahigh velocity gradients, J. Chem. Phys. 60, 5030 (1974).
  10. T. T. Perkins, D. E. Smith, and S. Chu, Single polymer dynamics in an elongational flow, Science 276, 2016 (1997).
  11. S. L. Anna and G. H. McKinley, Effect of a controlled pre-deformation history on extensional viscosity of dilute polymer solutions, Rheol. Acta 47, 841 (2008).
  12. S.-C. Dai, F. Qi, and R. I. Tanner, Viscometric functions of concentrated noncolloidal suspensions of spheres in a viscoelastic matrix, J. Rheol. 58, 183 (2014).
  13. J. Einarsson, M. Yang, and E. S. G. Shaqfeh, Einstein viscosity with fluid elasticity, Phys. Rev. Fluids 3, 013301 (2018).
  14. A. Jain, J. Einarsson, and E. S. G. Shaqfeh, Extensional rheology of a dilute particle-laden viscoelastic solution, Phys. Rev. Fluids 4, 091301(R) (2019).
  15. D. L. Koch, E. F. Lee, and I. Mustafa, Stress in a dilute suspension of spheres in a dilute polymer solution subject to simple shear flow at finite Deborah numbers, Phys. Rev. Fluids 1, 013301 (2016).
  16. D. L. Koch and G. Subramanian, The stress in a dilute suspension of spheres suspended in a second-order fluid subject to a linear velocity field, J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 138, 87 (2006).
  17. D. L. Koch and G. Subramanian, Corrigendum to “the stress in a dilute suspension of spheres suspended in a second-order fluid subject to a linear velocity field”, J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 153, 202 (2008).
  18. R. Scirocco, J. Vermant, and J. Mewis, Shear thickening in filled Boger fluids, J. Rheol. 49, 551 (2005).
  19. M. Yang, S. Krishnan, and E. S. G. Shaqfeh, Numerical simulations of the rheology of suspensions of rigid spheres at low volume fraction in a viscoelastic fluid under shear, J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 233, 181 (2016).
  20. M. Yang and E. S. G. Shaqfeh, Mechanism of shear thickening in suspensions of rigid spheres in Boger fluids. Part I: Dilute suspensions, J. Rheol. 62, 1363 (2018).
  21. E. J. Hinch, An averaged-equation approach to particle interactions in a fluid suspension, J. Fluid Mech. 83, 695 (1977).
  22. S. Kim and S. J. Karrila, Microhydrodynamics: Principles, and Selected Applications (Courier Corporation, Stoneham, MA, 2013).
  23. J. M. Rallison, The stress in a dilute suspension of liquid spheres in a second-order fluid, J. Fluid Mech. 693, 500 (2012).
  24. F. Greco, G. D'Avino, and P. L. Maffettone, Rheology of a dilute suspension of rigid spheres in a second order fluid, J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 147, 1 (2007).
  25. K. D. Housiadas and R. I. Tanner, On the rheology of a dilute suspension of rigid spheres in a weakly viscoelastic matrix fluid, J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 162, 88 (2009).
  26. R. Fattal and R. Kupferman, Constitutive laws for the matrix-logarithm of the conformation tensor, J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 123, 281 (2004).
  27. E. J. Hinch, Mechanical models of dilute polymer solutions in strong flows, Phys. Fluids 20, S22 (1977).
  28. M. S. Chai and Y. L. Yeow, Modelling of Boger fluid jets using the Oldroyd-B equation—A comparison of experimental, and numerical results, J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 29, 433 (1988).
  29. J. M. Rallison and E. J. Hinch, Do we understand the physics in the constitutive equation? J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 29, 37 (1988).
  30. A. Peterlin, Hydrodynamics of linear macromolecules, Pure Appl. Chem. 12, 563 (1996).
  31. R. Keunings, On the Peterlin approximation for finitely extensible dumbbells, J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 68, 85 (1997).
  32. M. Herrchen and H. C. Öttinger, A detailed comparison of various FENE dumbbell models, J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 68, 17 (1997).
  33. A. P. G. van Heel, M. A. Hulsen, and B. H. A. A. van den Brule, On the selection of parameters in the FENE-P model, J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 75, 253 (1998).
  34. G. Lielens, R. Keunings, and V. Legat, The FENE-L, and FENE-LS closure approximations to the kinetic theory of finitely extensible dumbbells, J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 87, 179 (1999).
  35. S. L. Anna, G. H. McKinley, D. A. Nguyen, T. Sridhar, S. J. Muller, J. Huang, and D. F. James, An interlaboratory comparison of measurements from filament-stretching rheometers using common test fluids, J. Rheol. 45, 83 (2001).
  36. P. Becherer, A. N. Morozov, and W. van Saarloos, Scaling of singular structures in extensional flow of dilute polymer solutions, J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 153, 183 (2008).
  37. M. Renardy, A comment on smoothness of viscoelastic stresses, J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 138, 204 (2006).
  38. G. H. McKinley and T. Sridhar, Filament-stretching rheometry of complex fluids, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 34, 375 (2002).
  39. D. E. Smith and S. Chu, Response of flexible polymers to a sudden elongational flow, Science 281, 1335 (1998).
  40. M. S. Chong, A. E. Perry, and B. J. Cantwell, A general classification of three-dimensional flow fields, Phys. Fluids A 2, 765 (1990).
  41. G. Haller, Lagrangian coherent structures, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 47, 137 (2015).
  42. M. D. Chilcott and J. M. Rallison, Creeping flow of dilute polymer solutions past cylinders, and spheres, J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 29, 381 (1988).
  43. R. Sureshkumar, A. N. Beris, and R. A. Handler, Direct numerical simulation of the turbulent channel flow of a polymer solution, Phys. Fluids 9, 743 (1997).
  44. G. K. Batchelor, The stress system in a suspension of force-free particles, J. Fluid Mech. 41, 545 (1970).
  45. A. Einstein, Eine neue Bestimmung der Moleküldimensionen, Ann. Phys. 324, 289 (1906).
  46. C. Clasen, J. Eggers, M. A. Fontelos, J. Li, and G. H. McKinley, The beads-on-string structure of viscoelastic threads, J. Fluid Mech. 556, 283 (2006).
  47. N. R. Hall, G. H. McKinley, P. Erni, J. Soulages, and K. S. Magee, Preliminary findings from the SHERE ISS experiment, in 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, AIAA-2009-618 (AIAA, Orlando, Florida, 2009).
  48. A. Jaishankar, S. Haward, N. R. Hall, K. S. Magee, and G. H. McKinley, Shear history extensional rheology experiment II (SHERE II) microgravity rheology with non-Newtonian polymeric fluids, in 2012 American Society for Gravitational and Space Research (ASGSR) Meeting (New Orleans, LA, 2012), https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20130011410.
  49. G. H. McKinley, S. Haward, A. Jaishankar, and J. Soulages, SHERE: Shear history extensional rheology experiment final report, Technical report, NASA, Washington, DC (2011).
  50. G. H. McKinley and A. Jaishankar, SHERE II: Shear history extensional rheology experiment II, Technical report, NASA, Washington, DC (2013).
  51. J. M. Soulages, G. H. McKinley, N. R. Hall, K. S. Magee, G. E. Chamitoff, and E. M. Fincke, Extensional properties of a dilute polymer solution following preshear in microgravity, in Earth and Space 2010 (12th Biennial International Conference on Engineering, Construction, and Operations in Challenging Environments), Honolulu, HI, 14–17 March 2010 (American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, 2010), pp. 2199–2206.
  52. J. P. Rothstein and G. H. McKinley, Extensional flow of a polystyrene Boger fluid through a 4:1:4 axisymmetric contraction/expansion, J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 86, 61 (1999).
  53. P. S. Doyle, E. S. G. Shaqfeh, and A. P. Gast, Dynamic simulation of freely draining flexible polymers in steady linear flows, J. Fluid Mech. 334, 251 (1997).
  54. A. Jain and E. S. G. Shaqfeh, Transient, and steady shear rheology of particle-laden viscoelastic suspensions, J. Rheol. 65, 1269 (2021).
  55. L. G. Leal, Particle motions in a viscous fluid, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 12, 435 (1980).
  56. G. K. Batchelor, Slender-body theory for particles of arbitrary cross-section in Stokes flow, J. Fluid Mech. 44, 419 (1970).
  57. H. Han and C. Kim, Extensional behavior of rod suspension in dilute polymer solution, Korea-Aust. Rheol. J. 27, 197 (2015).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation