- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review Fluids

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Purcell's swimmer in a shear-thinning fluid

Ke Qin and On Shun Pak

  • Department of Mechanical Engineering, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, California 95053, USA

PDF

Phys. Rev. Fluids 8, 033301 – Published 3 March, 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.8.033301

Abstract

Locomotion of biological and artificial microswimmers has received considerable attention due to its fundamental biological relevance and promising biomedical applications such as drug delivery and microsurgery. Purcell's well-known discussion on “Life at Low Reynolds Number” [Am. J. Phys. 45, 3 (1977)] elucidated the stringent fluid dynamical constraints on swimming at the microscopic scale. He also presented the “simplest animal,” now known as Purcell's swimmer, that can swim in the absence of inertia, which has now become a useful model for exploring different fundamental aspects of microscopic locomotion. While extensive studies have improved our understanding of locomotion in Newtonian fluids, microswimmers often encounter biological fluids that display complex (non-Newtonian) rheological behaviors, and much less is known about swimming in complex fluids. In this work, we utilize Purcell's swimmer as a model swimmer to probe the impacts of shear-thinning rheology, a ubiquitous non-Newtonian behavior of biological fluids such as blood and mucus, on swimming at low Reynolds numbers. We show how the propulsion characteristics of Purcell's swimmer in a shear-thinning fluid differ from those in a Newtonian fluid in terms of both the magnitude and direction of propulsion, depending on the details of the swimming strokes. The simplicity of Purcell's swimmer allows us to rationalize the results by examining how the shear-thinning effect manifests in different swimming strokes in a cycle. We also demonstrate how unequal arm rotational rates can couple with the shear-thinning effect to induce a net vertical displacement of the swimmer, which is not possible in a Newtonian fluid. These results suggest modulating the arm rotational rates as a way to enable different two-dimensional motions of Purcell's swimmer in a shear-thinning fluid.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (57)

  1. L. J. Fauci and R. Dillon, Biofluidmechanics of reproduction, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 38, 371 (2006).
  2. E. A. Gaffney, H. Gadêlha, D. J. Smith, J. R. Blake, and J. C. Kirkman-Brown, Mammalian sperm motility: Observation and theory, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 43, 501 (2011).
  3. S. A. Mirbagheri and H. C. Fu, Helicobacter pylori Couples Motility and Diffusion to Actively Create a Heterogeneous Complex Medium in Gastric Mucus, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 198101 (2016).
  4. H. Gadêlha, P. Hernández-Herrera, F. Montoya, A. Darszon, and G. Corkidi, Human sperm uses asymmetric and anisotropic flagellar controls to regulate swimming symmetry and cell steering, Sci. Adv. 6, eaba5168 (2020).
  5. B. J. Nelson, I. K. Kaliakatsos, and J. J. Abbott, Microrobots for minimally invasive medicine, Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 12, 55 (2010).
  6. J. L. Moran and J. D. Posner, Phoretic self-propulsion, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 49, 511 (2017).
  7. C. Hu, S. Pané, and B. J. Nelson, Soft micro- and nanorobotics, Annu. Rev. Control Rob. Auton. Syst. 1, 53 (2018).
  8. Z. Wu, Y. Chen, D. Mukasa, O. S. Pak, and W. Gao, Medical micro/nanorobots in complex media, Chem. Soc. Rev. 49, 8088 (2020).
  9. E. M. Purcell, Life at low Reynolds number, Am. J. Phys. 45, 3 (1977).
  10. E. Lauga and T. R. Powers, The hydrodynamics of swimming microorganisms, Rep. Prog. Phys. 72, 096601 (2009).
  11. J. M. Yeomans, D. O. Pushkin, and H. Shum, An introduction to the hydrodynamics of swimming microorganisms, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 223, 1771 (2014).
  12. E. Lauga, The Fluid Dynamics of Cell Motility, Cambridge Texts in Applied Mathematics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2020).
  13. A. C. H. Tsang, E. Demir, Y. Ding, and O. S. Pak, Roads to smart artificial microswimmers, Adv. Intell. Syst. 2, 1900137 (2020).
  14. B. Castaing, An introduction to hydrodynamics, in Hydrodynamics and Nonlinear Instabilities, edited by C. Godrèche and P. Manneville, Collection Alea-Saclay: Monographs and Texts in Statistical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998), pp. 25–80.
  15. L. E. Becker, S. A. Koehler, and H. A. Stone, On self-propulsion of micro-machines at low Reynolds number: Purcell's three-link swimmer, J. Fluid Mech. 490, 15 (2003).
  16. J. E. Avron and O. Raz, A geometric theory of swimming: Purcell's swimmer and its symmetrized cousin, New J. Phys. 10, 063016 (2008).
  17. Y. Or, Asymmetry and Stability of Shape Kinematics in Microswimmers' Motion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 258101 (2012).
  18. D. Tam and A. E. Hosoi, Optimal Stroke Patterns for Purcell's Three-Link Swimmer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 068105 (2007).
  19. O. Wiezel and Y. Or, Optimization and small-amplitude analysis of Purcell's three-link microswimmer model, Proc. R. Soc. A 472, 20160425 (2016).
  20. L. Giraldi, P. Martinon, and M. Zoppello, Optimal design of Purcell's three-link swimmer, Phys. Rev. E 91, 023012 (2015).
  21. E. Passov and Y. Or, Dynamics of Purcell's three-link microswimmer with a passive elastic tail, Eur. Phys. J. E 35, 78 (2012).
  22. K. Ishimoto, C. Moreau, and K. Yasuda, Self-organized swimming with odd elasticity, Phys. Rev. E 105, 064603 (2022).
  23. R. L. Hatton, Y. Ding, H. Choset, and D. I. Goldman, Geometric Visualization of Self-Propulsion in a Complex Medium, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 078101 (2013).
  24. H. C. Berg, How spiroplasma might swim. J. Bacteriol. 184, 2063 (2002).
  25. G. J. Elfring and E. Lauga, Theory of locomotion through complex fluids, in Complex Fluids in Biological Systems, edited by S. E. Spagnolie (Springer, New York, 2015), pp. 283–317.
  26. J. Sznitman and P. E. Arratia, Locomotion through complex fluids: An experimental view, in Complex Fluids in Biological Systems, edited by S. E. Spagnolie (Springer, New York, 2015), pp. 245–281.
  27. D. A. Fedosov, H. Noguchi, and G. Gompper, Multiscale modeling of blood flow: From single cells to blood rheology, Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 13, 239 (2014).
  28. S. H. Hwang, M. Litt, and W. C. Forsman, Rheological properties of mucus, Rheol. Acta 8, 438 (1969).
  29. T. D. Montenegro-Johnson, A. A. Smith, D. J. Smith, D. Loghin, and J. R. Blake, Modelling the fluid mechanics of cilia and flagella in reproduction and development, Eur. Phys. J. E 35, 111 (2012).
  30. T. D. Montenegro-Johnson, D. J. Smith, and D. Loghin, Physics of rheologically enhanced propulsion: Different strokes in generalized stokes, Phys. Fluids 25, 081903 (2013).
  31. M. Dasgupta, B. Liu, H. C. Fu, M. Berhanu, K. S. Breuer, T. R. Powers, and A. Kudrolli, Speed of a swimming sheet in Newtonian and viscoelastic fluids, Phys. Rev. E 87, 013015 (2013).
  32. J. R. Vélez-Cordero and E. Lauga, Waving transport and propulsion in a generalized Newtonian fluid, J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech. 199, 37 (2013).
  33. D. A. Gagnon, N. C. Keim, and P. E. Arratia, Undulatory swimming in shear-thinning fluids: Experiments with Caenorhabditis elegans, J. Fluid Mech. 758, R3 (2014).
  34. G. Li and A. M. Ardekani, Undulatory swimming in non-Newtonian fluids, J. Fluid Mech. 784, R4 (2015).
  35. D. A. Gagnon and P. E. Arratia, The cost of swimming in generalized Newtonian fluids: Experiments with C. elegans, J. Fluid Mech. 800, 753 (2016).
  36. J.-S. Park, D. Kim, J. H. Shin, and D. A. Weitz, Efficient nematode swimming in a shear thinning colloidal suspension, Soft Matter 12, 1892 (2016).
  37. E. E. Riley and E. Lauga, Empirical resistive-force theory for slender biological filaments in shear-thinning fluids, Phys. Rev. E 95, 062416 (2017).
  38. S. Gómez, F. A. Godínez, E. Lauga, and R. Zenit, Helical propulsion in shear-thinning fluids, J. Fluid Mech. 812, R3 (2017).
  39. Z. Qu and K. S. Breuer, Effects of shear-thinning viscosity and viscoelastic stresses on flagellated bacteria motility, Phys. Rev. Fluids 5, 073103 (2020).
  40. E. Demir, N. Lordi, Y. Ding, and O. S. Pak, Nonlocal shear-thinning effects substantially enhance helical propulsion, Phys. Rev. Fluids 5, 111301(R) (2020).
  41. C. Datt, L. Zhu, G. J. Elfring, and O. S. Pak, Squirming through shear-thinning fluids, J. Fluid Mech. 784, R1 (2015).
  42. K. Pietrzyk, H. Nganguia, C. Datt, L. Zhu, G. J. Elfring, and O. S. Pak, Flow around a squirmer in a shear-thinning fluid, J. Non-Newton. Fluid. 268, 101 (2019).
  43. Y. Chen, E. Demir, W. Gao, Y.-N. Young, and O. S. Pak, Wall-induced translation of a rotating particle in a shear-thinning fluid, J. Fluid Mech. 927, R2 (2021).
  44. B. van Gogh, E. Demir, D. Palaniappan, and O. S. Pak, The effect of particle geometry on squirming through a shear-thinning fluid, J. Fluid Mech. 938, A3 (2022).
  45. K. Qin, Z. Peng, Y. Chen, H. Nganguia, L. Zhu, and O. S. Pak, Propulsion of an elastic filament in a shear-thinning fluid, Soft Matter 17, 3829 (2021).
  46. T. Qiu, T.-C. Lee, A. G. Mark, K. I. Morozov, R. Münster, O. Mierka, S. Turek, A. M. Leshansky, and P. Fischer, Swimming by reciprocal motion at low Reynolds number, Nat. Commun. 5, 5119 (2014).
  47. K. Han, C. W. Shields, B. Bharti, P. E. Arratia, and O. D. Velev, Active reversible swimming of magnetically assembled “microscallops” in non-Newtonian fluids, Langmuir 36, 7148 (2020).
  48. J. Gray and G. J. Hancock, The propulsion of sea-urchin spermatozoa, J. Exp. Biol. 32, 802 (1955).
  49. J. Lighthill, Mathematical Biofluiddynamics (SIAM, Philadelphia, 1975).
  50. R. B. Bird, R. C. Armstrong, and O. Hassager, Dynamics of Polymeric Liquids, Fluid Mechanics (Wiley, New York, 1987), Vol. 1.
  51. Y. Cho and K. Kensey, Effects of the non-Newtonian viscosity of blood on flows in a diseased arterial vessel. Part 1: Steady flows, Biorheology 28, 241 (1991).
  52. F. J. H. Gijsen, F. N. van de Vosse, and J. D. Janssen, The influence of the non-Newtonian properties of blood on the flow in large arteries: Steady flow in a carotid bifurcation model, J. Biomech. 32, 601 (1999).
  53. W. G. Li, X. Y. Luo, S. B. Chin, N. A. Hill, A. G. Johnson, and N. C. Bird, Non-Newtonian bile flow in elastic cystic duct: One- and three-dimensional modeling, Ann. Biomed. Eng. 36, 1893 (2008).
  54. U. Eberhard, H. J. Seybold, M. Floriancic, P. Bertsch, J. Jiménez-Martínez, J. S. Andrade, and M. Holzner, Determination of the effective viscosity of non-Newtonian fluids flowing through porous media, Front. Phys. 7, 71 (2019).
  55. M. J. D. Powell, A hybrid method for nonlinear equations, in Numerical Methods for Nonlinear Algebraic Equations, edited by P. Rabinowitz (Gordon and Breach, London, 1970).
  56. L. Petzold, Automatic selection of methods for solving stiff and nonstiff systems of ordinary differential equations, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 4, 136 (1983).
  57. A. C. Hindmarsh, ODEPACK, a systematized collection of ODE solvers, in Scientific Computing, edited by R. S. Stepleman et al. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1983).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Fluids 8, 033301– Published 3 March, 2023
  • Received 8 July 2022
  • Accepted 31 January 2023
Article part of CHORUS
Crossmark - Check for updates button

©2023 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation