Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Scalings and decay of homogeneous, nearly isotropic turbulence behind a jet array

Shiyong Tan, Xu Xu, Yinghe Qi, and Rui Ni*

  • Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA

  • *rui.ni@jhu.edu

Phys. Rev. Fluids 8, 024603 – Published 7 February, 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.8.024603

Abstract

Homogeneous and isotropic turbulence can be generated by many different mechanisms, from classical passive grids to jet arrays. By using high-speed jets, a jet array becomes a promising way to produce intense turbulence with large energy dissipation rates in water and wind tunnels. In this paper, a systematic experimental investigation was conducted to understand how the turbulence decay scales with the jet velocity, nozzle size, and nozzle spacings. Three-dimensional particle tracking was performed to quantify the spatial distribution of different turbulent characteristics. Combined with several previous experiments focusing on near-field measurements, our results provide a clear picture of the decay of the kinetic energy and the energy dissipation rate as well as the development of the inhomogeneity and anisotropy of turbulence generated by a jet array. Suggestions and design considerations for future wind and water tunnels are also provided.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (56)

  1. H. Schubert, On the turbulence-controlled microprocesses in flotation machines, Int. J. Miner. Process. 56, 257 (1999).
  2. M. Pourtousi, J. Sahu, and P. Ganesan, Effect of interfacial forces and turbulence models on predicting flow pattern inside the bubble column, Chem. Eng. Process. 75, 38 (2014).
  3. Á. Leelőssy, F. Molnár, F. Izsák, Á. Havasi, I. Lagzi, and R. Mészáros, Dispersion modeling of air pollutants in the atmosphere: a review, Open Geosci. 6, 257 (2014).
  4. F. Peters and C. Marrasé, Effects of turbulence on plankton: An overview of experimental evidence and some theoretical considerations, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 205, 291 (2000).
  5. L. F. G. Simmons and C. Salter, Experimental investigation and analysis of the velocity variations in turbulent flow, Proc. R. Soc. Lond., Contain. Pap. Math. Phys. Character 145, 212 (1934).
  6. T. Kurian and J. H. Fransson, Grid-generated turbulence revisited, Fluid Dyn. Res. 41, 021403 (2009).
  7. P.-Å. Krogstad and P. Davidson, Near-field investigation of turbulence produced by multi-scale grids, Phys. Fluids 24, 035103 (2012).
  8. M. Gad-El-Hak and S. Corrsin, Measurements of the nearly isotropic turbulence behind a uniform jet grid, J. Fluid Mech. 62, 115 (1974).
  9. G. K. Batchelor, The Theory of Homogeneous Turbulence (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1953).
  10. G. Comte-Bellot and S. Corrsin, The use of a contraction to improve the isotropy of grid-generated turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 25, 657 (1966).
  11. L. Mydlarski and Z. Warhaft, On the onset of high-Reynolds-number grid-generated wind tunnel turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 320, 331 (1996).
  12. M. Hideharu, Realization of a large-scale turbulence field in a small wind tunnel, Fluid Dyn. Res. 8, 53 (1991).
  13. H. Makita and K. Sassa, Active turbulence generation in a laboratory wind tunnel, in Advances in Turbulence 3 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1991), pp. 497-505.
  14. H. S. Kang, S. Chester, and C. Meneveau, Decaying turbulence in an active-grid-generated flow and comparisons with large-eddy simulation, J. Fluid Mech. 480, 129 (2003).
  15. A. Thormann and C. Meneveau, Decay of homogeneous, nearly isotropic turbulence behind active fractal grids, Phys. Fluids 26, 025112 (2014).
  16. E. Bodenschatz, G. P. Bewley, H. Nobach, M. Sinhuber, and H. Xu, Variable density turbulence tunnel facility, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 85, 093908 (2014).
  17. G. I. Taylor, Statistical theory of turbulence-ii, Proc. R. Soc. Lond., A-Math. Phys. Sci. 151, 444 (1935).
  18. T. V. Karman, The fundamentals of the statistical theory of turbulence, J. Aeronaut. Sci. 4, 131 (1937).
  19. G. Birkhoff, Fourier synthesis of homogeneous turbulence, Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 7, 19 (1954).
  20. P. Saffman, The large-scale structure of homogeneous turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 27, 581 (1967).
  21. E. van Doorn, C. M. White, and K. Sreenivasan, The decay of grid turbulence in polymer and surfactant solutions, Phys. Fluids 11, 2387 (1999).
  22. M. R. Smith, R. J. Donnelly, N. Goldenfeld, and W. F. Vinen, Decay of Vorticity in Homogeneous Turbulence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 2583 (1993).
  23. S. R. Stalp, L. Skrbek, and R. J. Donnelly, Decay of Grid Turbulence in a Finite Channel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4831 (1999).
  24. G. Comte-Bellot and S. Corrsin, Simple Eulerian time correlation of full-and narrow-band velocity signals in grid-generated, isotropicturbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 48, 273 (1971).
  25. D. Hurst and J. Vassilicos, Scalings and decay of fractal-generated turbulence, Phys. Fluids 19, 035103 (2007).
  26. N. Mazellier and J. Vassilicos, Turbulence without Richardson–Kolmogorov cascade, Phys. Fluids 22, 075101 (2010).
  27. P. Valente and J. C. Vassilicos, The decay of turbulence generated by a class of multiscale grids, J. Fluid Mech. 687, 300 (2011).
  28. P.-Å. Krogstad and P. Davidson, Freely decaying, homogeneous turbulence generated by multi-scale grids, J. Fluid Mech. 680, 417 (2011).
  29. R. Poorte and A. Biesheuvel, Experiments on the motion of gas bubbles in turbulence generated by an active grid, J. Fluid Mech. 461, 127 (2002).
  30. E. A. Variano and E. A. Cowen, A random-jet-stirred turbulence tank, J. Fluid Mech. 604, 1 (2008).
  31. A. Pérez-Alvarado, L. Mydlarski, and S. Gaskin, Effect of the driving algorithm on the turbulence generated by a random jet array, Exp. Fluids 57, 20 (2016).
  32. B. A. Johnson and E. A. Cowen, Turbulent boundary layers absent mean shear, J. Fluid Mech. 835, 217 (2018).
  33. A. U. M. Masuk, A. Salibindla, S. Tan, and R. Ni, V-ONSET (vertical octagonal noncorrosive stirred energetic turbulence): A vertical water tunnel with a large energy dissipation rate to study bubble/droplet deformation and breakup in strong turbulence, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 90, 085105 (2019).
  34. S. Tan, A. Salibindla, A. U. M. Masuk, and R. Ni, An open-source shake-the-box method and its performance evaluation, in 13th International Symposium on Particle Image Velocimetry — ISPIV 2019 Munich (Germany, 2019).
  35. S. Tan, A. Salibindla, A. U. M. Masuk, and R. Ni, Introducing openLPT: New method of removing ghost particles and high-concentration particle shadow tracking, Exp. Fluids 61, 1 (2020).
  36. E. A. Variano, E. Bodenschatz, and E. A. Cowen, A random synthetic jet array driven turbulence tank, Exp. Fluids 37, 613 (2004).
  37. G. Bellani and E. A. Variano, Homogeneity and isotropy in a laboratory turbulent flow, Exp. Fluids 55, 1 (2014).
  38. D. Carter, A. Petersen, O. Amili, and F. Coletti, Generating and controlling homogeneous air turbulence using random jet arrays, Exp. Fluids 57, 1 (2016).
  39. S. Ghahremanian and B. Moshfegh, Investigation in the near-field of a row of interacting jets, J. Fluids Eng. 137, 121202 (2015).
  40. K. Svensson, P. Rohdin, and B. Moshfegh, A computational parametric study on the development of confluent round jet arrays, Eur. J. Mech. - B/Fluids 53, 129 (2015).
  41. K. Svensson, P. Rohdin, and B. Moshfegh, On the influence of array size and jet spacing on jet interactions and confluence in round jet arrays, J. Fluids Eng. 138, 081206 (2016).
  42. M. Boussoufi, A. Sabeur-Bendehina, A. Ouadha, S. Morsli, and M. El Ganaoui, Numerical analysis of single and multiple jets, Eur. Phys. J.: Appl. Phys. 78, 34814 (2017).
  43. B. T. Kannan and N. R. Panchapakesan, Influence of nozzle configuration on the flow field of multiple jets, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part G 232, 1639 (2018).
  44. S. Ghahremanian, K. Svensson, M. J. Tummers, and B. Moshfegh, Near-field mixing of jets issuing from an array of round nozzles, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 47, 84 (2014).
  45. M. Bisoi, M. K. Das, S. Roy, and D. K. Patel, Turbulent statistics in flow field due to interaction of two plane parallel jets, Phys. Fluids 29, 125108 (2017).
  46. H. Teramoto and T. Kiwata, Flow characteristics of multiple round jets issuing from in-line nozzle arrangement, in Symposium on Fluid-Structure-Sound Interactions and Control (Springer, Singapore, 2017), p. 161.
  47. G. K. Jankee and B. Ganapathisubramani, Interaction and vectoring of parallel rectangular twin jets in a turbulent boundary layer, Phys. Rev. Fluids 6, 044701 (2021).
  48. T. Berk, G. Gomit, and B. Ganapathisubramani, Vectoring of parallel synthetic jets: A parametric study, J. Fluid Mech. 804, 467 (2016).
  49. H. J. Hussein, S. P. Capp, and W. K. George, Velocity measurements in a high-Reynolds-number, momentum-conserving, axisymmetric, turbulent jet, J. Fluid Mech. 258, 31 (1994).
  50. S. B. Pope and S. B. Pope, Turbulent Flows (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000).
  51. P. C. Chu, J. H. Lee, and V. H. Chu, Spreading of turbulent round jet in coflow, J. Hydraul. Eng. 125, 193 (1999).
  52. A. N. Kolmogorov, The local structure of turbulence in incompressible viscous fluid for very large Reynolds numbers, Proc. R. Soc. Lond., A: Math. Phys. Sci. 434, 9 (1991).
  53. R. Ni, K.-Q. Xia, Kolmogorov constants for the second-order structure function and the energy spectrum, Phys. Rev. E 87, 023002 (2013).
  54. K. R. Sreenivasan, An update on the energy dissipation rate in isotropic turbulence, Phys. Fluids 10, 528 (1998).
  55. W. K. George, The decay of homogeneous isotropic turbulence, Phys. Fluids A 4, 1492 (1992).
  56. C. Or, K. M. Lam, and P. Liu, Potential core lengths of round jets in stagnant and moving environments, J. Hydro-Environ. Res. 5, 81 (2011).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation