Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Systematic study of the Reynolds number and streamwise spacing effects in two-dimensional square-bar rough-wall turbulent boundary layers

Jiahao Kong1,*, Luke G. Bennetts2, Bagus Nugroho3, and R. C. Chin1

  • 1School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, 5005 South Australia, Australia
  • 2School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, 5005 South Australia, Australia
  • 3Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, 3010 Victoria, Australia

  • *jiahao.kong@adelaide.edu.au

Phys. Rev. Fluids 8, 014601 – Published 10 January, 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.8.014601

Abstract

Turbulent boundary layer experiments above a smooth wall and two-dimensional (2D) rod-roughened walls are conducted to investigate the effects of friction Reynolds numbers Reτ and streamwise spacing of the roughness elements on the flow properties. The first study uses the roughness pitch p to height k ratio p/k=8 and a range of friction Reynolds numbers, 1840Reτ7500. The result shows that the drag coefficient Cf converges to the fully rough condition (akin to the classic k-type roughness at a fully developed state) with large roughness Reynolds numbers (k+>75) when the friction Reynolds number reaches Reτ3900 and the relative roughness height is k/δ990.02, where δ99 is the boundary layer thickness. As Reτ increases, the premultiplied energy spectra show that the normalized energy of the near-wall cycle decreases, while the large-scale structures become more dominant. The second study uses a wide range of p/k (2p/k128) at Reτ3500. The Cf and the roughness function ΔU+ results indicate that the increase of streamwise spacing of the roughness elements p/k induces higher Cf and ΔU+, and it reaches the maximum value at p/k=8. For p/k>8, the Cf and ΔU+ values decrease as p/k increases, indicating a less severe drag increase. The premultiplied energy spectra also show that the highly energetic near-wall cycle of streaks and quasistreamwise vortices decreases as p/k increases (for all cases from p/k=2–128), and they seem to be transported farther from the wall. The trend is slightly different for the largest-scale structures located around the log region. The result suggests that 2D square-bar roughness can reduce the energy distribution for the largest-scale structure for p/k=2128.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (98)

  1. E. J. Richards, A review of aerodynamic cleanness, J. R. Aeronaut. Soc. 54, 137 (1950).
  2. B. Nugroho, J. P. Monty, I. K. Utama, B. Ganapathisubramani, and N. Hutchins, Non-k-type behaviour of roughness when in-plane wavelength approaches the boundary layer thickness, J. Fluid Mech. 911, A1 (2021).
  3. I. K. Utama, B. Nugroho, M. Yusuf, F. A. Prasetyo, M. L. Hakim, I. K. Suastika, B. Ganapathisubramani, N. Hutchins, and J. P. Monty, The effect of cleaning and repainting on the ship drag penalty, Biofouling 37, 372 (2021).
  4. M. P. Schultz and G. W. Swain, The influence of biofilms on skin friction drag, Biofouling 15, 129 (2000).
  5. J. P. Monty, E. Dogan, R. Hanson, A. J. Scardino, B. Ganapathisubramani, and N. Hutchins, An assessment of the ship drag penalty arising from light calcareous tubeworm fouling, Biofouling 32, 451 (2016).
  6. T. Martin, M. Tsamados, D. Schroeder, and D. L. Feltham, The impact of variable sea ice roughness on changes in Arctic Ocean surface stress: A model study, J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 121, 1931 (2016).
  7. F. Hama, Boundary-layer characteristics for smooth and rough surfaces, Trans. Soc. Nav. Archit. Mar. Eng. 62, 333 (1954).
  8. D. Chung, N. Hutchins, M. P. Schultz, and K. A. Flack, Predicting the drag of rough surfaces, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 53, 439 (2021).
  9. M. R. Raupach, R. A. Antonia, and S. Rajagopalan, Rough-wall turbulent boundary layers, Appl. Mech. Rev. 44, 1 (1991).
  10. J. Jiménez, Turbulent flows over rough walls, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 36, 173 (2004).
  11. K. A. Flack and M. P. Schultz, Roughness effects on wall-bounded turbulent flows, Phys. Fluids 26, 101305 (2014).
  12. E. Napoli, V. Armenio, and M. De Marchis, The effect of the slope of irregularly distributed roughness elements on turbulent wall-bounded flows, J. Fluid Mech. 613, 385 (2008).
  13. R. J. Volino, M. P. Schultz, and K. A. Flack, Turbulence structure in a boundary layer with two-dimensional roughness, J. Fluid Mech. 635, 75 (2009).
  14. J. H. Lee, H. J. Sung, and P. Å. Krogstad, Direct numerical simulation of the turbulent boundary layer over a cube-roughened wall, J. Fluid Mech. 669, 397 (2011).
  15. L. Chan, M. Macdonald, D. Chung, N. Hutchins, and A. Ooi, A systematic investigation of roughness height and wavelength in turbulent pipe flow in the transitionally rough regime, J. Fluid Mech. 771, 743 (2015).
  16. T. O. Jelly and A. Busse, Reynolds number dependence of Reynolds and dispersive stresses in turbulent channel flow past irregular near-Gaussian roughness, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 80, 108485 (2019).
  17. J. Nikuradse, Laws of flow in rough pipes, Natl. Advis. Commitee Aeronaut., Technical Memorandum 1292, November (NACA, Washington, DC, 1950).
  18. K. Kevin, J. P. Monty, H. L. Bai, G. Pathikonda, B. Nugroho, J. M. Barros, K. T. Christensen, and N. Hutchins, Cross-stream stereoscopic particle image velocimetry of a modified turbulent boundary layer over directional surface pattern, J. Fluid Mech. 813, 412 (2017).
  19. P. Å. Krogstad and R. A. Antonia, Surface roughness effects in turbulent boundary layers, Exp. Fluids 27, 450 (1999).
  20. D. T. Squire, N. Hutchins, C. Morrill-Winter, M. P. Schultz, J. C. Klewicki, and I. Marusic, Applicability of Taylor's hypothesis in rough- and smooth-wall boundary layers, J. Fluid Mech. 812, 398 (2017).
  21. E. Hunke, W. Lipscomb, P. Jones, A. Turner, N. Jeffery, and S. Elliott, CICE, The Los Alamos Sea Ice Model (2017), https://www.osti.gov//servlets/purl/1364126.
  22. M. Tsamados, D. L. Feltham, D. Schroeder, D. Flocco, S. L. Farrell, N. Kurtz, S. W. Laxon, and S. Bacon, Impact of variable atmospheric and oceanic form drag on simulations of Arctic sea ice, J. Phys. Oceanogr. 44, 1329 (2014).
  23. Y. Furuya, M. Miyata, and H. Fujita, Turbulent boundary layer and flow resistance on plates roughened by wires, J. Fluids Eng. Trans. ASME 98, 635 (1976).
  24. M. F. Tachie and K. K. Adane, PIV study of shallow open channel flow over d- and k-type transverse ribs, J. Fluids Eng. Trans. ASME 129, 1058 (2007).
  25. E. Sams, Experimental investigation of average heat transfer and friction coefficient for air flowing in circular tubes having square-thread-type roughness (National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, 1952), Vol. RM E52D17.
  26. A. E. Perry and P. N. Joubert, Rough-wall boundary layers in adverse pressure gradients, J. Fluid Mech. 17, 193 (1963).
  27. H. W. Townes and R. H. Sabersky, Experiments on the flow over a rough surface, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 9, 729 (1966).
  28. A. E. Perry, W. H. Schofield, and P. N. Joubert, Rough wall turbulent boundary layers, J. Fluid Mech. 37, 383 (1969).
  29. I. Tani, Turbulent boundary layer development over rough surfaces, in Perspectives in Turbulence Studies, edited by H. U. Meier and P. Bradshaw (Springer, Berlin, 1987), pp. 223–249.
  30. S. Leonardi, P. Orlandi, and R. A. Antonia, Properties of d- and k-type roughness in a turbulent channel flow, Phys. Fluids 19, 125101 (2007).
  31. M. MacDonald, A. Ooi, R. García-Mayoral, N. Hutchins, and D. Chung, Direct numerical simulation of high aspect ratio spanwise-aligned bars, J. Fluid Mech. 843, 126 (2018),.
  32. L. Djenidi, R. Elavarasan, and R. A. Antonia, The turbulent boundary layer over transverse square cavities, J. Fluid Mech. 395, 271 (1999).
  33. S. Leonardi, P. Orlandi, L. Djenidi, and R. A. Antonia, Structure of turbulent channel flow with square bars on one wall, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 25, 384 (2004).
  34. S. H. Lee and H. J. Sung, Direct numerical simulation of the turbulent boundary layer over a rod-roughened wall, J. Fluid Mech. 584, 125 (2007).
  35. M. Nadeem, J. H. Lee, J. Lee, and H. J. Sung, Turbulent boundary layers over sparsely-spaced rod-roughened walls, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 56, 16 (2015).
  36. J. Cui, V. C. Patel, and C. L. Lin, Large-eddy simulation of turbulent flow in a channel with rib roughness, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 24, 372 (2003).
  37. S. E. Coleman, V. I. Nikora, S. r. McLean, and E. Schlicke, Spatial averaged turbulent flow over square ribs, J. Eng. Mech. 133, 194 (2007).
  38. S. Leonardi, P. Orlandi, R. J. Smalley, L. Djenidi, and R. A. Antonia, Direct numerical simulations of turbulent channel flow with transverse square bars on one wall, J. Fluid Mech. 491, 229 (2003).
  39. J. H. Lee, A. Seena, S. hyun Lee, and H. J. Sung, Turbulent boundary layers over rod- and cube-roughened walls, J. Turbul. 13, N40 (2012).
  40. A. A. Townsend, The Structure of Turbulent Shear Flow, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1976), p. 429.
  41. O. M. Bakken, P. Å. Krogstad, A. Ashrafian, and H. I. Andersson, Reynolds number effects in the outer layer of the turbulent flow in a channel with rough walls, Phys. Fluids 17, 065101 (2005).
  42. P. Å. Krogstad, H. I. Andersson, O. M. Bakken, and A. Ashrafian, An experimental and numerical study of channel flow with rough walls, J. Fluid Mech. 530, 327 (2005).
  43. A. Ashrafian, H. I. Andersson, and M. Manhart, DNS of turbulent flow in a rod-roughened channel, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 25, 373 (2004).
  44. A. Ashrafian and H. I. Andersson, Roughness effects in turbulent channel flow, Prog. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 6, 1 (2006).
  45. R. J. Volino, M. P. Schultz, and K. A. Flack, Turbulence structure in boundary layers over periodic two- and three-dimensional roughness, J. Fluid Mech. 676, 172 (2011).
  46. V. Efros and P. Å. Krogstad, Development of a turbulent boundary layer after a step from smooth to rough surface, Exp. Fluids 51, 1563 (2011).
  47. Y. K. Choi, H. G. Hwang, Y. M. Lee, and J. H. Lee, Effects of the roughness height in turbulent boundary layers over rod- and cuboid-roughened walls, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 85, 108644 (2020).
  48. L. Djenidi, R. A. Antonia, M. Amielh, and F. Anselmet, A turbulent boundary layer over a two-dimensional rough wall, Exp. Fluids 44, 37 (2007).
  49. S. K. Robinson, Coherent motions in the turbulent boundary layer, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 23, 601 (1991).
  50. R. J. Adrian, Particle-imaging techniques for experimental fluid mechanics, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 23, 261 (1991).
  51. R. J. Adrian, Hairpin vortex organization in wall turbulence, Phys. Fluids 19, 041301 (2007).
  52. A. J. Smits, B. J. McKeon, and I. Marusic, High-Reynolds number wall turbulence, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 43, 353 (2011).
  53. J. Jiménez, Cascades in wall-bounded turbulence, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 44, 27 (2012).
  54. B. J. McKeon, High Reynolds number turbulent pipe flow, Ph.D. thesis, Princeton University, 2003.
  55. I. Marusic and J. P. Monty, Attached eddy model of wall turbulence, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 51, 49 (2019).
  56. R. J. Adrian and J. Westerweel, Particle Image Velocimetry (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011), p. 586.
  57. S. M. Islam, K. Haga, M. Kaminaga, R. Hino, and M. Monde, Experimental analysis of turbulent flow structure in a fully developed rib-roughened rectangular channel with PIV, Exp. Fluids 33, 296 (2002).
  58. L. Wang, J. Hejcik, and B. Sunden, PIV measurement of separated flow in a square channel with streamwise periodic ribs on one wall, J. Fluids Eng. Trans. ASME 129, 834 (2007).
  59. D. Pokrajac, L. J. Campbell, V. Nikora, C. Manes, and I. McEwan, Quadrant analysis of persistent spatial velocity perturbations over square-bar roughness, Exp. Fluids 42, 413 (2007).
  60. S. H. Lee, J. H. Kim, and H. J. Sung, PIV measurements of turbulent boundary layer over a rod-roughened wall, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 29, 1679 (2008).
  61. J. H. Lee, H. J. Sung, S. H. Lee, and K. Kim, Structures of the turbulent boundary layer over a rod-roughened wall, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 30, 1087 (2009).
  62. K. C. Kim and R. J. Adrian, Very large-scale motion in the outer layer, Phys. Fluids 11, 417 (1999).
  63. N. Hutchins and I. Marusic, Evidence of very long meandering features in the logarithmic region of turbulent boundary layers, J. Fluid Mech. 579, 1 (2007).
  64. A. E. Perry and M. S. Chong, On the mechanism of wall turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 119, 173 (1982).
  65. P. M. Ligrani and P. Bradshaw, Subminiature hot-wire sensors: Development and use, J. Phys. E: Sci. Instrum. 20, 323 (1987).
  66. N. Hutchins, T. B. Nickels, I. Marusic, and M. S. Chong, Hot-wire spatial resolution issues in wall-bounded turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 635, 103 (2009).
  67. R. J. Adrian, C. D. Meinhart, and C. D. Tomkins, Vortex organization in the outer region of the turbulent boundary layer, J. Fluid Mech. 422, 1 (2000).
  68. C. I. Chan, P. Schlatter, and R. C. Chin, Interscale transport mechanisms in turbulent boundary layers, J. Fluid Mech. 921, A13 (2021).
  69. C. C. Chin, N. Hutchins, A. S. Ooi, and I. Marusic, Use of direct numerical simulation (DNS) data to investigate spatial resolution issues in measurements of wall-bounded turbulence, Meas. Sci. Technol. 20, 115401 (2009).
  70. K. A. Chauhan, H. M. Nagib, and P. A. Monkewitz, On the composite logarithmic profile in zero pressure gradient turbulent boundary layers, AIAA 2007-532, 45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit 9, 6432 (2007).
  71. F. H. Clauser, Turbulent boundary layers in adverse pressure gradients, J. Aeronaut. Sci. 21, 91 (1954).
  72. I. Marusic, J. P. Monty, M. Hultmark, and A. J. Smits, On the logarithmic region in wall turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 716, R3 (2013).
  73. J. P. Monty, J. J. Allen, K. Lien, and M. S. Chong, Modification of the large-scale features of high Reynolds number wall turbulence by passive surface obtrusions, Exp. Fluids 51, 1755 (2011).
  74. K. A. Flack, M. P. Schultz, and J. S. Connelly, Examination of a critical roughness height for outer layer similarity, Phys. Fluids 19, 095104 (2007).
  75. M. P. Schultz and A. Myers, Comparison of three roughness function determination methods, Exp. Fluids 35, 372 (2003).
  76. J. M. Walker, The application of wall similarity techniques to determine wall shear velocity in smooth and rough wall turbulent boundary layers, J. Fluids Eng. 136, 051204 (2014).
  77. D. T. Squire, C. Morrill-Winter, N. Hutchins, M. P. Schultz, J. C. Klewicki, and I. Marusic, Comparison of turbulent boundary layers over smooth and rough surfaces up to high Reynolds numbers, J. Fluid Mech. 795, 210 (2016).
  78. R. J. Smalley, R. A. Antonia, and L. Djenidi, Self-preservation of rough-wall turbulent boundary layers, Eur. J. Mech. B 20, 591 (2001).
  79. S. Mochizuki, T. Kameda, and H. Osaka, Self-preservation of a turbulent boundary layer over d-type roughness, J. Fluid Sci. Technol. 1, 24 (2006).
  80. I. Marusic, K. A. Chauhan, V. Kulandaivelu, and N. Hutchins, Evolution of zero-pressure-gradient boundary layers from different tripping conditions, J. Fluid Mech. 783, 379 (2015).
  81. S. J. Kline, W. C. Reynolds, F. A. Schraub, and P. W. Runstadler, The structure of turbulent boundary layers, J. Fluid Mech. 30, 741 (1967).
  82. M. P. Schultz and K. A. Flack, The rough-wall turbulent boundary layer from the hydraulically smooth to the fully rough regime, J. Fluid Mech. 580, 381 (2007).
  83. L. Djenidi, K. M. Talluru, and R. A. Antonia, Can a turbulent boundary layer become independent of the Reynolds number?, J. Fluid Mech. 851, 1 (2018).
  84. I. Marusic, B. J. McKeon, P. A. Monkewitz, H. M. Nagib, A. J. Smits, and K. R. Sreenivasan, Wall-bounded turbulent flows at high Reynolds numbers: Recent advances and key issues, Phys. Fluids 22, 065103 (2010).
  85. K. A. Flack, M. P. Schultz, and J. M. Barros, Skin friction measurements of systematically-varied roughness: Probing the role of roughness amplitude and skewness, Flow Turbul. Combust. 104, 317 (2020).
  86. K. A. Flack, M. P. Schultz, J. M. Barros, and Y. C. Kim, Skin-friction behavior in the transitionally-rough regime, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 61, 21 (2016).
  87. G. I. Taylor, The spectrum of turbulence, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 164, 476 (1938).
  88. J. P. Monty, N. Hutchins, H. C. Ng, I. Marusic, and M. S. Chong, A comparison of turbulent pipe, channel and boundary layer flows, J. Fluid Mech. 632, 431 (2009).
  89. N. Hutchins and I. Marusic, Large-scale influences in near-wall turbulence, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 365, 647 (2007).
  90. R. Örlü, A. Segalini, J. Klewicki, and P. H. Alfredsson, High-order generalisation of the diagnostic scaling for turbulent boundary layers, J. Turbul. 17, 664 (2016).
  91. J. H. Lee and H. J. Sung, Very-large-scale motions in a turbulent boundary layer, J. Fluid Mech. 673, 80 (2011).
  92. N. Hutchins, W. T. Hambleton, and I. Marusic, Inclined cross-stream stereo particle image velocimetry measurements in turbulent boundary layers, J. Fluid Mech. 541, 21 (2005).
  93. I. P. Castro and E. Epik, Boundary layer development after a separated region, J. Fluid Mech. 374, 91 (1998).
  94. A. J. Smits, S. T. Young, and P. Bradshaw, The effect of short regions of high surface curvature on turbulent boundary layers, J. Fluid Mech. 94, 209 (1979).
  95. L. Ding and A. J. Smits, Relaxation of turbulent pipe flow downstream of a square bar roughness element, J. Fluid Mech. 922, A34 (2021).
  96. A. J. Musker, Explicit expression for the smooth wall velocity distribution in a turbulent boundary layer, AIAA J. 17, 655 (1979).
  97. A. E. Perry and J. D. Li, Experimental support for the attached-eddy hypothesis in zero-pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layers, J. Fluid Mech. 218, 405 (1990).
  98. D. Coles, The law of the wake in the turbulent boundary layer, J. Fluid Mech. 1, 191 (1956).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation