Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Interaction of a rigid buoyant sphere and a deforming bubble with a vortex ring: The role of deformability

Subhajit Biswas* and Raghuraman N. Govardhan

  • Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India

Phys. Rev. Fluids 7, 094302 – Published 29 September, 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.7.094302

Abstract

In bubbly turbulent flows, the deformation of the bubble is known to play an important role in the interaction between the carrier phase and the dispersed phase. In the present paper, we experimentally study an idealized version of the problem where we look at the interaction of a deforming air bubble (nonzero Weber number) and a rigid buoyant particle (zero Weber number) with a single vortex ring (in water) for a large range of ring-circulation-based Reynolds numbers (Re=Γ/ν=6000–67 300; Γ=ring circulation, ν=kinematic viscosity of water). We are able to obtain the particle to fluid density ratio (ρparticle/ρwater0.008) to be very low and of the same order as that of the bubble (ρbubble/ρwater0.001), with the main difference being the distinct difference in their deformability. The buoyant low density (rigid) particle and the deforming bubble are directly engulfed into the core of the vortex ring and enable measurements of the effects of particles or bubbles on the vortex ring. On the particle (and bubble) dynamics side, distinct differences can be seen right from the capture phase, as unlike the rigid particle, the bubble undergoes a large axial elongation and, consequently, a quicker capture than the particle. After capture by the ring, the bubble experiences an azimuthal pressure gradient, which leads to its elongation into a thin long bubble whose diameter is relatively small compared to the vortex core size. In sharp contrast, the particle does not deform and remains effectively localized along the rings azimuthal direction. These differences in the shape of the bubble and particle within the ring lead to distinct differences in the ring's convection speed, azimuthal vorticity, and enstrophy at later times. In particular, the measurements indicate that the localized large perturbation to the vorticity in the rigid particle case (an equivalent of a rigid bubble, zero Weber number) leads to a larger disruption of the vortex ring as seen in terms of higher reduction in the rings convection speed and azimuthal enstrophy than for the deforming bubble (nonzero Weber number) case. These results could have implications in bubbly turbulent flows such as in bubble drag reduction (BDR), where many studies [like Van Gils et al., J. Fluid Mech. 722, 317 (2013)] indicate that deforming bubbles are better for drag reduction than nondeforming bubbles at higher flow Re, where the dominant mechanism is the lifting of structures away from the wall. The present results suggest that in cases where vortex disruption is the primary mechanism for BDR [for example, at lower flow Re, Sugiyama et al., J. Fluid Mech. 608, 21 (2008)], better drag reduction would occur with nondeforming bubbles. The current study thus brings us insight into the role of deformability in the interaction of bubbles with a vortical structure, which could be important in helping us model and understand bubble-turbulence interactions.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (62)

  1. S. Balachandar and J. K. Eaton, Turbulent dispersed multiphase flow, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 42, 111 (2010).
  2. V. Mathai, D. Lohse, and C. Sun, Bubbly and buoyant particle–laden turbulent flows, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 11, 529 (2020).
  3. S. L. Ceccio, Friction drag reduction of external flows with bubble and gas injection, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 42, 183 (2010).
  4. S. Elghobashi, Direct numerical simulation of turbulent flows laden with droplets or bubbles, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 51, 217 (2019).
  5. Y. Murai, Frictional drag reduction by bubble injection, Exp. Fluids 55, 1773 (2014).
  6. J. Lu and G. Tryggvason, Effect of bubble deformability in turbulent bubbly upflow in a vertical channel, Phys. Fluids 20, 040701 (2008).
  7. C. Martínez-bazán, J. Montanes, and J. C. Lasheras, On the breakup of an air bubble injected into a fully developed turbulent flow. part 1. breakup frequency, J. Fluid Mech. 401, 157 (1999).
  8. F. Risso and J. Fabre, Oscillations and breakup of a bubble immersed in a turbulent field, J. Fluid Mech. 372, 323 (1998).
  9. B. Bunner and G. Tryggvason, Effect of bubble deformation on the properties of bubbly flows, J. Fluid Mech. 495, 77 (2003).
  10. S. Dabiri, J. Lu, and G. Tryggvason, Transition between regimes of a vertical channel bubbly upflow due to bubble deformability, Phys. Fluids 25, 102110 (2013).
  11. E. A. Ervin and G. Tryggvason, The rise of bubbles in a vertical shear flow, J. Fluids Eng., Trans. ASME 119, 443 (1997).
  12. K. Sugiyama, E. Calzavarini, and D. Lohse, Microbubbly drag reduction in Taylor-Couette flow in the wavy vortex regime, J. Fluid Mech. 608, 21 (2008).
  13. I. M. Mazzitelli, D. Lohse, and F. Toschi, On the relevance of the lift force in bubbly turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 488, 283 (2003).
  14. Y. Murai, H. Oiwa, and Y. Takeda, Bubble behavior in a vertical Taylor-Couette flow, in Journal of Physics: Conference Series (IOP Publishing, Japan, 2005), Vol. 14, p. 018.
  15. K. Yoshida, Y. Tasaka, Y. Murai, and T. Takeda, Mode transition in bubbly Taylor-Couette flow measured by PTV, in Journal of Physics: Conference Series (IOP Publishing, Japan, 2009), Vol. 147, p. 012013.
  16. T. H. van den Berg, S. Luther, D. P. Lathrop, and D. Lohse, Drag Reduction in Bubbly Taylor-Couette Turbulence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 044501 (2005).
  17. I. M. Mazzitelli, D. Lohse, and F. Toschi, The effect of microbubbles on developed turbulence, Phys. Fluids 15, L5 (2003).
  18. T. H. van den Berg, S. Luther, and D. Lohse, Energy spectra in microbubbly turbulence, Phys. Fluids 18, 038103 (2006).
  19. E. Climent and J. Magnaudet, Dynamics of a two-dimensional upflowing mixing layer seeded with bubbles: Bubble dispersion and effect of two-way coupling, Phys. Fluids 18, 103304 (2006).
  20. N. K. Jha, A. Bhatt, and R. N. Govardhan, Effect of bubble distribution on wall drag in turbulent channel flow, Exp. Fluids 60, 127 (2019).
  21. D. P. Van Gils, D. N. Guzman, C. Sun, and D. Lohse, The importance of bubble deformability for strong drag reduction in bubbly turbulent Taylor-Couette flow, J. Fluid Mech. 722, 317 (2013).
  22. B. Jacob, A. Olivieri, M. Miozzi, E. F. Campana, and R. Piva, Drag reduction by microbubbles in a turbulent boundary layer, Phys. Fluids 22, 115104 (2010).
  23. V. Spandan, R. Ostilla-Mónico, R. Verzicco, and D. Lohse, Drag reduction in numerical two-phase Taylor-Couette turbulence using an euler–lagrange approach, J. Fluid Mech. 798, 411 (2016).
  24. A. Ferrante and S. Elghobashi, On the physical mechanisms of drag reduction in a spatially developing turbulent boundary layer laden with microbubbles, J. Fluid Mech. 503, 345 (1999).
  25. J. Lu, A. Fernández, and G. Tryggvason, The effect of bubbles on the wall drag in a turbulent channel flow, Phys. Fluids 17, 095102 (2005).
  26. V. Spandan, R. Verzicco, and D. Lohse, Deformable ellipsoidal bubbles in Taylor-Couette flow with enhanced euler-lagrangian tracking, Phys. Rev. Fluids 2, 104304 (2017).
  27. J. Magnaudet and I. Eames, The motion of high-Reynolds-number bubbles in inhomogeneous flows, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 32, 659 (2000).
  28. A. A. Townsend, The Structure of Turbulent Shear Flow (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1980).
  29. G. Sridhar and J. Katz, Effect of entrained bubbles on the structure of vortex rings, J. Fluid Mech. 397, 171 (1999).
  30. A. J. Cihonski, J. R. Finn, and S. V. Apte, Volume displacement effects during bubble entrainment in a travelling vortex ring, J. Fluid Mech. 721, 225 (2013).
  31. J. Finn, E. Shams, and S. V. Apte, Modeling and simulation of multiple bubble entrainment and interactions with two dimensional vortical flows, Phys. Fluids 23, 023301 (2011).
  32. A. Ferrante and S. E. Elghobashi, On the effects of microbubbles on Taylor-Green vortex flow, J. Fluid Mech. 572, 145 (2007).
  33. N. K. Jha and R. Govardhan, Interaction of a vortex ring with a single bubble: Bubble and vorticity dynamics, J. Fluid Mech. 773, 460 (2015).
  34. S. Biswas and R. N. Govardhan, Effect of single and multiple bubbles on a thin vortex ring, J. Flow Visualization Image Process. 27, 1 (2020).
  35. S. Biswas and R. N. Govardhan, Effects of weber number on the interaction of single and multiple bubbles with a vortex ring, in APS Division of Fluid Dynamics Meeting Abstracts (American Physical Society, Chicago, 2020), pp. J10–010.
  36. S. Biswas and R. N. Govardhan, Interaction of a vortex ring with single and multiple air bubbles, in APS Division of Fluid Dynamics Meeting Abstracts (American Physical Society, Seattle, 2019), pp. G28–004.
  37. F. Foronda-Trillo, J. Rodrguez-Rodrguez, C. Gutirrez-Montes, and C. Martnez-Bazn, Deformation and breakup of bubbles interacting with single vortex rings, Int. J. Multiphase Flow 142, 103734 (2021).
  38. T. Uchiyama and H. Yagami, Numerical simulation for the collision between a vortex ring and solid particles, Powder Technol. 188, 73 (2008).
  39. K. Domon, O. Ishihara, and S. Watanabe, Mass transport by a vortex ring, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 69, 120 (2000).
  40. J. Norbury, A family of steady vortex rings, J. Fluid Mech. 57, 417 (1973).
  41. L. E. Fraenkel, Examples of steady vortex rings of small cross-section in an ideal fluid, J. Fluid Mech. 51, 119 (1972).
  42. J. Choi, C.-T. Hsiao, G. Chahine, and S. Ceccio, Growth, oscillation and collapse of vortex cavitation bubbles, J. Fluid Mech. 624, 255 (2009).
  43. M. Gharib, E. Rambod, and K. Shariff, A universal time scale for vortex ring formation, J. Fluid Mech. 360, 121 (1998).
  44. A. Glezer, The formation of vortex rings, Phys. Fluids 31, 3532 (1988).
  45. J. P. Sullivan, S. E. Widnall, and S. Ezekiel, Study of vortex rings using a laser doppler velocimeter, AIAA J. 11, 1384 (1973).
  46. M. K. Tripathi, K. C. Sahu, and R. Govindarajan, Dynamics of an initially spherical bubble rising in quiescent liquid, Nat. Commun. 6, 6268 (2015).
  47. S. Takagi and Y. Matsumoto, Surfactant effects on bubble motion and bubbly flows, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 43, 615 (2011).
  48. R. Clift, J. R. Grace, and M. E. Weber, Bubbles, Drops, and Particles (Academic Press, New York, 1978).
  49. S. Takagi, T. Uda, Y. Watanabe, and Y. Matsumoto, Behavior of a rising bubble in water with surfactant dissolution: 1st report, steady behavior, Trans. Japan Soc. Mech. Eng. 69, 2192 (2003).
  50. P. Duineveld, The rise velocity and shape of bubbles in pure water at high Reynolds number, J. Fluid Mech. 292, 325 (1995).
  51. Y. Tagawa, S. Takagi, and Y. Matsumoto, Surfactant effect on path instability of a rising bubble, J. Fluid Mech. 738, 124 (2014).
  52. R. Mei, J. F. Klausner, and C. J. Lawrence, A note on the history force on a spherical bubble at finite Reynolds number, Phys. Fluids 6, 418 (1994).
  53. G. Oweis, I. Van der Hout, C. Iyer, G. Tryggvason, and S. Ceccio, Capture and inception of bubbles near line vortices, Phys. Fluids 17, 022105 (2005).
  54. W. L. Haberman and R. Morton, An experimental investigation of the drag and shape of air bubbles rising in various liquids, technical report, David Taylor Model Basin, Washington, D.C., 1953.
  55. A. Hölzer and M. Sommerfeld, New simple correlation formula for the drag coefficient of non-spherical particles, Powder Technol. 184, 361 (2008).
  56. S. Biswas and R. N. Govardhan, Bubble capture, breakup, and coalescence in vortex–bubble interaction, in Proceedings of 16th Asian Congress of Fluid Mechanics (Springer, Singapore, 2021), pp. 33–41.
  57. T. Maxworthy, Some experimental studies of vortex rings, J. Fluid Mech. 81, 465 (1977).
  58. I. S. Sullivan, J. J. Niemela, R. E. Hershberger, D. Bolster, and R. J. Donnelly, Dynamics of thin vortex rings, J. Fluid Mech. 609, 319 (2008).
  59. H. S. Husain and F. Hussain, Elliptic jets. Part 3. Dynamics of preferred mode coherent structure, J. Fluid Mech. 248, 315 (1993).
  60. Y. Fukumoto and H. Moffatt, Motion and expansion of a viscous vortex ring. Part 1. A higher-order asymptotic formula for the velocity, J. Fluid Mech. 417, 1 (2000).
  61. M. Pang, J. Wei, and B. Yu, Numerical study on modulation of microbubbles on turbulence frictional drag in a horizontal channel, Ocean Eng. 81, 58 (2014).
  62. P. Zhao, Y. Chen, G. Dong, Y. Liu, and X. Lyu, Proper orthogonal decomposition analysis on longitudinal streaks in channel flow laden with micro-bubbles, Fluid Dyn. Res. 51, 035504 (2019).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation