Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Forced separation unsteadiness in a supersonic blunt fin flow

Haryl Ngoh* and Jonathan Poggie

  • Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, USA

  • *jngoh@purdue.edu
  • jpoggie@purdue.edu

Phys. Rev. Fluids 7, 093903 – Published 12 September, 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.7.093903

Abstract

Detached eddy simulations of a Mach 3, turbulent flow over a blunt fin were performed. Past experiments have shown that this configuration generates a large, three-dimensional, unsteady, separated region. Our previously published detached eddy simulations exhibited large-scale unsteadiness even in the absence of fluctuations in the incoming flow. The introduction of synthetic turbulence at the inflow boundary altered that separation motion. With the previous simulations as a reference baseline, a parametric study was carried out of the response of the flow to time-periodic forcing of the incoming boundary layer. The disturbances were introduced into the boundary layer through momentum and energy source terms. The spatial form of the source terms was based on averages of the baseline flow, conditioned on the motion of the separation shock. The response of the separation shock motion to the imposed perturbations was found to be dependent on the frequency of forcing. With a forcing frequency representative of the characteristic large-scale separation unsteadiness in the baseline flow, the separation shock motion was phase locked to the applied force, and a larger forcing amplitude led to greater separation motion. The separation region did not, however, respond strongly to disturbances in a higher frequency range. These results show that, in a flow that oscillates in the absence of upstream disturbances, separation motion can be modulated by upstream forcing of a particular form. Similar results have been obtained in the past for flows where separation unsteadiness is directly driven by incoming turbulence, but the modulation of self-excited oscillations in the present class of flow is a different behavior. It suggests opportunities for flow control of strong shock-wave–boundary-layer interactions.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (55)

  1. N. T. Clemens and V. Narayanaswamy, Low-frequency unsteadiness of shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interactions, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 46, 469 (2014).
  2. D. R. Chapman, D. M. Kuehn, and H. K. Larson, Investigation of separated flows in supersonic and subsonic streams with emphasis on the effect of transition, NACA Report No. 1356 (1958).
  3. A. L. Kistler, Fluctuating wall pressure under a separated supersonic flow, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 36, 543 (1964).
  4. D. S. Dolling, Fifty years of shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction research: What next? AIAA J. 39, 1517 (2001).
  5. D. V. Gaitonde, Progress in shock wave/boundary layer interactions, Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 72, 80 (2015).
  6. K. M. Porter and J. Poggie, Selective upstream influence on the unsteadiness of a separated turbulent compression ramp flow, Phys. Fluids 31, 016104 (2019).
  7. J. Poggie, Effect of forcing on a supersonic compression ramp flow, AIAA J. 57, 3765 (2019).
  8. H. Ngoh and J. Poggie, Detached eddy simulation of blunt-fin-induced shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction, AIAA J. 60, 2097 (2022).
  9. M. C. Galbraith and P. D. Orkwis, Multi-Row Micro-Ramp Actuators for Shock Wave Boundary-Layer Interaction Control, AIAA Paper No. 2009-321 (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, VA, 2009).
  10. M. L. Funderburk and V. Narayanaswamy, Experimental Investigation of Microramp Vortex Generator Application Upstream of an Axisymmetric Shock Boundary Layer Interaction, AIAA Paper No. 2018-4937 (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, VA, 2018).
  11. M. J. Schwartz, K. M. Stamper, R. B. Bond, and J. D. Schmisseur, Passive Flow Control on Crossing Shock-Wave/Boundary-Layer Interactions, AIAA Paper No. 2019-3595 (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, VA, 2019).
  12. V. Shinde, J. McNamara, and D. V. Gaitonde, Control of transitional shock wave boundary layer interaction using structurally constrained surface morphing, Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 96, 105545 (2020).
  13. S. Lee and A. Gross, Numerical Investigation of Effect of Corrugated Wall on Supersonic Turbulent Shock-Wave Boundary Layer Interaction, AIAA Paper No. 2021-2765 (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, VA, 2021).
  14. Y.-L. Lin, M. J. Rimlinger, T. I.-P. Shih, and B. P. Willis, Control of Shock-Wave/Boundary-Layer Interactions with Passive Blowing and Bleeding, AIAA Paper No. 97-3002 (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, VA, 1997).
  15. R. Bur, B. Corbel, and J. Delery, Study of passive control in a transonic shock wave/boundary-layer interaction, AIAA J. 36, 394 (1998).
  16. V. Pasquariello, M. Grilli, S. Hickel, and N. A. Adams, Large-eddy simulation of passive shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction control, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 49, 116 (2014).
  17. M. Y. Ali, F. S. Alvi, R. Kumar, C. Manisankar, S. B. Verma, and L. Venkatakrishnan, Studies on the influence of steady microactuators on shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction, AIAA J. 51, 2753 (2013).
  18. S. B. Verma, C. Manisankar, and C. Raju, Control of shock unsteadiness in shock boundary-layer interaction on a compression corner using mechanical vortex generators, Shock Waves 22, 327 (2012).
  19. S. B. Verma, C. Manisankar, and P. Akshara, Control of shock-wave boundary layer interaction using steady micro-jets, Shock Waves 25, 535 (2015).
  20. D. P. Ramaswamy and A.-M. Schreyer, Control of shock-induced separation of a turbulent boundary layer using air-jet vortex generators, AIAA J. 59, 927 (2021).
  21. M. A. Eitner, Y.-J. Ahn, M. N. Musta, L. Vanstone, J. Sirohi, and N. T. Clemens, Effect of shock wave boundary layer interaction on vibratory response of a compliant panel, in AIAA Aviation Forum, AIAA Paper No. 2021-2493 (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, VA, 2021).
  22. J. Poggie, Control of Shock-Wave /Boundary-Layer Interaction Using Volumetric Energy Deposition, AIAA Paper No. 2008-1090 (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, VA, 2008).
  23. A. Sasoh, A. Iwakawa, T. Osuka, R. Majima, T. Tamba, and T. Sakai, Control of Shock Wave-Boundary Layer Interaction by Repetitive Laser Energy Depositions, AIAA Paper No. 2014-2369 (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, VA, 2014).
  24. A. Iwakawa, T. Tamba, H. S. Pham, T. Shoda, and A. Sasoh, Control of Shock Wave Boundary Layer Interaction using Laser Pulse Energy Depositions, AIAA Paper No. 2015-2781 (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, VA, 2015).
  25. A. Iwakawa, T. Tamba, H. S. Pham, T. Shoda, and A. Sasoh, Pulse Energy Effect on Shock Wave Boundary Layer Interaction Control using Repetitive Energy Depositions, AIAA Paper No. 2016-3342 (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, VA, 2016).
  26. E. Caraballo, N. Webb, J. Little, J.-H. Kim, and M. Samimy, Supersonic Inlet Flow Control Using Plasma Actuators, AIAA Paper No. 2009-924 (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, VA, 2009).
  27. N. Webb, C. Clifford, and M. Samimy, Preliminary Results on Shock Wave/Boundary Layer Interaction Control Using Localized Arc Filament Plasma Actuators, AIAA Paper No. 2011-3426 (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, VA, 2011).
  28. N. Webb, C. Clifford, and M. Samimy, Control of oblique shock wave/boundary layer interactions using plasma actuators, Exp. Fluids 54, 1545 (2013).
  29. T. Gan, Y. Wu, Z. Sun, D. Jin, H. Song, and M. Jia, Shock wave boundary layer interaction controlled by surface arc plasma actuators, Phys. Fluids 30, 055107 (2018).
  30. M. Tang, Y. Wu, S. Guo, Z. Sun, and Z. Luo, Effect of the streamwise pulsed arc discharge array on shock wave/boundary layer interaction control, Phys. Fluids 32, 076104 (2020).
  31. M. Tang, Y. Wu, S. Guo, H. Liang, and Y. Luo, Compression ramp shock wave/boundary layer interaction control with high-frequency streamwise pulsed spark discharge array, Phys. Fluids 32, 121704 (2020).
  32. V. Narayanaswamy, L. L. Raja, and N. T. Clemens, Control of a shock/boundary-layer interaction by using a pulsed-plasma jet actuator, AIAA J. 50, 246 (2012).
  33. V. Narayanaswamy, L. L. Raja, and N. T. Clemens, Control of unsteadiness of a shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction by using a pulsed-plasma-jet actuator, Phys. Fluids 24, 076101 (2012).
  34. B. R. Greene, N. T. Clemens, P. Magari, and D. Micka, Control of mean separation in shock boundary layer interaction using pulsed plasma jets, Shock Waves 25, 495 (2015).
  35. K. Kinefuchi, A. Y. Starikovskiy, and R. B. Miles, Control of shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction using nanosecond-pulsed plasma actuators, J. Propul. Power 34, 909 (2018).
  36. C. Kalra, S. H. Zaidi, B. J. Alderman, R. B. Miles, and Y. V. Murty, Magnetically Driven Surface Discharges for Shock-Wave Induced Boundary-Layer Separation Control, AIAA Paper No. 2007-222 (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, VA, 2007).
  37. C. S. Kalra, S. H. Zaidi, R. B. Miles, and S. O. Macheret, Shockwave-turbulent boundary layer interaction control using magnetically driven surface discharges, Exp. Fluids 50, 547 (2011).
  38. M. D. Atkinson, J. Poggie, and J. A. Camberos, Control of separated flow in a reflected shock interaction using a magnetically-accelerated surface discharge, Phys. Fluids 24, 126102 (2012).
  39. N. J. Bisek, D. P. Rizzetta, and J. Poggie, Plasma control of a turbulent shock boundary-layer interaction, AIAA J. 51, 1789 (2013).
  40. L. J. Mears, N. Arora, and F. S. Alvi, Introducing Controlled Perturbations in a 3-D Swept Shock Boundary Layer Interaction, AIAA Paper No. 2018-2076 (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, VA, 2018).
  41. L. J. Mears, N. Arora, and F. S. Alvi, Flowfield Response to Controlled Perturbations in Swept Shock/Boundary-Layer Interaction Using Unsteady Pressure-Sensitive Paint, AIAA Paper No. 2019-0094 (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, VA, 2019).
  42. A. Mohammed-Taifour and J. Weiss, Periodic forcing of a large turbulent separation bubble, J. Fluid Mech. 915, A24 (2021).
  43. S. Priebe, J. H. Tu, C. W. Rowley, and M. Pino Martin, Low-frequency dynamics in a shock-induced separated flow, J. Fluid Mech. 807, 441 (2016).
  44. J.-M. Chomaz, Global instabilities in spatially developing flows: Non-normality and nonlinearity, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 37, 357 (2005).
  45. M. C. Adler and D. V. Gaitonde, Dynamic linear response of a shock/turbulent-boundary-layer interaction using constrained perturbations, J. Fluid Mech. 840, 291 (2018).
  46. T. Hacker, B. Yang, and G. McCartney, Empowering Faculty: A campus cyberinfrastructure strategy for research communities, Educause Review (2014).
  47. D. S. Dolling and S. M. Bogdonoff, An Experimental Investigation of the Unsteady Behavior of Blunt Fin-Induced Shock Wave Turbulent Boundary Layer Interactions, AIAA Paper No. 1981-1287 (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, VA, 1981).
  48. D. S. Dolling and S. M. Bogdonoff, Blunt fin-induced shock wave/turbulent boundary-layer interaction, AIAA J. 20, 1674 (1982).
  49. T. Economon, F. Palacios, S. R. Copeland, T. W. Lukaczyk, and J. J. Alonso, SU2: An open-source suite for multiphysics simulation and design, AIAA J. 54, 828 (2016).
  50. E. S. Molina, C. Spode, R. G. A. Silva, D. E. Manosalvas-Kjono, S. Nimmagadda, T. D. Economon, J. J. Alonso, and M. Righi, Hybrid RANS/LES Calculations in SU2, AIAA Paper No. 2017-4284 (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, VA, 2017).
  51. M. L. Shur, P. R. Spalart, M. K. Strelets, and A. K. Travin, An enhanced version of DES with rapid transition from RANS to LES in separated flows, Flow Turbul. Combust. 95, 709 (2015).
  52. P. R. Spalart and S. R. Allmaras, A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows, in 30th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, AIAA Paper No. 1992-439 (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, VA, 1992).
  53. A. S. Deshpande, Unsteady dynamics of shock-wave boundary-layer interactions, Ph.D. thesis, Purdue University, 2021.
  54. P. Stoica and R. Moses, Spectral Analysis of Signals (Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2005), Secs. 2.6.2 and 2.7.2.
  55. M. P. Martin, S. Priebe, and C. M. Helm, Upstream and Downstream Influence on STBLI Instability, AIAA Paper No. 2016-3341 (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, VA, 2016).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation