Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Effect of Weissenberg number on polymer-laden turbulence

Sajjad ur Rehman

Junghoon Lee

Changhoon Lee*

  • School of Humanities and Sciences, College of Aeronautical Engineering (CAE), National University of Sciences and Technology, Risalpur, Pakistan

  • School of Mathematics and Computing, Yonsei University, 03722 Seoul, Korea

  • School of Mathematics and Computing, Yonsei University, 03722 Seoul, Korea and Department of Mechanical Engineering, Yonsei University, 03722 Seoul, Korea

  • *Corresponding author: clee@yonsei.ac.kr

Phys. Rev. Fluids 7, 064303 – Published 8 June, 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.7.064303

Abstract

Direct numerical simulation of polymer-laden turbulent flow is performed for the investigation of the two-way interaction. Lagrangian dynamic simulation is adopted for a finitely extensible nonlinear elastic (FENE-2) dumbbell model to observe polymer dynamics in turbulent flow. The impact of the polymers on fluid momentum is described using the elastic force between two beads. The elasticity of the polymer is characterized using the Weissenberg number, We*=τpτk, where τp and τk denote the elasticity timescale and the Kolmogorov timescale, respectively. We observe that for We*1.0 most of the polymers are in a coiled state and the hydrodynamic properties of fluid remain unchanged. The coil-stretch transition is observed at approximately We*=3.0. The highly stretched polymers in turn contribute to significant turbulence modification for large values of the Weissenberg number. The effect of the Weissenberg number on various turbulent statistics is computed and analyzed. The highly stretched polymers tend to rotate around the vortical structures. The feedback force effectively suppresses the turbulence structures for large values of the elasticity parameter. The effect of We* on the alignment between the end-to-end distance vector, vorticity vector, and the eigenvector of the rate of strain tensor is presented. A better insight into the effect of polymers on turbulence is obtained through the direct force modeling in stationary turbulence although the effect itself has been known for a long time.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (46)

  1. B. A. Toms, Some observations on the flow of linear polymer solutions through straight tubes at large Reynolds numbers, in Proceedings of the 1st International Congress of Rheology (N. Holland, Amsterdam, 1948), pp. 135–141.
  2. E. D. Burger, W. R. Munk, and H. A. Wahl, Flow increase in the Trans-Alaska Pipeline through use of a polymeric drag-reducing additive, J. Pet. Technol. 34, 377 (1982).
  3. R. B. Bird, Dynamics of Polymeric Liquids (Wiley, New York, 1977).
  4. W.-H. Cai, F.-C. Li, and H.-N. Zhang, Direct numerical simulation study of the interaction between the polymer effect and velocity gradient tensor in decaying homogeneous isotropic turbulence, Chin. Phys. B 20, 124702 (2011).
  5. E. De Angelis, C. Casciola, R. Benzi, and R. Piva, Homogeneous isotropic turbulence in dilute polymers, J. Fluid Mech. 531, 1 (2005).
  6. C. D. Dimitropoulos, Y. Dubief, E. S. Shaqfeh, P. Moin, and S. K. Lele, Direct numerical simulation of polymer-induced drag reduction in turbulent boundary layer flow, Phys. Fluids 17, 011705 (2005).
  7. C. D. Dimitropoulos, R. Sureshkumar, and A. N. Beris, Direct numerical simulation of viscoelastic turbulent channel flow exhibiting drag reduction: Effect of the variation of rheological parameters, J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 79, 433 (1998).
  8. R. Sureshkumar, A. N. Beris, and R. A. Handler, Direct numerical simulation of the turbulent channel flow of a polymer solution, Phys. Fluids 9, 743 (1997).
  9. P. Ilg, E. De Angelis, I. Karlin, C. Casciola, and S. Succi, Polymer dynamics in wall turbulent flow, EPL 58, 616 (2002).
  10. P. Perlekar, D. Mitra, and R. Pandit, Direct numerical simulations of statistically steady, homogeneous, isotropic fluid turbulence with polymer additives, Phys. Rev. E 82, 066313 (2010).
  11. P. C. Valente, C. B. da Silva, and F. T. Pinho, The effect of viscoelasticity on the turbulent kinetic energy cascade, J. Fluid Mech. 760, 39 (2014).
  12. P. C. Valente, C. B. da Silva, and F. T. Pinho, Energy spectra in elasto-inertial turbulence, Phys. Fluids 28, 075108 (2016).
  13. S. Jin and L. R. Collins, Dynamics of dissolved polymer chains in isotropic turbulence, New J. Phys. 9, 360 (2007).
  14. T. Watanabe and T. Gotoh, Coil-stretch transition in an ensemble of polymers in isotropic turbulence, Phys. Rev. E 81, 066301 (2010).
  15. D. Vincenzi, P. Perlekar, L. Biferale, and F. Toschi, Impact of the Peterlin approximation on polymer dynamics in turbulent flows, Phys. Rev. E 92, 053004 (2015).
  16. T. Peters and J. Schumacher, Two-way coupling of finitely extensible nonlinear elastic dumbbells with a turbulent shear flow, Phys. Fluids 19, 065109 (2007).
  17. T. Watanabe and T. Gotoh, Kinetic energy spectrum of low-Reynolds-number turbulence with polymer additives, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 454, 012007 (2013).
  18. T. Watanabe and T. Gotoh, Hybrid Eulerian-Lagrangian simulations for polymer-turbulence interactions, J. Fluid Mech. 717, 535 (2013).
  19. T. Watanabe and T. Gotoh, Power-law spectra formed by stretching polymers in decaying isotropic turbulence, Phys. Fluids 26, 035110 (2014).
  20. A. Ferrante and S. Elghobashi, On the physical mechanisms of two-way coupling in particle-laden isotropic turbulence, Phys. Fluids 15, 315 (2003).
  21. A. H. Abdelsamie and C. Lee, Decaying versus stationary turbulence in particle-laden isotropic turbulence: Turbulence modulation mechanism, Phys. Fluids 24, 015106 (2012).
  22. A. H. Abdelsamie and C. Lee, Decaying versus stationary turbulence in particle-laden isotropic turbulence: Heavy particle statistics modifications, Phys. Fluids 25, 033303 (2013).
  23. J. Lee and C. Lee, Modification of particle-laden near-wall turbulence: Effect of Stokes number, Phys. Fluids 27, 023303 (2015).
  24. B. Gereltbyamba and C. Lee, Flow modification by inertial particles in a differentially heated cubic cavity, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 79, 108445 (2019).
  25. J. Lee and C. Lee, The effect of wall-normal gravity on particle-laden near-wall turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 873, 475 (2019).
  26. H. Shim and C. Lee, Two-way interaction between isotropic turbulence and dispersed bubbles, J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 35, 1527 (2021).
  27. W.-H. Cai, F.-C. Li, and H.-N. Zhang, DNS study of decaying homogeneous isotropic turbulence with polymer additives, J. Fluid Mech. 665, 334 (2010).
  28. B. Eckhardt, J. Kronjäger, and J. Schumacher, Stretching of polymers in a turbulent environment, Comput. Phys. Comm. 147, 538 (2002).
  29. M. Fujimura, T. Atsumi, H. Mamori, K. Iwamoto, A. Murata, M. Masuda, and H. Ando, Numerical simulation of drag-reducing channel flow by using bead-spring chain model, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 63, 75 (2017).
  30. V. Eswaran and S. Pope, An examination of forcing in direct numerical simulations of turbulence, Comput. Fluids 16, 257 (1988).
  31. J.-I. Choi, K. Yeo, and C. Lee, Lagrangian statistics in turbulent channel flow, Phys. Fluids 16, 779 (2004).
  32. N. T. Ouellette, H. Xu, and E. Bodenschatz, Bulk turbulence in dilute polymer solutions, J. Fluid Mech. 629, 375 (2009).
  33. S. Elghobashi and G. Truesdell, On the two-way interaction between homogeneous turbulence and dispersed solid particles. I: Turbulence modification, Phys. Fluids 5, 1790 (1993).
  34. P. De Gennes, Coil-stretch transition of dilute flexible polymers under ultrahigh velocity gradients, J. Chem. Phys. 60, 5030 (1974).
  35. K. R. Sreenivasan and C. M. White, The onset of drag reduction by dilute polymer additives, and the maximum drag reduction asymptote, J. Fluid Mech. 409, 149 (2000).
  36. P. E. Hamlington, J. Schumacher, and W. J. Dahm, Direct assessment of vorticity alignment with local and nonlocal strain rates in turbulent flows, Phys. Fluids 20, 111703 (2008).
  37. C. M. White and M. G. Mungal, Mechanics and prediction of turbulent drag reduction with polymer additives, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 40, 235 (2008).
  38. Y. Dubief, V. E. Terrapon, C. M. White, E. S. Shaqfeh, P. Moin, and S. K. Lele, New answers on the interaction between polymers and vortices in turbulent flows, Flow, Turbul. Combust. 74, 311 (2005).
  39. S. B. Pope, Turbulent Flows (IOP, London, 2001).
  40. P.-K. Yeung and S. B. Pope, Lagrangian statistics from direct numerical simulations of isotropic turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 207, 531 (1989).
  41. V. Terrapon, Y. Dubief, P. Moin, E. S. Shaqfeh, and S. K. Lele, Simulated polymer stretch in a turbulent flow using Brownian dynamics, J. Fluid Mech. 504, 61 (1999).
  42. P. Ptasinski, B. Boersma, F. Nieuwstadt, M. Hulsen, B. Van den Brule, and J. Hunt, Turbulent channel flow near maximum drag reduction: Simulations, experiments, and mechanisms, J. Fluid Mech. 490, 251 (2003).
  43. Y. Kaneda, T. Ishihara, M. Yokokawa, K. Itakura, and A. Uno, Energy dissipation rate and energy spectrum in high resolution direct numerical simulations of turbulence in a periodic box, Phys. Fluids 15, L21 (2003).
  44. R. Pandit, P. Perlekar, and S. S. Ray, Statistical properties of turbulence: An overview, Pramana 73, 157 (2009).
  45. A. Liberzon, M. Guala, W. Kinzelbach, and A. Tsinober, On turbulent kinetic energy production and dissipation in dilute polymer solutions, Phys. Fluids 18, 125101 (2006).
  46. A. Robert, T. Vaithianathan, L. R. Collins, and J. G. Brasseur, Polymer-laden homogeneous shear-driven turbulent flow a model for polymer drag reduction, J. Fluid Mech. 657, 189 (2010).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation