Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Physical impact of a surfactant on the nonlinear oscillations of a microbubble considering a dynamic surface tension and subject to an external acoustic field

C. Yepez, J. Naude*, and F. Méndez

  • Departamento de Termofluidos, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 04510 CDMX, Mexico

  • *jorge_naude@hotmail.com

Phys. Rev. Fluids 7, 063603 – Published 27 June, 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.7.063603

Abstract

The dynamics of microbubbles under the action of external acoustic forces has become particularly important in several applications. In this work, we are particularly interested in studying the transport of surfactant molecules to the surface of an oscillating microbubble, considering the impact that the dynamic surface tension and temporal evolution of the radius of the microbubble has when an acoustic pressure as a driving force is used to promote the nonlinear oscillations. The resulting governing equations to predict the radius of the microbubble and the evolution of the surfactant at the surface are written in dimensionless form. For these equations, we identify two fundamental dimensionless parameters: the Gibbs elasticity E, and the cohesive (or repulsive) parameter K. Using the physical domain 0E10 and 13.2K13.2, and considering that the diffusive Péclet number is large, as occurs in some applications, the surfactant concentration equation is solvable by using a similarity transformation, whereas the Rayleigh-Plesset-type equation that includes the influence of the previous parameters E and K is solved by the fourth-order Runge-Kutta method. When the numerical predictions are compared with the well-known cases E=K=0, strong deviations reveal that the oscillation mechanisms can be significantly altered.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (22)

  1. C. E. Brennen, Cavitation and Bubble Dynamics (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1995), p. 48.
  2. S. Paul, R. Nahire, S. Mallik, and K. Sarkar, Encapsulated microbubbles and echogenic liposomes for contrast ultrasound imaging and targeted drug delivery, Comput. Mech. 53, 413 (2014).
  3. A. Doinikov and A. Bouakaz, Review of shell models for contrast agent microbubbles, IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 58, 981 (2011) .
  4. E. Stride, The influence of surface adsorption on microbubble dynamics, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 366, 2103 (2008).
  5. T. Faez, 20 Years of ultrasound contrast agent modeling, IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 60, 7 (2013).
  6. M. M. Fyrillas and A. J. Szeri, Surfactant dynamics and rectified diffusion of microbubbles, J. Fluid Mech. 311, 361 (1996).
  7. F. Jin, R. Balasubramaniam, and K. J. Stebe, Surfactant adsorption to spherical particles: The intrinsic length scale governing the shift from diffusion to kinetic-controlled mass transfer, J. Adhes. 80, 773 (2004).
  8. S.-T. Kang and C.-K. Yeh, Ultrasound microbubble contrast agents for diagnostic and therapeutic applications: Current status and future design, Chang Gung Med J. 35, 125 (2012).
  9. M. Postema and A. Van Wamel, Ultrasound-induced encapsulated microbubble phenomena, Ultrasound Med. Biol. 30, 827 (2004).
  10. K. Sarkar and W. T. Shi, Characterization of ultrasound contrast microbubbles using in vitro experiments and viscous and viscoelastic interface models for encapsulation, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 118, 539 (2005).
  11. Y. Liu, K. Sugiyama, S. Takagi, and Y. Matsumoto, Surface instability of an encapsulated bubble induced by an ultrasonic pressure wave, J. Fluid Mech. 691, 315 (2012).
  12. C. C. Church, The effects of an elastic solid-surface layer on the radial pulsation of gas bubbles, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97, 1510 (1995).
  13. N. de Jong, L. Hoff, T. Skotland, and N. Bom, Absorption and scatter of encapsulated gas filled microspheres: Theoretical consideration and some measurements, Ultrasonics 30, 95 (1992).
  14. P. Marmottant, S. van der Meer, M. Emmer, M. Versluis N. de Jong, S. Hilgenfeldt, and D. Lohse, A model for large amplitude oscillations of coated bubbles accounting for buckling and rupture, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 118, 3499 (2005) .
  15. J. P. O'Brien, N. Ovenden, and E. Stride, Accounting for the stability of microbubbles to multi-pulse excitation using a lipid-shedding, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 130, EL180 (2009).
  16. J. P. O'Brien, E. Stride, and N. Ovenden, Surfactant shedding and gas difussion during pulsed ultrasound through a microbubble contrast agent suspension, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 134, 1416 (2013).
  17. M. T. Warnez and E. Johnsen, Numerical modeling of bubble dynamics in viscoelastic media with relaxation, Phys. Fluids 27, 063103 (2015).
  18. N. J. Alvarez, L. M. Walker, and S. L. Anna, Diffusion-limited adsorption to a spherical geometry: The impact of curvature and competitive time scales, Phys. Rev. E 82, 011604 (2010) .
  19. L. G. Leal, Advanced Transport Phenomena. Fluid Mechanics and Convective Transport Processes (Cambridge University Press, New York, 2007).
  20. D. A. Edwards, H. Brenner, and D. T. Wasan, Interfacial Transport Processes and Rheology (Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, 1991).
  21. C.-L. Ho and C.-C. Lee, Similarity solutions of reaction-diffusion equation with space- and time-dependent diffusion and reaction terms, Ann. Phys. 364, 148 (2016).
  22. C. M. Bender and S. A. Orszag, Advanced Mathematical Methods for Scientists and Engineers. I. Asymptotic Methods and Perturbation Theory (Springer, Berlin, 1999).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation