- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review Fluids

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Possible, impossible, and expected diameters and production rates of droplets in aerosols and sprays

Maksim Mezhericher* and Howard A. Stone

  • Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA

  • *maksymm@princeton.edu
PDF

Phys. Rev. Fluids 7, 063602 – Published 15 June, 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.7.063602

Abstract

Liquid atomization processes generating sprays and aerosols of droplets are used in many delivery and coating systems involving pure solvents, solutions, and suspensions. In our recent experimental work, we introduced a novel liquid atomization process generating microsprays and aerosols of submicron-diameter droplets for pure solvents, solutions, and suspensions: gas jets disintegrate thin liquid films that are formed as bubbles approach a liquid surface. Here, we develop a theoretical description of droplet sizes and flow rates, using the first principles of conservation of mass and energy, and employing dimensional and scale analyses. We introduce atomization diagrams as a graphical tool to determine possible, impossible, and expected droplet diameters and specific flow rates in aerosols and sprays produced under various conditions. We find a reasonable agreement between the theory and experiments for five different liquids converted into aerosols of submicron-diameter droplets by an atomization process where gas jets disintegrate thin liquid films that are formed as bubbles approach a liquid surface, and also for five traditional pressure nozzles that produce sprays of droplets of hundreds of microns in diameter. Our study explores the overall range of mean droplet diameters between 0.1 and 100 μm and Ohnesorge numbers between 0.01 and 100, and the analysis and atomization diagrams contribute to understanding of liquid atomization and can serve as a theoretical framework for comparing different liquid atomization techniques.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (62)

  1. J. Wu, Evidence of sea spray produced by bursting bubbles, Science 212, 324 (1981).
  2. F. Veron, Ocean spray, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 47, 507 (2015).
  3. M. Marzen and T. Iserloh, Processes of raindrop splash and effects on soil erosion, in Precipitation, edited by J. Rodrigo-Comino (Elsevier, 2021), Chap. 15, pp. 351–371.
  4. S.-C. Zhao, R. de Jong, and D. van der Meer, Liquid-Grain Mixing Suppresses Droplet Spreading and Splashing During Impact, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 054502 (2017).
  5. T. Gilet and L. Bourouiba, Fluid fragmentation shapes rain-induced foliar disease transmission, J. R. Soc. Interface 12, 20141092 (2015).
  6. A. L. Yarin, Drop impact dynamics: Splashing, spreading, receding, bouncing…, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 38, 159 (2006).
  7. N. Beheshti and A. C. Mcintosh, The bombardier beetle and its use of a pressure relief valve system to deliver a periodic pulsed spray, Bioinspir. Biomim. 2, 57 (2007).
  8. R. L. Hines, Electrostatic atomization and spray painting, J. Appl. Phys. 37, 2730 (1966).
  9. F. Aziz and A. F. Ismail, Spray coating methods for polymer solar cells Fabrication: A review, Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 39, 416 (2015).
  10. M. Mezhericher, C. Rieck, N. Razorenov, and E. Tsotsas, Ultrathin coating of particles in fluidized bed using submicron droplet aerosol, Particuology 53, 23 (2020).
  11. K. Massel, I. Godwin, and L. Hickey, Tunable crops are just a spray away, Nat. Plants 7, 102 (2021).
  12. C. Beans, Agricultural spray could quickly deliver advantageous genes to crops mid-growing season, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118 (2021).
  13. A. G. MacPhee et al., X-ray imaging of shock waves generated by high-pressure fuel sprays, Science 295, 1261 (2002).
  14. M. M. Elkotb, Fuel atomization for spray modelling, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 8, 61 (1982).
  15. R. Woodriff, Atomization chambers for atomic absorption spectrochemical analysis: A review, Appl. Spectrosc. 28, 413 (1974).
  16. J. B. Willis, Atomization problems in atomic absorption Spectroscopy—I. A study of the operation of a typical nebulizer, spray chamber and burner system, Spectrochim. Acta Part A: Mol. Spectrosc. 23, 811 (1967).
  17. S. Padma Ishwarya and C. Anandharamakrishnan, Spray-freeze-drying approach for soluble coffee processing and its effect on quality characteristics, J. Food Eng. 149, 171 (2015).
  18. C. S. MacLeod, J. A. McKittrick, J. P. Hindmarsh, M. L. Johns, and D. I. Wilson, Fundamentals of spray freezing of instant coffee, J. Food Eng. 74, 451 (2006).
  19. V. Birchal, M. L. Passos, G. Wildhagen, and A. Mujumdar, Effect of spray-dryer operating variables on the whole milk powder quality, Drying Technol. 23, 611 (2005).
  20. K. Inthavong, M. C. Fung, X. Tong, W. Yang, and J. Tu, High resolution visualization and analysis of nasal spray drug delivery, Pharm. Res. 31, 1930 (2014).
  21. P. G. Djupesland, Nasal drug delivery devices: Characteristics and performance in a clinical perspective—a review, Drug Deliv. Transl. Res. 3, 42 (2013).
  22. S. P. Hertel, G. Winter, and W. Friess, Protein stability in pulmonary drug delivery via nebulization, Adv. Drug. Delivery Rev. 93, 79 (2015).
  23. A. R. Martin and W. H. Finlay, Nebulizers for drug delivery to the lungs, Expert Opinion Drug Delivery 12, 889 (2015).
  24. P. M. Comiskey, A. L. Yarin, and D. Attinger, Theoretical and experimental investigation of forward spatter of blood from a gunshot, Phys. Rev. Fluids 3, 063901 (2018).
  25. J. Plog, J. Wu, Y. J. Dias, F. Mashayek, L. F. Cooper, and A. L. Yarin, Reopening dentistry after COVID-19: Complete suppression of aerosolization in dental procedures by viscoelastic medusa gorgo, Phys. Fluids 32, 083111 (2020).
  26. M. Alsved, A. Matamis, R. Bohlin, M. Richter, P.-E. Bengtsson, C.-J. Fraenkel, P. Medstrand, and J. Löndahl, Exhaled respiratory particles during singing and talking, Aerosol Sci. Technol. 54, 1245 (2020).
  27. M. Abkarian, S. Mendez, N. Xue, F. Yang, and H. A. Stone, Speech can produce jet-like transport relevant to asymptomatic spreading of virus, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117, 25237 (2020).
  28. F. Yang, A. A. Pahlavan, S. Mendez, M. Abkarian, and H. A. Stone, Towards improved social distancing guidelines: Space and time dependence of virus transmission from speech-driven aerosol transport between two individuals, Phys. Rev. Fluids 5, 122501(R) (2020).
  29. M. Abkarian and H. A. Stone, Stretching and break-up of saliva filaments during speech: A route for pathogen aerosolization and its potential mitigation, Phys. Rev. Fluids 5, 102301(R) (2020).
  30. B. E. Scharfman, A. H. Techet, J. W. M. Bush, and L. Bourouiba, Visualization of sneeze ejecta: Steps of fluid fragmentation leading to respiratory droplets, Exp. Fluids 57, 24 (2016).
  31. L. Bourouiba, The fluid dynamics of disease transmission, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 53, 473 (2021).
  32. L. Bourouiba, E. Dehandschoewercker, and J. W. M. Bush, Violent expiratory events: On coughing and sneezing, J. Fluid Mech. 745, 537 (2014).
  33. M. Mezhericher, N. Razorenov, G. Mazor, Y. Ju, and H. A. Stone, Submicron aerosols of liquid fuels: Method of production, experimental characterization and a semi-empirical model, Appl. Energy 235, 1651 (2019).
  34. M. Mezhericher, I. Ladizhensky, and I. Etlin, Atomization of liquids by disintegrating thin liquid films using gas jets, Int. J. Multiphase Flow 88, 99 (2017).
  35. M. Mezhericher, J. K. Nunes, J. J. Guzowski, and H. A. Stone, Aerosol-assisted synthesis of submicron particles at room temperature using ultra-fine liquid atomization, Chem. Eng. J. 346, 606 (2018).
  36. X. Jiang, L. Rotily, E. Villermaux, and X. Wang, Submicron drops from flapping bursting bubbles, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 119, e2112924119 (2022).
  37. A. H. Lefebvre and V. G. McDonell, Atomization and Sprays, 2nd ed. (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2017).
  38. Handbook of Atomization and Sprays: Theory and Applications, edited by N. Ashgriz (Springer, New York, 2011).
  39. W. C. Hinds, Aerosol Technology: Properties, Behavior, and Measurement of Airborne Particles (Wiley, 2012).
  40. W. H. Finlay, The Mechanics of Inhaled Pharmaceutical Aerosols: An Introduction (Elsevier Science, 2019).
  41. G. I. Taylor, The dynamics of thin sheets of fluid. III. Disintegration of fluid sheets, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 253, 313 (1959).
  42. A. M. Gañán-Calvo, Generation of Steady Liquid Microthreads and Micron-Sized Monodisperse Sprays in Gas Streams, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 285 (1998).
  43. E. Villermaux, Ph. Marmottant, and J. Duplat, Ligament-Mediated Spray Formation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 074501 (2004).
  44. S. Kooij, R. Sijs, M. M. Denn, E. Villermaux, and D. Bonn, What Determines the Drop Size in Sprays? Phys. Rev. X 8, 031019 (2018).
  45. E. Villermaux, Fragmentation versus cohesion, J. Fluid Mech. 898, P1 (2020).
  46. H. Lhuissier and E. Villermaux, Bursting bubble aerosols, J. Fluid Mech. 696, 5 (2012).
  47. J. Eggers and E. Villermaux, Physics of liquid jets, Rep. Prog. Phys. 71, 036601 (2008).
  48. C. Dumouchel, On the experimental investigation on primary atomization of liquid streams, Exp. Fluids 45, 371 (2008).
  49. D. R. Guildenbecher, C. López-Rivera, and P. E. Sojka, Secondary atomization, Exp. Fluids 46, 371 (2009).
  50. X. Jiang, G. A. Siamas, K. Jagus, and T. G. Karayiannis, Physical modelling and advanced simulations of gas–liquid two-phase jet flows in atomization and sprays, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 36, 131 (2010).
  51. K. Luo, C. Shao, M. Chai, and J. Fan, Level set method for atomization and evaporation simulations, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 73, 65 (2019).
  52. M. Gorokhovski and M. Herrmann, Modeling primary atomization, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 40, 343 (2008).
  53. C. Borgnakke and R. E. Sonntag, Fundamentals of Thermodynamics, 10th ed. (John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2020).
  54. M. Mezhericher and H. A. Stone, Size distribution of raindrops, arXiv:2204.03151.
  55. I. Sher and E. Sher, Analytical criterion for droplet breakup, Atomiz Sprays 21, 1059 (2011).
  56. F. Marcotte and S. Zaleski, Density contrast matters for drop fragmentation thresholds at low Ohnesorge number, Phys. Rev. Fluids 4, 103604 (2019).
  57. S. A. Krzeczkowski, Measurement of liquid droplet disintegration mechanisms, Int. J. Multiphase Flow 6, 227 (1980).
  58. M. Jain, R. S. Prakash, G. Tomar, and R. V. Ravikrishna, Secondary breakup of a drop at moderate Weber numbers, Proc. R. Soc. A 471, 20140930 (2015).
  59. T. Hatch and S. P. Choate, Statistical description of the size properties of non uniform particulate substances, J. Franklin Inst. 207, 369 (1929).
  60. Spraytec User Manual, MANO368. Issue 3.0, Malvern Instruments Ltd.; (2007) (n.d.).
  61. G. B. J. de Boer, C. de Weerd, D. Thoenes, and H. W. J. Goossens, Laser diffraction spectrometry: Fraunhofer diffraction versus Mie scattering, Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 4, 14 (1987).
  62. C. F. Bohren and D. R. Huffman, Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles (Wiley, 2008).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Fluids 7, 063602– Published 15 June, 2022
  • Received 20 December 2021
  • Accepted 13 May 2022
Crossmark - Check for updates button

©2022 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation