Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Silo flow and clogging in the presence of an obstacle

Anna Belle Harada, Emma Thackray, and Kerstin N. Nordstrom*

  • Department of Physics, Mount Holyoke College, South Hadley, Massachusetts 01075, USA

  • *Corresponding author: knordstr@mtholyoke.edu

Phys. Rev. Fluids 7, 054301 – Published 26 May, 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.7.054301

Abstract

In this work we present experimental results of the flow and clogging of monodisperse spheres in a silo geometry, with an obstacle placed near the exit aperture. In previous work, it has been shown that the placement of an obstacle in a two-dimensional silo can suppress clogging. We extend prior work to investigate the effects of obstacle size, and find that larger obstacles are better at suppressing clogs; however, most obstacles will suppress clogging. We investigate the local velocity, granular temperature, and local packing for several specific cases, and find that the mechanisms of clog suppression may be different depending on the exact size of the obstacle, with one case not suppressing clogs at all. We find bulk granular temperatures are increased with the presence of an obstacle, but local temperatures near the exit may not be. We also find the average packing is not substantially affected by an obstacle, but the local packing can be quite different. Specifically, large obstacles introduce spatial disorder that percolates, resulting in a more fluid system overall. We also observe spatiotemporal inhomogeneity in the flows.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (26)

  1. C. Mankoc, A. Janda, R. Arevalo, J. M. Pastor, I. Zuriguel, A. Garcimartin, and D. Maza, The flow rate of granular materials through an orifice, Granular Matter 9, 407 (2007).
  2. L. Kondic, Simulations of two dimensional hopper flow, Granular Matter 16, 235 (2014).
  3. X. Hong, M. Kohne, M. Morrell, H. Wang, and E. R. Weeks, Clogging of soft particles in two-dimensional hoppers, Phys. Rev. E 96, 062605 (2017).
  4. A. Janda, I. Zuriguel, and D. Maza, Flow Rate of Particles through Apertures Obtained from Self-Similar Density and Velocity Profiles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 248001 (2012).
  5. R. Stannarius, D. Sancho Martinez, T. Finger, E. Somfai, and T. Börzsönyi, Packing and flow profiles of soft grains in 3D silos reconstructed with x-ray computed tomography, Granular Matter 21, 56 (2019).
  6. L. Fullard, D. J. Holland, P. Galvosas, C. Davies, P.-Y. Lagrée, and S. Popinet, Quantifying silo flow using MRI velocimetry for testing granular flow models, Phys. Rev. Fluids 4, 074302 (2019).
  7. I. Zuriguel, D. R. Parisi, R. C. Hidalgo, C. Lozano, A. Janda, P. A. Gago, J. P. Peralta, L. M. Ferrer, L. A. Pugnaloni, E. Clément, D. Maza, I. Pagonabarraga, and A. Garcimartín, Clogging transition of many-particle systems flowing through bottlenecks, Sci. Rep. 4, 7324 (2014).
  8. H. Péter, A. Libál, C. Reichhardt, and C. J. O. Reichhardt, Crossover from jamming to clogging behaviours in heterogeneous environments, Sci. Rep. 8, 10252 (2018).
  9. J. M. Pastor, A. Garcimartín, P. A. Gago, J. P. Peralta, C. Martín-Gómez, L. M. Ferrer, D. Maza, D. R. Parisi, L. A. Pugnaloni, and I. Zuriguel, Experimental proof of faster-is-slower in systems of frictional particles flowing through constrictions, Phys. Rev. E 92, 062817 (2015).
  10. D. Helbing, L. Buzna, A. Johansson, and T. Werner, Self-organized pedestrian crowd dynamics: Experiments, simulations, and design solutions, Transp. Sci. 39, 1 (2005).
  11. D. Helbing, A. Johansson, J. Mathiesen, M. H. Jensen, and A. Hansen, Analytical Approach to Continuous and Intermittent Bottleneck Flows, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 168001 (2006).
  12. R. Nedderman, U. Tuzun, S. Savage, and G. Houlsby, Simulations of two dimensional hopper flow, J. Chem. Eng. Sci. 37, 1597 (1982).
  13. K. To, P.-Y. Lai, and H. K. Pak, Jamming of Granular Flow in a Two-Dimensional Hopper, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 71 (2001).
  14. K. To, Jamming transition in two-dimensional hoppers and silos, Phys. Rev. E 71, 060301(R) (2005).
  15. A. Janda, I. Zuriguel, A. Garcimartín, L. A. Pugnaloni, and D. Maza, Jamming and critical outlet size in the discharge of a two-dimensional silo, Europhys. Lett. 84, 44002 (2008).
  16. C. C. Thomas and D. J. Durian, Geometry dependence of the clogging transition in tilted hoppers, Phys. Rev. E 87, 052201 (2013).
  17. I. Zuriguel, Invited review: Clogging of granular materials in bottlenecks, Pap. Phys. 6, 060014 (2014).
  18. C. C. Thomas and D. J. Durian, Fraction of Clogging Configurations Sampled by Granular Hopper Flow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 178001 (2015).
  19. I. Zuriguel, A. Janda, A. Garcimartín, C. Lozano, R. Arévalo, and D. Maza, Silo Clogging Reduction by the Presence of an Obstacle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 278001 (2011).
  20. C. Lozano, A. Janda, A. Garcimartín, D. Maza, and I. Zuriguel, Flow and clogging in a silo with an obstacle above the orifice, Phys. Rev. E 86, 031306 (2012).
  21. K. Endo, K. A. Reddy, and H. Katsuragi, Obstacle-shape effect in a two-dimensional granular silo flow field, Phys. Rev. Fluids 2, 094302 (2017).
  22. G. Cai, A. B. Harada, and K. N. Nordstrom, Mesoscale metrics on approach to the clogging point, Granular Matter 23, 69 (2021).
  23. J. C. Crocker and D. G. Grier, Methods of digital video microscopy for colloidal studies, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 179, 298 (1996).
  24. E. Thackray and K. Nordstrom, Gravity-driven granular flow in a silo: Characterizing local forces and rearrangements, EPJ Web Conf. 140, 03087 (2017).
  25. T. Matsushima and R. Blumenfeld, Universal Structural Characteristics of Planar Granular Packs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 098003 (2014).
  26. Y. Amarouchene, J. F. Boudet, and H. Kellay, Dynamic Sand Dunes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4286 (2001).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation