- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review Fluids

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Influence of density and viscosity on deformation, breakage, and coalescence of bubbles in turbulence

Francesca Mangani1, Giovanni Soligo1,2,*, Alessio Roccon1,3, and Alfredo Soldati1,3,†

  • 1Institute of Fluid Mechanics and Heat Transfer, TU-Wien, 1060 Vienna, Austria
  • 2Complex Fluids and Flows Unit, OIST, 904-0495 Okinawa, Japan
  • 3Polytechnic Department, University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy

  • *Present address: Complex Fluids and Flows Unit, OIST, 904-0495 Okinawa, Japan.
  • †Corresponding author: alfredo.soldati@tuwien.ac.at
PDF

Phys. Rev. Fluids 7, 053601 – Published 17 May, 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.7.053601

Abstract

We investigate the effect of density and viscosity differences on a swarm of large and deformable bubbles dispersed in a turbulent channel flow. For a given shear Reynolds number, Reτ=300, and a constant bubble volume fraction, Φ≃5.4%, we perform a campaign of direct numerical simulations of turbulence coupled with a phase-field method accounting for interfacial phenomena. For each simulation, we vary the Weber number (We, ratio of inertial to surface tension forces), the density ratio (ρr, ratio of bubble density to carrier flow density) and the viscosity ratio (ηr, ratio of bubble viscosity to carrier flow viscosity). Specifically, we consider two Weber numbers, We=1.50 and We=3.00, four density ratios, from ρr=1 down to ρr=0.001, and five viscosity ratios, from ηr=0.01 up to ηr=100. Our results show that density differences have a negligible effect on breakage and coalescence phenomena, while a much stronger effect is observed when changing the viscosity of the two phases. Increasing the bubble viscosity with respect to the carrier fluid viscosity damps turbulence fluctuations, makes the bubble more rigid, and strongly prevents large deformations, thus reducing the number of breakage events. Local deformations of the interface, on the contrary, depend on both density and viscosity ratios: as the bubble density is increased, a larger number of small-scale deformations, small dimples and bumps, appear on the interface of the bubble. The opposite effect is observed for increasing bubble viscosities: the interface of the bubbles become smoother. We report that these effects are mostly visible for larger Weber numbers, where surface forces are weaker. Finally, we characterize the flow inside the bubbles; as the bubble density is increased, we observe, as expected, an increase in the turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) inside the bubble, while as the bubble viscosity is increased, we observe a mild reduction of the TKE inside the bubble and a strong suppression of turbulence.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (74)

  1. W. K. Melville, The role of surface-wave breaking in air-sea interaction, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 28, 279 (1996).
  2. A. Jessup, C. Zappa, M. Loewen, and V. Hesany, Infrared remote sensing of breaking waves, Nature (London) 385, 52 (1997).
  3. M. Gorokhovski and M. Herrmann, Modeling primary atomization, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 40, 343 (2008).
  4. V. Mathai, D. Lohse, and C. Sun, Bubbly and buoyant particle-laden turbulent flows, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 11, 529 (2020).
  5. S. Elghobashi, Direct numerical simulation of turbulent flows laden with droplets or bubbles, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 51, 217 (2019).
  6. G. Soligo, A. Roccon, and A. Soldati, Turbulent flows with drops and bubbles: What numerical simulations can tell us—Freeman scholar lecture, J. Fluids Eng. 143, 080801 (2021).
  7. C. Boyer, A.-M. Duquenne, and G. Wild, Measuring techniques in gas–liquid and gas–liquid–solid reactors, Chem. Eng. Sci. 57, 3185 (2002).
  8. N. G. Deen, J. Westerweel, and E. Delnoij, Two-phase PIV in bubbly flows: Status and trends, Chem. Eng. Technol. 25, 97 (2002).
  9. C. Poelma, J. Westerweel, and G. Ooms, Turbulence statistics from optical whole-field measurements in particle-laden turbulence, Exp. Fluids 40, 347 (2006).
  10. R. S. Rogallo and P. Moin, Numerical simulation of turbulent flows, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 16, 99 (1984).
  11. J. Kim, P. Moin, and R. Moser, Turbulence statistics in fully developed channel flow at low Reynolds number, J. Fluid Mech. 177, 133 (1987).
  12. J. Lu and G. Tryggvason, Effect of bubble size in turbulent bubbly downflow in a vertical channel, Chem. Eng. Sci. 62, 3008 (2007).
  13. J. Lu and G. Tryggvason, Effect of bubble deformability in turbulent bubbly upflow in a vertical channel, Phys. Fluids 20, 040701 (2008).
  14. L. Scarbolo, F. Bianco, and A. Soldati, Coalescence and breakup of large droplets in turbulent channel flow, Phys. Fluids 27, 073302 (2015).
  15. L. Scarbolo, F. Bianco, and A. Soldati, Turbulence modification by dispersion of large deformable droplets, Eur. J. Mech. B Fluids 55, 294 (2016).
  16. A. Roccon, M. De Paoli, F. Zonta, and A. Soldati, Viscosity-modulated breakup and coalescence of large drops in bounded turbulence, Phys. Rev. Fluids 2, 083603 (2017).
  17. G. Soligo, A. Roccon, and A. Soldati, Breakage, coalescence and size distribution of surfactant-laden droplets in turbulent flow, J. Fluid Mech. 881, 244 (2019).
  18. G. Soligo, A. Roccon, and A. Soldati, Effect of surfactant-laden droplets on turbulent flow topology, Phys. Rev. Fluids 5, 073606 (2020).
  19. J. Hasslberger, P. Cifani, N. Chakraborty, and M. Klein, A direct numerical simulation analysis of coherent structures in bubble-laden channel flows, J. Fluid Mech. 905, A37 (2020).
  20. I. Cannon, D. Izbassarov, O. Tammisola, L. Brandt, and M. E. Rosti, The effect of droplet coalescence on drag in turbulent channel flows, Phys. Fluids 33, 085112 (2021).
  21. D. Jacqmin, Calculation of two-phase Navier–Stokes flows using phase-field modeling, J. Comput. Phys. 155, 96 (1999).
  22. V. Badalassi, H. Ceniceros, and S. Banerjee, Computation of multiphase systems with phase field models, J. Comput. Phys. 190, 371 (2003).
  23. Y. Li, J. Choi, and J. Kim, A phase-field fluid modeling and computation with interfacial profile correction term, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 30, 84 (2016).
  24. Y. Zhang and W. Ye, A Flux-corrected phase-field method for surface diffusion, Commun. Comput. Phys. 22, 422 (2017).
  25. G. Soligo, A. Roccon, and A. Soldati, Mass-conservation-improved phase field methods for turbulent multiphase flow simulation, Acta Mech. 230, 683 (2019).
  26. G. Soligo, A. Roccon, and A. Soldati, Coalescence of surfactant-laden drops by phase field method, J. Comput. Phys. 376, 1292 (2019).
  27. P. Yue, C. Zhou, and J. Feng, Spontaneous shrinkage of drops and mass conservation in phase-field simulations, J. Comput. Phys. 223, 1 (2007).
  28. G. Tryggvason, S. Dabiri, B. Aboulhasanzadeh, and J. Lu, Multiscale considerations in direct numerical simulations of multiphase flows, Phys. Fluids 25, 031302 (2013).
  29. L. Rekvig and D. Frenkel, Molecular simulations of droplet coalescence in oil/water/surfactant systems, J. Chem. Phys. 127, 134701 (2007).
  30. J. Kamp, J. Villwock, and M. Kraume, Drop coalescence in technical liquid/liquid applications: A review on experimental techniques and modeling approaches, Rev. Chem. Eng. 33, 1 (2017).
  31. G. Tryggvason, B. Bunner, A. Esmaeeli, D. Juric, W. Tauber, J. Han, S. Nas, and Y. Jan, A front-tracking method for the computations of multiphase flow, J. Comput. Phys. 169, 708 (2001).
  32. J. Lu and G. Tryggvason, Direct numerical simulations of multifluid flows in a vertical channel undergoing topology changes, Phys. Rev. Fluids 3, 084401 (2018).
  33. M. Dodd and A. Ferrante, On the interaction of Taylor length scale size droplets and isotropic turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 806, 356 (2016).
  34. J. Eggers, Theory of drop formation, Phys. Fluids 7, 941 (1995).
  35. M. Herrmann, On simulating primary atomization using the refined level set grid method, Atomiz. Spr. 21, 283 (2011).
  36. S. Dong and J. Shen, A time-stepping scheme involving constant coefficient matrices for phase-field simulations of two-phase incompressible flows with large density ratios, J. Comput. Phys. 231, 5788 (2012).
  37. F. O. Alpak, B. Riviere, and F. Frank, A phase-field method for the direct simulation of two-phase flows in pore-scale media using a nonequilibrium wetting boundary condition, Comput. Geosci. 20, 881 (2016).
  38. H. Ding, P. Spelt, and C. Shu, Diffuse interface model for incompressible two-phase flows with large density ratios, J. Comput. Phys. 226, 2078 (2007).
  39. J. Kim, Phase-field models for multicomponent fluid flows, Commun. Comput. Phys. 12, 613 (2012).
  40. D. Korteweg, Sur la forme que prennent les equations du mouvements des fluides si l'on tient compte des forces capillaires causées par des variations de densité considérables mais continues et sur la théorie de la capillarité dans l'hypothèse d'une variation continue de la densité, Archives Néerlandaises des Sciences Exactes et Naturelles 6, 1 (1901).
  41. C. Speziale, On the advantages of the vorticity-velocity formulation of the equations of fluid dynamics, J. Comput. Phys. 73, 476 (1987).
  42. F. Zonta, C. Marchioli, and A. Soldati, Modulation of turbulence in forced convection by temperature-dependent viscosity, J. Fluid Mech. 697, 150 (2012).
  43. J. J. Jasper, The surface tension of pure liquid compounds, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 1, 841 (1972).
  44. F. Magaletti, F. Picano, M. Chinappi, L. Marino, and C. Casciola, The sharp-interface limit of the Cahn–Hilliard/Navier–Stokes model for binary fluids, J. Fluid Mech. 714, 95 (2013).
  45. S. Falzone, A. Buffo, M. Vanni, and D. L. Marchisio, Chapter three—Simulation of turbulent coalescence and breakage of bubbles and droplets in the presence of surfactants, salts, and contaminants, in Bridging Scales in Modelling and Simulation of Non-Reacting and Reacting Flows. Part I, Adv. Chem. Eng, Vol. 52 (Elsevier Science Publishing Co. Inc., San Diego, US, 2018), pp. 125–188.
  46. J. Lasheras, C. Eastwood, C. Martınez-Bazán, and J. Montanes, A review of statistical models for the break-up of an immiscible fluid immersed into a fully developed turbulent flow, Int. J. Multiphase Flow 28, 247 (2002).
  47. C. D. Eastwood, L. Armi, and J. Lasheras, The breakup of immiscible fluids in turbulent flows, J. Fluid Mech. 502, 309 (1999).
  48. W. M. S. Perrard, A. Rivière and L. Deike, Bubble deformation by a turbulent flow, J. Fluid Mech. 920, A15 (2021).
  49. A. Vela-Martín and M. Avila, Deformation of drops by outer eddies in turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 929, A38 (2021).
  50. D. D. Joseph, Stability of Fluid Motions. I, II (Springer Science & Business Media, Cham, 1976).
  51. A. Roccon, F. Zonta, and A. Soldati, Energy balance in lubricated drag-reduced turbulent channel flow, J. Fluid Mech. 911, A37 (2021).
  52. R. Aris, Vectors, Tensors, and the Basic Equations of Fluid Mechanics (Dover Publications, Mineola, NY, 1989).
  53. Y. Sun and C. Beckermann, Sharp interface tracking using the phase-field equation, J. Comput. Phys. 220, 626 (2007).
  54. J. Cano-Lozano, R. Bolaños-Jiménez, C. Gutiérrez-Montes, and C. Martínez-Bazán, The use of volume of fluid technique to analyze multiphase flows: Specific case of bubble rising in still liquids, Appl. Math. Model 39, 3290 (2015).
  55. J. Lu, A. Fernández, and G. Tryggvason, The effect of bubbles on the wall drag in a turbulent channel flow, Phys. Fluids 17, 095102 (2005).
  56. S. Ceccio, Friction drag reduction of external flows with bubble and gas injection, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 42, 183 (2010).
  57. D. van Gils, D. N. Guzman, C. Sun, and D. Lohse, The importance of bubble deformability for strong drag reduction in bubbly turbulent Taylor–Couette flow, J. Fluid Mech. 722, 317 (2013).
  58. R. A. Verschoof, R. C. A. van der Veen, C. Sun, and D. Lohse, Bubble Drag Reduction Requires Large Bubbles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 104502 (2016).
  59. S. B. Pope, Turbulent Flows (Cambridge University Press, 2000).
  60. T. Von Kármán, Mechanical similitude and turbulence, Reprint from Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Gottingen (1931).
  61. J. Lu and G. Tryggvason, Multifluid flows in a vertical channel undergoing topology changes: Effect of void fraction, Phys. Rev. Fluids 4, 084301 (2019).
  62. J. Lu, M. Muradoglu, and G. Tryggvason, Effect of insoluble surfactant on turbulent bubbly flows in vertical channels, Int. J. Multiphase Flow 95, 135 (2017).
  63. G. Segré and A. Silberberg, Behaviour of macroscopic rigid spheres in Poiseuille flow Part 1. Determination of local concentration by statistical analysis of particle passages through crossed light beams, J. Fluid Mech. 14, 115 (1962).
  64. P. Ayyaswamy, S. Sadhal, and L. Huang, Effect of internal circulation on the transport to a moving drop, Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transfer 17, 689 (1990).
  65. J. R. Gissinger, A. Z. Zinchenko, and R. H. Davis, Internal circulation and mixing within tight-squeezing deformable droplets, Phys. Rev. E 103, 043106 (2021).
  66. V. G. Levich and R. J. Seeger, Physicochemical hydrodynamics, Am. J. Phys. 31, 892 (1963).
  67. F. Mashayek and N. Ashgriz, Nonlinear oscillations of drops with internal circulation, Phys. Fluids 10, 1071 (1998).
  68. S. M. Ghiaasiaan and G. F. Yao, A theoretical model for deposition of aerosols in rising spherical bubbles due to diffusion, convection, and inertia, Aerosol Sci. Technol. 26, 141 (1997).
  69. A. Hajisharifi, C. Marchioli, and A. Soldati, Particle capture by drops in turbulent flow, Phys. Rev. Fluids 6, 024303 (2021).
  70. A. Roccon, F. Zonta, and A. Soldati, Turbulent drag reduction by compliant lubricating layer, J. Fluid Mech. 863, R1 (2019).
  71. A. Saboni, S. Alexandrova, A. Spasic, and C. Gourdon, Effect of the viscosity ratio on mass transfer from a fluid sphere at low to very high Peclet numbers, Chem. Eng. Sci. 62, 4742 (2007).
  72. R. Andersson and B. Andersson, On the breakup of fluid particles in turbulent flows, AIChE J. 52, 2020 (2006).
  73. S. Maaß, A. Gäbler, A. Zaccone, A. Paschedag, and M. Kraume, Experimental investigations and modeling of breakage phenomena in stirred liquid/liquid systems, Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 85, 703 (2007).
  74. F. Azizi and A. A. Taweel, Turbulently flowing liquid-liquid dispersions. Part I: Drop breakage and coalescence, Chem. Eng. J. 166, 715 (2011).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Fluids 7, 053601– Published 17 May, 2022
  • Received 10 November 2021
  • Accepted 26 April 2022
Crossmark - Check for updates button

©2022 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation